Support NeoGAF

[SgtCobra]

Ice cold.

I don't know man, seems like some serious over exaggeration. Even if he's right.

 

[Card Boy]

I was shocked when angry joe gave it a 6. Every design decision outside of the core combat mechanic just makes you say,"what the fucking fuck?" He barely mentioned the horrendous boss encounters. Nor how much of the levels aren't used for anything more than to run/drive through with no purpose. Game is a complete mess. I choose to believe the reddit guy... Because if he is wrong and this is really what Bungie came up with and intended to release... Holy shit.

I'm so glad Halo is in 343's hands now. Microsoft must feel lucky as shit they bailed when they did.

He only gave it a 6 because he said the PvP proped it up (which I agree with). He said he would of gave it a 4 if was based on the PvE.

 

[JB1981]

Yep.

I posted it in the OT but this seems like an appropriate moment to link Matt Lees Destiny: Abridged video again.

Lol this is perfect

 

[Poodlestrike]

So, how was it? Is it worth continuing? Constructive critisism?

Pretty good. Certainly better than what was there originally, though some of the introductions felt a little inorganic.

 

[Thunderstorm910]

Finally! Someone speaking frankly.

 

[MC Safety]

This is unsubstantiated silliness. Makes Bungie sound evil or something for releasing a game with a shitty story.

I was crushed when it released, mostly cause of the complete lack of a campaign and incredibly repetitive mission design, but having my friends force me to play with them has gotten kind of addicted actually. It's very grindy, but it's fun. Great Halo gunplay too of course.

Evil? Hardly.

Game design is an endless series of compromises.

 

[Mockerre]

Pretty good. Certainly better than what was there originally, though some of the introductions felt a little inorganic.

Do tell which ones, everything can be fixed