• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Reactions to E3 don't sicken me...

DarienA

The black man everyone at Activision can agree on
You know the more I think about it... the more I look at what's being argued about in threads:

fonts, console shapes, controller shapes, free AA, over-engineering claims, etc...

The more I realize... this years E3 was incredibly underwhelming.... bordering on sucking... we're in that holding pattern between generations... and although we've got good stuff still coming out on various platforms THIS generation... nothing(relative term, yes I know a FEW titles were shown) for the NEXT generation was ready enough to show us and blow our socks off, and nothing else this generation WILL blow our socks off(it'll just be good stuff).
 
DarienA said:
You know the more I think about it... the more I look at what's being argued about in threads:

fonts, console shapes, controller shapes, free AA, over-engineering claims, etc...

The more I realize... this years E3 was incredibly underwhelming.... bordering on sucking... we're in that holding pattern between generations... and although we've got good stuff still coming out on various platforms THIS generation... nothing for the NEXT generation was ready enough to show us and blow our socks off, and nothing else this generation WILL blow our socks off(it'll just be good stuff).

JohnnyNighttrain.gif


Yup.
 
DarienA said:
You know the more I think about it... the more I look at what's being argued about in threads:

fonts, console shapes, controller shapes, free AA, over-engineering claims, etc...

The more I realize... this years E3 was incredibly underwhelming.... bordering on sucking... we're in that holding pattern between generations... and although we've got good stuff still coming out on various platforms THIS generation... nothing(relative term, yes I know a FEW titles were shown) for the NEXT generation was ready enough to show us and blow our socks off, and nothing else this generation WILL blow our socks off(it'll just be good stuff).

Yup. Reminds me of 1999-2000.
 
Ignatz Mouse said:
Yup. Reminds me of 1999-2000.

1999 was awesome, with sega unleashing the dreamcast

2000 was even better with sega kicking sony's ass all the way, too bad it didn't translate in sales
 
well, it was clear that this year was a hardware year, and where else is the emphasis placed? Doesn't defend the fact that this year was really really really lackluster.
 
Fularu said:
1999 was awesome, with sega unleashing the dreamcast

2000 was even better with sega kicking sony's ass all the way, too bad it didn't translate in sales

Yeah, 2000 was drowning in fine titles for DC and PS1; but sales themselves was off. I wonder if next year will be like that.
 
There's always next year....sigh...

Really though, next year should be killer. We'll most likely be seeing Microsoft's next wave of software for 360, if PS3 does come out in March or whenever, we'll surely be seeing big things there, then for Revolution, well, who knows, but I'm sure it'll be good.

PSP and DS should have big things ahead too.
 
Ancestor_of_Erdrick said:
There's always next year....sigh...

Really though, next year should be killer.

People say that every single year though. I look back at the last few, and every time there were bunches of people going "oh man, this one sucked, but wait until next year!" I had tremendous amounts of fun at every one though, and there was more than enough new stuff to see.
 
It keeps getting worse. In some ways, it's a victim of its own success. There is so much attention on what's shown at E3 now, and so much deference to the press, that 2 things happen: regular non-press attendees don't get to see jack, and companies are afraid to show anything imperfect. Call it "Halo 2001 Syndrome".
 
Some of it has to do with the information leakage that occurs in the weeks leading up to the show. There are very few surprises left by the time E3 conferences are underway. But even the titles that were revealed this year don't really leave me much to be excited about.
 
DarienA said:
The more I realize... this years E3 was incredibly underwhelming.... bordering on sucking... we're in that holding pattern between generations... and although we've got good stuff still coming out on various platforms THIS generation... nothing(relative term, yes I know a FEW titles were shown) for the NEXT generation was ready enough to show us and blow our socks off, and nothing else this generation WILL blow our socks off(it'll just be good stuff).

Yeah, in all honesty I think this E3 would've been better off without any next-gen information. I'm most interested in software, and that was largely absent this time.
 
Now until X360 launch sucks on the console front.

GTA:VC Xbox, Conker Xbox, Madden 2006 Xbox, and Ninja Gaiden Black Xbox. That is it, really.

Please let F.E.A.R. for the PC come out in a couple months!!!!
 
It's interesting, because there was so much potential going in... But most companies blew their surprises early (so we didn't get many reveals at E3, just updates on things we already knew about)... And most of the next-gen consoles didn't have much substance ready.

Xbox 360 is the least excuseable, I think... by all accounts, they're something like five months away from launch, yet a lot of the games aren't even close to "there" yet, and were shown off on dev kits that were supposedly weaker and weaker as the show went on until they settled on the pathetic "30%" number... So some of the private showing stuff (presumably on full-power 360s) looked good, but the on-floor stuff was often underwhelming, and had developers repeatedly asking for large leaps of faith. Microsoft needed more working Xbox 360 units out on the show floor.

PS3 was nice and pretty and had some good-looking stuff... and of course, it was then made clear that if a lot of devs don't have their 360 stuff together, there's no way in hell that most of what we saw was actually designed and run on a PS3. No, a lot of it existed as tech estimates, done to optimal spec and polished in minute ways most console games would never be. True, most consoles present such estimates early on, but in the end, we were left with a lot of pretty videos and some ideals, but little substance and a lot of arguments.

And Nintendo... let's see, we had a slip out of Perrin (if she hadn't actually chose NOW of all times to kick her Jedi habit, we wouldn't have as strong preconceptions about the power of the Rev; even if they end up being wrong, that's still some damage done), heavy-duty backwards compatibility and a few game name drops, and another... "Wait until later." Which is... what we got last time. People were upset at this, and then cited it as a brilliant move, because... Nintendo makes brilliant moves. Always. To make up for this, they have expanded GCN support with... games we've already known about for months. And Super Mario Strikers. And another Mario Party with the completely daft idea of two people sharing a controller. (Got to say, though, their DS gamble has paid off a bit, the PSP is getting a lot of port-downs, while the DS is getting original games and GBA port-ups.) And they refuse to reveal their unique control interface for fear of it being knicked, so all we pretty much got out of it was "Tiny retro box with FF:CC and a blue-lined slot loading disc drive."

So the next-gen aspect was disappointing (not to mention the lack of reveals, although MGS3: Substinance looks promising), but at least we got confirmation that some of the titles in dev are doing well.

No excuses for Namco not announcing a US release of Namco X Capcom, though.
 
Top Bottom