no, I'm not. The point is even if people as a whole in LA are less engaged, there's way way way more people and way way way more TV sets.
The Rams can be god awful, terrible, fire the coach, and still have 3x the TV viewers in their local market.
That's a WINDFALL.
And the Rams were welcomed back, the city was so excited. Then they sucked, and USC got really good. LA don't got time for shitty football teams. We are fair weather because we always have fair weather.
no, I'm not. The point is even if people as a whole in LA are less engaged, there's way way way more people and way way way more TV sets.
The Rams can be god awful, terrible, fire the coach, and still have 3x the TV viewers in their local market.
That's a WINDFALL.
And the Rams were welcomed back, the city was so excited. Then they sucked, and USC got really good. LA don't got time for shitty football teams. We are fair weather because we always have fair weather.
Nope. Still missing the point. Fewer people are now watching the NFL on TV in L.A. AND St. Louis because the Rams are such a shit franchise. And being fairweather is nothing to brag about. It just cements your rep as poor sports fans. Oh well. Bad teams deserve bad fans.
First off, the NFL shares media revenue so local ratings aren't relevant in the same way it is for an NBA team.
So while 10% in LA might be better than 25% in STL, it doesn't go directly to the team owner, it goes to the league as a whole.
The second issue is that one needs to compare the LA NFL ratings PRE-RAMS and POST-RAMS. If the overall viewership is down, and down in StL, then the NFL will lose money, including the Rams.
This is a colossal mistake, IMO.
LA doesn't want the Chargers.
I don't know the numbers but someone could find, I'm sure. That said, NFL TV ratings were down across the board this year, so that has to be taken into account.
From a pure fan count, LA has a lot more folks, I see lots of Rams gear in town. I think the new stadium will help them, and if they can even be remotely competitive and exciting to watch, I think they will sell out their games
You're missing the point. Those are still dogshit ratings for L.A. and still indicative of the fact that the team was not welcomed back in the way it was expected.
Man all the LA Teams are terrible right now. Every Sport
Sad Days
You're the one missing the point. The Rams calculated that even if less of LA watch, that's fine because it's still a bigger market because of the sheer size of it.
No, they didn't. because they don't get money from those ratings. NFL teams don't get individual media deals. it's split evenly among the 30 franchises.
They keep gate receipts, merch, and the like.
Of course I'm not claiming anything specifically about the ratings, just saying you made the wrong comparison.
It would also be interesting if the biggest drop in overall NFL ratings came from Los Angeles (in terms of major media markets).
I think this is a mistake. These teams have no history here, this city needs a reason to watch a team, and this isn't a real football town (it's basketball and baseball). And to the extent it is a football town, it's always been USC and some UCLA over the NFL.
If it was an organic team (meaning a new franchise starting from scratch) maybe. But in the new internet-digital age, I just don't see it. People over 25 have their teams and will stick with it. We're not a city that needs an NFL team or cares (unlike other cities).
I haven't seen the Rams gear you have. I still see more Raiders/Cowboys/Niners stuff. We'll see. I hate it. Not just as a niner fan but I loved getting all the other games instead of the crappy rams. Oh well. Less football watching for me. And many others I imagine.
These nature of stadium clauses in team-city agreements are ridiculous TBH. Wonder if they'll ever get firmer regulation from the leagues.
No, they didn't. because they don't get money from those ratings. NFL teams don't get individual media deals. it's split evenly among the 30 franchises.
They keep gate receipts, merch, and the like.
Chargers aren't total dogshit, that defense has some moxie. If Phillip rivers plays decent ball next year, I could see them sneaking into a wild card.
Ever since Marty was fired
On a tangential note, it's been great in St. Louis. We are able to watch the Chiefs with rabbit ears, so no more splurging on Sunday Ticket for me.
You're the one missing the point. The Rams calculated that even if less of LA watch, that's fine because it's still a bigger market just sheer size of it compared to STL.
They also get the value of having a billion dollar stadium in the second largest media market for sponsor opportunities locally as well as real estate value. The franchise instantly doubled in value with the move.
I mean, the Rams did play in LA for 50 years.
Is there a big KC following over there? I've been curious to see whether you guys would assimilate or not. Also welcome to the party, bud. ANDY REID AND ALEX SMITH ARE GETTING RINGS THIS YEAR, BITCHES.
That stadium he got in Inglewood isn't going to be built alone, you know?
For real. That's all there is to it.
Maybe if they kept Marty, They could've won one. Maybe then, we might be more open to paying your damn stadium.
Is there a big KC following over there? I've been curious to see whether you guys would assimilate or not. Also welcome to the party, bud. ANDY REID AND ALEX SMITH ARE GETTING RINGS THIS YEAR, BITCHES.
Ive adopted the Chiefs. Went to the opener, the game in Indy, and now have tickets for Sunday.
Chargers aren't total dogshit, that defense has some moxie. If Phillip rivers plays decent ball next year, I could see them sneaking into a wild card.
Is the San Diego stadium really that bad that they've been trying to get a new one for 15 years?
Is the San Diego stadium really that bad that they've been trying to get a new one for 15 years?
Is the San Diego stadium really that bad that they've been trying to get a new one for 15 years?
Yeah, Qualcomm Stadium is a dump and is a good 40 minute drive from downtown San Diego. It was a bad stadium when I went to go watch John Elway and the Broncos play in 1998 and it was a dump when I went to watch a preseason game against the Packers in what was Aaron Rodgers first preseason.
It's location certainly didn't do any favors for fans all over San Diego county.
You don't understand how the TV revenue works in the NFL, do you? It's not fine. It's an embarrassment.
Unless you're talking about Spanos chipping in, yeah, it kinda is.
It sounds like the biggest contribution of public money to the deal is that Kroenke may get public funds for up to $180m for infrastructure (roads around the stadium plus some shuttle bus operations for getting fans to the game) in the form of reimbursements that only kick in after the stadium begins generating a certain level of revenue for the city.
It's not nothing, for sure, but in terms of public financing of stadiums it's on the low end of public contributions to building a stadium. He's building a $2.5b stadium, and public funds will pay for just over 7% of it, and that's only in the form of reimbursements after the stadium is operating and generating more than a certain threshold in revenue for the local area.