seismologist
Banned
Mrbob said::lol
Do what Nintendo fans can't do, just ignore! :lol
PSP has a new Ridge Racer and new Metal Gear game at launch mmmm sexay!![]()
sorry a racing game sequel and a card game are not interesting.
Mrbob said::lol
Do what Nintendo fans can't do, just ignore! :lol
PSP has a new Ridge Racer and new Metal Gear game at launch mmmm sexay!![]()
seismologist said:sorry a racing game sequel and a card game are not interesting.
Me too. Because every word he said in that post was true. Haters be damned. RRDS will kill your mom.kpop100 said:glad you speak for us all
Insertia said:Lots of quality innovative stuff on DS...
When the racing game is Ridge Racer and the card game is made by Kojima, yeah, they really are interesting.sorry a racing game sequel and a card game are not interesting.
Ac!d isn't by Kojima, though.Drek said:When the racing game is Ridge Racer and the card game is made by Kojima, yeah, they really are interesting.
jiji said:Ac!d isn't by Kojima, though.
Now that's good news. The GBC MGS is my favorite in the series.Mrbob said:But it's by the guy behind Ghost Babel so I'm not complaining.
Soul4ger said:Seriously, did someone actually say this was going to be better than the PSP version?
PSP Ridge Racer looks fantastic no doubt. But the verdict is still in on whether it's a good game. Remember, RR64 has already proven to be a cult classic. Brilliant level design and fun gameplay are part of the package. My only concern is the limited visuals on RRDS. I'm positive NST could've gotten more out of the hardware. Just look at Metroid Hunters.
I prefer the look of the DS game, the PSP one looks too detailed and there are probably times when you won't know whether to turn left or right because there's so much annoying detail in the way.
PSP Ridge Racer looks more realistic, but I don't think it looks better. I dunno, i'm weird, I just don't care for graphics much anymore.
I never said RRDS holds a candle to the PSP one in terms of graphics. There's simply no comparison. But that doesn't mean I dislike the visual style in RRDS. Also, let's not forget that RR64 received some pretty good scores from some major publications. If you check out Gamerankings.com all that shit about RV being better than RR64 seems less significant. Hey, I can like whatever I want, and I like RR64. It seems Gamespot doesn't. Whatver.Amir0x said::lol :lol :lol
Nothing like the howls of a dellusional fanboy, no matter the camp.
And then, there's "expert mode." This is truly the way to play Ridge Racer 64, and it's another game that puts Nintendo's downplayed "Thumb Strap" to use for control.
But what Ridge Racer DS does extremely well: multiplayer racing. Unless I'm completely mistaken, this is the first time six players can race against each other in a Ridge Racer game, and only one copy of the game is required to take advantage of this support.
7.5And the real trip is its great handling of wireless multiplayer, obviously thanks to the team's previous effort with Metroid Prime Hunters.
Johnny Nighttrain said:what i don't get is where all the hate comes from.
i mean, it's Ridge Racer, Ridge Racer Revolution, an original NST level (which is quite good), and 6 player multiplayer off of one card. the game even has nicer graphics than the PSone games. granted, the style isn't as nice, so the nicer graphics don't really matter in my book.
but after all is said and done, it's still a very solid package with 2 of the best racing games ever made. the gameplay and frame rate is still there, so what's with all the bitching?
yeah yeah, PSP Ridge Racer is gonna be an awesome "remade remix", but i don't see how the makes this game shittier.
not to mention that the games have different styles of gameplay. like i said though, i'd understand if you're all for PSP Ridge Racer over Ridge Racer DS, but i don't see how that makes Ridge Racer DS a shitty game. it's a great package for $30 if you ask me.
videos man. c'mon, it's damn clear that the DS has to be seen in person for it to not look like complete shit.XS+ said:The game, from the videos I've seen, looks worse than RRType 4.
uh....you sure about that dude? i've never been to japan.evilromero said:Hey Johnny Nighttrain, you coming to Japan again soon? I remember you being there recently.
Johnny Nighttrain said:uh....you sure about that dude? i've never been to japan.
evilromero said:I never said RRDS holds a candle to the PSP one in terms of graphics. There's simply no comparison. But that doesn't mean I dislike the visual style in RRDS. Also, let's not forget that RR64 received some pretty good scores from some major publications. If you check out Gamerankings.com all that shit about RV being better than RR64 seems less significant. Hey, I can like whatever I want, and I like RR64. It seems Gamespot doesn't. Whatver.
jett said:R4 destroys RRDS, technically and artistcally, just like it destroyed RR64. You'd have to either be blind or seismologist to not see it.
Johnny Nighttrain said:so am i right in saying that all the complaints and bitching about RRDS have nothing to do with anything aside from graphics?
Johnny Nighttrain said:so am i right in saying that all the complaints and bitching about RRDS have nothing to do with anything aside from graphics?
dude, i've played the game. i can tell all you Ridge Racer/Revolution fans out there, that the game looks just fine in person, and controls just like you'd expect to with the D-Pad.jett said:You kidding me? Haha, Gamespot's review makes it sound like the graphics are the least of its problems.
Johnny Nighttrain said:how do you figure? didn't like Ridge Racer or Ridge Racer Revolution?
Johnny Nighttrain said:but after all is said and done, it's still a very solid package with 2 of the best racing games ever made. the gameplay and frame rate is still there, so what's with all the bitching?
Johnny Nighttrain said:and like i've been saying, even then, who gives a shit, it's still a fuckin awesome game as far as gameplay goes.
if you don't like classic Ridge Racer....well, more power to you i guess. but you're totally missing out man.Amir0x said:The point we're trying to make is that it's not awesome gameplay wise, and in fact it sucks.
cybamerc said:Well, in this case they are.
But seriously, a Ridge Racer is bound to suck regardless of how it looks. There's a reason why Namco is releasing Ridge Racers on the PSP at launch instead of the PS2.
or just gives us an upgrade port of the best racing game of all time. R4.evilromero said:Whatever. The only thing that'll make me happier is if Namco gives us a upgraded version of Rave/Rage Racer on the DS.
I completely agree. I spent countless nights with my college friends ripping through RR64 over many a drink. The game is smooth and enjoyable. I'm fucking pumped to relive that feeling with the DS, only now with 6-players in the mix.Johnny Nighttrain said:if you don't like classic Ridge Racer....well, more power to you i guess. but you're totally missing out man.
Listen, no facts, no bullshit like that. We like the game. You don't. IGN, EGM and many other pubs loved the game (check Gamerankings and don't make me pull out RRV comparisons). But hell, the DS version is just more of the game, and I'm happy with that. Burnout doesn't offer me the arcade thrills I've longed for since the Rage Racer/RR64 days. The DS version fills that void.The point we're trying to make is that it's not awesome gameplay wise, and in fact it sucks.
Johnny Nighttrain said:if you don't like classic Ridge Racer....well, more power to you i guess. but you're totally missing out man.
evilromero said:Listen, no facts, no bullshit like that. We like the game. You don't. IGN, EGM and many other pubs loved the game (check Gamerankings and don't make me pull out RRV comparisons). But hell, the DS version is just more of the game, and I'm happy with that. Burnout doesn't offer me the arcade thrills I've longed for since the Rage Racer/RR64 days. The DS version fills that void.
dark10x said:You've got to be shitting me...
Ridge Racer V stands along with Outrun 2 as the best arcade racer this gen...
Which makes Ridge Racer and Revolution shit by your standards. RR64 pretty much took everything from those games and made it better.Amir0x said:I'd only be missing out if I never played it.
And even if I didn't play it (which I did play it... and at one point I even owned it), I don't feel that I'd be missing out on a game that is the virtual equivalent of dog shit. But that's just me being hyperbolic, I really do hate the gameplay of RR64.
Amir0x said:I'd only be missing out if I never played it.
And even if I didn't play it (which I did play it... and at one point I even owned it), I don't feel that I'd be missing out on a game that is the virtual equivalent of dog shit. But that's just me being hyperbolic, I really do hate the gameplay of RR64.
evilromero said:Which makes Ridge Racer and Revolution shit by your standards. RR64 pretty much took everything from those games and made it better.
Johnny Nighttrain said:well, it's classic Ridge Racer in general man, no need to single out the DS port.
unless you know, you have nothing better to do than hate on systems.
Wario64 said:http://www.gamespot.com/ds/driving/ridgeracerds/review.html
6.6
"It's safe to say that a lot of the players that are at least thinking about picking up Ridge Racer DS never actually played Ridge Racer 64 back on the N64, and even those players will most likely think that some of the gameplay mechanics and design work in Ridge Racer DS are from another time. It simply doesn't feel like a modern game, and while it may be a decent remake of an older game, it doesn't stand up to today's standards especially well. Even though players will get a kick out of the game's ludicrous take on drifting, Ridge Racer DS has too many flaws to stand out from the pack. "
Looks like it's better than the PSP version!...