• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rottenwatch: AVATAR (82%)

Status
Not open for further replies.
ToxicAdam said:
I mentioned it earlier, but I had problems with the entire ending sequence. I thought at some point Cameron puts the action on cruise control and gives you a heaping helping of Hollywood cliches we've seen in 100 different action movies from the 80's and 90's.


The only thing missing was the old "Oh no, he's not dead yet!" ending with the final villain.

You mean cliches he created?

kidding.

Anyway, I was watching the trailers again. I guess this movie has resonated a bit more deeply than I first realised. I need to see it again in a less confused state (I didn't fully get the storytelling first time around).
 
Koodo said:
Just came back from seeing it, and holy shit did Cameron deliver. The 3D was EPIC, and most of the movie was spellbinding (I was choking up during the
destruction of Hometree
).

I do have a few nitpicks though:

- The plot felt rushed at the end, maybe even a bit phoned in. Some of the important moments in that last act just came and went.


The movie was too long. I started getting bored to tears until the end.
 
JGS said:
Actually, that one made sense to me
as they were moving the trailer directly to the flux. Also the battle area was linear and narrow, so the entire battle was heading into that direction and the ship crashed just at it's drop zone.
Ok, that actually does make sense. Bravo to Cameron for making the battlefield easy to follow geographically.
However, I may have this backwards or something since I was confused at first how the Na'vi missed the dropping of the trailer initially. I kept thinking they were going to be atacked when they landed!
That is another thing I noticed.
Why weren't they met or attacked after they landed the trailer so close to their sacred area? You'd think they'd be on edge especially after what happened to the hometree. I suppose the only answer would be they were in too much sorrow and pain to do much.
 
ToxicAdam said:
I'm talking about before they move it. They have to know where they INITITALLY moved the units. The military is the one who hauled them up there, not the scientists.

The military guys aren't going to fly some scouts looking for them?

First of all, it doesn't matter because the intricacy of the plot was aim exactly at the Disney 2D animations' level.

Second, you have to remember this is a frontier colony town. Think of it as early American settlements. There were alot of cases of settlers being attacked by the natives. Also there was a case of a whole settlement disappear after a winter. It is very expensive to colonize a new continent/planet when the technology is not there yet.
 
ToxicAdam said:
I mentioned it earlier, but I had problems with the entire ending sequence. I thought at some point Cameron puts the action on cruise control and gives you a heaping helping of Hollywood cliches we've seen in 100 different action movies from the 80's and 90's.


The only thing missing was the old "Oh no, he's not dead yet!" ending with the final villain.

This is why I don't think this movie is too cliched because that battle was not typical.

I do not think a typical ending would have worked well as it was never realistically an even match and I think he may have been going for a Shock & Awe type of battle that was going to be quick. To me, he seemed to set it up this way at Hometree(?).

There was never a time that the fight would have been realistically even, on one side when the Marines had the upper hand, and on the other, when the whole of Pandora stepped in, which immediately turned the tide in the opposite direction where the sky people weren't able to put up a good fight.

It's also why the "important" battle had to be between Jake and the the commander since the big battle swung rapidly from one side to the other.
 
The executive running this Pandora project is that brother guy from Friends. I just can't take him seriously :lol
 
NetMapel said:
The executive running this Pandora project is that brother guy from Friends. I just can't take him seriously :lol

Off Topic response to you: Check out his other roles, the guy has an INTENSE range and is a damn good actor

On Topic: LOVED this movie, not much I can say that hasn't been said, might have said it last night after the movie can't remember, either way its really good!
 
just saw the movie in IMAX 3D. Holy fuck that's a great movie. I'd pay another $15 to see it again right now.

one note about 3D, I agree with others here that the 3D did nothing for me, I would've rather watched the movie in regular IMAX. Making shit blurry/depth of field(?) of what I'm trying to focus on just annoyed me I don't always look at exactly what the filmmaker wants me to see

So I've tried both 3D technologies and I say pass.
 
Jamesfrom818 said:
MY SISTER IS HAVING MY BABY!
Seriously... all I can hear coming out of his mouth during the movie is "I like stuff that melts and I don't like things that don't melt." :lol
 
great movie
great effects

liked the story, dont know why all the complaints

cant believe he wrote the script like 15 years ago
 
Another skeptic turned believer. I couldn't have been the only one who was smiling at parts of this movie, it made me feel like a child again. It was magical.
 
Holy shit I just got out of the movie. Visually, this movie was fucking mind blowing in 3D. The end battle was just EPIC. Overall I loved it
 
NetMapel said:
The executive running this Pandora project is that brother guy from Friends. I just can't take him seriously :lol
Giovanni Ribisi is much more than a guy from Friends. Guy's a damn good actor and if nothing else, remember him from My Name is Earl rather than Friends if you go the sitcom route.
 
Just came back from seeing this in IMAX 3D and man I didn't think Cameron would deliver but goddam. The movie delivered on every aspect good story, good action, basically everything I could want out of a movie. The IMAX showing I went to was at 10:20 and it was PACKED. Actually all the rest of the shows that day were sold out this movie is gonna make a shit ton of movie. At the end of the me and my friends yelled out "FUCKIN JAMES CAMERON" and the whole theater started clapping :lol
 
Meier said:
Giovanni Ribisi is much more than a guy from Friends. Guy's a damn good actor and if nothing else, remember him from My Name is Earl rather than Friends if you go the sitcom route.

Friends is what they got out of him? Not even Saving Private Ryan or Flight of the Phoenix out of his works?



Anyway, question.

How long did it take them to get to Pandora again? Was it 6 years? If its orbiting Alpha Centauri, that means they speeds close to the speed of light!?

(I just wish we could travel to other systems :lol )
 
I bought tickets online for a 3D showing this morning, but they oversold and there was only 1 seat left for me and 4 friends, so we saw the 2D.
It was still really damn immersive. This is the first (part) CG movie I've seen that I've actually believed in the world presented.
I'd say the worst part about the movie was that the setting was more interesting than every single character combined.
Scratch that, the worst part was that Michelle Rodriguez never got out of her overalls.

Awesome movie. I'll go to see it again in 3D.
 
So I guess that Cameron's stealth multi-year project to put Michelle Rodriguez in the good graces of fans has been a massive success. ;)

Did you guys all get applause at the end of your showings, by the way? Movie's a definite audience-pleaser.
 
I am surprised. I am shocked.

It was a good movie, and I haven't seen one of those in a very, very long time.

Supremely paced, not a single awkward moment in sight, and the CG actors were compelling as hell.

Sigourney Weaver Nav'i <3
 
McNei1y said:
Friends is what they got out of him? Not even Saving Private Ryan or Flight of the Phoenix out of his works?



Anyway, question.

How long did it take them to get to Pandora again? Was it 6 years? If its orbiting Alpha Centauri, that means they speeds close to the speed of light!?

(I just wish we could travel to other systems :lol )

i think it was 5 years, 9 months?
 
Since I've been on complete blackout on this movie until commercials for it started flooding television, I had no idea that the weird (comparatively) scientist from Bones was in this as well. It makes that Avatar episode of Bones so much better.
 
Zeliard said:
So I guess that Cameron's stealth multi-year project to put Michelle Rodriguez in the good graces of fans has been a massive success. ;)

Did you guys all get applause at the end of your showings, by the way? Movie's a definite audience-pleaser.


Yea. My friend started the clapping right when at the end. Then the whole theater joined in. I'm definitely going to see this movie again, in 3D probably. I can't now though, to much snow here in MD.

This movie re-sparked my interest of planets / moons like this. I am always interested in that stuff, its just seeing how close Cameron placed the setting, made me do as much research to see if were making any progress on travel :lol :lol
 
Gary Whitta said:
There is no doubt, none at all, that this is a game-changer from a technical perspective. This is by far the best use of 3D ever, and proves its validity not just as a gimmick but practically a necessity for any subsequent sci-fi blockbusters that seek to compete at this level.

Semi-related: I hesitate to add a bum note because I can safely be counted among those who thought this movie was incredible and plan to see it again, but I can't help but think ahead and be slightly bummed out by the certainty that there's no way this movie can retain all its magic at home, where it will eventually spend most of its life on Blu-ray and (yuk!) DVD. Movies these days have a shelf life of a few weeks in theaters (surely a little longer than usual in this case) but then are TV experiences for the rest of their lifespan, and the big-screen 3D experience is such an integral part of what makes Avatar so amazing, I almost don't want to see it that way. It's hard to imagine this movie without the 3D component. It'll still be awesome, just quite a bit less so.

True. Though, the one thing I'm optimistic about when it comes to something like watching the Avatar Blu-Ray at home is that the colors are MUCH nicer and much more vibrant without the 3D glasses.

If you go see Avatar again, remove your glasses for just a second during some scenes. The difference in saturation is rather huge.

I took them off a couple of times during the Pandoran night scenes and my god. The vibrancy and sheer color on the bioluminescent flora was really a sight to behold. When they get 3D to work without dimming the picture, it's all over.
 
McNei1y said:
Friends is what they got out of him? Not even Saving Private Ryan or Flight of the Phoenix out of his works



Giovanni Ribisi (sp) ... I remember him best as the photog from LOST IN TRANSLATION. you know his character.. tapped that ass.
 
McNei1y said:
How long did it take them to get to Pandora again? Was it 6 years? If its orbiting Alpha Centauri, that means they speeds close to the speed of light!?

(I just wish we could travel to other systems :lol )
According to one of the Wiki's, the ISV Venture Star travels at 130,200 miles per second. :o
 
I have seen Saving Private Ryans and Lost in Translation or other movies with Giovanni Ribisi in it. However, I don't remember a lick of his performance in those movies. I'm sure he's a great actor and I don't mean any disrespect. I just only remember his performance from Friends, as I'm sure many people do.

pxleyes said:
They might as well make a new category for it, frankly.
Seriously. I used to think maybe 2012, District 9 or Transformers 2 could compete with the movie visually. However, after tonight's viewing in 3D, I was floored. There is just no competition. If this movies doesn't win the VFX category in Oscar, there will be much rage.
 
NetMapel said:
I have seen Saving Private Ryans and Lost in Translation or other movies with Giovanni Ribisi in it. However, I don't remember a lick of his performance in those movies. I'm sure he's a great actor and I don't mean any disrespect. I just only remember his performance from Friends, as I'm sure many people do.

His single biggest part was probably in Boiler Room, where he was in nearly every scene.

Ribisi's character in this movie was so damn confusing. It was obvious they were trying to make him seem like he was somewhat remorseful for his actions after a while (especially compared with Stephen Lang), but they only did that with a couple of glances at his face when he seemed to be considering what they were doing.

I don't mind the subtlety there but it still wasn't nearly enough, overall, to give an indication of where he really stood. His character felt severely shortchanged, like a bunch of his scenes had been cut out. It seemed like he was ultimately meant to be the middle ground between Lang and Weaver's characters, but the movie never really got there with him.
 
NetMapel said:
I have seen Saving Private Ryans and Lost in Translation or other movies with Giovanni Ribisi in it. However, I don't remember a lick of his performance in those movies. I'm sure he's a great actor and I don't mean any disrespect. I just only remember his performance from Friends, as I'm sure many people do.


Seriously. I used to think maybe 2012, District 9 or Transformers 2 could compete with the movie visually. However, after tonight's viewing in 3D, I was floored. There is just no competition. If this movies doesn't win the VFX category in Oscar, there will be much rage.

I'm just thinking with this technology, it is time. We can capture performances well enough to make old actors young. lol. That said, Sigourney is looking pretty good. CG?

And to what extent did they CG Jake's legs?
 
Zeliard said:
His single biggest part was probably in Boiler Room, where he was in nearly every scene.

Ribisi's character in this movie was so damn confusing. It was obvious they were trying to make him seem like he was somewhat remorseful for his actions after a while (especially compared with Stephen Lang), but they only did that with a couple of glances at his face when he seemed to be considering what they were doing.

I don't mind the subtlety there but it still wasn't nearly enough, overall, to give an indication of where he really stood. His character felt severely shortchanged, like a bunch of his scenes had been cut out. It seemed like he was ultimately meant to be the middle ground between Lang and Weaver's characters, but the movie never really got there with him.
Never saw Boiler Room, but allow me to bring my discussion more on-topic now. I honestly thought he's going to
be the good guy in the end and call off the invasion or something... or sack the big bad military general guy. However, he did nothing, which I guess it's entirely realistic seeing as he's just a puppet leader in this military-driven project. We shall see what the sequel brings ;) That very last scene of the movie screams AVATAR 2 to me.

mrkgoo said:
I'm just thinking with this technology, it is time. We can capture performances well enough to make old actors young. lol. That said, Sigourney is looking pretty good. CG?

And to what extent did they CG Jake's legs?
They already did this with Benjamin Buttons, right ? Very cool to see Brad Pitt's younger and potential older self. I wonder if it totally freaked him out to see what he might look like when he's old.
 
Man i feel like playing a videogame that would immerse me into its world as much as this movie did! ITs effin awesome! (Besides the official videogame which i heard blows)
 
NetMapel said:
They already did this with Benjamin Buttons, right ? Very cool to see Brad Pitt's younger and potential older self. I wonder if it totally freaked him out to see what he might look like when he's old.

The actors in Avatar were apparently able to look at a screen and see their digital representations moving in real-time along with them.

Talk about freaky. :lol

And awesome.
 
Words are hard to describe Avatar for me. Watched it twice, once in Imax Experience 3d and regular 2d. Loved it, both showings.

There's some moments that are so emotionally and visually stunning that it's almost to much...
The moment where Jake takes the huge Banshee to round up the other tribes, with the shot of him flying down the cliff with the western sea tribe as the water crashes against the rocks with 50-100 banshees flying down... My eyes started watering and this huge emotional surge came up from my chest. It wasn't like I was crying, but the visual stimuli actually brought me too tears.

Also, the moment where Neytiri's mother comes up to Jake, bound to the tree and says "If you're one of us, help us.", got to me hard both times.

The best way to describe Avatar is 'awesome'. Not like "This hot dog, it's awesome'. More around the lines of physical existence in a universe so vast that life beyond carbon existence is possible, awesome.
 
I don't feel like scouring the thread (its pretty big) but have to ask, did anyone else sit through this movie and get a really REALLY big "its a futuristic Pocahontas" vibe from it?
 
It's been a while since I've seen a movie that gave me such an experience that I actually miss it, and crave going back. Many moments in the movie I want to see again, but more so the overall experience. I came out of Avatar just reeling, and now that the hit has worn off I want to go get another.
 
LeMaximilian said:
The best way to describe Avatar is 'awesome'. Not like "This hot dog, it's awesome'. More around the lines of physical existence in a universe so vast that life beyond carbon existence is possible, awesome.

I liked Jeff Cannata on the Totally Rad Show specifying the dictionary definition of the word "awesome" to describe Avatar. "A feeling of awe".

lsslave said:
I don't feel like scouring the thread (its pretty big) but have to ask, did anyone else sit through this movie and get a really REALLY big "its a futuristic Pocahontas" vibe from it?

You're the first I've seen mention that. Pretty interesting connection.
 
It is a room temperature super-conductor for energy, which makes it very valuable: it's worth $20 Million per kilogram on Earth. However, It is vastly expensive to mine on Pandora since humans are unable to breathe in the Pandoran atmosphere. Because of this, all personnel are required to wear a mask and it is very cumbersome. Humans transport Unobtainium on trucks called Hell Trucks from the mines back to Hell's Gate.

Unobtainium has a unique magnetic field and properties of superconductivity, causing it to levitate. On Pandora, the magnetic effect causes huge outcroppings of Unobtainium to rip loose from the surface and float in the magnetic vortexes. These huge islands, named Hallelujah Mountains by Earth's explorers, are called Thundering Rocks by the Pandorans, who hold them sacred. The unique magnetic properties of Unobtainium are used to contain and direct the energy of the matter-antimatter annihilation which propels ships like ISV Venture Star. Without Unobtanium, interstellar commerce on this scale would not be possible. Unobtanium is not only the key to Earth’s energy needs in the 22nd century, but it is the enabler of interstellar travel and the establishment of a truly spacefaring civilization. Making a feed back loop, the more Unobtainium is mined, the more ship can be built, and more mining equipment can be sent to Pandora

If this is accurate, then wouldn't they want to try and come up with a way of hauling away the floating mountains instead? I mean, I get the large deposit under the tree, but is this any harder to get?
 
pxleyes said:
If this is accurate, then wouldn't they want to try and come up with a way of hauling away the floating mountains instead? I mean, I get the large deposit under the tree, but is this any harder to get?
Umm, you saw how big those mountains are right? Plus flying in those things messes up most of the instrumentation in the flying vehicles, so it'd probably be deemed to risky. It also seemed that most of their mining equipment was ground based (huge stuff) so I don't think they have any air vehicles that could carry those things. The Dragon and Valkyrie aren't exactly that large.
 
pxleyes said:
If this is accurate, then wouldn't they want to try and come up with a way of hauling away the floating mountains instead? I mean, I get the large deposit under the tree, but is this any harder to get?
Two thoughts on that. One, while way in the future I didn't see any indication that they had the technology or resources haul away/move mountains (even floating ones), or get those massive mining machines on top of mountains of questionable stability. Not to mention all the difficulty of dealing with the interference in that location.

Second, if they were having a hard time getting the Na'vi to leave their home tree, I can only imagine the shitstorm that would have erupted had they tried to start destroying the mountains right over their most sacred location.
 
NetMapel said:
They already did this with Benjamin Buttons, right ? Very cool to see Brad Pitt's younger and potential older self. I wonder if it totally freaked him out to see what he might look like when he's old.

Ah yes, forgot about that. I guess more example of 'it is time'. Arnie in T4 also another example.
 
Combine said:
Umm, you saw how big those mountains are right? Plus flying in those things messes up most of the instrumentation in the flying vehicles, so it'd probably be deemed to risky. It also seemed that most of their mining equipment was ground based (huge stuff) so I don't think they have any air vehicles that could carry those things.
I was exaggerating a bit with the whole "hauling them off" thing, but they had no problem lifting a science facility up there, and while the instrumentation went wacky, it was due to the ore in the first place, not to mention it doesn't prevent flight beyond making it fly by sight.

I guess what bothers me most is the declaration that the land the tree sits on holds the highest concentration (hell its in the trailer), but from what I am reading here that i far from correct. Fascinating stuff, really. I'm glad I was able to find out why the mountains flew in the first place, which I thought they would explain a bit more in the movie (like at all).
 
lsslave said:
I don't feel like scouring the thread (its pretty big) but have to ask, did anyone else sit through this movie and get a really REALLY big "its a futuristic Pocahontas" vibe from it?

Yea, thats what I first thought of after seeing it, just alien and alien rather than same planet man.

GhaleonEB said:
It's been a while since I've seen a movie that gave me such an experience that I actually miss it, and crave going back. Many moments in the movie I want to see again, but more so the overall experience. I came out of Avatar just reeling, and now that the hit has worn off I want to go get another.


This. I went in not knowing much but coming out I felt attached. I want to see it again because it was such an experience that I want to see it again and again. Seeing this made me want it to be real. Like I wish this was part of our present just because Pandora looks so fucking cool.
 
pxleyes said:
I was exaggerating a bit with the whole "hauling them off" thing, but they had no problem lifting a science facility up there, and while the instrumentation went wacky, it was due to the ore in the first place, not to mention it doesn't prevent flight beyond making it fly by sight.

I guess what bothers me most is the declaration that the land the tree sits on holds the highest concentration (hell its in the trailer), but from what I am reading here that i far from correct. Fascinating stuff, really. I'm glad I was able to find out why the mountains flew in the first place, which I thought they would explain a bit more in the movie (like at all).

I think the real answer is that it doesn't involve getting friendly with the natives, nor wiping them out thus no interesting movie.

Probably mining equipment up there is not a feasible option.
 
mrkgoo said:
I think the real answer is that it doesn't involve getting friendly with the natives, nor wiping them out thus no interesting movie.

Probably mining equipment up there is not a feasible option.
Ya, but it looked so real, so hypotheticals are soon to follow. :)
 
lsslave said:
I don't feel like scouring the thread (its pretty big) but have to ask, did anyone else sit through this movie and get a really REALLY big "its a futuristic Pocahontas" vibe from it?
There has been people posting about similarities with other things for months. Actually years since the scriptment has been in circulation for a while.

It happened in our history. White men did indeed fall in love with Indians. We wanted resources from them. We relocated and killed them unjustly.

I don't really know how noble they were. I know they fought wars with other Indians. And some were scalpers. But I know nature was important to them. They used animals instead of wasted them.

When filmmakers study a tribe in Africa the only way to learn about them is to stay among them. There's people who study old cultures for a living.

I think it's ok to take logical influence and tell it in a new way.

By the way the only way to study animals is to film and stay among them. I think JC felt the thrill of that first hand and it has to be a impassioned feeling.
 
Saw this earlier today in IMAX3D. Visually stunning, even though the 3D effects weren't that great. The art direction is just on another level, Pandora and its inhabitants were beautifully "rendered". The story is cliched as expected, but I liked it, no complaints from me on that front.

Another note, I really appreciate how Cameron shoots the action scenes. I am so fucking tired of shaky/quick cutting actions scenes found in recent action films. Overall, I'd probably give it a solid 8.5/10. I will probably catch it again on a regular screen just to see how it is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom