• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rush Limbaugh = "Fat ass drug addict"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Woah, a Democrat with some balls. From the guy who called the President a "son of a bitch," and told Republicans that even though he didn't vote for the President, he'd "still die for him," comes another good quote. Last week, Hackett lost in his bid for a seat in the House of Represenatives by 4 points in Ohio's 2nd district. It looks like Ohio Dems are recruitign him for a run in the Senate. Meanwhile, Rush was throwing temper tantrums on the radio about Hackett not really being a "marine."

Anyway...

That's typical for that fatass drug addict to come up with something like that. There's a guy ... I didn't hear this, but actually when I was on drill this weekend, I've got to tell you, he lost a lot of Republican supporters with his comments. Because they were coming up to me, telling me, "I can't believe he said that! Besides that, he called you a soldier. He doesn't know the difference between a soldier and a marine!"

So generally, the consensus is Rush doesn't know squat about patriotism. He's typical of the new Republican. He's got a lot of lip and he doesn't walk the walk. The fact of the matter is, I went to Iraq to serve my country. I left my nice house, my nice wife by my choice because I thought it was the right thing to do. And man, if I was good enough to be able to see into the future that Rob Portman was going to step down from Congress, I mean I should actually be running for something a lot more than Congress. I went to Iraq because I wanted to serve my country and be with my Marines.

I think it probably says more about Rush Limbaugh than it does anybody else that he comes up with those thought processes. And I think it's indicative of today's Republican party, which is patriotic lite translated to anybody who serves their country who truly who truly serves their country and demonstrates it by their actions as opposed to their flapping gums.

They want to attack us. But the fact of the matter is they can attack me, but I punch back just as hard as I get. Ask Rush how come he wasn't taking phone calls for the two days when he was on the attack with me. Ask him why his phone lines were clogged up. That's because he was getting thousands of calls from veterans from this war and other wars who were clogging up his phone lines, giving him an earful.

Shit. Hackett for President already. :lol

MP3 Files of Hackett on Ed Schulz
 
560.jpg


"I gotta tell ya guys, but this Hackett is just some no good liberal masquerading as a proud American."
 
Actually, I don't believe that Rush said anything directly about Hackett being a Marine or not. There was an actual Marine that called into Rush's radio program who said that Hackett never served in any capacity other than being a "desk jockey." He called him a "staff puke" or something of the sort.

Hackett lost the House seat because of advertising he was running during his campaign. He represented himself as being close friends with George W. Bush, supporting the troops and whatnot, while his quotes of calling the president an S.O.B., and lashing out at the media, did little to help support this image he was trying to project.
 
calling bullshit on you error macro, it was a navy officer who had no clue what hackett did in Fallujah

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_080305/content/stack_a.guest.html

CALLER: “Once a Marine, always a Marine.” Isn’t that what they say? That doesn’t mean all those things that you learned… Those things are supposed to stay with you and it doesn’t seem like — he either never had them in the first place or he’s not being true and have any integrity like you’ve already mentioned.

RUSH: Okay, call him a staff puke if thatÂ’s what you want, but civilian affairs, staff puke. Bottom line is heÂ’s running a fraudulent, deceptive campaign, and the Democrats are saying this is a bellwether election. WeÂ’ve got two instances of huge fraud being perpetrated here, and IÂ’m bound and determined theyÂ’re not going to get away with this, whether the guy wins or not, theyÂ’re not going to get away with misportraying the results of this when the whole campaign has been one of total fraud and
CALLER: Did you call him a staff puke?

RUSH: Yeah, I called him a staff puke. IÂ’ll call him a staff puke today.

CALLER: He was on the ground at Fallujah.

RUSH: You had better go talk to people in the military if you want to know what staff puke means. They call each other that. Do you know what Marines call each other? They call them grunts. What if IÂ’d have called him a grunt yesterday? You clueless liberals would have thought I was assuming a lot of things and insulting him. Staff puke, the term has been used by other military people to me. It means person. HeÂ’s a staff puke, because thatÂ’s what a Navy officer was telling us on the phone.

who the fuck is he to call anybody a staff puke, fucker dodged the draft with a pilonidal cyst in his ass. fuckin more gop chickenhawk bullshit. if the dems support the troops and not the war then the gop sure as hell supports the war, not the troops

the whole fucking gop is filled with chickenhawks who dont have the balls to fight and sure as hell dont mind when other people do the dying.
 
Error Macro said:
Hackett lost the House seat because of advertising he was running during his campaign. He represented himself as being close friends with George W. Bush, supporting the troops and whatnot, while his quotes of calling the president an S.O.B., and lashing out at the media, did little to help support this image he was trying to project.

Actually I thought he lost because he was running in a heavily republican area where the last election the republicans won by like 30 points. If anything what he said and did helped him.
 
Okay, time to get heavy.

I dunno . . . obviously people that are too much like Rush are not your friend. They are, in fact, retarded Boyscouts on crack as I have always said. Even if they hump each other, it proves nothing. Retarded boyscouts humping proves nothing, since Rome had really mean Gays . . . some people make lousy Gays. They are just viscious. Duh.

I'm always on the lookout for someone setting themselves up as another Mussolini with his machine workin'. Lots of people are being tortured in Israel and such. Brrrrrrmmmmhumph. I feel normal, etc. Sadism, although we all have a taste for it, has nothing to do with sex, freedom, life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness. It is a quite different high.

The thought has occured to me, of course in which case everything is a waste of time. However, curiosity drives me and it would be interesting to see if love can win. If it can't then we are in Hell, of course, and after we torture life for a while and then toss it carelessly aside, there will be great torture inflicted upon us as requested before the supernova. Mabus, etc.

Some people are just stubborn and will not deviate from a path they are set on reguardless of all the evidence that the actions they are taking are counterproductive. As some fameous people in history once said, "I was just following orders".

Reguardless, the only way for all the violence to be behind us is to make love, not war. Terrance Mann coined that phrase, and I think he was right. I really reccomend that very militant conservative guys though, if they do decide to turn Gay, should stick with the Taylor Hanson type. Taylor of TODAY, at 22. A man.

I find the Roman style of pedophilia morally reprehinsible, and it causes those types to be too defensive when they are already naturally sadistic. Bad combination. Stick with the girlie men, as Ahnuld would say.

Leave the little boys to the people in Brazil, Costa Rica, Honduras, and, yes, Thailand. A part of me still wants to retire there some day because the weather is good when they are not having tsunamis. That was my plan for a while. And, no, I would not have humped the little boys. That's gross.

Sorry to be so heavy, but I really can't find a better way to stress the importance of the great idea behind making love instead of war. Liberals have always had the advantage of getting conservatives to back off with their weirdness by pointing out that they are a little wacko with the celebacy and elitist morality.

If all the liberals keep acting like Muslims and loose that which Terrance Mann gave to them, everything is very unbalanced. This reverse free love must end for the common good.

In other words, fuck Rush in the ear, and Ahnuld will be cool if he just keeps listening to his wife, who is a Kennedy. The Kennedy family's work with Civil Rights was good, since people living together with one as master and the other as servant is bad for both. Obviously you will end up having sex which defeats the premise of your racism to begin with. I mean, why say one thing and do another?

That's just crazy. Denial, lies, and corruption. Gotta go, gotta go.
 
It's bad enough that we've got idiots like Rush running around yelling "feminazi", "Hitlery Clinton", and "staff puke", but do we really need those who wish to run our country calling people "son of a bitches" and "fatass drug addicts"? The idea of politicans as statesmen has never been more dead.
 
Parcher is a jokesque character from That Other Forum(tm), kids. Don't let your WTFs obstruct your sarcastic LOLs, in this case.
 
I rarely speak legitimate ill of others - I just don't think it's right - but Rush is on my short list.

Rush, Hannity, Coulter, and Novak all deserve to be out on the street, living in a cardboard box, and guzzling Thunderbird until their livers explode. It's rare that people are so utterly callous, so completely barren of personal responsibility, and so consistently offer nothing to any kind of discourse except hatred and/or dangerous misinformation.

O'Reilly doesn't make the cut. As often as he pisses me off, on rare occasions he DOES admit error, which is more than most talking heads are capable of doing.
 
O'Reilly doesn't make the cut. As often as he pisses me off, on rare occasions he DOES admit error, which is more than most talking heads are capable of doing.
That doesn't mean anything. Even Limbaugh recanted after the 2000 election after promising a landslide GOP victory, and O'Reilly is still a pathological douche.
 
Oh, Ohio again. Stop getting surprised by shit like this already and join us in the present. If you didn't know before, Rush Limbaugh is a fucking turd who was addicted to drugs and is probably a closet homosexual (if he only found a channel for his stress, like that handsome Sean Hannity). Stop taking him seriously and get back to the moral values you couldn't even name when you voted for the most dishonest president in my lifetime, jackasses. Damnit.
 
Squirrel Killer, if you can't see the difference between the deliberately manufactured strawmen that come with terms like "feminazi" or the misappropriation of the term "staff puke" as proffered by Rush, and the all-too-appropriate contempt for deceptive mealy-mouthed shitheels like Rush and Junior so precisely expressed by Hackett, then maybe politics are just a LITTLE bit over your head.
 
Hitokage said:
That doesn't mean anything. Even Limbaugh recanted after the 2000 election after promising a landslide GOP victory, and O'Reilly is still a pathological douche.

Eh, O'Reilly fessed up about the WMDs. That's a little bigger, at least IMHO.
 
I knew you guys would have the "uh. ..." thing workin'. Sorry to be heavy. I did appologise for doing that, and I'm doing it again. It's just that I've studied the bible and stuff. I've got the Jehova's Witness Bible, The Mormon BOM, Doctrine and Covenants, the Old and New Testament, etc. I even have the Koran.

Just ignore that post if you wish. I'm just telling you I'm not high or weird or something, just religious, which often sounds the same.

After doing my homework, I can converse with the religious even though I often feel religion is like a broken clock. It's right two times a day, of course, and that makes people stick with it.

I have the Buddhist stuff, too, which I find makes me tranquil and at peace.
 
Rush, Hannity, Coulter, and Novak all deserve to be out on the street, living in a cardboard box, and guzzling Thunderbird until their livers explode


Did anyone watch Hannity and Colmes last night with Charles Dobson? Hannity brought up something like "leave it to the liberals to attack people on spiffy adoption papers, blah blah, blah.." I guess he wasn't aware of his own party attack John McCain and his adopted kid back in the 2000 primaries.
 
Drinky Crow said:
Parcher is a jokesque character from That Other Forum(tm), kids. Don't let your WTFs obstruct your sarcastic LOLs, in this case.

Jokesque perhaps since I clown around, sure. However, I really do have all those bibles here right next to me and if you don't believe it, ask me to quote some scripture after stating the chapter and verse.

Hey, religion is weird, dude. Now I'm appologising for the third time for stating what I think of Rush from a religious standpoint. I'm fully in favor of the seperation of church and state of course.

And I'm not just, "from that other forum". I'm from Cuddly Gamers and other places, too, and before that my Dad's willie just as you are.
 
xsarien said:
I rarely speak legitimate ill of others - I just don't think it's right - but Rush is on my short list.

Rush, Hannity, Coulter, and Novak all deserve to be out on the street, living in a cardboard box, and guzzling Thunderbird until their livers explode. It's rare that people are so utterly callous, so completely barren of personal responsibility, and so consistently offer nothing to any kind of discourse except hatred and/or dangerous misinformation.

O'Reilly doesn't make the cut. As often as he pisses me off, on rare occasions he DOES admit error, which is more than most talking heads are capable of doing.

Its only because O'Reilly is a clever one. He may be illogical, but he's not completely stupid. He realizes that if he throws out an apology or something once in awhile, he can use it to justify his stance on anything at a later time. He's basically buying himself a free pass. I doubt he's very legitimate when he does it.
 
Drinky Crow said:
Squirrel Killer, if you can't see the difference between the deliberately manufactured strawmen that come with terms like "feminazi" or the misappropriation of the term "staff puke" as proffered by Rush, and the all-too-appropriate contempt for deceptive mealy-mouthed shitheels like Rush and Junior so precisely expressed by Hackett, then maybe politics are just a LITTLE bit over your head.
Sorry, Doug, while you are right, there is a difference - one is from an arrogant, loud mouth, opinionated blowhard, the other is from someone who wants to run our country - it seems to me that both ought to be more mature, but one even moreso. The level of political discourse in this country needs to rise, not delve further depths. Maybe adult conversations are just a LITTLE bit over your head.
 
Squirrel Killer said:
Sorry, Doug, while you are right, there is a difference - one is from an arrogant, loud mouth, opinionated blowhard, the other is from someone who wants to run our country - it seems to me that both ought to be more mature, but one even moreso. The level of political discourse in this country needs to rise, not delve further depths. Maybe adult conversations are just a LITTLE bit over your head.

I dunno. I've always believe you're allowed to talk shit if you can back it up. Most politicians/talking heads CAN'T.
 
Drinky Crow said:
Parcher, far be it from me to doubt ANYTHING about you.

Good. Then don't doubt that I would rather date Taylor Hanson of today at 22 than I would little Zac Hanson. Hey, I just need a little emotional content and there are other reasons for it as well as I stated in the first post. I've got heart.

I choose not to be Roman, dude. To Hell with that Ceasar/Musulini trip. That's the wrong road.

Let's all make love, not war.
 
Belfast said:
I dunno. I've always believe you're allowed to talk shit if you can back it up. Most politicians/talking heads CAN'T.
So what if Hackett can back up "fatass drug addict", someone else could back up "greedy ambulance chaser" in regards to Hackett. That'd be great... I thought people outgrew name calling in junior high school. It's not how you get things done in politics.
 
Squirrel Killer said:
So what if Hackett can back up "fatass drug addict", someone else could back up "greedy ambulance chaser" in regards to Hackett. That'd be great... I thought people outgrew name calling in junior high school. It's not how you get things done in politics.

Charachter assassination is a bit pariphreal . . . side trackin', sure. However, I'll state that Rush showed some VERY STRONG supremicist personality traits there on National T.V. He's been exposed.

We all know that supremicists want slavery and that just leads to lots of half White babies, dude. Thomas Jefferson knew what was what, and was very cool in many ways and spoke out against slavery. He knew it was an unhealthy relationship.

Most people that CLAIM to be "racialists" say that White Supremicists are an embarassment to their agenda or whatever. It's funny AND enlightening to see someone who seemed to be evolved and willing to compromise and held beliefs along these lines exposed for what he is, that's all.

The truth was heard, and that man is a nerd. What a braindead dork! Psycho, man.
 
Squirrel Killer said:
So what if Hackett can back up "fatass drug addict", someone else could back up "greedy ambulance chaser" in regards to Hackett. That'd be great... I thought people outgrew name calling in junior high school. It's not how you get things done in politics.

Calling out the Republicans and their operatives for what they are-however blunt it may be-is probably good politics for Democrats. It's not necessarily civil, or even socially appropriate, but certainly isn't bad election politics, which is a completely different beast than legislative politics.
 
Squirrel Killer said:
So what if Hackett can back up "fatass drug addict", someone else could back up "greedy ambulance chaser" in regards to Hackett. That'd be great... I thought people outgrew name calling in junior high school. It's not how you get things done in politics.

Unfortunately, it *is* how things are done in politics, just in nicer words so as not to offend the soccer moms they'll need to appeal to come election time.
 
Fragamemnon said:
Calling out the Republicans and their operatives for what they are-however blunt it may be-is probably good politics for Democrats. It's not necessarily civil, or even socially appropriate, but certainly isn't bad election politics, which is a completely different beast than legislative politics.
Stop and think that through. Wouldn't calling out Democrats and their operatives for what they are-however blunt it may be-is probably good politics for Republicans? Where does that lead to? I saw a Repubican state representative call his opponent a "fucking bitch" in public. I was overjoyed to see him, despite being an incumbent in a safely Republican district, get his foul-mouthed ass kicked to the curb. The governance of our country should not be a flamewar.
 
Squirrel Killer said:
So what if Hackett can back up "fatass drug addict", someone else could back up "greedy ambulance chaser" in regards to Hackett. That'd be great... I thought people outgrew name calling in junior high school. It's not how you get things done in politics.
I think you forget that he's running for office in Ohio. These are the hardcore republicans who love shit like Rush and FUX news (lolz). You're idealistic vision of how politics should be is all well and good, but purveyors of that ideal ain't gonna win diddly-squat.
 
If he was calling his opponent a fatass drug addict, I think I'd care. But he's calling out the biggest mudsling, namecalling blowhard on his own terms. I think that's commendable.
 
=W= said:
You're idealistic vision of how politics should be is all well and good, but purveyors of that ideal ain't gonna win diddly-squat.
So you think that winning is important enough to justify name-calling and profanity?
 
WTF, SquirrelKiller? Everything you deem wrong about politics has been the modus operadi for Republicans for over 20 years now. Quit being a damn apologist.
 
Squirrel Killer said:
Sorry, Doug, while you are right, there is a difference - one is from an arrogant, loud mouth, opinionated blowhard, the other is from someone who wants to run our country - it seems to me that both ought to be more mature, but one even moreso. The level of political discourse in this country needs to rise, not delve further depths. Maybe adult conversations are just a LITTLE bit over your head.

Exactly. There is no need to sink to that level... unless you think its ok to open up name calling across the board? Rush is a "fatass drug addict". Hmm what else? Savage is a stupid Jew? Coulter is a dumb cunt bitch?

I thought democrats were above the name calling stereotypes? hmm?
 
Incognito said:
WTF, SquirrelKiller? Everything you deem wrong about politics has been the modus operadi for Republicans for over 20 years now. Quit being a damn apologist.
Um... if Republicans are doing it too, then who the hell exactly am I an apologist for?
 
Squirrel Killer said:
Stop and think that through. Wouldn't calling out Democrats and their operatives for what they are-however blunt it may be-is probably good politics for Republicans? Where does that lead to? I saw a Repubican state representative call his opponent a "fucking bitch" in public. I was overjoyed to see him, despite being an incumbent in a safely Republican district, get his foul-mouthed ass kicked to the curb. The governance of our country should not be a flamewar.

You're cool, brother. Yeah, let's chill with that flame war. I'm still gonna rock a little, though. Gotta rock a little. That's how you get things done. Poco a poco, muchaco. Little by little. :D
 
Incognito said:
WTF, SquirrelKiller? Everything you deem wrong about politics has been the modus operadi for Republicans for over 20 years now. Quit being a damn apologist.

Hey, I like SquirrelKiller, man. He's a homeboy. He should boast his badassness for a bit. Can't loose that part of America and get caught up in the LITTLE things, now. :D
 
AssMan said:
LOL, which is why the liberals are getting hammered by the media 24 freakin 7' due to their outlandish comments.

Bah its just idiots like Rush and Hannity... but they arent running for politics. They are entertainers that want to make loads of cash.

All that guy did was give Rush more ammo. :\
 
AssMan said:
LOL, which is why the liberals are getting hammered by the media 24 freakin 7' due to their outlandish comments.

Liberals tend to worry about how to spend money too much. Caught up in the little things. If they ease off of that just a bit, now, they can get good things done like Civil Rights.

Little things kill progress, that's all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom