Giolon said:This was sent to me by a friend this morning and I got a great :lol out of it:
(Spoilers if you've never seen Avatar...or Pocahontas I guess)
http://i.imgur.com/JmRmb.jpg
gdt5016 said:Howard mentioned that Cameron will be in one the show this week. Can't wait!
For non fans, definitely check it out. Probably be a ~1hour interview.
Cameron isn't exactly ready to start the cameras rolling on a follow-up. He'll probably wait until awards season is over at the very least. Whenever he does get started on the continuing story of Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and his Na'vi mate Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), we at least know that he's got a broad strokes plan in mind for where life will take them next.
"We'll follow Jake and Neytiri," Cameron told MTV's Josh Horowitz in an interview at the pre-release "Avatar" junket in London. "I have a trilogy-scaled arc of story right now, but I haven't really put any serious work into writing a script," he said.
Some of the satisfied fans undoubtedly left theaters this past weekend wondering exactly when we might see more of the "Avatar" universe. After all, Cameron's initial idea for the story grew out of an 80-page treatment he penned back in 1995. Will it be another 13 years before we get a return trip to Pandora?
"From the time we capture and finish the capture, it's literally nine to 10 months to get the CG characters working, to get their facial musculature working," he said. "So now we have Jake, we have Neytiri. Sam can step right back into it, the characters will fit them like a glove, and we'll just go on. So a lot of the start-up torque that had to be done for one movie really makes more sense if you play it out across several films."
Presuming the director pulls together a new script in a reasonable amount of time, we could see more "Avatar" as soon as 2012, 2013. Perhaps even sooner, if Cameron gets his way.
"My next goal is to refine the technique, make it easier so it doesn't take as long. We were doing a lot of pioneering work on 'Avatar.' It wouldn't have taken as long if we already knew exactly how to do it."
rhino4evr said:did he say he liked the film? I missed him talk about it, heard him talk about a whole ton of other movies (SAG) though.. :lol
gdt5016 said:Howard mentioned that Cameron will be in one the show this week. Can't wait!
For non fans, definitely check it out. Probably be a ~1hour interview.
gdt5016 said:Robin LOVED it, Howard hasn't seen it yet.
Will it be available on the net?gdt5016 said:Howard mentioned that Cameron will be in one the show this week. Can't wait!
For non fans, definitely check it out. Probably be a ~1hour interview.
Vic said:Will it be available on the net?
oh, I seegdt5016 said:Through nefarious means, yes.
Looks like someone missed the interview Cameron did for Titanic.saiftk said:Excited!!!
Although Howard would focus most of his time on James 5 wives of course. And alimony etc.
It works with Ferngully too.DanielPlainview said:pocahontas.jpg
TAJ said:Looks like someone missed the interview Cameron did for Titanic.
link if possible?TAJ said:Looks like someone missed the interview Cameron did for Titanic.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:I get why Avatar has more appeal in the international markets, but I'm quite surprised that Avatar has a better-than-good shot to top The Dark Knight domestically. Personally, I think that The Dark Knight is easily a much better film, but I suppose that Avatar is more of an 'event' film than TDK and is more likely to get people out to the cinema. I do like Avatar, though.
I think TDK was more of an event - the $156m opening weekend is a testament to that.Snowman Prophet of Doom said:I get why Avatar has more appeal in the international markets, but I'm quite surprised that Avatar has a better-than-good shot to top The Dark Knight domestically. Personally, I think that The Dark Knight is easily a much better film, but I suppose that Avatar is more of an 'event' film than TDK and is more likely to get people out to the cinema. I do like Avatar, though.
The themes of the film are very universal and the story is straight forward enough to translate well.Gui_PT said:Why is that?
Director James Cameron Comes In. 12/17/97. 8:50am
James Cameron who has directed such hit movies as ''Terminator'', ''Terminator 2'', ''True Lies'' and ''The Abyss'' came in to promote his latest movie ''Titanic''. ''Titanic'' opens on Friday. Robin has seen the movie and said it was great. We have to remember that Robin also said that ''The Last Action Hero'' was great also so maybe we should wait until someone more credible sees the movie. Mr. Cameron talked about how he got into the movie business after being a truck driver. He also said that he won't be making any money off of ''Titanic'' because he gave up the rights to it. He said he went a bit over his $120 Million budget so he gave up his part of the deal. The movie ended up being $200 Million to produce. He said that he enjoyed ''Private Parts''. He also said that he may be directing a ''Spiderman'' movie sometime in the future. This interested Howard because he said he'd like to see a good ''Spiderman'' movie since most comic book movies are pretty bad. James said that the rights to the Spiderman character are kind of screwed up right now so he's not sure if it'll work out. He also wrote the script for it. James is married to Linda Hamilton who you may remember from the ''Terminator'' movies. One of his wives left him because he wanted to go and make movies. She's probably kicking herself now. Mr. Cameron had to leave shortly after coming in because he had to catch a plane to Mexico to meet with the President.
Gui_PT said:Why is that?
Vic said:link if possible?
GhaleonEB said:I think TDK was more of an event - the $156m opening weekend is a testament to that.
Or maybe it's better to say they both are, but people didn't realize it until after Avatar opened.
The themes of the film are very universal and the story is straight forward enough to translate well.
It's doing well because it's a great movie and people like it. It's hard to pin down something like why a movie does well with a broad, international audience. But I think the topics it addresses and the way it does so are probably more universally appealing than say, Batman, which seems to be more popular in the US; certainly the weighting of TDK's domestic versus international take indicates that.Gui_PT said:Well I'm "international" and I can honestly tell you that a movie being more or less general is not an important factor at all. Most of the other people I know are the same way.
It might be a factor, but I highly doubt that is why the movie is doing so well internationally
True, TDK was billed as more of an event movie and openend as such - though it seems like Avatar is a better demonstration of what that means.Snowman Prophet of Doom said:Well, the opening of The Dark Knight was more of an event, I'll give you that. I guess I meant 'event' in the sense that the actual process of going to the movie and seeing it on the big screen seems to be more present with Avatar than with The Dark Knight. Outside of the scenes filmed for IMAX, nothing in TDK was really necessary to see in a theater, whereas I have heard many, many people on television, in print, and on the radio say that this is definitely one that needs to be seen in the theater for the experience to be 'complete'.
Um... I've always listened to his show the old-fashioned way, even after they started charging for it. I'd have no idea where to look. A portion of it was on his TV show on E!, though.Vic said:link if possible?
TAJ said:Um... I've always listened to his show the old-fashioned way, even after they started charging for it. I'd have no idea where to look. A portion of it was on his TV show on E!, though.
VelvetMouth said:And so the backlash begins.
old.jpg
My favorite part was at the end, when they wanted him to record promos for the show. He just glanced at the sheet with his lines, then recited them a couple times without looking at it. That part was on TV, too.gdt5016 said:No, so do I.
I just wondered if anyone has a link for it. Many people keeps archives for one reason or another.
GhaleonEB said:It's doing well because it's a great movie and people like it. But I think the topics it addresses and the way it does so are probably more appealing than say, Batman, which seems to be more popular in the US; certainly the weighting of TDK's domestic versus international take indicates that.
Gui_PT said:Well I'm "international" and I can honestly tell you that a movie being more or less general is not an important factor at all. Most of the other people I know are the same way.
It might be a factor, but I highly doubt that is why the movie is doing so well internationally
skybaby said:This movie is huge here in Brazil. I just looked for every theater that sells tickets online and every session for the rest the day is sold out. ON A MONDAY. crazy shit
Yeah. And to be fair, I'm purely speculating; I don't think this is a question we can really answer right now. I think part of the reason was touched on earier on this page - Cameron has created something so visually rich that people want to see it in theaters, a sentiment which seems to be universal. The way Avatar has been tracking internationally has been nearly lockstep with its domestic performance, so he's clearly hit a nerve (again!) that very few seeem to touch on.Gui_PT said:Well , you have a point there. But I still don't think it makes a big difference.
Problem is, I spend most of my days in the internet, which gives me more of an "americanized" mentality. So that might give me a different view on things compared to other people
I liked the movie a lot, but I think this is kind of funny. :lolVelvetMouth said:And so the backlash begins.
![]()
And to be fair, Cameron said he pitched the movie to Fox as Fern Gully in space. So I think he knew the comparisons.roman2003h said:I liked the movie a lot, but I think this is kind of funny. :lol
VelvetMouth said:And so the backlash begins.