CassidyIzABeast
Member
should have been in the movie. Here's hoping its in the sequel
Somnia said:So the 8th Annual VES (Visual Effects Society) just announced their nominations for this years awards. Avatar is nominated for 11 awards (cannot win them all due to being nominated multiple times in some categories though). I am going to quote which catgeories its nominated in below along with its competition, though I think it will win pretty much every category it's up for. http://www.visualeffectssociety.com/group/ves-member/ves-announces-nominees-8th-annual-ves-awards
1138 said:Avatar trailer made up of Pocahontas clips:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdIIqoDakHU
I found this a couple of minutes ago, i don't know if it has been posted but i thought it was pretty funny.
Black-Wind said:I just noticed something . . . is there a reason why Grace's Avatar has a human nose?
Like, people are saying either its because she has one-of-if-not-the first Avatar before they out everything ooooorrr they simply wanted he Avatar to look more like her. Its there a correct answer to this? And if the 2nd one then is there a reason why they wanted that?
JGS said:Since the Avatars are technically half human DNA (right?)., Grace's nose had the dominant gene.
I actually wondered why there would be a need to mix the DNA anyway. Was it not possible to simply make a Na'vi clone or did the brains have to match up?
I'm sure it was explained & I have forgotten since.
Well, Tarantino has now seen everything and has quickly put together a final list. It showed up in British tabloid writer Baz Bamigboye's Daily Mail update (via The Playlist and contains most of those old films as well as some interesting new ones. "My movie aside, I cannot NOT list Avatar at the top," Tarantino said.
Tarantino's Top 11 Films of 2009:
1. Avatar
2. Star Trek
3. Drag Me to Hell
4. Funny People
5. Zombieland
6. Chocolate
7. Observe & Report
8. The Hurt Locker
9. Julie & Julia
10. Up in the Air
11. District 9
Read more: http://www.firstshowing.net/2010/01...ar-to-his-top-11-films-of-2009/#ixzz0dAgBbwJV
gdt5016 said:Tarrantino is loving this movie, eh?
EARTH SHOTS
The Earth Shots (one shot for the Pedestrian Crossing and 13 for the Alley) were Set Extensions that were designed specifically for 3D screening. Only the foreground was actually shot - against green screen. BUF created and integrated the background set according to the references provided by the production, adapting them to the filmed shots (aerial train, holographic commercials and surrounding buildings).
CROSSWALK
For this scene, only two medium close passes of the crowd were shot. The only visible part of the set includes the street in the foreground and the changing of the traffic light. To simulate the strip lighting, the extras were lit by blinking colored lights.
Taking into account the initial camera move on the foreground crowd plates, the shot features a wide introductory view on the crowded futuristic city. Because the stereoscopic view is more demanding than in 2D films, the depth and placement of the buildings has to be very precise and coherent. Once the main buildings were placed and the overall architecture defined, thecrowd was created, thus matching the live takes and perfectly integrating them into the 3D environment ambiance.
BUF's Art Department, led by Olivier Gilbert, also designed the holographic commercials (the Media Sky") and billboards that populate the city. For the Full-CG commercials, we shot a few characters to integrate them in the designs of the ads. All of the Mediasky was developed with the stereo in mind, accentuating the impression of depth by enhancing the parallax between them. This is why some commercials might seem very flat if seen in 2D, while in 3D they show much more depth.
These two Earth sequences have trains that run through them. Each train was modeled and textured independently then filled with 3D extras. Next, each train was animated, lit and integrated into the shots. Due to the very bright and busy environment with heavy strip lighting and commercials, the lighting and placement of reflections were crucial to achieving realism. Additionally, the placement of the raised train tracks and their supports as well as the skyscrapers had to be very precise to ensure that the depth would be realistic when projected in stereo.
Finally, we created the Laser Pedestrian Crossing. The challenge here was that director Cameron wanted the crosswalk be floating six inches above the ground. This meant that all of legs of the characters would cross through it. This work was quite complex as we had to match-move the live characters in stereo to ensure that the interaction between the Laser Crossing and the legs would work.
EARTH ALLEY
Only the foreground of the set was shot live (the entry to the alley, back door and actors) were shot. The rest of the shot is Full CG. To achieve the best results for set extension, careful attention was paid to maintain the continuity between the filmed foreground and the CG set background. The architecture, the wet reflective materials such as walls, the ground, pipes, the blinking lights and the ground full of puddles we created had to match the live plates for shape and texture. Reflections in this very humid, dark environment also required great attention to detail. We had to ensure that the waves in the puddles would distort the reflections of the commercials in a natural manner and appear correctly in stereo. Haze and mist were also added to recreate the dark and humid atmosphere of the sequence, all in stereo. From the three points of views of the sequence, the most dramatic features are the trains and the Mediasky. It was very important to place the commercials and light the set to match the lighting on the actors. Since the shots were filmed against green screen, the resulting images were very green so quite a bit of color-correction was required to restore the actual color of the alley.
In addition, the continuity between live action and CG had to work for all points of view. Since these shots show a lot of depth, the camera calibration required a lot of precision because even a tiny difference in the spacing between the two cameras could result in a huge difference in depth perception.
Dead said:Another video of the Directors roundtable where they discuss what was the one scene they hated losing the most
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/mov...ectors-roundtable-the-scene-i-had-to-cut.html
Cameron says its the Tsu'teySays it was 100% finished and was struggling to cut it or not and took it out and put it back in a few times, and eventually took it out at the last minute. He sort of implies it will be in the special "fan" edition.death scene
I understand, and kind of agree with his reasoning, still it will be nice to see in an alternate cut of the film.
The other articles are great too--The Road isn't exactly an effects-heavy movie, but it was still a fantastic behind-the-scenes look. I, too, might actually subscribe--it seems like a really quality publication, and I can see why it's considered an industry standard. It was cool to see all the advertisements from Cameron and co. thanking the effects companies for their work, too (and vice versa, especially the ad from Framestore that called it "probably the most ambitious movie ever made"). I realize that the Avatar segment is available for free online (though it's extremely difficult to find) but I encourage you all to actually buy the issue. It's just really well-done overall, from the content to the articles to the binding.Somnia said:Just got my issue of the Cinefex in. The quality of this magazine is amazing. I think I might set up a subscription now. Haven't got to read any of the articles just yet, but was def. worth the $12.50!
Fastest to $100 million 24
Fastest to $150 million 18
Fastest to $200 million 10
Fastest to $250 million 6
Fastest to $300 million 3
Fastest to $350 million 2
Fastest to $400 million 2
Fastest to $450 million 2
Fastest to $500 million 1
Somnia said:BOM update from their twitter regarding Tuesday #'s
"giteshpandya Avatar makes $4.2M on TUE -17% vs. last wk. Will pass Dark Knight on SAT for #2 spot on all time dom list in just 37 days."
-17%...I was guessing for a -25% or so drop due to coming off the holidays, but -17% is just =O
Dead said:Another video of the Directors roundtable where they discuss what was the one scene they hated losing the most
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/mov...ectors-roundtable-the-scene-i-had-to-cut.html
Cameron says its the Tsu'teySays it was 100% finished and was struggling to cut it or not and took it out and put it back in a few times, and eventually took it out at the last minute. He sort of implies it will be in the special "fan" edition.death scene
I understand, and kind of agree with his reasoning, still it will be nice to see in an alternate cut of the film.
Dead said:![]()
http://www.buf.fr/visual_effects.php?display=gallery&id=946
Buf are the company who worked on teh Earth scenes. They were supposedly completely finished.
Sharp said:The other articles are great too--The Road isn't exactly an effects-heavy movie, but it was still a fantastic behind-the-scenes look. I, too, might actually subscribe--it seems like a really quality publication, and I can see why it's considered an industry standard. It was cool to see all the advertisements from Cameron and co. thanking the effects companies for their work, too (and vice versa, especially the ad from Framestore that called it "probably the most ambitious movie ever made"). I realize that the Avatar segment is available for free online (though it's extremely difficult to find) but I encourage you all to actually buy the issue. It's just really well-done overall, from the content to the articles to the binding.
Dead said:
Pretty sure it is, yes, which is impressive for a non-summer movie. I think the record for consecutive days over 1 million is probably out of reach, though--Titanic has it and it's over 100.turnbuckle said:Amazing. I know it broke the record for most days over $5m, but I imagine it's done the same for consecutive days over $4m as well. I'm seeing it my 4th time this weekend, and I still have to check for tickets ahead of time because they still are selling out.
Sharp said:Pretty sure it is, yes, which is impressive for a non-summer movie. I think the record for consecutive days over 1 million is probably out of reach, though--Titanic has it and it's over 100.
ryutaro's mama said:Holy crap, that shot is EXACTLY as it was described in the scriptment.
I'm soooooo hyped.
jett said:Heh, I love how he considers the theatrical cuts his director's cuts. True director's cuts of T2 and Aliens ftw, sorry sculli.![]()
turnbuckle said:Yeah, that Titanic record seems impossible. The only way that happens is if theatres keep extending its run on their 3D screens.
PantherLotus said:Does anybody get that Tarantino's list is in backwards order?
vicktormerv said:Well, the article states its in no real order, and that avatar isnt his top pick either
so, lol
"My movie aside, I cannot NOT list Avatar at the top," Tarantino said.
vicktormerv said:Well, the article states its in no real order, and that avatar isnt his top pick either
so, lol
"My movie aside, I cannot NOT list Avatar at the top," Tarantino said.
I mean yes, it will be interesting because it could mean Avatar gets past $700 million, but I don't think it will really help its chances at this particular record. It would literally need another ten weeks of consecutive million-plus dollar days from here; even if it maintains drops of 17% week-to-week (which is pretty absurdly unlikely) it goes below a million around week nine. Of course, if it drops like that, by the time that happens it will have made another $68 million on weekdays alone, $151 million more on weekends, and be coming off of a $9 million+ weekend, adding it to its $720+ million gross and nowhere near the end of its run.Somnia said:Well we should hear soon how long the IMAX extensions are going to be, but it sounds like it will be extended on IMAX (will run along with Alice apparently) and theaters are also extending their 3D count 10 more weeks. Will be interesting.
Sharp said:I mean yes, it will be interesting because it could mean Avatar gets past $700 million, but I don't think it will really help its chances at this particular record. It would literally need another ten weeks of consecutive million-plus dollar days from here; even if it maintains drops of 17% week-to-week (which is pretty absurdly unlikely) it goes below a million around week nine. Of course, if it drops like that, by the time that happens it will have made another $68 million on weekdays alone, $151 million more on weekends, and be coming off of a $9 million+ weekend, adding it to its $720+ million gross and nowhere near the end of its run.
All of which is to say, even in a ridiculously unlikely scenario like the one I just outlined (but one I'm not willing to rule out entirely given Avatar's run so far) Titanic doesn't really have anything to worry about when it comes to that particular record.
Yeah, I think $650m is a pretty reasonable low-end projection, though I wouldn't necessarily call it the minimum. $700m is doable but will be a challenge, and if it does cross that mark I suspect it does it just barely a la Titanic.Somnia said:Oops sorry didn't mean to imply it would get that record was only commenting on you part about loss of 3D screens...I fully agree titanic will keep that record.
There is a good possibility that Avatar is going to end up at 700+ at this point. With Presidents Day weekend coming up it will yet again see a decent Holiday weekend on top of getting Oscar buzz which will help also. Avatar should be at 550m by the end of this weekend and will pass Titanic between Feb. 1st-3rd imo. Then Oscar buzz should kick in and keep its legs going. Who knows how high it will go, but I see 650m at the minimum at this point.
I think the only Jesus relation to the scene is that Jakes life on earth is pretty much dead and his life on Pandora afterwards is essentially his rebirth.vicktormerv said:Fix'd, didn't catch the double negative, anyway, Im just hoping cameron can take into some new territories in terms of the story itself, (i.e. something other then the jesus cliché )
Well, less than a month ago the movie had just come out. So I think I'll forgive you this one point.Sharp said:Yeah, I think $650m is a pretty reasonable low-end projection, though I wouldn't necessarily call it the minimum. $700m is doable but will be a challenge, and if it does cross that mark I suspect it does it just barely a la Titanic.
Edit: I will confess to calling $650m an unattainable upper bound less than a month ago, so take my box office prognosis with a grain of salt.
Dead said:
tarantino list
It's a good read, but the editorial note due to the timing of release literally made me laugh out loud.Scullibundo said:Rolling Stone article on 'The Impossible Reality of James Cameron'. Seems to have been written a while ago but just released.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31820418/the_impossible_reality_of_james_cameron
Yup. I read through most of the rest of it yesterday, and couldn't come up with a snippet to talk about here. It goes into such detail that it's very hard to summarize. The ways they describe the various methods Cameron and company overcame technical and logistical challenges - often with hilariously low-tech solutions (blocking out the banshee and helicopter flight paths by walking around the set with hand-held models) was just incredibly fascinating.jett said:After reading around half of the Cinefex article and skimming through the rest, it's unfortunate that they seemingly don't talk about the stereoscopic aspect of the movie at all(except for one line). I really would like to know how did the amazing window/glass/reflection 3D effect came about and how it was realized, it's something that I have never seen before.
Other than that, it's an incredibly in-depth article. Sure you can quote it here and there, but it's impossible to summarize. If you are truly interested in knowing pretty much everything regarding how this movie was shot and made, this is what you need.