you can stream in hd from rtl website, costs 4 euro for the whole thing and you get the english commentary.It's a shame that not all matches get broadcasted over here. Rugby is a bit of a marginal sport in the Netherlands.
you can stream in hd from rtl website, costs 4 euro for the whole thing and you get the english commentary.
uses silverlight though which is shitty, no chrome and cant cast it to telly.
not sure quite likely yeah is it all free to air on itv?Couldn't he just use a simple proxy like Hola extension and set it to the UK and watch through ITV.Player?
Sean O'Brien will surely be cited. Will miss the quarters if so.
Especially since one of our (Scotland) best players is Dutch. Tim Visser has maybe been a bit quieter recently but i still think our team is much stronger when he is in it.It's a shame that not all matches get broadcasted over here. Rugby is a bit of a marginal sport in the Netherlands.
Id rather play France than Ireland atm, was always gonna be a tough quarter final. If your gonna win the world cup you have to beat the best teams.France in Cardiff during the quarterfinals... Bugger..
Judging by this performance the French have nothing in their armoury to bother New Zealand. They're a big, nasty pack but all they have is physical strength. Ireland dismantled them at set piece and got the better of the breakdown. They have no real attacking set plays other than using the forwards to bash it and then using Bastereud to either bash it as well or as a decoy. In fact Bastereud was mostly anonymous today. We were quick up in a defensive line whenever he got the ball and he didn't have enough time to get up a head of steam so he was nullified.France in Cardiff during the quarterfinals. Bugger..
Classy.
Although it's a bit swings and roundabouts.
France's strategy seems to be cripple the important players early and take advantage in the confusion. They said they were going to target Sexton for the match and they did. Once Sexton was gone it was like "What do we do now?"
Ireland did a great job to power through and the players stepped up.
I wonder if France will try the strategy again with All Blacks.
Honestly too many players were injured but I didn't see any dirty tactics. So I don't know how you can say that it was a strategy to cripple irish players. You're being really unfair here.
Also just want to say good job OP, loving the timely updates to the OT! Keep em coming.
The French had told the press before the game that they were going to target Sexton. No dirty tackles, for sure, but they said what they said.
They said they needed to throw him off his game because he was ireland's best asset. I don't see anything wrong in what they said or did during the game so don't say that french players intentionally crippled your players. That's just disengenuous.
simply a case of sabre-rattling if you like, but after the result, I don't agree that it's disingenuous to posit that they may have been actively attempting to take him out, even with legal means.I am going to hunt him down as often as possible. We are going to go after him 200 per cent because he is the strong man of this team.
No change he gets away with it. Clear as day.
Gutted Japan missed out. The Scots should be kissing the feet of whoever came up with the draw because it really did screw Japan over. If a tier 1 team had to play two other tier 1 teams with only a 3 day break between them, the complaining would've been epic (and understandable).
I'd have to respectfully disagree with you on that. I agree that they didn't do anything dirty on the pitch toward Sexton, but the rhetoric beforehand paints a big target on him. You can call simply a case of sabre-rattling if you like, but after the result, I don't agree that it's disingenuous to posit that they may have been actively attempting to take him out, even with legal means.
Frankly, I'm not bothered by it that much. The French have always said they will target the kicker in our games. I recall many instances with it happening with O'Gara before Sexton. The French are a rough side, and we often get a lot of injuries out of it. Not frequently to this extent, though. Certainly O'Connell's injury is simply showing his age -- he is retiring after the tournament anyway.
Well I agree with everything you said but I still don't see how you leap from that to " French players were out there to cripple irish players ".
Why would you single out french players when the only player who should be criticized ITT is O'brien http://www.leparisien.fr/coupe-du-m...on-de-o-brien-sur-pape-11-10-2015-5176169.php (video at the link). Except from two or three posts saying that he'll probably get suspended, I've seen 0 outrage. And yet apparently it's french players who are the devil.
You know we've had our fair share of injuries during the previous games, right ? And it's not because we're the rougher team, it's because the game in general has gotten way too rough.
Disagree with this. Wales played England and Fiji in the same situation and won both without too much complaining. And their team was full of injuries to boot.
Plus, you have to bear in mind Scotland were third seeds when the draw was made.
Do feel for Japan, but as a Scot I'm a little bit bored of people seeming to suggest the only reason we won was due to the 4 day break. We beat USA by 23 points after they had a week rest, Scotland had 4 days.
Japan beat them by 10 points last night after USA had 4 days off after playing South Africa, whilst Japan had 7.
Obviously the 4 days helped Scotland but the claim that it was the only reason bugs me - Scotland played well that day.
Considering Scotlands players all play professionally at a high level our fitness levels would have been higher even without the 4 day break.Well if we're going to just decide possible results based on other results, how about we use each teams respective games against South Africa or Samoa instead? Or don't they count?
You don't need to do any of that though, you can just look at the game they played against each other. It was a close game up until the second half, when Japan's fitness levels collapsed and Scotland ran away with it.
Sean O'Brien will surely be cited. Will miss the quarters if so.
Considering Scotlands players all play professionally at a high level our fitness levels would have been higher even without the 4 day break.
Do I think the 4 day break contributed? Absolutely. Would the result have been any different? Probably not.
Do feel for Japan, but as a Scot I'm a little bit bored of people seeming to suggest the only reason we won was due to the 4 day break. We beat USA by 23 points after they had a week rest, Scotland had 4 days.
Japan beat them by 10 points last night after USA had 4 days off after playing South Africa, whilst Japan had 7.
Obviously the 4 days helped Scotland but the claim that it was the only reason bugs me - Scotland played well that day.
Well if we're going to just decide possible results based on other results, how about we use each teams respective games against South Africa or Samoa instead? Or don't they count?
You don't need to do any of that though, you can just look at the game they played against each other. It was a close game up until the second half, when Japan's fitness levels collapsed and Scotland ran away with it.
Edit: Also, if your argument is that Japan should have the same kind of depth and recoverability as Scotland then I think you're missing the point. They're still a tier 2 country.
Well if we're going to just decide possible results based on other results, how about we use each teams respective games against South Africa or Samoa instead? Or don't they count?
You don't need to do any of that though, you can just look at the game they played against each other. It was a close game up until the second half, when Japan's fitness levels collapsed and Scotland ran away with it.
Edit: Also, if your argument is that Japan should have the same kind of depth and recoverability as Scotland then I think you're missing the point. They're still a tier 2 country.
France went in hard and fair I'd say most Irish realise that. Just unfortunate it injured some of our guys. Targeting a player is different from going out to injure someone and I don't think they went out to injure Jonny. We all see differently when a game is on and the adrenaline is high.Quarters? His world cup is over
It's hilarious to see what was the rhetoric on this topic yesterday and that the actual dirty play was actually from an Irish. They should have played at 14 basically all the match. I suppose it's a good revenge for Thierry Henry's hand lol.
France sucked yesterday btw
But surely that's what everyone who points out that Scotland only won because Japan had a 4 day rest are doing - looking at another result to try and gauge what they think 'should' have happened when Scotland played Japan. All I'm saying is that it's a lot more complex than just the 4 day rest period - there are so many other factors at play - South Africa being complacent, Japan playing the game of their lives - that even though the 4 day rest was a factor, it's not the only one.
Also, when New Zealand win, a lot of commentators talk about how they keep going and tire the opposition out - this is seen as good game management. When Scotland do the same - using the vagaries of the match day draws to their advantage, they're seen as somehow being just lucky. For example, Scotland made 192 tackles - I think a commentator mentioned that around 120 tackles of those were in the first half when Japan were at their fittest, but they only got over the try line once, which seems to suggest we knew how to defend their game plan.
I'm really not saying that we would have definitely beaten Japan if both had been fully rested - I'm just saying that a lot of people think that is the only deciding factor in our win. It's not, but we'll never be able to know that!