I've played the demo, giving me a good understanding of the core controls, pace and game feel, and I'm someone who believes that most games can be very accurately judged from video evidence anyway.
Eh, I disagree. A lot of games give me tactile feedback that video alone doesn't.
Dark Souls and survival horror are great examples of games that, through video, I don't particularly think I could enjoy, and Demon's Souls was a disaster of a demo at its first E3 due to so few people "understanding" what the game was going for and just viewing it as a frustrating, unappealing slog. People needed more time with it and they needed to play it themselves in the right environment.
'Someone might/will enjoy it' is a weak excuse for a bad game, and one that could be used for almost any mediocre game. The idea behind making games is to please as large an audience as possible either in totality or within a particular fanbase or genre niche. Nintendo isn't in the business of making games that appeal to a small minority. They've clearly fucked up here.
It's not officially OUT yet. You keep relying on the "it's a bad game" argument which, while it might be eventually be true, it also might not. It's like predicting that a film may or may not suck before you've seen it.
And some of Nintendo's best games only appeal to a small minority. There's not a huge market for games like Earthbound, F-Zero, Sin & Punishment, Punch Out!, Pikmin, Star Fox... Nintendogs alone sold more with one installment on DS than the entire Metroid franchise combined over 30 years. Nintendo is okay having huge successes in additional to moderate ones that appeal only to specific fans, just like a movie studio can release an arthouse film AND a blockbuster.
We clearly totally disagree on the idea of what constitutes a spin-off. ODST is not in any way shape or form a spin-off, and as to the bolded I disagree if those are the major gameplay features. If those are the same, the game isn't a spin-off. And Fed Force has more than a moderately similar control scheme to Prime. Having played the demo, I'd say it's about as close as you can get, adjusting for the fact that it's on 3DS.
Federation Force has MULTIPLE control scheme options, including gyroscope and twin-stick aiming. Has there EVER been a Prime game with twin-stick aiming before?
Even the Halo wiki for ODST begins by labeling ODST as "A spin-off game using the Halo 3 engine and set during the time between Halo 2 and Halo 3, and was created by Bungie."
It's not a mainline entry, it has almost no bearing on the on-going Halo saga, it doesn't star the franchise's main character (he doesn't even cameo), it doesn't even star a Spartan... it's a spin-off.
But all those games you've mentioned were travesties that should not have been allowed to happen, and are worthy of the criticism and anger they received. What do you mean by 'get over themselves'? Accept shit products in their favourite series? I don't get what you're saying here at all.
That a single bad spin-off isn't the end of the world. This isn't a mainline Metroid. It's a spin-off.
Most sane people didn't put much stock into Death by Degrees or Special Forces or Castlevania Judgment or Resident Evil Survivor. They just ignored them altogether. It's surprisingly easy to do that. Saves energy and rage too that could better be directed at truly offensive things in gaming.
You made it sound like these bad games "ruined" their franchises, when those franchises survived, often without skipping a beat as soon as a proper installment dropped and everyone could have a good laugh over that time Vincent got his own Final Fantasy spin-off shooter game with a Gackt-cameo.
And 'we survived Other M'? That game completely changed my relationship with the Metroid franchise. It spoiled it, basically. We didn't exactly get out of that one unscathed.
Hence "survived".
Wounds still hurt like hell, man. I feel you.
But even this "cameo" in Federation Force shows Samus saving the day and being awesome in a way the ENTIRETY of Other M failed to do in its entire playthrough.
I could (and have) rant endlessly about how offensive I found Other M from a social point of view.... but I also saved those judgments until I actually played and beat the game.
Sure. I get your point about patience. I wouldn't mind the wait so much if it wasn't filled with stuff trying to sell off the name, you know? Attempting to exploit the love for the franchise without actually delivering what made that love exist.
Welcome to Mega Man and Sonic fan's hell.
I would even say, as an old-school turn-based Final Fantasy fan, I haven't had THAT itch scratched since Final Fantasy X, really, and have had to make due with games like Lost Odyssey and Bravely Default.
... But I'm still going to try FFXV, because while it's not what I'd ask for, I'll judge it on its own merits. FFXIV wasn't what I wanted either, and I loathe MMOs, yet it surprised me with how great it became. I'm open-minded to try things I even at one point openly mocked and ridiculed.
So I just hate it when they use their premier franchises in such a fashion and always have, even with Zelda and Mario. Save the wacky experimentation for new IP. If you're lucky, you'll pull a Splatoon, and Nintendo really needs to be creating more new IP.
Nintendo has actually created dozens of new IPs, mostly on portables, and some were hits and some weren't. Splatoon, Sakura Samurai, Dillon's Rolling Western, Pushmo, Codename STEAM, Art Academy, Brain Age, Nintendogs, Wii Fit, Rhythm Heaven, Elite Beat Agents, Xenoblade... a lot of new IPs these past 10 years or so.
... That said, all this being said, I do think Metroid deserves respect. Samus deserves respect. Metroid isn't just "another Nintendo game" or just another game at all. It's a genre-defining franchise. It's a progressive series that gave us one of gaming's most prominent and strong heroines. It's a game that pushed me to learn game design and pursue a career in game design and game creation. It's influential, important, and worthy of both accolades and reverence.
Nintendo can and should do better, absolutely.
But personally think Federation Force is just... inoffensive.