• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Richard Dawkins: Attention Governor Perry: Evolution is a fact

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd like to know why nib as well as other religious members have faith/believe in god. I used to be one and then I decided that you know what? I really don't know if god exists or not. And you know what? It doesn't matter because we're living on a tiny little spec of rock in a huuuuuuge mothereffing cosmos. We are still in our semi-infant stage of understanding how everything works, how the universe was created, how we came to be. We may know very little to jack shit compared to another developed life-form. For instance, let's say that we are 5% more intelligent than monkeys on earth. Now imagine another species with the same 5% jump in intelligence to us. Imagine how they would look at humans and laugh their asses off at our ignorance. To believe that god exists and he created everything because he loves us and wants to test us is in my opinion is quite a bit pompous.
Sure it gives a sense of comfort to believe a creator is there, looking over us, being within each of us. But to me, that sense of conform was destroyed once I started to read more about the universe, evolution, science in general as well as watching documentaries like The Cosmos.
 
nib95 said:
As the examples above show, sometimes the stuff you say is rude, offensive, often false, insulting, insensitive and worse.

What has Amir0x said that is false? And not false because you disagree, but factually false.
 
Kaako said:
I'd like to know why nib as well as other religious members have faith/believe in god. I used to be one and then I decided that you know what? I really don't know if god exists or not. And you know what? It doesn't matter because we're living on a tiny little spec of rock in a huuuuuuge mothereffing cosmos. We are still in our semi-infant stage of understanding how everything works, how the universe was created, how we came to be. We may know very little to jack shit compared to another developed life-form. For instance, let's say that we are 5% more intelligent than monkeys on earth. Now imagine another species with the same 5% jump in intelligence to us. Imagine how they would look at humans and laugh their asses off at our ignorance. To believe that god exists and he created everything because he loves us and wants to test us is in my opinion quite pompous.
Sure it gives a sense of comfort to believe a creator is there, looking over us, being within each of us. But to me, that sense of conform was destroyed once I started to read more about the universe, evolution, science in general as well as watching documentaries like The Cosmos.
I consider myself fairly religious, I was raised Roman catholic and still occasionaly attend mass. I don't really believe in a personal god however, I think I have a more deistic belief that god does exist but is utterly unknowable and doesn't really interact with His creation. As for religion, I perceive it more as a social construct that doesn't have any of the divine authority it claims, but has nevertheless had a significant impact on my development as a person. I'd probably say my experiences have made me a better or more open minded person. Whether I would be a different person without a religious upbringing I don't know, but I feel it has a positive impact on my life and it is a part of who I am and my identity. I hope that makes sense lol.
 
Kaako said:
I'd like to know why nib as well as other religious members have faith/believe in god. I used to be one and then I decided that you know what? I really don't know if god exists or not. And you know what? It doesn't matter because we're living on a tiny little spec of rock in a huuuuuuge mothereffing cosmos. We are still in our semi-infant stage of understanding how everything works, how the universe was created, how we came to be. We may know very little to jack shit compared to another developed life-form. For instance, let's say that we are 5% more intelligent than monkeys on earth. Now imagine another species with the same 5% jump in intelligence to us. Imagine how they would look at humans and laugh their asses off at our ignorance. To believe that god exists and he created everything because he loves us and wants to test us is in my opinion quite pompous.
Sure it gives a sense of comfort to believe a creator is there, looking over us, being within each of us. But to me, that sense of conform was destroyed once I started to read more about the universe, evolution, science in general as well as watching documentaries like The Cosmos.

I will never shun away science. I believe in science, and have much faith in it. It's just at the end of it all, for some reason I just have faith that there is a higher power, a creator of sorts. I can't really explain why I feel that way, I just do. It's something spiritual in me. And the way I see it is, as long as my beliefs don't harm anyone, then so what?

See, I've thought long and hard over this religious thing, ultimately, after carefully going through these books (namely the Qur'an), whilst much of it did take me aback negatively, much of it still resonated with me. In it I saw promotions of an exemplary measure of things that I believe are sorely missing or depreciating from society today compared to before. Family values, a lack of materialism, charitable notions, general respect to one's parents, neighbour or kin, the notion of prevention is better than cure in so many things from random sex, drink or whatever. I really don't need these things in my life to enjoy it any more or less, and I do see the dangers or negatives of these things every day. Even then, religiously even if you DO these things, it's a sin that can be balanced out with good deeds. Even if it were a farce and fantasy, I like that notion. Of giving something back in kindness for even minor wrong.

When I was young, I was not remotely religious. I was in-fact a bit of a rebel. I never really did a whole lot of good, but as I grew older and took a deeper interest in to Islam, everything improved. I did so much more good in every respect, with family, with friends, with charity. It helped guide me to what I believe to be a more morally grounded foundation, so I don't harbour that resentment for religion many others do. I found solace, kinship and kindness in it. Brothers and sisters at the Mosque who were by in large more understanding, decent and kind than any I had come across in day to day normal life. It's just serene, peaceful and heart warming to be in such presence. These people who often give their blood, sweat and tears to help others and not just because they want to, but under this compelling banner of religion.

On Laylatal Qadr when I'm sat in East London Mosque with thousands of other brothers who are pouring out their wallets and time guided by Islam, but also by virtuous morals, I honestly don't care. These people are doing good. I mean, watching a hand rise up every 2-5 seconds of people who live locally donating hundreds and thousands to charities of nations not even their own (Somalia, Sudan, Bangladesh etc). It's really humbling.

If there is no God, I won't sweat it one bit because I feel I'm living my life fairly respectably. And if there is a God, then I'm set. Either way, I haven't lost anything in the process. Praying, not drinking, being kind to parents and people, giving generously or taking part in charitable things, I don't mind any of it and honestly wish I was less lazy, so that I could do more.

.
 
nib95 said:
I will never shun away science. I believe in science, and have much faith in it. It's just at the end of it all, for some reason I just have faith that there is a higher power, a creator of sorts. I can't really explain why I feel that way, I just do. It's something spiritual in me. And the way I see it is, as long as my beliefs don't harm anyone, then so what?

See, I've thought long and hard over this religious thing, ultimately, after carefully going through these books (namely the Qur'an), whilst much of it did take me aback negatively, much of it still resonated with me. In it I saw promotions of an exemplary measure of things that I believe are sorely missing or depreciating from society today compared to before. Family families, a lack of materialism, charitable notions, general respect to one's parents, neighbour or kin, the notion of prevention is better than cure in so many things from random sex, drink or whatever. I really don't need these things in my life to enjoy it any more or less, and I do see the dangers or negatives of these things every day. Even then, religiously even if you DO these things, it's a sin that can be balanced out with good deeds. Even if it were a farce and fantasy, I like that notion. Of giving something back in kindness for even minor wrong.

When I was young, I was not remotely religious. I was in-fact a bit of a rebel. I never really did a whole lot of good, but as I grew older and took a deeper interest in to Islam, everything improved. I did so much more good in every respect, with family, with friends, with charity. It helped guide me to what I believe to be a more morally grounded foundation, so I don't harbour that resentment for religion many others do. I found solace, kinship and kindness in it. Brothers and sisters at the Mosque who were by in large more understanding, decent and kind than any I had come across in day to day normal life. It's just serene, peaceful and heart warming to be in such presence. These people who often give their blood, sweat and tears to help others and not just because they want to, but under this compelling banner of religion.

On Laylatal Qadr when I'm sat in East London Mosque with thousands of other brothers who are pouring out their wallets and time guided by Islam, but also by virtuous morals, I honestly don't care. These people are doing good. I mean, watching a hand rise up every 2-5 seconds of people who live locally donating hundreds and thousands to charities of nations not even their own (Somalia, Sudan, Bangladesh etc). It's really humbling.

If there is no God, I won't sweat it one bit because I feel I'm living my life fairly respectably. And if there is a God, then I'm set. Either way, I haven't lost anything in the process. Praying, not drinking, being kind to parents and people, giving generously or taking part in charitable things, I don't mind any of it and honestly wish I was less lazy, so that I could do more.

Hope you enjoy hell, you're worshiping the wrong god dude. Flying spaghetti monster will not tolerate your heathen beliefs. ;)
 
Log4Girlz said:
Hope you enjoy hell, you're worshiping the wrong god dude. Flying spaghetti monster will not tolerate your heathen beliefs. ;)

Haha lol. I believe Islamically all people of the book or single God belief have potential access to paradise. Non believers is a trickier matter.


--------

Ramadhan.

Also, too add to the previous post above, now that I think about it, with Ramadhan just gone, even that has powerful affects. Yes, even a non religious person can fast, but will they? And under such a uniform presence with so many others globally in kinship?

Ramadhan is a beautiful thing. Some people frown on it as barbaric and overly harsh. How can you fast and not eat and drink for so many hours?! And you know what? It is hard....less hard because so many others are doing it along side you, but still difficult. It's also profoundly enlightening. It's not just in obedience to God, but in remembrance of those less fortunate.

When you're sat there moments before being able to break your fast among family and friends, even on your own....and that hunger or thirst is eating away at you. You can't help but remember that others less fortunate have this same feeling, times ten, and do not have a table full of food to look forward to. It hurts inside, and not the hunger. What hurts is the realisation that so many millions have to deal with this day in day out but without any light at the end of the tunnel or food at the end of a table. Like I said, it's profoundly impactful, and just one other thing that just resonates with me about Islam.
 
The problem with Dawkins isn't that he's wrong, it's that he's an asshat about being right. If he truly is interested in making rational, scientific thought a societal norm, acting like an arrogant, condescending prick is pretty much the best possible way to harm his cause (or any other); all an attitude like that accomplishes is to get people who already agree with him to jump up and wave their arms around in excitement, while making those who don't already agree with him personally offended and thus even harder to reason with. Not to mention that for a guy who purports to be a champion of rational thought, he sure does spend a lot of time positioning his opinions as facts.

Some particular bits that I take issue with:

Richard Dawkins said:
Intellect, knowledge and linguistic mastery are mistrusted by Republican voters, who, when choosing a president, would apparently prefer someone like themselves over someone actually qualified for the job.
A sizable chunk of the most educated people I know are Republicans, so how the fuck do you explain that Richard? Making sweeping generalizations about a large group of people doesn't seem like a very rational thing to do.

Richard Dawkins said:
There is surely something wrong with a system for choosing a leader when, given a pool of such talent and a process that occupies more than a year and consumes billions of dollars, what rises to the top of the heap is George W Bush. Or when the likes of Rick Perry or Michele Bachmann or Sarah Palin can be mentioned as even remote possibilities.
You mean representative democracy isn't a perfect system of government? Golly gee willickers!! What do you suggest, Richie? Rule by scientists? Rule by AI? A Platonic Republic, where rationality supersedes all else and the educated upper class hold absolute power over the plebian masses?

Richard Dawkins said:
What any theory of life needs to explain is functional complexity. Complexity can be measured as statistical improbability, and living things are statistically improbable in a very particular direction: the direction of functional efficiency. The body of a bird is not just a prodigiously complicated machine, with its trillions of cells - each one in itself a marvel of miniaturized complexity - all conspiring together to make muscle or bone, kidney or brain. Its interlocking parts also conspire to make it good for something - in the case of most birds, good for flying. An aero-engineer is struck dumb with admiration for the bird as flying machine: its feathered flight-surfaces and ailerons sensitively adjusted in real time by the on-board computer which is the brain; the breast muscles, which are the engines, the ligaments, tendons and lightweight bony struts all exactly suited to the task. And the whole machine is immensely improbable in the sense that, if you randomly shook up the parts over and over again, never in a million years would they fall into the right shape to fly like a swallow, soar like a vulture, or ride the oceanic up-draughts like a wandering albatross. Any theory of life has to explain how the laws of physics can give rise to a complex flying machine like a bird or a bat or a pterosaur, a complex swimming machine like a tarpon or a dolphin, a complex burrowing machine like a mole, a complex climbing machine like a monkey, or a complex thinking machine like a person.
And that means God couldn't possibly exist, amirite??

Maybe my responses are a bit much, but honestly, this is the level of discourse anyone should expect when they go into a debate with this kind of attitude. I'm as exasperated by the kind of stupidity that permeates America's positions of authority as anybody else with half an education, but I'm also not Richard fucking Dawkins, a guy who's well-known and respected enough that his word actually counts for something.
 
F#A#Oo said:
Why is that a dilemma? Why does there need to be a physical proof? It is not gods job to make himself aware to you...it is your responsibility to seek and aquire knowledge as to your existence and that of a creator.
I just wanted to say FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU this idea right here is just nuts. I refuse to believe someone can be this brainwashed or that a truly intelligent person could buy into this, ever.
 
nib95 said:
Haha lol. I believe Islamically all people of the book or single God belief have potential access to paradise. Non believers is a trickier matter.

Way to miss the point.

Even though you worship a god, it is likely to be the wrong one. That might piss off the real one.
 
Rocket Punch said:
True free will
Critical thinking
Living without fear
Creating your own moral standards
Spiritual maturity

Lol, I completely disagree.


Count Dookkake said:
Way to miss the point.

Even though you worship a god, it is likely to be the wrong one. That might piss off the real one.

Well obviously I believe I'm worshipping the right one. The only one. Either way, I'll take my chances. Like I said earlier, religion has had a profoundly positive affect on my life, without it imo I'd have been a worse person. My life was certainly less morally grounded. Only so much parents, piers, friends, family, media, film etc can instill. Especially with time constraints, busy jobs and all the rest. All though to be fair, sometimes these days I feel parents are fighting a battle against morality induced through media, which imo is often corrupting instead. Teaching the wrong, not right kind of things.
 
nib95 said:
Well obviously I believe I'm worshipping the right one. The only one. Either way, I'll take my chances.

I cut out the irrelevant part of your response.

Anyway, if you are gonna cling to Pascal's Wager, you should know that it hasn't been sold to you fairly. There are more than two options. If you can admit that, then you should see why it is a foolish position that offers no solace or protection.
 
Count Dookkake said:
I cut out the irrelevant part of your response.

Anyway, if you are gonna cling to Pascal's Wager, you should know that it hasn't been sold to you fairly. There are more than two options. If you can admit that, then you should see why it is a foolish position that offers no solace or protection.

Lol. Out of curiosity, what are the other options you speak of? The different religions? Most religions of the book sort of fall under a similar banner anyway. And how can you judge whether it offers me solace or protection? I told you that's exactly what it gives me. So you're wrong about that.

Whether it all comes in to fruition or not obviously is a whole different matter.
 
gatotsu911 said:
And that means God couldn't possibly exist, amirite??

Dawkins' response was on the subject of evolution. He himself admits there is a possibility that a god exists.
 
nib95 said:
Ami argued earlier that there is no good in religion, that it is all poison. And that it is not harmless which somehow gave some entitlement to bash the hell out of my belief in it (I am not a Christian mind so half the stuff he said doesn't even relate, there is a reason I chose Islam over Christianity).

What gives me entitlement to bash religion is the fact that it's a hypothesis for creation, which requires the stern analysis of a rational and reasoned mind. Now the place you choose your God - one of the big three Abrahamic Religions - is easily disproved as false. Virtually everything in these books is either historically inaccurate, scientifically impossible or logically disastrous. But, alas, this isn't enough for religious folk today - they'll decide to pick which is metaphor, what is real, what is and is not symbolic as it fits their requirements for not seeming like nutcases on any given day.

The point is, religion DOES poison everything. Religion IS a malignant influence on society today. And incidentally, religion - at least, any thing even remotely resembling the various religions we have on this Earth today - are all easily disproven by the near endless factually incorrect statements within said books, things which would not happen if these texts were even remotely guided by a deity. And if they weren't, and they're just the work of man, why believe in them with so much bullshit?

If I wrote a book about dragons and you could not independently verify that any part of it is historically accurate, why would you follow it? You wouldn't, of course, because your rational brain tells you that's silly. Well, Islam is exactly that silly. Christianity is exactly that silly. Judaism is precisely that silly. Hinduism and Buddhism and Zoroastrianism and whatever the fuck else is out there, is just as silly.

No matter how much you cry about it, though, it's not an attack on you. If I said FUCK Muhammad - and, by the way, it's a sentiment I fully agree with - it's an attack on a man, just a man, who led billions astray with his false teachings. It may have been good for desert goat herders, but it certainly is dangerous for society today. Religion, is the problem.

And if you personally feel attacked for an attack on your religion, once again...that's unfortunate. But religion will receive no quarter because sensitive individuals are attached to it. It needs be critiqued like any other hypothesis for creation, whether you like it or not. Unless you can give a good reason why it shouldn't be, it will always continue.

nib95 said:
To me that kind of thinking in itself is poisonous. I am religious, and as far as I can tell, religion has never compelled me to do harm on to anyone. In-fact, if I had properly followed my religion, I'd have even more reason to do less harm, more charity (I already do a fair bit), be more respectful to my parents, family, friends, fellow man etc.

If you had properly followed your religion, you'd want to kill a lot more than you do! By pretending these versus don't exist or that everyone has the improper context somehow, it makes one seem hopelessly indoctrinated. Which, of course, you are. Do you know how many versus in the Qu'ran contain some inference toward killing infidels? And not just some sort of laughable interpretation of what the word means, I mean direct reference to non-believers requiring brutal deaths. You probably do know all about this. I know it's over a hundred, although I don't remember the exact count.

And yet you arbitrarily decide to quote some other parts of the book to try to act like Islam is peaceful and a great moral guide. That's hogwash. Just like the Bible, it's filled with grotesque acts of horror, unspeakably awful moral guideposts and, like the Bible, it requires a complete shutdown of logical faculties to try to pretend like this is the sort of thing we should be following in modern society.

The reason you "chose" Islam is as arbitrary as anyone who chose Christianity - they're both violent religions with genocidal Gods who endorse the killing of people who don't think or act like you do. As crude as you think I am, I bet you never heard me say I think all muslims should die. No, I just think their institutions need to be removed from the world. I hope all people who follow that unfortunate religion peace and prosperity and the eventual ability to be free from the corrupted influences of these malign religions.

nib95 said:
And my gripe was with Amir0x's method of delivering his opinions or dealing with opposing one's in this thread, not his beliefs (Atheism) themselves, which is why I debated as much. Essentially I found his method of debating this subject (like most) abhorrent and called him out for it.

If you did it that tactfully I'd not have said a word. Instead, for pages and pages it's, all religion is poison, it's always harmful, no good comes of it, God is a retard, an idiot, it's a bullshit laughable mockery and farce that should be mocked, people who love the Bible have their brains switched off etc etc.

Because, I'm sorry, the God of the Abrahamic holy books is a horrifying thing, a morally reprehensible individual who variously endorses infanticide, genocide, rape, racism, slavery, killing of infidels and a near endless list of other horrors. And if that isn't someone you think is "a retard" and a "laughable farce" that is worthy of derision, one realizes immediately how dangerous such an irrational belief is.

Because it allows people to think that is OK.
 
nib95 said:
Lol. Out of curiosity, what are the other options you speak of? The different religions? Most religions of the book sort of fall under a similar banner anyway. And how can you judge whether it offers me solace or protection? I told you that's exactly what it gives me. So you're wrong about that.

Whether it all comes in to fruition or not obviously is a whole different matter.

The other options are the thousands of other gods described throughout human history.

You keep saying this silly "of the book" like it is a "get out of jail free" card or something.

Are all religions "of the book"? No.

Are most religions "of the book"? No.

So if the one true god happens to be not "of the book," then you may end up eternally ass-raped in a lake of fire or something like that.

As for the bolded... geez. If I give you a fake bullet-proof vest, will you be protected from bullets? No. Pascal's Wager is a fake bullet-proof vest. It appears to offer protection, but with the smallest bit of inspection you see it is a fool's shield.
 
Amir0x said:
What gives me entitlement to bash religion is the fact that it's a hypothesis for creation, which requires the stern analysis of a rational and reasoned mind. Now the place you choose your God - one of the big three Abrahamic Religions - is easily disproved as false. Virtually everything in these books is either historically inaccurate, scientifically impossible or logically disastrous. But, alas, this isn't enough for religious folk today - they'll decide to pick which is metaphor, what is real, what is and is not symbolic as it fits their requirements for not seeming like nutcases on any given day.

The point is, religion DOES poison everything. Religion IS a malignant influence on society today. And incidentally, religion - at least, any thing even remotely resembling the various religions we have on this Earth today - are all easily disproven by the near endless factually incorrect statements within said books, things which would not happen if these texts were even remotely guided by a deity. And if they weren't, and they're just the work of man, why believe in them with so much bullshit?

If I wrote a book about dragons and you could not independently verify that any part of it is historically accurate, why would you follow it? You wouldn't, of course, because your rational brain tells you that's silly. Well, Islam is exactly that silly. Christianity is exactly that silly. Judaism is precisely that silly. Hinduism and Buddhism and Zoroastrianism and whatever the fuck else is out there, is just as silly.

No matter how much you cry about it, though, it's not an attack on you. If I said FUCK Muhammad - and, by the way, it's a sentiment I fully agree with - it's an attack on a man, just a man, who led billions astray with his false teachings. It may have been good for desert goat herders, but it certainly is dangerous for society today. Religion, is the problem.

And if you personally feel attacked for an attack on your religion, once again...that's unfortunate. But religion will receive no quarter because sensitive individuals are attached to it. It needs be critiqued like any other hypothesis for creation, whether you like it or not. Unless you can give a good reason why it shouldn't be, it will always continue.



If you had properly followed your religion, you'd want to kill a lot more than you do! By pretending these versus don't exist or that everyone has the improper context somehow, it makes one seem hopelessly indoctrinated. Which, of course, you are. Do you know how many versus in the Qu'ran contain some inference toward killing infidels? And not just some sort of laughable interpretation of what the word means, I mean direct reference to non-believers requiring brutal deaths. You probably do know all about this. I know it's over a hundred, although I don't remember the exact count.

And yet you arbitrarily decide to quote some other parts of the book to try to act like Islam is peaceful and a great moral guide. That's hogwash. Just like the Bible, it's filled with grotesque acts of horror, unspeakably awful moral guideposts and, like the Bible, it requires a complete shutdown of logical faculties to try to pretend like this is the sort of thing we should be following in modern society.

The reason you "chose" Islam is as arbitrary as anyone who chose Christianity - they're both violent religions with genocidal Gods who endorse the killing of people who don't think or act like you do. As crude as you think I am, I bet you never heard me say I think all muslims should die. No, I just think their institutions need to be removed from the world. I hope all people who follow that unfortunate religion peace and prosperity and the eventual ability to be free from the corrupted influences of these malign religions.



Because, I'm sorry, the God of the Abrahamic holy books is a horrifying thing, a morally reprehensible individual who variously endorses infanticide, genocide, rape, racism, slavery, killing of infidels and a near endless list of other horrors. And if that isn't someone you think is "a retard" and a "laughable farce" that is worthy of derision, one realizes immediately how dangerous such an irrational belief is.

Because it allows people to think that is OK.

What the flying fuck are you talking about. Since when does anything need to make sense to be believed in. I'm personally a Christian, Jew, Muslim, Zorroastrian (en garde), Satanist, and Jehova's witness. I'm working on becoming a Mormon. You cannot be too safe with your soul.
 
Amir0x said:
The point is, religion DOES poison everything. Religion IS a malignant influence on society today.

If you had properly followed your religion, you'd want to kill a lot more than you do! By pretending these versus don't exist or that everyone has the improper context somehow, it makes one seem hopelessly indoctrinated. Which, of course, you are. Do you know how many versus in the Qu'ran contain some inference toward killing infidels? And not just some sort of laughable interpretation of what the word means, I mean direct reference to non-believers requiring brutal deaths. You probably do know all about this. I know it's over a hundred, although I don't remember the exact count.

And yet you arbitrarily decide to quote some other parts of the book to try to act like Islam is peaceful and a great moral guide. That's hogwash. Just like the Bible, it's filled with grotesque acts of horror, unspeakably awful moral guideposts and, like the Bible, it requires a complete shutdown of logical faculties to try to pretend like this is the sort of thing we should be following in modern society.

Because, I'm sorry, the God of the Abrahamic holy books is a horrifying thing, a morally reprehensible individual who variously endorses infanticide, genocide, rape, racism, slavery, killing of infidels and a near endless list of other horrors. And if that isn't someone you think is "a retard" and a "laughable farce" that is worthy of derision, one realizes immediately how dangerous such an irrational belief is.

Because it allows people to think that is OK.

Firstly, as expressed in my response to why I chose to follow Islam above, clearly in my life's example alone, religion has only done good and no harm has come of it. Hence why to me, and hundreds of my pier's, we'd argue it doesn't poison everything. I suppose I could possibly even argue that me and most of my religious friends have probably done a lot more good or charity work for this world, or led more respectable lives, again, a good part because of religion.

As the links provided earlier proved, many studies have found that religious people are more charitable (often considerably) than non religious people. That alone disapproves your theory and does show there is good in religion.

Also, I think you likely have a very jaded view of what the Qur'an tells. You're telling me I'll selectively pick verses of the Qur'an but I believe that is exactly what you are doing. Yes there are verses such as the one's you claimed, that without taken in context could be perceived that way, taken in context however, it's a completely different story. Ignore wrongly interpreting Bakhara and you'll see that the Qur'an itself is a largely peace orientated religion that promotes kindness not genocide. Charity not greed. But I can only imagine the kind of Qur'anic learning you have done has been cherry picked from anti-Islamic or pro atheist sites, so your viewpoint does not surprise me. Also, be careful to not confuse Hadith with actual Qur'anic versus. People regularly confuse the two, and do not understand that hadith is often little more than occurrences of the that period of time in society, not Islamic revelation itself.

Also, yes, obviously some of it does consist of many darker things such as the one's described. But that is life. We hand down harsh punishments ourselves, from imprisoning people to out right killing them. Punishment is simply just an intrinsic part of society that does often have a darker lure or tone. God's wrath or punishment is no different. In-fact, so much of society is dark and horrific, I never went in expecting the Qur'an to be all rainbows and roses.

On a side note, what element of Islam or specifically the Qur'an promotes rape?

.
 
nib95 said:
Firstly, as expressed in my response to why I chose to follow Islam above, clearly in my life's example alone, religion has only done good and no harm has come of it. Hence why to me, and hundreds of my pier's, we'd argue it doesn't poison everything. I suppose I could possibly even argue that me and most of my religious friends have probably done a lot more good or charity work for this world, or led more respectable lives, again, a good part because of religion.

As the links provided earlier proved, many studies have found that religious people are more charitable (often considerably) than non religious people. That alone disapproves your theory and does show there is good in religion.

Placebo effect. You could have bettered yourself with common sense and you didn't. That you need the fear of God or the advice of goat herders from a thousand years ago to guide you makes no difference as to the actual truth of what you believe.

nib95 said:
Also, I think you likely have a very jaded view of what the Qur'an tells. You're telling me I'll selectively pick verses of the Qur'an but I believe that is exactly what you are doing. Yes there are verses such as the one's you claimed, that without taken in context could be perceived that way, taken in context however, it's a completely different story. Ignore wrongly interpreting Bakhara and you'll see that the Qur'an itself is a largely peace orientated religion that promotes kindness not genocide. Charity not greed. But I can only imagine the kind of Qur'anic learning you have done has been cherry picked from anti-Islamic or pro atheist sites, so your viewpoint does not surprise me. Also, be careful to not confuse Hadith with actual Qur'anic versus. People regularly confuse the two, and do not understand that hadith is often little more than occurrences of the that period of time in society, not Islamic revelation itself.

How can I be jaded? It either says these things, or it doesn't. And unfortunately for you, it says these things over a hundred times - indeed, in the Qu'ran itself many times. Now, you can go on saying that somehow that doesn't apply to your version of Islam, but that's just selective reading, no more viable in the argument that the selective application of what is and is not silly in terms of Godly belief.

The point here is that you're choosing your standard of morality from a dark place indeed, from a book that endorses horror that would make Hitler and Stalin proud. It's the reality of it. You can go on thinking that there's a net positive effect of this thing for which you have no proof of for which we can demonstratively prove is historically, scientifically and logically inaccurate in thousands of ways, but the belief itself - the religion we're criticizing - goes on to be the same amount implausible and wrong.

nib95 said:
Also, yes, obviously some of does consist of many darker things such as the one's described. But that is life. We hand down harsh punishments ourselves, from imprisoning people to out right killing them. Punishment is simply just an intrinsic part of society that does often have a darker lure. God's wrath or punishment is no different.

That...is life?


My goodness...and OUR morality is messed up?

nib95 said:
On a side note, what element of Islam or specifically the Qur'an promotes rape?

God of the Abrahamic Holy books, I was listing sins that the God in these books has done collectively. I don't know about Islam in this case of rape, but I know of a specific example in the Bible where God instructs Moses to keep the YOUNG WOMEN - children - and virgins for their own personal pleasure.

http://bible.cc/numbers/31-18.htm

"But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves."

This is of course after just committing wholesale slaughter.
 
Count Dookkake said:
t appears to offer protection, but with the smallest bit of inspection you see it is a fool's shield.

Yes, because you do not believe it, I do. You choose to believe a scientific theory about the creation of the universe, one that you do not have the ability to comprehend or prove yourself but one you choose to go with anyway. Remember, even science is a self improving thing.

On a side note, dark matter itself and the big bang theory may actually all be wrong. Even scientifically speaking. Hell, Dark Matter may not even exist....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...-may-not-exist-in-space-scientists-claim.html
 
reggie said:
What has Amir0x said that is false? And not false because you disagree, but factually false.

Funny how this question was ignored. As if pretending not to see the things that discredit you will convince people.
 
nib95 said:
Yes, because you do not believe it, I do. You choose to believe a scientific theory about the creation of the universe, one that you do not have the ability to comprehend or prove yourself but one you choose to go with anyway. Remember, even science is a self improving thing.

On a side note, dark matter itself and the big bang theory may actually all be wrong. Even scientifically speaking. Hell, Dark Matter may not even exist....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...-may-not-exist-in-space-scientists-claim.html

Thank god the pope deduced this.
 
nib95 said:
Yes, because you do not believe it, I do.

Holy shit. He still doesn't get it!

Am I saying something crazy or indecipherable?

Is he pretending to miss the point? Is he really that dense?

Is he doing it on purpose to avoid melting down?

NOTE: I edited out all the stuff that has no bearing on the point we are discussing. It's weird how he keeps doing that.
 
nib95 said:
On a side note, what element of Islam or specifically the Qur'an promotes rape?

.

I would love to hear/see that as well.

And fantastic, apparently since I am a Muslim I am now a Hitler/Stalin in the making.
 
Log4Girlz said:
Thank god the pope deduced this.

Lol point is, based off of the new ground breaking study, there might not even be a current theory as to why or how this universe was created. So even scientifically speaking a higher power or creator is still up for grabs. Not that I think that will be the eventual new theory, but I'm sure they'll think of something to fill the current void.


Count Dookkake said:
Holy shit. He still doesn't get it!

Am I saying something crazy or indecipherable?

Is he pretending to miss the point? Is he really that dense?

Is he doing it on purpose to avoid melting down?

NOTE: I edited out all the stuff that has no bearing on the point we are discussing. It's weird how he keeps doing that.

I honestly do not know what the fuck you're trying to get at. You have completely confused me. From what I can gather, you're telling me Pascal's Wager is bullshit because so many religions are not of the book etc. But what I'm trying to tell you is that I don't follow Pascal's wager, I follow Islam. Get it? I'm not doing it as a gamble. I personally believe Islam is the true religion. If it isn't then like I said above, no worries, but I do believe it will be. Hence why I'm a Muslim. Otherwise I'd just be something new and in-between.

My post above about religions of the book was only to Christians, Jews etc. Which Islamically speaking (nothing to do with Pascal's Wager) would still be considered as people of the book thus permitted potential access to paradise.

Laughing Banana said:
I would love to hear/see that as well.

And fantastic, apparently since I am a Muslim I am now a Hitler/Stalin in the making.

Conveniently he was talking about the wrong religion. I'm not versed well enough with Christianity to know better with his link though. Certainly could be dubious, who knows, I'd like to hear a Christians take on it.

.
 
Count Dookkake said:
Holy shit. He still doesn't get it!

Am I saying something crazy or indecipherable?

Is he pretending to miss the point? Is he really that dense?

Is he doing it on purpose to avoid melting down?

NOTE: I edited out all the stuff that has no bearing on the point we are discussing. It's weird how he keeps doing that.

man Dookkake stop picking on him, it's just his beliefs. you have no ability to comprehend the creation of the universe







therefore God
 
nib95 said:
Lol point is, based off of the new ground breaking study, there might not even be a current theory as to why or how this universe was created. So even scientifically speaking a higher power or creator is still up for grabs. Not that I think that will be the eventual new theory, but I'm sure they'll think of something to fill the current void.

But until then, the god of the gaps rules all.
 
MuseManMike said:
Goddamn, Ami. You must have to consume an exorbitant amount of baby fetuses to keep up with such idiocy.

Hahaha, only one per day. It's nothing dude.

Seriously though, I enjoy it. Like I said, I understand where they come from. I know how difficult it is to shake off that belief and as a result I'm far more willing to keep the discussion going than someone else. Plus, as everyone knows, I'm personality disposed to keep going until my head bursts ;)

But more to the point, where I'm coming from is certainly that of an aggressive atheists - but not a dispassionate one. I feel genuine compassion for these people, because it's scary how indoctrination works to cripple ones sense of reason. And I wish only for them to be free of such shackles. Only then can we be truly moral individuals.
 
Count Dookkake said:
Holy shit. He still doesn't get it!

Am I saying something crazy or indecipherable?

Is he pretending to miss the point? Is he really that dense?

Is he doing it on purpose to avoid melting down?

NOTE: I edited out all the stuff that has no bearing on the point we are discussing. It's weird how he keeps doing that.

Stay strong. It's infuriating just to read, let alone try and participate. I can't keep up with 2 threads like this.

Ediot: wow, he did it again. Don't pop a blood vessel Count.
 
nib95 said:
I honestly do not know what the fuck you're trying to get at. You have completely confused me. From what I can gather, you're telling me Pascal's Wager is bullshit because so many religions are not of the book etc. But what I'm trying to tell you is that I don't follow Pascal's wager, I follow Islam. Get it? I'm not doing it as a gamble. I personally believe Islam is the true religion. If it isn't then like I said above, no worries, but I do believe it will be. Hence why I'm a Muslim. Otherwise I'd just be something new and in-between.

Sorry I have to have a crack:

Pascal's Wager is nonsense because it's just flat out wrong. There are SO many religions (that they no longer exist in practice does not invalidate their individual claims for individual gods) that no matter which one you follow, odds are you are supporting the wrong god. The god that may exist instead of the one you follow will very likely not appreciate you worshipping a non-existent god.

The level of your devotion does not alter these odds one iota.
 
Amir0x said:
Hahaha, only one per day. It's nothing dude.

Seriously though, I enjoy it. Like I said, I understand where they come from. I know how difficult it is to shake off that belief and as a result I'm far more willing to keep the discussion going than someone else. Plus, as everyone knows, I'm personality disposed to keep going until my head bursts ;)

But more to the point, where I'm coming from is certainly that of an aggressive atheists - but not a dispassionate one. I feel genuine compassion for these people, because it's scary how indoctrination works to cripple ones sense of reason. And I wish only for them to be free of such shackles. Only then can we be truly moral individuals.
By moral individuals, do you mean someone who will edit their posts to hide the truth of previous positions? Or maybe you mean someone who will get into physical altercations with their mother and berate police officers? If not, what does being a moral individual mean?

I'm sorry, that was harsh of me. But if you're going to make the claim of moral high ground in comparison to other people, your personal behavior is going to become fair game.
 
I agree that any religious faith or belief that makes strong, refutable statements about empirical reality is in a precarious position. As others have just mentioned, the God of the Gaps is not a model for long term success (where long term success could mean millinea here).

However, there are literally infinite number of deities which could exist but have no impact on the observable world -- that is, the observable world, as observed by humans. However, we can never prove such a thing exists, of course.
 
Pixel Pete said:
Sorry I have to have a crack:

Pascal's Wager is nonsense because it's just flat out wrong. There are SO many religions (that they no longer exist in practice does not invalidate their individual claims for individual gods) that no matter which one you follow, odds are you are supporting the wrong god. The god that may exist instead of the one you follow will very likely not appreciate you worshipping a non-existent god.

The level of your devotion does not alter these odds one iota.

Holy shit some of you guys are absolutely void of reading comprehension.

Let me link you.


nib95 said:
I honestly do not know what the fuck you're trying to get at. You have completely confused me. From what I can gather, you're telling me Pascal's Wager is bullshit because so many religions are not of the book etc. But what I'm trying to tell you is that I don't follow Pascal's wager, I follow Islam. Get it? I'm not doing it as a gamble. I personally believe Islam is the true religion. If it isn't then like I said above, no worries, but I do believe it will be. Hence why I'm a Muslim. Otherwise I'd just be something new and in-between.

My post above about religions of the book was only to Christians, Jews etc. Which Islamically speaking (nothing to do with Pascal's Wager) would still be considered as people of the book thus permitted potential access to paradise.

I'm telling you Pascal's Wager could and likely is full of shit. But Pascal's Wager is not what I believe. I believe Islam to be the true religion with the one true God and am not doing a numbers or odds game. Pascal's Wager means nothing to me.

I never argued it wasn't bullshit. I was referring to the Qur'anic take on religions of the book or those who believed in one God. Not Pascal's.
 
nib95 said:
I honestly do not know what the fuck you're trying to get at. You have completely confused me. From what I can gather, you're telling me Pascal's Wager is bullshit because so many religions are not of the book etc. But what I'm trying to tell you is that I don't follow Pascal's wager, I follow Islam. Get it? I'm not doing it as a gamble. I personally believe Islam is the true religion. If it isn't then like I said above, no worries, but I do believe it will be. Hence why I'm a Muslim. Otherwise I'd just be something new and in-between.

You invoked the wager, you goofball. Obviously, you do follow it to some degree.

I merely pointed out why it is worthless.

Don't you remember typing these EXACT words in post 1304?

nib95 said:
If there is no God, I won't sweat it one bit because I feel I'm living my life fairly respectably. And if there is a God, then I'm set. Either way, I haven't lost anything in the process. Praying, not drinking, being kind to parents and people, giving generously or taking part in charitable things, I don't mind any of it and honestly wish I was less lazy, so that I could do more.

Are you on any sort of drugs? I mean, that's some stunning memory loss.
 
Branduil said:
By moral individuals, do you mean someone who will edit their posts to hide the truth of previous positions? Or maybe you mean someone who will get into physical altercations with their mother and berate police officers? If not, what does being a moral individual mean?

I'm sorry, that was harsh of me. But if you're going to make the claim of moral high ground in comparison to other people, your personal behavior is going to become fair game.

Lol oh crap. I avoided hinting at the personal things though only touched on them in vague measure. But I will at least agree that certain people are the last people who should be talking about moral ideals. Credibility wise as well.
 
Pascal's Wager has even a more fundamental issue, aside from mere statistics. It's inherently "sinful." You are believing because of the math; it isn't true faith. The God of (you name it) would see this and call bullshit, so either way Pascal's wager is a lose-lose situation.

Obligatory Hitch-slap:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUwZrVz86q0&feature=related
Hitchens also talks about why mockery of religion and criticism are necessary.
 
I'm surprised this topic is still going on. What else is there to argue about that hasn't been argued to death in this topic already? Would somebody mind filling me in?
 
Count Dookkake said:
Are you on any sort of drugs? I mean, that's some stunning memory loss.

Holy shit your reading comprehension is mind numbing. I was referring to the moral benefits of following religion. Hence why I would not care if at the end of it there wasn't a God. because I feel that as a result of religion I've lived my life more respectably.

No where in the quote above do I invoke Pascal's theory or even mention it. That was your misrepresentation and understanding of my post. I think you believe that when I say "and if there is a God, I'm set" you think I mean any God, not the God I believe in.

Holy shit....
 
Air said:
I'm surprised this topic is still going on. What else is there to argue about that hasn't been argued to death in this topic already? Would somebody mind filling me in?
Thread got turned into "Atheism vs. Theism |OT2| Dawkins is a jerk!" because that's what the people wanted.
 
Branduil said:
By moral individuals, do you mean someone who will edit their posts to hide the truth of previous positions? Or maybe you mean someone who will get into physical altercations with their mother and berate police officers? If not, what does being a moral individual mean?

I'm sorry, that was harsh of me. But if you're going to make the claim of moral high ground in comparison to other people, your personal behavior is going to become fair game.

One, I never got into a physical altercation with my mom. That was a complete fabrication of the reality of the situation, passed on by hyperactive GAFers thinking they could goad a mod. They couldn't. I've never hit my mom, and I never will. But, as always, religious folk have nothing but actual personal attacks to resort to.

Two... Lying is something I detest, and when I was wrong I admitted it. There's nothing to hide. That's what a moral person does.

Thirdly, nobody said anything about being perfect. Being moral does not imply always making the right decisions. it implies I know what the right decision is and I consciously choose whether or not to follow it during any given situation. Notice that when I did wrong, I admitted it.

Blindly believing in a dangerously immoral God means you're taking your pointers from a horrible starting point, rather than the common sense middle ground of being good to others and treating people how you want to be treated.
 
nib95 said:
Holy shit your reading comprehension is mind numbing. I was referring to the moral benefits of following religion. Hence why I would not care if at the end of it there wasn't a God. because I feel that as a result of religion I've lived my life more respectably.

Holy shit....

Now you are pretending that the wager only covers if there is not a god. You are ignoring the possibility of worshiping the wrong god.

With apologies to CS Lewis: troll, tard or terrified?
 
Count Dookkake said:
Now you are pretending that the wager only covers if there is not a god. You are ignoring the possibility of worshiping the wrong god.

With apologies to CS Lewis: troll, tard or terrified?

Dude, seriously, try to understand. I do not CARE about the wager. It doesn't even factor in to any of my thinking or beliefs. I believe my God to be the true God. I do not believe I am worhisping the wrong God, and as I said before, if I am then so be it. It won't bother me as I've still lived life charitably and more respectably as a result of religion.

Please for the love of God....no more posts on this area of the topic. It is mind numbing.
 
Amir0x said:
One, I never got into a physical altercation with my mom. That was a complete fabrication of the reality of the situation, passed on by hyperactive GAFers thinking they could goad a mod. They couldn't. I've never hit my mom, and I never will. But, as always, religious folk have nothing but actual personal attacks to resort to.

Two... Lying is something I detest, and when I was wrong I admitted it. There's nothing to hide. That's what a moral person does.

Thirdly, nobody said anything about being perfect. Being moral does not imply always making the right decisions. it implies I know what the right decision is and I consciously choose whether or not to follow it during any given situation. Notice that when I did wrong, I admitted it.

Blindly believing in a dangerously immoral God means you're taking your pointers from a horrible starting point, rather than the common sense middle ground of being good to others and treating people how you want to be treated.

Sorry dude I'm not buying it. You lied once and are not a moral person. Enjoy hell. Flying spaghetti monster never forgets and you will burn.

Let us now pray to our all merciful, all forgiving spaghetti monster.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom