I'd prefer something new instead of the same characters.
The constraints of rewriting, recasting, and a new director means you'll essentially get an original film.
For example, Evil Dead and Evil Dead 2013 are vastly different films. As is Ocean's Eleven, and uhh... Ocean's Eleven 2001. (Yeah, 2001. This film will be an entire decade removed from the final film in the first reboot trilogy.) Nightmare on Elm Street? What about Dawn of the Dead 2004? Charlie and the Chocolate Factory? True Grit? Battlestar Galactica and Galactica 2004 were exactly the same, right?
Let's be perfectly honest: reboots are rarely the same as their source material. For many, just as much effort and time goes into making something enjoyable as anything other film or TV project. The major difference is some names or a general premise is reused, something that frankly true of many new films.
Reboots fail for the same reason new films fail. Audience apathy or bad execution.
It's not a big deal at all. lol
Didn't know about Ocean's 11 being a reboot.
Yep. Starring Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, and Sammy Davis Jr.
The Clooney film was also made to trade on the name of the original.