I guess the coverage the other day didn't have enough partisan bias injected into it to attract interest.
As for the unflagging interest in the PSP's battery life vs. the DS's its worth noting AGAIN that Sony has already been more forthcoming about battery life than Nintendo has. Sony has acknowledged the fact that the PSP is a device with variable power consumption by indicating battery life expectations for a number of different uses - 2-3 hrs for CPU intensive games, 8-10 hrs for music with the screen turned off, etc. Meanwhile, to my knowledge, Nintendo has only indicated one number for DS battery life, 10 hrs, which was unspecific about which use that referred to - is that for...
- GBA gameplay, where the touchscreen will likely be turned off
- Or is that for actual DS games using both screens
- And what if a DS game doesn't use the touchscreen for input
- And what if a DS game only shows fairly static visuals on one screen vs using both screens for rapidly changing visuals
- And what about the cost to battery life for using either form of wireless multiplayer?
Etc.
So, given the fact that Sony has already given more insight into PSP battery life than Nintendo has for the DS, perhaps the reason why Bain was so recalcitrant about answering the questions on battery life was because they were all apparently coming from reporters, not developers for whom the conference was for:
Kaz Hirai has gone on record more than once about PSP battery life so what are reporters still fishing for, monopolizing a Q&A session that is meant for developers, with Gamespot go so far as to label the battery life as "still-secret"?
I'm not a game developer, but I do business software development and have gone to plenty of developer conferences - I have rarely seen reporters attempt to monopolize a Q&A session meant specifically for developers at such an event. Professional journalists seek the answers they're looking for offline or in GENERAL Q&A sessions.