JosephManderley
Member
If Microsoft do announce the Nextbox at CES, do you think there is a chance they could actually beat Nintendo to the punch and get their console out first?
If Microsoft do announce the Nextbox at CES, do you think there is a chance they could actually beat Nintendo to the punch and get their console out first?
Yes, but we wouldn't want them trapped within the limitations of last-gen components.
If these consoles are going to last us a good bit without being upgradable (that's a given), we're going to need the initial splash to draw us in.
DDR3 has become cheap, and the graphic cards still using such technology have become ridiculously discounted to a point where the consumer is getting paid to clear out such technology. (Well here in Canada, rebates forever!)
There is being callous, granted, but what allure do the systems have if they aren't able to compete with the PC? All this, and the possibility of cloud gaming has got me thinking if all game compatible systems will work in harmony for online play.
If we are going for egregious spending and risky choices, then my choice is Sony, they have proven themselves capable of that numerous times.
It would be better to delay these system until 2013, but we can only speculate the hardware and nitpick the selection for now.
Let's do a bgassasin post here:
If Microsoft do announce the Nextbox at CES, do you think there is a chance they could actually beat Nintendo to the punch and get their console out first?
No. Nintendo will be first. They don't have a choice at this point. The Wii is fading fast.
Needing to be first ≠ being first.
So basically, the primary argument that Microsoft won't release their next gen console by the end of this year boils down to the fact that HALO 4 comes out the same year??
As important as 343 Studios release will be for Microsoft, somehow I do not think that this single game will be a deciding factor in Microsoft's very complex decision (involving a million other factors) on wether they are willing and able to launch within 2012.
That and the fact that by now, we would have had much more background chatter about the machine then we would have if it was over a year away from launch.
Almost 3,900 posts in this thread alone. I would consider that a pretty good example of "background chatter", with all due respect.
He meant background chatter from people that matter.
like twitts / hints / leaks from devs.
[Nintex];33992678 said:
Something along the lines of, "just finished play testing the 4th mission of our [next gen] game", would reveal a bit more. Launch games should be playable now, and yet you have semi-accurate saying devs are still in the dark.
shouldn't those tweets come like after a reveal.
Something along the lines of, "just finished play testing the 4th mission of our [next gen] game", would reveal a bit more. Launch games should be playable now, and yet you have semi-accurate saying devs are still in the dark.
If the launch is less than a year away, we should be hearing hints about the state of launch games / projects.
Wii U is 6-9 months away and we know pretty much zero about the state of launch games.
Sony is the least likely to pull another PS3 next gen. They are not in the position to do so, financially.
If the launch is less than a year away, we should be hearing hints about the state of launch games / projects.
Rumors point that devs first started receiving kits after E3 2011, giving them around 1.5 years to make a launch game if a 2012 release date is true.
If Xbox Next and PS4 are coming out in 2015, I can see chances for DDR4 being used.
Low yield parts in mass produced hardware ftw.
I don´t understand how a Halo 4 release would be an argument against a release of a new Xbox this year.
I am no Halo fan, but if I recall correctly Halo 4 would be the start of a new trilogy, meaning there is going to be a Halo 5 and 6. Are you telling me that Halo 4-6 will only be released on X360 only? Or if you think that Halo 5 and 6 is going next gen, wouldn´t you think that Halo 4 must also be on the new Xbox considering it´s a trilogy?
If anything I would think Halo 4 would be a great launch game for a new Xbox (with some extra effects vs the 360 version). Or at worst just be X360 backwards compatible.
Microsoft / 343 / Frankie has been extremely vocal in saying that Halo 4 is for the 360 and only the 360.
5 and 6 will of course be for the next console, but 4 is a 360 product.
Microsoft / 343 / Frankie has been extremely vocal in saying that Halo 4 is for the 360 and only the 360.
5 and 6 will of course be for the next console, but 4 is a 360 product.
We'll see StevieP, as far as I can tell, they show no signs of slowing down.
If they fall, they just pick themselves right back up.
PS2, PSP, PS3, PSVita, all got off to a rocky start, and were costly to develop.
Exactly, we wait a while for the ram to become cheaper, and then implement it into the system as an investment, because DDR4 will eventually become the norm.
Then 4 will be backwards compatible and work on the new Xbox as well.
Vita is the "more careful" Sony at work, and is a lot more "normal" than PS2/PS3/etc were.
Are you advocating for a manufacturer to wait for a future date DDR4 yields to become acceptable solely to launch a console? lol
Then why would the mainstream consumer buy a new, expensive, Xbox when the current 360 at home plays his most wanted game for the year just fine?
If MS does release this year, I am incredibly interested in seeing how they will handle Halo 4 and all of that.
Then why would the mainstream consumer buy a new, expensive, Xbox when the current 360 at home plays his most wanted game for the year just fine?
Then why would the mainstream consumer buy a new, expensive, Xbox when the current 360 at home plays his most wanted game for the year just fine?
If MS does release this year, I am incredibly interested in seeing how they will handle Halo 4 and all of that.
That 2 GB needs to be 4 or 6.
If we want to cautious, and lose moved units due to time wasted, yes!
If we want to be the normal Sony at work and offer something flashy, no.
Sony is unpredictable; but I have a feeling they will be flashy again.
And besides, in the current market, everything gets marked down considerably after a few months on store shelves, I wouldn't worry about it when it comes to DDR4. Like I said, we have the PSVita to keep us occupied, if ever they decide to play it slow.
It's always an extreme with Sony, one way or another, they seek to amaze you.
I just can't see the two top systems (in terms of performance) using DDR3, one will need to splurge.
SMT said:Vinterbird, if we wait a few years from now, our current systems will become obsolete, which is why we will need the new gadgetry, not for another 2-3 years however.
Why is that?
As if they'd admit that they're working on that before the console was announced?Microsoft / 343 / Frankie has been extremely vocal in saying that Halo 4 is for the 360 and only the 360.
5 and 6 will of course be for the next console, but 4 is a 360 product.
Then why would the mainstream consumer buy a new, expensive, Xbox when the current 360 at home plays his most wanted game for the year just fine?
If MS does release this year, I am incredibly interested in seeing how they will handle Halo 4 and all of that.
It's always an extreme with Sony, one way or another, they seek to amaze you.
I don´t understand how a Halo 4 release would be an argument against a release of a new Xbox this year.
I am no Halo fan, but if I recall correctly Halo 4 would be the start of a new trilogy, meaning there is going to be a Halo 5 and 6. Are you telling me that Halo 4-6 will only be released on X360 only? Or if you think that Halo 5 and 6 is going next gen, wouldn´t you think that Halo 4 must also be on the new Xbox considering it´s a trilogy?
If anything I would think Halo 4 would be a great launch game for a new Xbox (with some extra effects vs the 360 version). Or at worst just be X360 backwards compatible.
Sorry bit of a double post here-As if they'd admit that they're working on that before the console was announced?
It's classic David Jaffe denying that he's working on Twisted Metal and naive fans believing his white lie. These devs have to consider business first. I'm not saying that it's a sure thing that Halo 4 will be for the 360's successor or that it'll have some souped-up backwards compatibility, I'm saying that you won't know for sure until Halo 4 and the 360's successor are fully unveiled.
Yep
PS1 -> PS2 = 13.3X
N64 -> Gamecube = 10.75X
Xbox -> Xbox 360 = 8.16X
PS2 -> PS3 = 12.8X
2GB would only be 3.92X
halo 4 can be prob up-specced to xbox 720
Halo 4 is going to be 360 only Frankie has even said they dont even have a new Xbox dev kit in the studio as of now.