George Floyd —————Tony Timpa
Breonna Taylor ———— Duncan Lemp
There’s been more people killed in the riots as a result. 1 death begets 15 (last number I knew of).
This is a complex issue that nobody wants to take the time to talk about with any degree of nuance. People have their ideas and beliefs and hold onto them with a death grip. Since nobody wants to talk about it honestly and talk about every aspect it will not be solved and we will be here again soon enough. It’s a shame.
It doesn't matter what kind of a person he was, he was still murdered.Tell the truth about their martyr, get cancelled. Everyday I hate this world more and more.
He doesn’t get it
and if his views are contradictory to the company that fired him, that is entirely their right to do so
He posted exactly what I’d expect a racist old white dude to post. Completely and absolutely missing the point.
He doesn’t get it
and if his views are contradictory to the company that fired him, that is entirely their right to do so
He posted exactly what I’d expect a racist old white dude to post. Completely and absolutely missing the point.
It's racist to name a black criminal... a criminal. Okay. Now watch the entire "ur a wacist!" name calling crash & burn.
Humanity existed for thousands of years long before racism was coined as a negative & will endure for long after. This little era is a small hiccup & your post simply epitomized why slippery, subjective definitions of racism are a failed moral concept.
Companies don't get to have views, man. A company is not a person. Does a company cast a vote in US elections? Does a company have a favorite color? Favorite food? If we knock one of its windows out, does it feel pain, will it bleed?
A company is comprised of multiple people with differing sets of views. It's morally reprehensible for companies to fire employees on the basis of not sharing opinions or beliefs, especially those of a political nature.
While I agree (and I never wish anyone dies, except that guy who stole my bike back in 2006--he deserves to die hanging). Anyway, the disturbing thing is that the people who fired him probably wish President Trump died at every waking hour and in their dreams. These are not positions I agree with, one does not make the other "right", they are ideological factions that are fighting for power, and we are caught in the middle--assuming you have not taken a side.Pointing out the guy was a habitual criminal and should not be made into a saintly figure is one thing, but wishing he'd died sooner is crossing a line that instantly undermines the point he was trying to make.
It doesn't matter what kind of a person he was, he was still murdered.
Floyd is the perfect example of a repeat offender criminal.
Bringing up his past is a way of deflecting. The reality is that he was murdered on camera while begging for his life. He may have been a criminal, but he was still human. We can't abide living in a society where this can happen or does happen too frequently. It's more about condemning his death than it is about celebrating his life.I completely agree and I'm glad the officer that did it was charged, why in turn should he be thrown these big public funerals and given all this attention. The guy didn't deserve to die, but he was not a good person, so people need to stop pretending he was and cancelling anyone that brings up his past.
Well, ok. So if any random company had a CEO or someone who worked at a company and represented that brand, on their personal and public account supported something like Racism or Slavery it’s ok?
mid companies do not have views then how about corporate NASCAR banning confederate flags?
I think companies should have views if there are moral grounds for those views, and what we are seeing by many companies onboard with black lives matter and showing support is evidence that there are moral grounds to support or at least publicly show support of
The man was murdered for $20 hell yeah he is fucking wrong . He had a family.....
youre intellectualizing this too much
the core issues are what they are. and someone is either able to acknowledge them, or someone is unable to do so, for whatever myriad of reasons. This guys Facebook post reveals his stance and inability to understand the core issues.
so yeah, he’s got the same view id expect from a racist old white dude who probably doesn’t even realize he is racist or understand what privilege is
Bringing up his past is a way of deflecting. The reality is that he was murdered on camera while begging for his life. He may have been a criminal, but he was still human. We can't abide living in a society where this can happen or does happen too frequently. It's more about condemning his death than it is about celebrating his life.
Have you seen anyone anywhere defending the cops actions? I haven't.
The cop should have been able to recognize that floyd was drugged out of his mind and won't be able to withstand being stepped on for so long.
Except for the fact that he had preexisting heart conditions, was on fentanyl, and died from a heart attack. He would have died from running up a flight of stairs.
No, he refused to have his opinion dictated by the mob--right or wrong he has courage.I knew the moment he tweeted that that he was gonna get fired. What a fucking idiot.
Companies don't get to have views, man. A company is not a person. Does a company cast a vote in US elections? Does a company have a favorite color? Favorite food? If we knock one of its windows out, does it feel pain, will it bleed?
A company is comprised of multiple people with differing sets of views. It's morally reprehensible for companies to fire employees on the basis of not sharing opinions or beliefs, especially those of a political nature.
It's not one death though. George Floyd is the tipping point.
Freedom of speech doesn't exist when you represent a company on social media. He should have known that.
Solution: DONT USE SOCIAL MEDIA
Everyone should be afraid of censorship and the oppression of speech, while it may not affect you now it will get you eventually.
Not arguing that, but my point I was making still stands. Outrage mobs and the like are ridiculous and shouldn't be cheered on or supported imoHoly shit Ron, read the room.
Bingo. Got a opinion that may be construed as shitty, especially in our current political climate? Maaaaayyyybe don't post that on a global platform right now.
The first amendment protects your freedom of speech from the government, but doesn't mean you're free from the consequences of that speech from everybody else.
What does his background has to do with him being murdered
It's clear some of you shouldn't even be involved in a discussion about this kind of topic. It's definitely one of the reasons why I don't talk about this here. To each their own, but some of the reactions and opinions I've seen here are a bit much to say the least. All I will say is, while Floyd may seem like a "nobody" to some, he was the latest target of police brutality. Which made him much more than a nobody in the eyes of many. A man that lost his life over something that was so incredibly petty, also at the hands of law enforcement. It's absurd, and it's disgusting.
All in all there's a time and a place for stuff like this. Opinions as well. That being said, I'm glad that Ron was removed. Also, screw Riot Games, lmao.
Not arguing that, but my point I was making still stands. Outrage mobs and the like are ridiculous and shouldn't be cheered on or supported imo
Well the American left is out of it's goddamn mind and always exploit whatever they can. I just ignore it.That's how it should be. But then you look at the 3 lavish funerals he got and the fact that nobody can say anything negative about the man's life without the wokest among us jumping down their throats. And then you have Biden, in all his addled glory, saying shit like Floyd's death had more of a global impact than MLK dying. Very few people seem to be capable of keeping things in perspective.
The first amendment protects your freedom of speech from the government, but doesn't mean you're free from the consequences of that speech from everybody else.
When you paint situations like these as "Outrage Mobs" you're kinda missing the point.
If an individual represents a company and they make a controversial statement, as a customer of that company you have the right to query said company as to whether or not they stand behind those statements.
The company could say "We stand behind his/her statement." just as easily as they're allowed to reprimand the individual. By the same token, if the company stands behind the statement, you're allowed as a customer to no longer give them your business.
I would never think to question the company because the statement was made by an individual. Lots of collectivist thinking going around.
There’s is the cultural idea of freedom of speech and it appears we are losing that. I imagine that is what he’s referring to. You do not want other people deciding what you can and cannot say. It may not affect you now, but given enough time and encouragement from myopic people, it will.
If he posted that image, then I'd say that last line is the only real problem there.
Pointing out the guy was a habitual criminal and should not be made into a saintly figure is one thing, but wishing he'd died sooner is crossing a line that instantly undermines the point he was trying to make.
Agree to disagree, especially when we're talking about an executive position.
You can say whatever you want to say, nobody is stopping you from doing so.
You're not free from the consequences of what you say.
If you truly believe in what you say, you need to stand by you opinion despite the blowback that may come from it.
So you want ideological conformity? Collectivist thinking.
The difference is I think you should be free to say whatever you want and the only consequence should be that I stop hanging around you if I don‘t want to hear it. I don’t want you to lose your job or be hurt. Words are just that. If you can’t speak, you can’t think; if you can’t think, you can‘t grow or change your mind. We work things out by speaking to others.
I don’t think you answer words with physical violence.Let me simplify it for you.
If you're on a street corner and you run up to a dude and start yelling racist things at him and he hauls off an punches you square in the jaw, that's on you.
You had the freedom to say what you want, but you can't be mad at him getting angry and retaliating.
I don’t think you answer words with physical violence.
Well the American left is out of it's goddamn mind and always exploit whatever they can. I just ignore it.