What does that have to do with my point? I already made point quite clear, lol.What's your point? Do you even have a PS5?
What does that have to do with my point? I already made point quite clear, lol.What's your point? Do you even have a PS5?
Now yes, but back then it was state of the art and SSDs were not so cheap. Sure Gen4 SSDs are cheap now, but at the time they were not even on the market when PS5 got announced.Do you realize that having a higher end internal SSD on PS5 vs a lower end would be a difference of a couple bucks to Sony right now at this moment?
I bought 2 x Samsung 980 Pro 2TB for less than $160 yesterday (meaning each was less than $80). How much do you think MS is saving from having a 1TB Gen 3 SSD vs Sony having a 825GB Gen 4 SSD? I would bet it’s less than tree-fiddy!
Regardless, you sound like a typical hater who still don’t want to admit that PS5 objectively has a smarter overall design when it comes to value compared to Series X.
What marketing hype? The point of the SSD was for gameplay purposes and quality of life improvement over HDDs. Most PS5 exclusive loaded games in a few seconds.
So wouldn’t you agree that it was smart for Sony to think ahead and make a future-proof data streaming I/O alongside a higher-end SSD by only losing some extra money for a very short period of time?Now yes, but back then it was state of the art and SSDs were not so cheap. Sure Gen4 SSDs are cheap now, but at the time they were not even on the market when PS5 got announced.
So this game is possible with a HDD
I would only say yes if we saw anything to justify having Gen4 SSD in PS5, right now we haven't seen anything. Spending more on GPU instead is something we can all agree we would have immediately seen benefits of. I mean we're already seeing games on PS5 dropping to 1080p or even below in performance mode in some games, that's something an extra GPU power would have definitely helped with. As for SSD, we haven't seen a single case where we can say that having Gen4 SSD over Gen3 is of any benefit beyond a couple of seconds faster loading.So wouldn’t you agree that it was smart for Sony to think ahead and make a future-proof data streaming I/O alongside a higher-end SSD by only losing some extra money for a very short period of time?
I think you are missing the point.I would only say yes if we saw anything to justify having Gen4 SSD in PS5, right now we haven't seen anything. Spending more on GPU instead is something we can all agree we would have immediately seen benefits of. I mean we're already seeing games on PS5 dropping to 1080p or even below in performance mode in some games, that's something an extra GPU power would have definitely helped with. As for SSD, we haven't seen a single case where we can say that having Gen4 SSD over Gen3 is of any benefit beyond a couple of seconds faster loading.
But I thought the 3070 was a shit 1080p card now because of it's 8gb VRAM? them recent ports were clearly unoptimised shit if it can run this at 1440p 60fps with RT on this game
But I thought the 3070 was a shit 1080p card now because of it's 8gb VRAM? them recent ports were clearly unoptimised shit if it can run this at 1440p 60fps with RT on this game
And yet you cannot provide a single example of that SSD being of value over more powerful GPU in practice. It's all nice talking about IO and throughput, but it's all pie in the sky stuff until you can show its benefits in practice.I think you are missing the point.
You can absolutely add a more powerful GPU on a PS5 Pro, and later iterations of PlayStation for that matter, but you absolutely cannot change something as fundamental as the system’s I/O + SSD speed.
PS5 is designed in a way to not face the same fate of PS4. You simply don’t want to sell +100 million units in this day and age only to press a reset button and start from zero unit again when later iterations of PlayStation is released.
Notice how reluctant Sony was to leave PS4 behind and they developed all their main franchises as cross-gen titles… but that has to end now even though no business would in reality want to leave that massive PS4 install-base out.
PS5 is designed to make it ‘forward-compatible’, meaning when it comes to future transitions of PlayStation, you will absolutely still see games releasing on PS5 more than a decade from today (yes possibly at 720p @ 30 FPS, but that’s besides the point).
Without that over-designed SSD/IO, that simply may not be been possible, but hey, if you only care about today then you would be right, but Sony / Mark Cerny designed the system for the purpose of having PS5 last as long as possible.
And yet you cannot provide a single example of that SSD being of value over more powerful GPU in practice. It's all nice talking about IO and throughput, but it's all pie in the sky stuff until you can show its benefits in practice.
They could have at least matched Series X GPU. Of course were aren't going to see difference between them because third party games also have to run on Series S and PS5 is the primary development console. Where we would see a difference though is first party games. Most people just think of resolution when they think of more powerful GPU, but in reality it also allows devs to push more fidelity, more geometry and have more graphical features in their games. Like I said, these are immediate benefits, whereas we are yet to see any practical benefit of having PS5 Gen4 SSD over a tad slower Gen3 SDD.In reality how much more powerful GPU they could have? I bet nothing over series x and it already shows that difference between them is not very big (if at all in some games).
SSD speed may become some advantage later in generation, so far we just STARTED to see 9 gen only games.
This port proofed „marketing hype” as Nixxes had to use direct storage for fast data loadingIt's always marketing hype. "The power of the cloud". "Most powerful console". It's almost always bullshit.
This port proofed „marketing hype” as Nixxes had to use direct storage for fast data loading
I dont think you can use DS with a regular HDD. I would wait to make such claims.This port proofed „marketing hype” as Nixxes had to use direct storage for fast data loading
So you don't want PCs to show off the point of having the latest tech? There should be a new minimum standard,the fact some want newer games to run on old technology is very weird.lol so many butthurt ppl will stop talking after the game shows that it can run on an hdd, even if its on low, if it doesnt present any issues, then the ssd marketting talk is just all BS.
I dont think you can use DS with a regular HDD. I would wait to make such claims.
With DirectStorage 1.2, developers can now use the same code on both SSDs and HDDs. While DirectStorage has traditionally used an unbuffered mode to pass data from SSDs to the GPU as fast as possible, it now supports a buffered mode for legacy HDDs.
“The legacy hard drives require buffered IO in order to mask the long seek times,” says Microsoft’s DirectX team. Developers will now be able to enable this mode for games installed strictly to slower HDDs so they can benefit from OS file buffering features and speed increases.
Why would it NOT work with HDDs?I dont think you can use DS with a regular HDD. I would wait to make such claims.
Yeah, probably at low settings for smooth gameplay.Minimum spec with SSD Recommended in brackets.
GAF
See I told it was all bullshit, I'll be running it 4k60fps on a HDD
Most likely by Bugaga.I await the most important Digital Foundry video of our time.
Don't be an idiot. It's gonna run like ass on the minimum settings w/ HDD.Someone please post a Tweet from that hack Insomniac developer claiming that this game would be impossible on HDD. Thanks.
Weak?i'm good for ultimate raytracing. might able to do 4K with more than 60fps lol.
seems pretty weak to be honest.
Saved, for later.720p/30FPS is due to CPU/GPU, not storage. Can't wait to hear my mechanical drive going kra-ka-ka-ka as I run this at 4k 120FPS.
Impossible at the PS5 targeted resolutions and frame rates perhaps. However, with a couple more years of dev time and at a target of 720p 30fps, maybe not so impossible anymore.Someone please post a Tweet from that hack Insomniac developer claiming that this game would be impossible on HDD. Thanks.
Minimum spec with SSD Recommended in brackets.
GAF
See I told it was all bullshit, I'll be running it 4k60fps on a HDD
Should be a good hate watchMost likely by Bugaga.
Series X is smaller, consume less energy, run games at better resolutions, and cost the same.Do you realize that having a higher end internal SSD on PS5 vs a lower end would be a difference of a couple bucks to Sony right now at this moment?
I bought 2 x Samsung 980 Pro 2TB for less than $160 yesterday (meaning each was less than $80). How much do you think MS is saving from having a 1TB Gen 3 SSD vs Sony having a 825GB Gen 4 SSD? I would bet it’s less than tree-fiddy!
Regardless, you sound like a typical hater who still don’t want to admit that PS5 objectively has a smarter overall design when it comes to value compared to Series X.
eh, HZD and Days Gone were not too hot at launch on PC and both had about a dozen patchesThat's how you make a PC port. Sony cares about PC gamers more than many PC only devs. TLOU was exception but many other PC ports was suffering at same time.
Also 3070 FTW.
That's how you make a PC port. Sony cares about PC gamers more than many PC only devs. TLOU was exception but many other PC ports was suffering at same time.
Also 3070 FTW.
Sorry I miss out the quotes, I was mocking people in this threadExtremely weird you would have the hardware to run this game at 4k60, but introduce such a bottleneck to your system by using a HDD. Not even talking games, just using the OS. Honestly, I didn't think anyone still did this, I thought HDD was for cold storage/media only, and no one would be caught dead running a real gaming system on one.
Feature-wise at least. Shit happen.Yeah totally.
Zero Dawn - Launched in perfect condition
Days Gone - Sooo gooood
Returnal - Traversal stutter is not a thing.
Spider-Man - Didnt even need to get patched once.
The Last of Us - Shining example of how to do a port.
Sackboy - Praised to high heaven on PC at launch.
Sorry I miss out the quotes, I was mocking people in this thread
He already got an erection regarding the PC port.Should be a good hate watch
Gears 5.Also name a PC game without same or more problems?