Has DC completely abandoned the name "Captain Marvel" altogether?
No, it's still used in DC multiverse stories like Thunderworld and Convergence - it just can't make it to the covers.
Is Geoff Johns writing this? If he is..........
The Billy we deserve.
No, that's the Billy Johns distorted to give his story a twisted sense of character progression, but he missed the point.
The whole point of Billy getting the powers is that he sets out to be the best person he can be and do the right thing even if he's powerless and outmatched, be it against
common thugs bigger than him, or
a guy he just saw beating freakin' Superman - so he's found to be deserving of getting the power to act on his nature, literally being given a body worthy of his spirit.
The Captain America classic story and especially movie pulled this off just fine with drugs - they just have to make sure the same principle applies through the magical side of the DC universe.
I kinda want Superman to have a small part in this. Kinda like Iron Man in the newest Spider-man movie.
I can't be the only one tired of seeing Superman shoved into any attempt to actually use Captain Marvel... and the current movie version wouldn't really add all that much to a story with the tone they say they want to go for, especially considering the recent Superman's track record as far as public deeds and public perception in that universe goes...
Might as well go with Mr Myxlplyx instead as an antagonist...
Agree, but at least he actually's a fan of the character, which is more then can be said for most of the writers who have touched the characters in the past-decade.
The impression I keep getting is that Black Adam is the one Johns likes, so he ends up having to address young Batson's role in that character's history.
With that in mind, Rock and Black Adam's absence from a Captain Marvel movie might be the best possible thing to happen to it, since it leaves things open for other kinds of antagonists and tones.