• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Question of God: S. Freud vs. C.S. Lewis on PBS, Sept 15 & 22 , 9pm - 10:30pm

Status
Not open for further replies.

geogaddi

Banned
Official Website : http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/questionofgod/

Mark your calendar if you want to watch this! Its a four part series on PBS.

The Question of God, a four-hour series on PBS, explores in accessible and dramatic style issues that preoccupy all thinking people today: What is happiness? How do we find meaning and purpose in our lives? How do we reconcile conflicting claims of love and sexuality? How do we cope with the problem of suffering and the inevitability of death? Based on a popular Harvard course taught by Dr. Armand Nicholi, author of The Question of God, the series illustrates the lives and insights of Sigmund Freud, a life-long critic of religious belief, and C.S. Lewis, a celebrated Oxford don, literary critic, and perhaps this century's most influential and popular proponent of faith based on reason.

"It may be that Freud and Lewis represent conflicting parts of ourselves," Dr. Nicholi notes. "Part of us yearns for a relationship with the source of all joy, hope and happiness, as described by Lewis, and yet, there is another part that raises its fist in defiance and says with Freud, 'I will not surrender.' Whatever part we choose to express will determine our purpose, our identity, and our whole philosophy of life."

Through dramatic storytelling and compelling visual re-creations, as well as interviews with biographers and historians, and lively discussion, Freud and Lewis are brought together in a great debate. "The series presents a unique dialogue between Freud, the atheist, and Lewis, the believer," says Catherine Tatge, director of The Question of God. "Through it we come to understand two very different ideas of human existence, and where each of us, as individuals, falls as believers and unbelievers."

The important moments and emotional turning points in the lives of Freud and Lewis — which gave rise to such starkly different ideas — fuel an intelligent and moving contemporary examination of the ultimate question of human existence: Does God really exist?
 

Musashi Wins!

FLAWLESS VICTOLY!
Ugh. Based on the crappy, one-sided (of course for Lewis, why ask?) book? For all the intellectual shenanigans of Freud, Lewis is a real paper bag when he leaves the cubbyhole of childrens literature.
 

Loki

Count of Concision
Musashi Wins! said:
Ugh. Based on the crappy, one-sided (of course for Lewis, why ask?) book? For all the intellectual shenanigans of Freud, Lewis is a real paper bag when he leaves the cubbyhole of childrens literature.

You're kidding, right? Obviously, religion will never be science (nor are many other human endeavors that we generally consider worthy: philosophy, politics, and the arts are all inherently subjective at base), but if you think that C.S. Lewis was not, at the very least, well-reasoned, then you're jusy waaaay out there. Unless you feel that only syllogistic arguments are well-reasoned, which would be a silly bias to have imo. I'd also like to ask you if you honestly think yourself to be "less" of an intellectual "paper bag" than Lewis was; if not, why make such a remark? I tend not to disparage my intellectual superiors, because I can recognize and appreciate the amount of thought that went into their arguments, even when I may not agree with them. Not trying to be snippety, but that has to be one of the oddest (and most unfounded) comments I've ever heard, whether you agree with Lewis' worldview or not.


At any rate, the show sounds interesting; I'll check it out if I remember. :p
 

Loki

Count of Concision
And really, you can't take Lewis to task for not being "scientific" in his reasoning while absolving Freud of his own failings in that same vein. Freud was not a scientist-- dream analysis and Rorschach tests aren't scientifically accurate measures, being both non-reproducible and lacking a causal explanation which can be singled out, controlled for, and examined (modern neuroscience helps to explain the reasons for certain types of dream content, but it is by no means perfect) . I'd go so far as to say that Freud was more speculative and less well-reasoned than Lewis, for what it's worth. His psychosexual theory was tremendously influential and hangs together quite nicely, but it is of little predictive value, and cannot be disproved; it is much like determinism in that sense. Very untenable, albeit important in many ways-- particularly in developing the notion of the unconscious, which was later seized upon by others.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom