OuterLimits
Member
Sanders/Mike 2016?
I can't think of a legit choice that would take him up on such a plan.
There has to be a desperate person like Fiorina on the left somewhere.
Sanders/Mike 2016?
I can't think of a legit choice that would take him up on such a plan.
There has to be a desperate person like Fiorina on the left somewhere.
There has to be a desperate person like Fiorina on the left somewhere.
First point, it's still a dirty word to most americans but okay.
Second point, less people have voted this primary than in the 2008 ones, who are these new people he got involved in politics?
Third point, oh no corruption at some level of government, what a novel idea. What he did was call the entire political process corrupt, which is dumb as hell.
I can't believe I liked this guy when this entire thing started...keep it about the policies Bernie, and if you lose, you lose. Influence the conversation and platform with your delegates. Don't be an asshat or make enemies.
Thats bad news for you actually, not me lol. I already live in a country where everything that bernie is fighting for is happening. Although it would be nice to get free college education. I'm even willing to pay more taxes for that,
Can you refute his claim and elbaorate on why the political system isn't corrupt at the root level? What do you call politicians receiving campaigns donation from lobbyists that they then pass legislations related to the agenda of the lobbyists? What do you call the duopoly stranglehold the two parties have in deciding who becomes out next president?What makes his claim "dumb as hell"?
Something that is inherent in the way our government functions.Can you refute his claim and elbaorate on why the political system isn't corrupt at the root level? What do you call politicians receiving campaigns donation from lobbyists that they then pass legislations related to the agenda of the lobbyists? What do you call the duopoly stranglehold the two parties have in deciding who becomes out next president? What makes his claim "dumb as hell"?
Please...not everyone buys into his born-again BS even if some found it genuine or politically convenient to stand right next to him as an example of such. But that's not the point anyway yet you keep trying to wash Hillary's hands. Like, the record is out there who cares.
Maybe I am missing something. Is there a big controversy about Hillary and Robert Byrd going on? Google shows me rightwing and Bernie sites freaking out about her praising him after he died. I'm not trying to wash her hands because I wasn't aware Byrdgate was even a thing.
You know what?
Fuck Bernie Sanders.
I say this knowing my political views currently align slightly more with his than with the other candidates in this election.
I have come all the way from my original position of "this guy is pushing hard for a lot of good things, but is probably unelectable", and now I'm of the opinion that Sanders is a fucking garbage candidate. His campaign is a fucking dumpster fire. He comes across as someone who has come to completely believe the over-the-top hype his most strident and unreasonable supporters have been spewing over the course of the campaign. He comes across as petty and small-minded, like he has no perspective and would rather burn the whole party down if he can't have the nomination. He has become the Trump of the Democratic party. He is literally using Tea Party obstructionist tactics.
He's an asshole.
The duopoly is enshrined is the constitution. Just because you don't like something doesn't make it corruption.Can you refute his claim and elbaorate on why the political system isn't corrupt at the root level? What do you call politicians receiving campaigns donation from lobbyists that they then pass legislations related to the agenda of the lobbyists? What do you call the duopoly stranglehold the two parties have in deciding who becomes out next president?What makes his claim "dumb as hell"?
It's fucking embarrassing how Sanders has become literally the polar opposite of Trump.
You'll hear it soon enough and hopefully by then it doesn't catch you off-guard. It's a Trump card.
You know what?
Fuck Bernie Sanders.
I say this knowing my political views currently align slightly more with his than with the other candidates in this election.
I have come all the way from my original position of "this guy is pushing hard for a lot of good things, but is probably unelectable", and now I'm of the opinion that Sanders is a fucking garbage candidate. His campaign is a fucking dumpster fire. He comes across as someone who has come to completely believe the over-the-top hype his most strident and unreasonable supporters have been spewing over the course of the campaign. He comes across as petty and small-minded, like he has no perspective and would rather burn the whole party down if he can't have the nomination. He has become the Trump of the Democratic party. He is literally using Tea Party obstructionist tactics.
He's an asshole.
Just cause its inherent doesn't make it right. For the confederates, slavery was inherent and a necessity. Our founding fathers themselves were against our government falling into a two party system.Something that is inherent in the way our government functions.
The closest any third party has gotten was Theodore Roosevelt's Progressive Party, and that was still a blowout.
Just cause its inherent doesn't make it right. For the confederates, slavery was inherent and a necessity. Our founding fathers themselves were against our government falling into a two party system.
If you cant provide anything besides your own substandard commentary when making accusations, you can please kindly go away.
Just cause its inherent doesn't make it right. For the confederates, slavery was inherent and a necessity. Our founding fathers themselves were against our government falling into a two party system.
What the duck did I just read...Just cause its inherent doesn't make it right. For the confederates, slavery was inherent and a necessity. Our founding fathers themselves were against our government falling into a two party system.
You'll hear it soon enough and hopefully by then it doesn't catch you off-guard. It's a Trump card.
No, it's not, because those of us who were around when he was alive know exactly who he was and why it doesn't matter.You'll hear it soon enough and hopefully by then it doesn't catch you off-guard. It's a Trump card.
The Confederacy was fucking obliterated by one of the bloodiest wars in our nation's history.Just cause its inherent doesn't make it right. For the confederates, slavery was inherent and a necessity. Our founding fathers themselves were against our government falling into a two party system.
The Confederacy was fucking obliterated by one of the bloodiest wars in our nation's history.
I'm not making a comparison between the two. I'm posing a example where precedence does not constitute right....Are you SERIOUSLY COMPARING THE VOTING SYSTEM TO SLAVERY?
I'm not sure what was wrong with what I said.We have reached peak fukkery GAF.
We've done it.
Even if we didn't have a government structure that made a two-party system a necessity, we'd really just see the different wings of each party split into more focused groups that would then have to form coalitions and work together the way they currently do, it would be similar to primary politics except less unified since groups wouldn't have the same leadership. It's not completely flawed but it's not like having four parties would magically make our representatives more progressive, just that the progressives would have their own label and would have to work with the moderate left party formed by the rest of the democrats.
You know what?
Fuck Bernie Sanders.
I say this knowing my political views currently align slightly more with his than with the other candidates in this election.
I have come all the way from my original position of "this guy is pushing hard for a lot of good things, but is probably unelectable", and now I'm of the opinion that Sanders is a fucking garbage candidate. His campaign is a fucking dumpster fire. He comes across as someone who has come to completely believe the over-the-top hype his most strident and unreasonable supporters have been spewing over the course of the campaign. He comes across as petty and small-minded, like he has no perspective and would rather burn the whole party down if he can't have the nomination. He has become the Trump of the Democratic party. He is literally using Tea Party obstructionist tactics.
He's an asshole.
I'm not making a comparison between the two. I'm posing a example where precedence does not constitute right....
I'm not sure what was wrong with what I said.
The duopoly is enshrined is the constitution. Just because you don't like something doesn't make it corruption.
Same with campaign contributions. The act of giving someone money isn't corruption by definition.
No, it's not, because those of us who were around when he was alive know exactly who he was and why it doesn't matter.
Dead serious. I like the message, but not the self-centered, thin-skinned messenger. I've been really torn by this for the entire primary cycle. I've always thought that Bernie's message was largely on point and that he was bringing up things that a lot of us on the left care about. However, I found it obvious early on that the guy was out of his league. Now, I'm not just convinced of that, I'm convinced that he lacks the temperament or competency to be President. Hillary has her issues, but I support her enthusiastically because she believes in nearly all of the same things, yet has the competence and understanding of the need for incrementalism necessary to get things done.
I really hope that when 2024 rolls around that the party can find someone with Bernie's ideals, without his baggage. His message needs to stay out there, but we need a better messenger.
I don`t know if he would endorse Hillary. They have very different world views. To be honest I think a lot is owed to Bernie this election cycle, first of all for making `socialist`not so much of a dirty word. Second of all, getting more people involved in politics. And lastly, being able to call out the corruption in government. I mean even if you are a diehard Hillary fan, you cannot deny there is corruption on some level.
There is no language in the US. Constitution that mentions, much less creates, political parties.
Yeah, this is my point. We have two parties to represent a wide variety of viewpoints that join together because they share basic goals. We just do it inside the party instead of having multiple parties have to work together on the outside.I mean we really have like 5-6 parties that just form coalitions to begin with.
That's what the GOP and Dems are. Coalitions.
The same Byrd who made racist comments even late in his life in the year 2001?
Oh sorry, I'm tired and I wasn't sure if I had said something stupid.Nothing. I'm just re-iterating how insane what the other poster said was by stating that it has officially reached peak fukkery status.
I was agreeing with you.
The craziest thing is with every additional Sanders story, Hillary remains silent. I mean, the obvious reasons are that she doesn't want to waste time pretending she's still in a primary and also not alienate his voters.
But man, the patience needed to not just attack him on all of this stuff is crazy high.
The craziest thing is with every additional Sanders story, Hillary remains silent. I mean, the obvious reasons are that she doesn't want to waste time pretending she's still in a primary and also not alienate his voters.
But man, the patience needed to not just attack him on all of this stuff is crazy high.
Not relevant to my statement.There is no language in the US. Constitution that mentions, much less creates, political parties.
You know exactly what you are comparing.
I merely used an extreme example to get my point across that just because societal process is inherent does not make it right. I'm not even sure what you are suggesting.