Desprado123
Member
RTX 4080 Super is now beating RX 7900 XTX with the margin of 3% average on 1440P Ancient Gameplays Latest Benchmark video.
However lows are still better on RX 7900 XTX.
However lows are still better on RX 7900 XTX.
When it was released it was 5% to 10% and some pro title it was 20% better.Now beating, as in is this news?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the 4080S already beat the 7900XTX around that 5% margin? I'm talking raster alone, no RT or DLSS.
Also raster is ancient the RT future is now old man!I thought "ancient gameplay" was a joke about how AMD biased reviewers use ancient games for how "good" AMD have gotten at RT (F1, Shadow Of Tomb Raider) LMAO
I had a 7900 XTX. It isn't worth it, RT instantly downgrades the card a generation. It's also the only experience I've had in decades where games crash with a "driver timeout" error and other bizarre things.
And if you're buying a card like this, it ain't for 1440p.
I had a 7900 XTX. It isn't worth it, RT instantly downgrades the card a generation. It's also the only experience I've had in decades where games crash with a "driver timeout" error and other bizarre things.
Different people, different expirience, i have 2 people with 5700XT since start, working like a charmThe 5700XT I suggested my brother to buy and he got 2 year of black screens with many peoples
i've had 670, and league of legends a lot was crashing, until nv fix it.Years of using Nvidia - zero issues related to drivers.
There is no 7090. 9700XT is AMD's biggest card this year. Rumored to be around 4080 Super / 7900 XTX level but for a $500-600 price point.I have had a 5700 XT since 2019 and rarely have I had an issue with any update or drivers. My card is on the low end for many AAA games of today, but it served me well all these years and I spent less than $500 after taxes for it when I first purchased it. I have played most games I want to play in the 1440P range and some older or less stressful titles at 4K. The top of the line card back in 2019 when I purchased this card was a 2080 TI, and it was a $1000, and I was never going to pay that amount for a card back then. I believe competition for the 5700 XT was a 2070 for $499.99 plus taxes, and all in all I think I made a good choice and have no regrets about my 5700 XT.
Now that more games I want to play are requiring a bump in VRAM and ray tracing, I am going to have to make a decision between AMD and Nvidia once again. I'm leaning toward AMD again because of how well my 5700 XT worked out for me all these years. I will be looking at RX 7090 XT very seriously when it is announced. If the price to performance ratio is good then I will be getting it.
5700XT black screens were extremely common, ignoring such problems is what have gotten AMD almost extinct from the GPU space.Different people, different expirience, i have 2 people with 5700XT since start, working like a charm
were, but not all people have it5700XT black screens were extremely common
if around 4080 level, more like 650$$500-600 price point.
5070ti is minimum, 5070 with anemic VRAM againa bump in VRAM and ray tracing, I am going to have to make a decision between AMD and Nvidia once again
I posted this topic because generally people believe that AMD GPU are aged well and Nvidia GPU performance decreases overtime when new GPU is about to launch or new game with new features.
Even Ancient was shocked during the video he said that AMD has advantage of RDNA on Console and still it is lagging behind is shocking for him at least.
Thing is 7900 XTX can be had for like $850 in US on sale. That's usually at least $200 under 4080 Super and in most games AMD is near 4080S performance even with RT (outside say Cyberpunk).I posted this topic because generally people believe that AMD GPU are aged well and Nvidia GPU performance decreases overtime when new GPU is about to launch or new game with new features.
Even Ancient was shocked during the video he said that AMD has advantage of RDNA on Console and still it is lagging behind is shocking for him at least.
It's not unusual for me to play 10+ year old games. I'm sure AMD drivers are good enough for the latest triple A releases but old/obscure games I wouldn't chance it.AMD drivers are good only in eyes of fanboys.
Years of using Nvidia - zero issues related to drivers.
Few months using AMD - few problems caused by drivers.
That's my experience. Most games run completely fine but drivers are not on Nvidia level of being almost problem free.
Flight sim?How many titles actually use more than 16GB on PC right now?
a bit dropped this monthNvidia rules with a 90% market share
NV also have with old games problems.but old/obscure games I wouldn't chance it.
AMD drivers are good only in eyes of fanboys.
Years of using Nvidia - zero issues related to drivers.
Few months using AMD - few problems caused by drivers.
That's my experience. Most games run completely fine but drivers are not on Nvidia level of being almost problem free.
Oops! Lol, I meant RX 9070 XT. Stupid AMD naming decisions! I will edit that.There is no 7090. 9700XT is AMD's biggest card this year. Rumored to be around 4080 Super / 7900 XTX level but for a $500-600 price point.