Spukc
always chasing the next thrill
Good call sirRobocop
Alien
The Thing
Contact
Good call sirRobocop
Alien
The Thing
Contact
I guess my thought is if you changed a couple things about Star Wars and made it like a Pirates of the Caribbean swashbuckling fantasy, not much in the narrative is going to change…meanwhile a movie like 2001 is completely driven by the question of what does an artificial intelligence do when it has contradicting orders? Or Blade Runner, which source material’s title is “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?”Nah. It's sci-fi... just very heavy on the 'fi' bit. It's too damned full of sci-fi tropes to not be considered part of that genre. In many ways it defined what 'sci-fi' is the culture and audience. It's fashionable to try and distance it, because of how awful the whole thing has become, and because it steers away from 'hard' sci-fi as much as possible. But it's as much sci-fi as any other movie of the genre. The term is very broad. You're right to say that it includes many fantasy tropes as well, but that was kind of Lucas's brilliance. He took those tropes and applied them in a fresh, exciting new way.
Personally for me the best sci-fi movie is a toss up between Blade Runner (noir detective story) and Alien (ghost house horror), but I can't deny that Star Wars is culturally at the top of the heap.
Never really thought of it like that Funk. Nicely worded and agree with your assessment.Nah. It's sci-fi... just very heavy on the 'fi' bit. It's too damned full of sci-fi tropes to not be considered part of that genre. In many ways it defined what 'sci-fi' is the culture and audience. It's fashionable to try and distance it, because of how awful the whole thing has become, and because it steers away from 'hard' sci-fi as much as possible. But it's as much sci-fi as any other movie of the genre. The term is very broad. You're right to say that it includes many fantasy tropes as well, but that was kind of Lucas's brilliance. He took those tropes and applied them in a fresh, exciting new way.
Personally for me the best sci-fi movie is a toss up between Blade Runner (noir detective story) and Alien (ghost house horror), but I can't deny that Star Wars is culturally at the top of the heap.
Star Wars is only really sci fi because it’s set in space with pew pew lasers, but because you could change all that and hardly anything would change plot-wise, it’s almost just window dressing on the classic fantasy hero’s journey
Aging myself a bit, but I remember seeing Flash Gordon in the movies. Soundtrack was amazing. Queen was killing it back then. Let’s not forget Highlander. There can be only one.I think the first act is slow. The music is Stellar. But it isn't Star Wars or Flash Gordon, or Blade Runner, or Black Hole. It is an excellent movie that deals with relationships, loss, and time.
It's up there. Great acting, great writing, great cinematography, great score. And the science holds up very well relative to other science fiction out there.
I guess my thought is if you changed a couple things about Star Wars and made it like a Pirates of the Caribbean swashbuckling fantasy, not much in the narrative is going to change…meanwhile a movie like 2001 is completely driven by the question of what does an artificial intelligence do when it has contradicting orders? Or Blade Runner, which source material’s title is “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?”
Star Wars is only really sci fi because it’s set in space with pew pew lasers, but because you could change all that and hardly anything would change plot-wise, it’s almost just window dressing on the classic fantasy hero’s journey
The ending is very conclusive.Will there ever be a sequel?
Here's my hot take. Gattaca is a better Nolan sci-fi film that is not made by Nolan.
I would also recommend Children of Men
VERY underrated