Solo said:No, Ive only seen it in 3D. I wont even try 2D. Thats why Im not gonna buy the Bluray. Im gonna get my fill theatrically.
antiloop said:Saw it yesterday ant it is pure magic. Can't imagine how future films will look. These 3D effects are leagues above everything else. Story and music were good also.
Want to see it in 3D now.
U K Narayan said:What are the chances of the BluRay release using anaglyph? I noticed that there are several BluRay films that use TrioScopic Green/Magenta anaglyph configurations. Coraline uses it. I own that, but I haven't watched it in 3D yet.
I think I'll watch it today just to see how it compares.DoctorWho said:I find the colours don't look as good on Coraline 3D. I'd be curious to see how this holds up.
Yeah, but you need a 120hz TV and all that shit. My TV (Samsung LN40A750) uses AutoMotion Plus 120hz, but I doubt that's what the 3D spec is asking for.Zzoram said:Wasn't a Blu-ray 3D spec finalized just last week? It should be ready by the time the Avatar Blu-ray is out.
Solo said:Interesting thing about the Rottenwatch on this one is that the Top Critics are at 94% while the overall is 82%. That never happens :lol
He's probably referring to the CG used in the film.gdt5016 said:
Zzoram said:Top critics like James Cameron? Or other critics hate Pocahontas?
What is this based on? It's almost certainly incorrect.Zzoram said:You can still buy the Avatar 3D Blu-ray and when you eventually upgrade to a new TV, you'll be able to get the 3D, but otherwise it'll be perfectly good in 2D.
stuburns said:What is this based on? It's almost certainly incorrect.
Thing is if you did you'd still feel like that, in three years you'd want QuadHD, then polarized 3D, then autostereoscopic 3D, and so on. I wouldn't worry about when you decided to bite on a new set, because it was, and will be like this for quite a while.DoctorWho said:I wish I had held for a 120hz TV.I'm getting tired of feeling like I need to change TVs every 3-4 years.
jett said:Nikki Finke has now put up a 72 million estimate for the weekend. Will SMIF reigns supreme.
stuburns said:Thing is if you did you'd still feel like that, in three years you'd want QuadHD, then polarized 3D, then autostereoscopic 3D, and so on. I wouldn't worry about when you decided to bite on a new set, because it was, and will be like this for quite a while.
rhino4evr said:My guess was so close...(75M)
all said in done..that's not GREAT for a movie that cost over 200M to make. Lets hope it has legs..otherwise this will be considered a disappointment.
jett said:Nikki Finke has now put up a 72 million estimate for the weekend. Will SMIF reigns supreme.
ironic that Cameron's movie about saving mother nature loses money because of her.rhino4evr said:My guess was so close...(75M)
all said in done..that's not GREAT for a movie that cost over 200M to make. Lets hope it has legs..otherwise this will be considered a disappointment.
DoctorWho said:I've finally seen it and thought it was a really good film. Visually this is an unparalleled triumph and I think this is meant as a technical showcase first and foremost. The story was good but I though they could have picked up the pace a little during the middle half of the film.
Also,Cameron missed a huge opportunity to reinforce the implications of what would happen to the human race if we couldn't get at the unobtanium. At the end of the film, I felt this was more of a "natives vs. Corporation and PMC" than a Na'Vi vs. the Human Race film. If they had played with the idea that the human race was dying off and that humans needed this natural resource to survive and prosper I think that would have improved my emotional investment ten-fold. I've seen plenty of movies were "THE MAN" is the bad guy and this felt like another one of those. It never once felt like the HUMAN RACE was the villain of this film and I thought that was what Cameron really wanted you to feel.
Playing up the fact that these people (PMC and the corporation) were just in it for profit instead of survival downplayed the absolute need for this resource. Establish that the humans need that resource or die off and then you have a moral "gray" area that you can play with. That story would have been far more interesting. How far would you go to save your own race?
Solo said:Its because her avatar's face was EXACTLY her face, but Navi'd. Whereas Jake's wasnt just Worthington's face. They changed his features.
http://www.reald.com/Content/avatarTheatreLocator.aspxbig black woman said:where do i go to watch this in the best 3D possible? or which 3D is the best? I'm in houston tx.
Yeah I feel sorry for Sherlock right now...Solo said:Next weekend will be fun. I think, based on Avatar WOM, and a gut feeling I have about Sherlock Holmes underperforming, that Avatar might very well hold the top spot.
No, it was somewhat blurry for me as well. I know a fair number of people who had the same experience as mine.PumpkinPie said:I really liked the film, watched it in IMAX 3D but found the image to be quite blurry, maybe it was my eyes not focusing properly.
Please explain.jett said:People that think Fox is gonna slip in proper 3D support in the first video release of AVATAR are in for a surprise. Fox is gonna milk this bitch.
polyh3dron said:Yeah I feel sorry for Sherlock right now...
Monty Mole said:EDIT: GF loved it too. It's technically sci-fi, but feels more fantasy really.
Yup, very similar dragon designs. I noticed it from the trailer and it really held up in the movie. Might be one of the reasons I loved the flying scenes so much.LaneDS said:Was anyone reminded of Panzer Dragoon at all? The appearance of the flying creatures and the bonds between their riders really felt reminiscent of the dragons from PD, and I loved that.
GhaleonEB said:Where are you, Edge?
$73m now.jett said:Nikki Finke has now put up a 72 million estimate for the weekend. Will SMIF reigns supreme.
SUNDAY EARLY AM: Even with depressed grosses because of massive snowstorms in New York, Philadelphia, and Washington DC, 20th Century Fox tells me "we are having a tremendous Saturday" as Avatar finishes -6% compared to Friday. That puts James Cameron's big budget technopic at $27M Friday and $25M for Saturday. With $20M estimated for Sunday, that's now officially a $73M pre-Xmas domestic opening weekend.
NetMapel said:The executive running this Pandora project is that brother guy from Friends. I just can't take him seriously :lol
U K Narayan said:EDIT: ^ SHIT! DP. Sorry.
Please explain.
PumpkinPie said:I really liked the film, watched it in IMAX 3D but found the image to be quite blurry, maybe it was my eyes not focusing properly.
Yours and Cameron's (not the wank red/blue bit though, I'm pretty sure that won't happen).jett said:First BD release will be just 2D(and/or with shit blue/red glasses), then when 3DTVs become more common a new THREE-DEE version will come out.This is my guess.