Seinfeld: 'Diversity' in Comedy doesn't matter. Gawker calls him Racist

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think this dude took Seinfeld's comment out of context. It seems to me Seinfeld was saying that considering the race of the comedian should have nothing to do with comedy and that your are funny if you are funny, regardless of your race (be it black, white, asian, etc.). I'm not sure how the gawker author came to those conclusions from the comment made.
 
Don't start me up. There is a commonly recognized issue in media, and Jerry can decide to address it or not. I'm not outraged.

Ya but in this particular situation this is about comedy and comedians. There is no agenda going on with Seinfeld. It's simply people are funny or not, that's really all he is saying.
 
All I'm learning from threads like these is that we are spending way too much of our educational budgets on the social studies. I think we could use those resources for something a little more useful and something that is more scientific.
 
As long as you don't bother going on a long pointless rant.

Knob off, dingbat. I didn't "threaten" anything. But I did warn Riggs about insinuating 'false' outrage when I'm not even upset.

Ya but in this particular situation this is about comedy and comedians. There is no agenda going on with Seinfeld. It's simply people are funny or not, that's really all he is saying.

I'm not separating situations from overarching realities. I certainly didn't say there was any kind of "agenda". I said Seinfeld can recognize the issue and act on it, or he can focus elsewhere, and not.
 
Why do you think that they wouldn't be funny? Jerry Seinfeld seems to only really expose himself to white male comedians. As far as I know, the only people in that show who weren't white men were Tina Fey and Chris Rock. I doubt it's intentional, but it seems like Seinfeld only really watches stand-up routines performed by white guys. The two not-white-men that he did have were incredibly famous, and much more well-known than a lot of the white dudes he's had on his show. Jerry Seinfeld has a really small reference pool for choosing his guests, and that's the crux of the issue.

Do you watch the show?

http://comediansincarsgettingcoffee.com/


Comedy is the ultimate "by your bootstraps" profession. It doesn't matter what race or gender you are, if you're funny, you'll make people laugh and people will want to give you money to make them laugh.
 
If you're looking for something then sure you can come to that conclusion. But if you say you don't care about race or gender yet your firm is mostly black women, to me that just says those were the best modelers that came to your door so you hired them. I would have to have my own notion and agenda or motive to think that you are lying or hiding something to not believe your statement just because of what is visible. Sort of like how this writer did, if his intention was to get more clicks.

My example was extreme for a reason: you do not need a special agenda to reach the conclusion that someone whose staff is 91% black women has some non-objective criteria used in the hiring process. A reasonable person would infer that such a dramatic deviation from pure chance based on underlying demographic statistics is extremely unlikely.

It may just so happen that all 43 presidents before Barack Obama just happened to be white men because white men were always the best candidate for the job until 2008. A reasonable person would reasonably conclude that isn't likely, however.
 
I really hope this Chayka person has an equal number of friends from every country. Nice to meet you, oh wait, you're from Ireland? Sorry I already have too many Irish friends. Need to diversify my friend list.
 
Knob off, dingbat. I didn't "threaten" anything. But I did warn Riggs about insinuating 'false' outrage when I'm not even upset.



I'm not separating situations from overarching realities. I certainly didn't say there was any kind of "agenda". I said Seinfeld can recognize the issue and act on it, or he can focus elsewhere, and not.
Sorry, it's hard to tell with you.
 
Gawker instead of taking a longer look into why more comedians Seinfeld is exposed to happen to be white men, whatever those reasons are, you decide to post an article lambasting him and twisting his words.

Great journalism as usual.
 
I just finished that Howard interview, and I could tell he appreciates some minority comics (both race and gender wise) but while I don't see him as racist (outside of the Paula Deen defense), he comes across an incredibly arrogant dick throughout the entire thing

On the flip side, I never listen to Howard Stern so I dont' know what I expected but he came across as incredibly well prepared for the interview which left me pretty impressed
 
This is stupid, he's friends with guys like Chris Rock, if anything he's going beyind the superficial make up of what "we are" and only cares about comedic talent.
 
I just finished that Howard interview, and I could tell he appreciates some minority comics (both race and gender wise) but while I don't see him as racist (outside of the Paula Deen defense), he comes across an incredibly arrogant dick throughout the entire thing

On the flip side, I never listen to Howard Stern so I dont' know what I expected but he came across as incredibly well prepared for the interview which left me pretty impressed

Are you talking about seinfeld on howard stern?
 
http://gawker.com/who-cares-about-diversity-in-comedy-says-jerry-seinf-1515412052



Mediaite destroys the Gawker Author in its response


http://www.mediaite.com/online/gawk...ith-baseless-racial-attack-on-jerry-seinfeld/



What do you guys think. Is Seinfeld right in saying that as long as you are a good comedian, diversity does not matter or is Gawker right in saying that Seinfeld's comment has racial overtones

Noah Rothman does well in that piece for mediaite:

Apparently, the bar for racial insensitivity has now been lowered so much that one can be branded with the scarlet “R” for insisting that racial and gender identity issues should be irrelevant in certain circumstances. Merely asserting that merit, and not demographic identifiers which result from accidents of birth, should carry more weight is enough to offend those for whom racial and gender-based grievances suffice for a raison d’être.

It seems that Chayka did not research for his piece at all. What an idiot.

http://comediansincarsgettingcoffee.com/chris-rock-kids-need-bullying
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAxoRh06XM4
 
Gawker trolling regular people, pissing them off and getting page hits... something they are starting to master.

In short... they are journalism's stinky taint.
 
Gawker instead of taking a longer look into why more comedians Seinfeld is exposed to happen to be white men, whatever those reasons are, you decide to post an article lambasting him and twisting his words.

Great journalism as usual.

Now that would have been an interesting article. I feel dirty for having given them a click.
 
The biggest reason there's not much diversity in comedy is because America has been for a long time a patriarchal, majority-white society. Which means the people who have opportunities to do something creative - like standup comedy - are white men who have connections and resources to fall back on in case they fail.

Is that a problem? Sure, but only in that it's indicative of a social trend that bears much broader implications. If people like Seinfeld are actively suppressing comedians for their race, gender, whatever, that's one thing. If "diverse" comedians are failing to break through for economic reasons, that suggests stand-up comedy isn't the only field where this is a problem.

There's nothing wrong with what Seinfeld said, obviously.
 
The biggest reason there's not much diversity in comedy is because America has been for a long time a patriarchal, majority-white society. Which means the people who have opportunities to do something creative - like standup comedy - are white men who have connections and resources to fall back on in case they fail.

I was always under the impression most comedians were poor schmucks, with no other real options.
 
Are you talking about seinfeld on howard stern?

I am talking about the interview posted earlier of Howard Stern interviewing Seinfeld. I thought Jerry came across as really arrogant and dickish, while Howard came off as surprisingly (to me, as a non-listener) informed
 
There is a plausible argument to be made that Seinfeld could use his considerable wealth and influence to provide exposure to comedians outside of the white male.

However I'm not about to make that argument, and not doing so certainly does not make him racist. I believe he is sincere when he says he only cares if it is funny.
 
seinfeld-black-white-cookie.jpg

ELAINE: What's wrong?

JERRY: My stomach, I think it was that cookie.

ELAINE: The black and white?

JERRY: Yeah.

ELAINE: Not getting along?

JERRY: I think I got David Duke and Farrakhan down there.
 
I usually ignore the Gawker clickbait, but this is abysmal. The author barely writes at high school essay level!
Cite a quote, make insanely false, judgmental, self-serving claim. Success!

I love how they pretend that Jerry didn't have Chris Rock and Mario Joyner on Comedians in Cars. What a tool.
 
I am talking about the interview posted earlier of Howard Stern interviewing Seinfeld. I thought Jerry came across as really arrogant and dickish, while Howard came off as surprisingly (to me, as a non-listener) informed

Yeah he does come across as arrogant but I think that's his whole persona even on seinfeld. I'm not sure if he defended paula deen though, it's hard to discern what he meant by the comment but I don't think it's defense.
 
Yeah he does come across as arrogant but I think that's his whole persona even on seinfeld. I'm not sure if he defended paula deen though, it's hard to discern what he meant by the comment but I don't think it's defense.

I mean, I guess you're right that it is pretty ambiguous what he means when talking about Paula (and Howard drops the subject) but I guess I am giving him whatever you would call the opposite of the "benefit of the doubt" and combining his comments there with his statement in the OP that he does not want to go out of his way just for PC sake. So when he says he is glad people are finally angry with regard to the Paula Deen situation I take it not as "I am glad that people are finally angry about a famous woman hosting slave parties and calling every black guy that treats her wrong nigger" but "I am glad that there is finally some angry backlash against the push for everyone to be politically correct."

It may be somewhat hypocritical of me to criticize this anyway since I support the backlash against this Gawker article, but while I think Jerry may be avoiding affirmatively taking any action that would correct the issue, I don't think he has taken any affirmative action to deny minority participants either. I don't find that analogous to Paula Deen who made the affirmative choice to degrade black people
 
I mean, I guess you're right that it is pretty ambiguous what he means when talking about Paula (and Howard drops the subject) but I guess I am giving him whatever you would call the opposite of the "benefit of the doubt" and combining his comments there with his statement in the OP that he does not want to go out of his way just for PC sake. So when he says he is glad people are finally angry with regard to the Paula Deen situation I take it not as "I am glad that people are finally angry about a famous woman hosting slave parties and calling every black guy that treats her wrong nigger" but "I am glad that there is finally some angry backlash against the push for everyone to be politically correct."

It may be somewhat hypocritical of me to criticize this anyway since I support the backlash against this Gawker article, but while I think Jerry may be avoiding affirmatively taking any action that would correct the issue, I don't think he has taken any affirmative action to deny minority participants either. I don't find that analogous to Paula Deen who made the affirmative choice to degrade black people

I agree especially in regards to your last paragraph.
 
My example was extreme for a reason: you do not need a special agenda to reach the conclusion that someone whose staff is 91% black women has some non-objective criteria used in the hiring process. A reasonable person would infer that such a dramatic deviation from pure chance based on underlying demographic statistics is extremely unlikely.

It may just so happen that all 43 presidents before Barack Obama just happened to be white men because white men were always the best candidate for the job until 2008. A reasonable person would reasonably conclude that isn't likely, however.
I'm assuming you aren't trying to equate the barriers in place of achieving the presidency with those of "successful" comedian, right?

Following something to its conclusion through steps of logical progression when that something is intrinsically linked to sense of comedy sounds like a disastrously bad idea. Logic is almost the anti-funny.
 
A lot of reaching on that gawker article

Far too much reaching... the writers assertions were either completely fabricated or full of false equivalence. It was trying way too hard to be inflammatory.

I actually find his statement that Jerry Seinfeld comedies are by and for white people only way more offensive.
 
Far too much reaching... the writers assertions were either completely fabricated or full of false equivalence. It was trying way too hard to be inflammatory.

I actually find his statement that Jerry Seinfeld comedies are by and for white people only way more offensive.

I want to assume that he means that the majority consumers of his comedies are white people not that he makes it for whites only.
 
I want to assume that he means that the majority consumers of his comedies are white people not that he makes it for whites only.

oh come on. You know that is not what he meant.\

That Gawker article is terrible - Seinfeld's statement is basically the opposite of racism. He essentially said, if you're funny, it's all good. Some "journalists" today are just pure rubbish.

I have to comment on this. While most people would see Seinfeld comment as being very race neutral, there is a growing sentiment of thought, that puts pure diversity over anything else.

To them, the issue has nothing to do with quality or skill, it's a pure number's game, and headcounts is all that matters. Seinfeld argument is a fairly conservative one, as it doesn't accept there is a problem that needs to be reformed, so to them "if you're funny, it's all good" is basically saying "I like the racist status quo"

It's a silly and stupid way of thinking, but it has grown more popular and sites like Gawker and Jezebel use it all the time
 
I would agree but it's comedy man, you either got it or you don't. There are so many great black comedians for example, but maybe Larry and Seinfeld just wanted the cast members they wanted, I don't know for sure. I think this entire situation just shows that a lot of people are tired of the over zealous political correctness crowd. I want equality for all, but God damn if it doesn't bring out the crazies who will go into faux outrage mode at the drop of a dime. It's those folks that annoy the he'll out of people, not legitimate arguments. It's not just gaf it's everywhere now, but how can we decide what's legit and what's bullshit? That's where things get fucked up, I certainly am no authority but I can understand also what you are saying. Hope I didn't offend in all honesty.

I'm positive Jerry Seinfeld didn't mean to be exclusive. But he mostly chose comedians for his show from his particular interest pool, which (because of unconscious bias or institutional pressure) was almost totally white dudes.

Also, the Gawker article was definitely overreacting. I'm sorry if I was too harsh earlier. But representation is really important. It takes a while for most white people (myself included) to realize this, but if you're Black or Indian or Korean, there are very few role models for your particular interests. If you're an Indian American girl who likes swimming, there are only three people in the whole world who look like you and do what you do. If you're a Black girl who likes to tell jokes, there's Wanda Sykes and Whoopi Goldberg, and not much else. It's hard for white people (male or female) to get this, but if you don't have a role model who looks and acts like you, it's really hard to be motivated to keep doing what you do.

I wouldn't have an issue with this show's demographics if most other comedy shows were more diverse. But they aren't! Almost every sitcom has an all white cast with one or two people of color. Often, like in the Big Bang Theory, 30 Rock, or Two Broke Girls, most of that character's jokes are about their race. Black women make up six percent of the population of the US, but way less than 6% of sitcom main cast members are Black women. Hispanic people are almost 17% of the United States, but way less TV show actors are Hispanic.

There's no malice at all behind Jerry Seinfeld's opinions, and he's free to not worry about having a diverse cast, but television as a genre really needs to be better representative of the United States as a whole.
 
Imagine the rage you'd feel doing an interview like this then this asshole tries making all these points attacking your character. What a misleading article.
 
I think it's kinda funny that the only two episodes I've seen of Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee were the ones with Chris Rock and Tina Fey.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom