CassidyIzABeast
Member
ROTF is visual spectacle and LITERALLY nothing else. Still made bank. I'm sure a movie with a little story behind the best visual spectacle in years will do fine
CassidyIzABeast said:ROTF is visual spectacle and LITERALLY nothing else. Still made bank. I'm sure a movie with a little story behind the best visual spectacle in years will do fine
Count Dookkake said:Have any Bayformers fans stepped forward to slag Avatar?
silverbullet1080 said:Because the design of the aliens and mechs look like total ass? And while it's well told, it seems like most reviews seem to agree that the story isn't anything fresh.
Masaki_ said:Style over substance? What kind of stupid reasoning is that? This is a fucking movie. If it's an "outstanding visual masterpiece", then it's an outstanding film.
To put it simply, style IS substance here.
Solo said:Dude, you've read the scriptment :lol
RubxQub said:Hey Sculli, add one of these to the OP:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=382220
Scullibundo said:No, I read the first quarter of the scriptment MORE THAN 4 YEARS ago. I read up until Jake became his AVATAR and thats it. The thing didn't even remotely resemble a proper treatment.
Dabookerman said:When are you seeing this Sculli?
Beat me, I'll be twenty minutes in forty eight hours from now. Woop.Scullibundo said:32.5 hours from now.
rhino4evr said:Was talkng to someone this weekend about this..he thought that Avatar was the name of "the tribe of blue indians". The Avatar tribe :lol
some people just don't pay attention to commercials.
Dabookerman said:96 hours![]()
Scullibundo said:
I'll make sure to see it a second time in that period just for you.
Jtwo said:I had a dream last night that I went to see AVATAR, but got too drunk and blacked out and didn't remember any of it. :lol
Happened to me at the midnight showing of Watchmen.mckmas8808 said:That would suck if it happened for real.
GhaleonEB said:Just a heads up.
RT has updated with one more review (42/46 now) from Time magazine. The review is interesting because it's from someone who somewhat famously trashed Titanic. He talks about that review, and how Avatar is superior to Titanic in his view; it's a very positive review overall.
But he decided to describe the very last shot in the movie in the opening sentence of the review. It's not a huge spoiler. But it's not something I did not appreciated, to put it lightly.
THAT WASN'T NO DREAM, MAN.Jtwo said:I had a dream last night that I went to see AVATAR, but got too drunk and blacked out and didn't remember any of it. :lol
Yeah, that's the one, and yup, it was.Zeliard said:The Richard Corliss one? That was a nicely-written review.
What's worse? That you dreamed about Avatar or that you described the dream in totality to GAF?Jtwo said:I'm kind of depressed I dreamt about AVATAR now.
Combine said:What I really love about Cameron's mech/tech designs are that they are built around a "functional" foundation, where one could see them as machines that could exist and function in the real world.
Most other mechs, especially japanese, are not this way and just are built based on what looks good. I actually think designing a machine that is functional is much more difficult than designing one that just looks pretty.
Jtwo said:The Dream was surprisingly detailed.
I remember getting up to go to the bathroom and slipping on the tile floor. And then like all of a sudden I was wearing sweatpants and no shoes.
And I kept kicking the person the seat in front of me.
The actual "footage" of AVATAR was really weird too, there were like 4 or 5 screens all next to eachother playing the exact same thing.
I'm kind of depressed I dreamt about AVATAR now.
NeonZ said:The robots of this movie were designed just to look pretty though. They looks small and detailed enough to have a vaguely "real" look, but that's it, there was no worry at all about their actual functionality.
The whole cockpit, basically exposed, is an incridebly design oversight and most of the details are just there to make the machines look...detailed. Many don't seem to have any kind of function.
mckmas8808 said:Why do you believe the story and design will be bad?
Posting about it on GAF in my dream and then posting about that on GAF would be worse.Socreges said:What's worse? That you dreamed about Avatar or that you described the dream in totality to GAF?
Dead said:Current tracking for Avatar opening is 72 million
We're waiting on Armond White to meta-troll us with a glowing review.Zeliard said:There isn't exactly a great deal to discuss when the movie isn't out yet.