I watched Fox news during the election for a new president.....never never ever again! Fox make me to trow up. I trust CNN news more than does idiots at Fox news.Never watched CNN in my life. And certainly not RT.
But which one has the hotter anchors?I watched Fox news during the election for a new president.....never never ever again! Fox make me to trow up. I trust CNN news more than does idiots at Fox news.
I watched Fox news during the election for a new president.....never never ever again! Fox make me to trow up. I trust CNN news more than does idiots at Fox news.
It will be, when whatever Russian company developing the tech starts selling it to the world?
I dont care about anchors i only care about unbiased and news without a clear agenda. The only problem i have with CNN the constant commercials during the news.But which one has the hotter anchors?
Russian Facebook equivalent
Isn't the Arma 3 engine Russian?
I just wish journalists stopped writing deceitful headlines. From the original source:
- They talked with Russian developers about such possibility, so there's nothing being developed yet
- They mention Unity and Unreal as examples of what is most often used by developers, no mentions of "competitor to Unreal 5"
- They raise a lot of questions about GPU support, training, funding and other issues that need to be taken into account before such project is realized
Good. Sanctions will be lifted at some point and competition is always welcome. Too many quasi monopolies in the gaming and hardware space.
Not sure where you're from, but from a Western perspective a multitude of instable baby nations armed with 4600 nukes isn't exactly a good outcome. The most important step would be to disarm Russia of its nuclear arsenal. And even then, I'm not sure if a united Russia wouldn't be a better partner of the West. Russia needs to become part of NATO.Regardless of the outcome of the war in Ukraine, the harm is done and we'll see regions/oblasts pushing for independence which they'll eventually achieve, due to the russian government becoming an international pariah.
It's a lot better than the alternative of becoming a vassal state to the chinese communist party, like North Korea.
And the devs using the pirate engine would only be able to publish PC versions on nefarious sites and console versions wouldnt exist.They could use U5/Source and every engine available and just ignore licensing. They wouldn't have technical support though.
That's the only option now for the Russian gaming industry anyway. might as well develop their own store. They opened piracy wide and that would kill even a local game development industry. media based industry isn't viable for them without IP protections.And the devs using the pirate engine would only be able to publish PC versions on nefarious sites and console versions wouldnt exist.
All that work to sell one copy that everyone then just pirates cuz there is no secure way to buy the game?
Sounds like a plan.
The cope here about Russia is really something. There will be no Russian collapse; it will be easier for Russia to find replacements for western consumer products than it will be for the west to replace the missing Russian oil, gas, grain and fertilizer. If anything, countries like Germany are much more likely to experience an economic collapse, since their industry simply can’t survive without cheap Russian energy, and their political class has been pursuing retarded anti-nuclear energy policies for the last few decades.
Anyway, I wouldn’t underestimate Russia’s tech sector. Russia is one of the few countries in the world with their own domestic competitors to US giants like Facebook or Google. The EU tech sector in comparison is a joke, if it even exists in the first place.
That's a horrible idea.Russia needs to become part of NATO.
United Nations Security Council veto power
Since 1992, Russia has been the most frequent user of the veto, followed by the United States and China. France and the United Kingdom have not used the veto since 1989.
As of May 2022, Russia/USSR has used its veto 121 times, the US 82 times, the UK 29 times, China 17 times, and France 16 times.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_veto_powerRussian vetoes became more common in the early 21st century to block resolutions on conflicts with Russian military involvement, including Georgia, Syria and Ukraine.
That's a horrible idea.
NATO, like United Nations, European Union and other international devices are crippled by the single estate veto systems.
We've seen it in place with Turkey threatening to block/veto Sweden and Finland NATO membership. Meanwhile Russia was using their interventions at the UN to spread disinformation as news internally, which is why they didn't care about how flat their speeches were coming out against people in the room that know what is going out.
I'm sure Russia would be stoked to be able to be part of any organization on the planet. But not for good reasons, their interest is being in the room and influencing/helping their interests as much as possible.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_veto_power
Didn't know that, but it doesn't surprise me.Actually, Russia did make it's candidacy to join Nato in 1954. Probably for that exact reason.
Apart from grain those are all sectors that are still very important but we should he phasing out due to their CO2 footprint anyway. Grain is also not sustainable to the soils and uses their fertilizers, but we can't phase it out, we can just plant it elsewhere in a more sustainable manner, which we should anyway.Fertilizers, oil gas and grain are commodities, and other countries will take advantage to fill Russia's market share.
Didn't know that, but it doesn't surprise me.
NATO would be useless for Sweden, Finland and Ukraine if Russia was there already.
Apart from grain those are all sectors that are still very important but are finite and not sustainable.
Russian Fertilizers are not state of the art and should have been effectively banned decades ago. They are making the black sea into poisonous soup (creating huge dead areas where no life can thrive) and we really don't want them anywhere else or we'll have a big problem in the coming decades. Russian industry as we know barely adapts so there have been articles stating that the russian fertilizer ban could speed up transitions we actually need (the other more sustainable fertilizers are not expensive but leagues better when it comes to price we'll pay down the line)
Oil and gas I don't need to elaborate. Every prediction of the CO2 effects in the atmosphere is being broken for the worst, so every "best case scenario" is not going to happen, we're only dealing with worst case scenarios or worse at this point. 2050 is our real deadline, not 2100. And we're not being serious enough about it. any year we don't decrease CO2 from now on is going to cost us, and cost life on the planet.
The mighty S300 and S400, some of the most advanced and best tech Russia can produce, is in fact just worthless against modern weapons.
It's probably good enough to fight some third world country, but not much more.
I really doubt it. Unfortunately, Russia does not seem like it's going to end its attack on Ukraine any time soon (ever?), so sanctions are going to continue for quite some time. With those sanctions in place, it will be very hard for any major player in the game sphere to license Russia's game engine for games sold outside of Russia. Additionally, there will be other concerns that will make the engine basically unusable.It will be, when whatever Russian company developing the tech starts selling it to the world?
Yes, it is.This really isn't about "competition" though.
There are a ton of super talented game developers, programmers and hackers in Russia, plus in a ton of countries that aren't blocking Russia like China or India. And as a game programmer I can tell you you don't need to be a genious to make a game engine. A big percent of game programmers can make you a game engine.Nothing will be developed. Game engines take a lot of effort time and knowledge.
I assume that in addition to the devs from Russia people from a ton of other countries (outside the few ones who put sanctions to Russia, that are basically NA, EU, Australia, Japan and not sure if a few more) would use it if good enough.How would this engine take on Unreal, Unity, Cry, Unigine in its first iteration with literally no community support?
Let's all the nukes to piece of shits like Biden, Pelosi, Deep state, Obamda, Bush family etc so they can threaten everyone that doesn't want to carry water for their terror Regime into submission and the population that support everything because they are blind and idiots who eat whatever the media feed them.Not sure where you're from, but from a Western perspective a multitude of instable baby nations armed with 4600 nukes isn't exactly a good outcome. The most important step would be to disarm Russia of its nuclear arsenal. And even then, I'm not sure if a united Russia wouldn't be a better partner of the West. Russia needs to become part of NATO.
Yes, it is.
Unreal has almost a monopoly for AAA games and for political reasons Epic is banning the companies of a country, which means they need to do their own engine to be able to compete in the gaming market.
Let's all the nukes to piece of shits like Biden, Pelosi, Deep state, Obamda, Bush family etc so they can threaten everyone that doesn't want to carry water for their terror Regime into submission and the population that support everything because they are blind and idiots who eat whatever the media feed them.
(X) DoubtAnyway, I wouldn’t underestimate Russia’s tech sector. Russia is one of the few countries in the world with their own domestic competitors to US giants like Facebook or Google. The EU tech sector in comparison is a joke, if it even exists in the first place.
Gamedevs from Russia aren't to blame for any war. This project exist because USA put sanctions to Russia and blocked them for using the game engine that practically have a monopoly in development of AAA games, so it's perfectly understandable that they now will have their own AAA game engine to continue working.Absent the abhorrent invasion of another country under completely made-up pretext, this "project" wouldn't be a thing. "Compete" is not "Competition" as they both have very different origins.