SHOCKING NEWS: Tweets About Prophet Muhammad Spark Saudi Death Threats

Status
Not open for further replies.
Every religion has it's zealots. I think some countries need more time to secularize their societies.

Not too long ago you'd be killed in MANY "Christian" nations for insulting God. People need to keep in mind that this is a VERY recent development in society where we've grown past the need to LITERALLY stone people and kill them for Blasphemy.

It's naive to expect the entire planet to come around at once. It'll take longer than our lifetimes or our children's children's lifetime. I say another millennium, minimum.

And women in the US at the turn of the last century were arrested for showing any skin at beaches.
 
There's nothing offensive about those tweets, goddamn what in the saudi fuck.

There's not a single person on earth who thinks Prophet Muhammad is divine and there's not a single Muslim on earth that bows down to Muhammad. No Muslim, especially from the wahabi thought, prays for Muhammad. It's clear to every Muslim that Muhammad was a mere mortal. Where the hell is the outrage coming from?

Mob mentality.
 
and I'm talking about the Saudi Gov and 'actual saudi citizens'. read the post again, it's about Saudi Arabia and its people not the foreigner workers over there.
I'm watching it, but it seems like most of the people shown aren't Saudi "subjects".

Trust me, I'm not trying to downplay it, as I do know that the lives of a good percentage of Saudi people is pretty bad, but my point is that for those with influence in the population, it's pretty good, and thus, they see no reason to change.

Once again, not everyone living in Saudi Arabia, even if they've been living there for years, and we may not consider them to be foreign workers anymore are still deemed so, and they don't get real help from the govt. Those people are marginalized, and they're opinion doesn't mean much. I'm trying to answer your question as to why the Saudi population doesn't just have an Arab Spring of their own.

From what I've learned, Saudi Arabia is like two separate worlds. One of old Saudi families that are wealthy with thousands of well off "subjects", and another world of foreign workers and their descendants who don't live too well off. Yes, I know there is a naturalization process, but I believe that unless you're very well qualified, or more importantly, have a true Saudi male relative, then you don't have much of a chance of becoming a "subject" (citizen).

In fact, I was once told by a Saudi that I know that most of the population of Saudi Arabia isn't even technically Saudi, if that makes any sense.
 
Sorry Soulplaya but you don't know what you're talking about. There's plenty of poverty in Saudi Arabia, and the middle class is shrinking and less well off. We've also got high unemployment. Altogether, it's not the rosy picture you paint.

BTW naturalised Saudis tend to be well off, as generally only highly skilled professionals or people with connections get offered naturalisation.
 
Sorry Soulplaya but you don't know what you're talking about. There's plenty of poverty in Saudi Arabia, and the middle class is shrinking and less well off. We've also got high unemployment. Altogether, it's not the rosy picture you paint.

BTW naturalised Saudis tend to be well off, as generally only highly skilled professionals or people with connections get offered naturalisation.
Where the fuck am I denying poverty? Where? In fact, I said, "lives of a good percentage of Saudi people is pretty bad".

He's asking why isn't there an Arab Spring in Saudi Arabia? I said (and this isn't the only reason), those with influence in Saudi Arabia, are very wealthy, live a very comfortable life, and don't want things to change. How is that statement wrong?

And your point about the naturalization process is the one that I just made in my last post. Holy shit, I'm sorry for being pissed, but this has been happening to me a few times over the last few days.

EDIT: OK, here are some REAL numbers. The population of Saudi Arabia is 27,000,000. 8 million of which are non-nationals. They, from my understanding, aren't considered "subjects", and get little help from the government. That's what I've been saying. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Saudi_Arabia#UN_estimates.5B5.5D
 
All of that stuff you posted is on the books also when it comes to Christianity and The Bible. It wasn't too long ago that this violent behavior was accepted in Christian nations- the Salem Witch Hunts, the Spanish Inquisition, The Crusades, The Slave Trade, Colonialism etc... You can also argue that this Christian extremism exists today with the Bush Administration invoking God and Christianity in starting their illegal invasion of Iraq. I'm just saying...

There are so many things wrong with this post.

The slave trade and colonialism were not because of Christianity.

And the rise of extreme Christian evangelicalism has little to nothing to do with the Bush Administration and more to do with the religious right rising up after Roe v. Wade and politicizing.
 
There are so many things wrong with this post.

The slave trade and colonialism were not because of Christianity.

And the rise of extreme Christian evangelicalism has little to nothing to do with the Bush Administration and more to do with the religious right rising up after Roe v. Wade and politicizing.

What's the bible's stance on slavery? Is it condemned anywhere?
 
What's the bible's stance on slavery? Is it condemned anywhere?

The African slave trade did not come about because those people viewed it as God's will, but because they were greedy and racist, viewing the Africans as sub-human, and then using religion to justify it. Yea the Bible says slavery is OK. So what? There's a difference between the type of slavery practiced in the Roman Empire and the African slave trade. I'm not OK-ing either but just saying that neither types of slavery were BECAUSE of Christianity. Justified by it, sure, but not the root cause.
 
You are correct. But the depictions are not just .. depictions. They are humiliating or derogatory in nature. But yeah, a reason be it legitimate or not is enough for the loonies to go overboard. Now lets just replace Prophet Muhammad with say .. Ram, Shiva, Hanuman (Hinduism) and depict them in a derogatory cartoon and pretty sure loonies will also come out for blood.

This isnt exclusive to Islam, it applies to all those religions that have yet to have their religious figures mocked/exploited.

It isn't on the same level bro. Not in the current climate. Radical Islam is a big problem.
 
What's the bible's stance on slavery? Is it condemned anywhere?
In the OT, it is condemned when owning another Jew, but that mainly pertains to Mosaic law that DOES NOT apply to Christians.

In the NT, what I remember from Bible classes, is in a letter from Paul to Philemon, where he said that he was returning an old slave of his (Philemon's slave who ran away), Onesimus, to him, but Paul wanted Philemon to accept him as a brother of his, and no longer as a slave. Legend holds that Philemon indeed listened to Paul and freed Onesimus.

EDIT: I also believe that in Corinthians, Paul told slaves to seek their freedom.
 
The African slave trade did not come about because those people viewed it as God's will, but because they were greedy and racist, viewing the Africans as sub-human, and then using religion to justify it. Yea the Bible says slavery is OK. So what? There's a difference between the type of slavery practiced in the Roman Empire and the African slave trade. I'm not OK-ing either but just saying that neither types of slavery were BECAUSE of Christianity. Justified by it, sure, but not the root cause.

Why couldn't they view it as god's will if the bible states slavery is ok? If they choose to use the word of god as a moral compass, wouldn't that mean they were justified in believing it was morally justified if the good book did not explicitly say otherwise?
 
Most ignorant post in the thread.

What other religion has even a fraction of the developmentally damaged sociopaths?

And then you look at coutnries that can be labeled by their predominate belief system. Christian nations, Buddhist nations, Atheist nations, etc. no real issues in them for the most part but Islamic nations? Oh boy.
 
What other religion has even a fraction of the developmentally damaged sociopaths?

And then you look at coutnries that can be labeled by their predominate belief system. Christian nations, Buddhist nations, Atheist nations, etc. no real issues in them for the most part but Islamic nations? Oh boy.

You really think all muslims nations have this problem? For real?
 
I just read the tweets. Is the guy an atheist?? The article mentions that some the angry clergymen called him an atheist, and the tweets seem to suggest that.

I would have a problem if he was trying to spread his views to other young people, because it contradicts Islamic values. But the reaction that this is receiving is unreal. These people getting riled up and calling for his death need to calm down. This needs to be approached in a rational way. But I guess, it is too much to ask for.. since we are talking about a country raised on the wahabi version of Islam.

He is a 23 year old guy!! We all make mistakes when we are young. If these people really want justice, they would talk to him and find out why he feels that way about the prophet. Maybe he just doesn't quite understand what Islam is about, or the history of the prophet. Try to educate him.

What these clergymen are doing is ignorant, and goes against everything the prophet preached. (God is the most forgiving)


But in the end, this is the result of what happens when you take something to the extreme. Saudi Arabia is taking Islam, twisting it and trying to promote an extreme version of it. They have been doing this for decades, and as a result people are going to the other extreme and leaving Islam.

Islam is supposed to be a moderate religion. God says that muslims are supposed to be stand in the middle, to not be taken to extremes.

What is happening right now, is the exact opposite.
 
You really think all muslims nations have this problem? For real?

Number of atheist/christian/hindu/buddhist/etc. nations that regularly prosecute, execute, etc. non-believers or those seen as going against or slighting said belief system: 0

Number of islamic nations that regularly prosecute, execute, etc. non-believers or those seen as slighting said belief system: several

So sure, not all of them, but the fact that there's a significant and noticeable number that do is disgusting
 
Number of atheist/christian/hindu/buddhist/etc. nations that regularly prosecute, execute, etc. non-believers or those seen as going against or slighting said belief system: 0

Number of islamic nations that regularly prosecute, execute, etc. non-believers or those seen as slighting said belief system: several

So sure, not all of them, but the fact that there's a significant and noticeable number that do is disgusting

The only reason these nations exist in the state they do is because power was handed to lunatics by foreigners.

Saudi Arabia would be the exception to this, but even Arabs think that country is insane.
 
I just read the tweets. Is the guy an atheist?? The article mentions that some the angry clergymen called him an atheist, and the tweets seem to suggest that.

I would have a problem if he was trying to spread his views to other young people, because it contradicts Islamic values. But the reaction that this is receiving is unreal. These people getting riled up and calling for his death need to calm down. This needs to be approached in a rational way. But I guess, it is too much to ask for.. since we are talking about a country raised on the wahabi version of Islam.

He is a 23 year old guy!! We all make mistakes when we are young. If these people really want justice, they would talk to him and find out why he feels that way about the prophet. Maybe he just doesn't quite understand what Islam is about, or the history of the prophet. Try to educate him.

What these clergymen are doing is ignorant, and goes against everything the prophet preached. (God is the most forgiving)


But in the end, this is the result of what happens when you take something to the extreme. Saudi Arabia is taking Islam, twisting it and trying to promote an extreme version of it. They have been doing this for decades, and as a result people are going to the other extreme and leaving Islam.

Islam is supposed to be a moderate religion. God says that muslims are supposed to be stand in the middle, to not be taken to extremes.

What is happening right now, is the exact opposite.

What did he do wrong? He just has different views on a historical and religous figure.
 
I just read the tweets. Is the guy an atheist?? The article mentions that some the angry clergymen called him an atheist, and the tweets seem to suggest that.

I would have a problem if he was trying to spread his views to other young people, because it contradicts Islamic values. But the reaction that this is receiving is unreal. These people getting riled up and calling for his death need to calm down. This needs to be approached in a rational way. But I guess, it is too much to ask for.. since we are talking about a country raised on the wahabi version of Islam.

He is a 23 year old guy!! We all make mistakes when we are young. If these people really want justice, they would talk to him and find out why he feels that way about the prophet. Maybe he just doesn't quite understand what Islam is about, or the history of the prophet. Try to educate him.

What these clergymen are doing is ignorant, and goes against everything the prophet preached. (God is the most forgiving)


But in the end, this is the result of what happens when you take something to the extreme. Saudi Arabia is taking Islam, twisting it and trying to promote an extreme version of it. They have been doing this for decades, and as a result people are going to the other extreme and leaving Islam.

Islam is supposed to be a moderate religion. God says that muslims are supposed to be stand in the middle, to not be taken to extremes.

What is happening right now, is the exact opposite.

Or maybe he understands perfectly well?

What 'mistake' did he make?
 
I just read the tweets. Is the guy an atheist?? The article mentions that some the angry clergymen called him an atheist, and the tweets seem to suggest that.

I would have a problem if he was trying to spread his views to other young people, because it contradicts Islamic values. But the reaction that this is receiving is unreal. These people getting riled up and calling for his death need to calm down. This needs to be approached in a rational way. But I guess, it is too much to ask for.. since we are talking about a country raised on the wahabi version of Islam.

He is a 23 year old guy!! We all make mistakes when we are young. If these people really want justice, they would talk to him and find out why he feels that way about the prophet. Maybe he just doesn't quite understand what Islam is about, or the history of the prophet. Try to educate him.

What these clergymen are doing is ignorant, and goes against everything the prophet preached. (God is the most forgiving)


But in the end, this is the result of what happens when you take something to the extreme. Saudi Arabia is taking Islam, twisting it and trying to promote an extreme version of it. They have been doing this for decades, and as a result people are going to the other extreme and leaving Islam.

Islam is supposed to be a moderate religion. God says that muslims are supposed to be stand in the middle, to not be taken to extremes.

What is happening right now, is the exact opposite.

what
 
UPDATE3: Some good news. Turns out the newspaper reports of Hamza's apprehension were false. He's still out there somewhere and locals are thirsting for blood. A liberal Saudi blogger with sources close to Hamza confirms that he's been targeted for a while as some sort of attempt by the ultra-conservatives to make an example out of a list of people on Twitter (some were even told they were being watched). This is life here, GAF.
 
I would have a problem if he was trying to spread his views to other young people, because it contradicts Islamic values.

But, just to be clear, you still wouldn't support death threats, arresting him or otherwise taking action against him, correct?
 
But, just to be clear, you still wouldn't support death threats, arresting him or otherwise taking action against him, correct?

No, he shouldn't be receiving death threats. If he is an apostate, then it is up to God to punish him, not me, unless he starts spreading his idea and organizing some kind of religious war.


Insisting on uniformity of religious opinion (Islamic values) across an entire state is extreme in itself.

I guess I should have clarified what I was talking about. I would have a problem with him promoting his ideas to young people, because it goes against Islamic unity. You should know by now that Islam is a way of life, and it is not just some set of rituals you do at home.

Let's say that there is someone in the USA ( or any country) who preaches to people about how being American is terrible and that he is constantly promoting for people to revoke their rights as citizens and secede. Isn't that a danger to the country as a whole? Wouldn't you want to stop him from spreading his ideas?

So, imagine living in a muslim country.... and you will get the idea.
 
No, he shouldn't be receiving death threats. If he is an apostate, then it is up to God to punish him, not me, unless he starts spreading his idea and organizing some kind of religious war.

?

Then I guess you'll take it upon yourself to kill him?
 
What kind of question is that?? Man, some people on this board just love asking silly questions. And I say that with respect. :P

Well you did say it was up to God, not you, to punish him unless he starts spreading his ideas to other people, meaning that if that did indeed happen, you would bring it upon yourself to punish him. What I said isn't really out of context with the phrasing of your post.
 
Well you did say it was up to God, not you, to punish him unless he starts spreading his ideas to other people, meaning that if that did indeed happen, you would bring it upon yourself to punish him. What I said isn't really out of context with the phrasing of your post.

I think you know what I meant. I can't fight a war by myself!!! What I meant was that it is up to God to punish him, unless he starts gathering people and wages a war, then we have problem. We obviously can't just stand aside and watch. And by we, I mean muslims.
 
I think you know what I meant. I can't fight a war by myself!!! What I meant was that it is up to God to punish him, unless he starts gathering people and wages a war, then we have problem. We obviously can't just stand aside and watch. And by we, I mean muslims.

ah, I see. The chances of that ever happening though are 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% x 0
 
ah, I see. The chances of that ever happening though are 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% x 0

It has happened before though.
 
I don't know the exact name of the person that started it. But it happened a loooong time ago. I will try to find it later.
So, if he went around and started telling other Muslims that they should leave their faith, then he should be punished?
 
Islam is supposed to be a moderate religion. God says that muslims are supposed to be stand in the middle, to not be taken to extremes.
It's sad that just believing in God isn't considered extreme yet. Humanity has so far to go... I get depressed knowing I'll never see it truly grow up.
 
I strongly agree with the suggestion that you can't get angry about people who don't share your religious views doing something that may go against your own beliefs.

Thankfully, all the Muslim people I know are far more tolerant and rational than these Saudi knobs who take things to extremes.
 
This may seem stupid, but what about when the Simpsons mocked Ganesha, the Indian God?

Sorry, I really don't know much about Hinduism.
I'm Hindu. AFAIK there wasn't much backlash for caricatures of Hindu deities in american cartoons. Indian cartoonists frequently depict our deities in comics in newspapers, though not in an unfavorable light.

The religious loonies in the country live in rural areas or parts of northern India where Hindi is the major language. They wouldn't know what a Simpson is. The biggest religious backlash to my knowledge happened when a Muslim painter (M.F.Hussain) drew nude depictions of Hindu deities.
 
Other Muslim countries, including the world's most populous Muslim country, do not have similar configurations. The situation in Saudi Arabia is truly unique. You might find particular elements, and certainly this author's tweets would have went over poorly virtually everywhere in the North African / Arab / Persian Islamic world (I suspect South-East Asian Muslims would be comparatively more chill), but Saudi Arabia exists on its own plane entirely in terms of how it approaches law and morality.

They have to. SA has the holiest shrine/place in Islam, and the Saudi family are afraid that if they don´t take a hard line in regard to these things, they would be overthrown by their population or at least by extreme elements of their population.
 
what did the first round achieve?

Apparently, not enough. Perhaps more effort is required next time, maybe some mainstream media participation.

Some muslims need to learn that islamic rules and norms are completely irrelevant to non-muslims (and some muslims!). If it takes some hardcore offence to teach them that, so be it.
 
Let's say that there is someone in the USA ( or any country) who preaches to people about how being American is terrible and that he is constantly promoting for people to revoke their rights as citizens and secede. Isn't that a danger to the country as a whole? Wouldn't you want to stop him from spreading his ideas?

137340980_620x350.jpg
 
Apparently, not enough. Perhaps more effort is required next time, maybe some mainstream media participation.

Some muslims need to learn that islamic rules and norms are completely irrelevant to non-muslims (and some muslims!). If it takes some hardcore offence to teach them that, so be it.

dedicating a day to insulting the prophet isn't going to achieve that, it will only make them more hardline.

enaging them on the fact that they've made the prophet into a idol would bare more results.
 
Similar news from Indonesia
A defiant declaration of atheism by an Indonesian civil servant has inflamed passions in the world’s most populous Muslim nation, pitting non-believers and believers against each other.

The trouble began when civil servant Alexander Aan posted a message on the Facebook page of Atheist Minang, a group of Indonesians with godless beliefs. It read: “God doesn’t exist.”

The post so enraged residents in Aan’s hometown of Pulau Punjung in West Sumatra province that an angry mob of dozens stormed his office and beat up the 30-year-old.

To add insult to injury, police then arrested him and now want to press blasphemy charges that could see him locked up for five years.


Muslim extremists have called for Aan to be beheaded but fellow atheists have rallied round, and urged him to stand by his convictions despite the pressure.

“Dear Alex, stick to your beliefs. This country has no right to restrict your faith,” Fahd Singa Diwirja wrote on the same Facebook page, where Aan is one of the administrators.

“You’re facing narrow-minded people, but this is the true Indonesia, a fertile ground for the spread of fundamentalism,” Diwirja added, advising Aan to escape persecution by seeking asylum in a European country.

Aan has also gained the support of the US-based International Atheist Alliance.

The group, together with Atheist Minang, has written to President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, calling on him to ensure that the blasphemy allegations are dropped.

“This is a law that has been used to promote mob violence and intimidation against those who do not agree with ... vigilante groups,” said the letter, copies of which were also sent to the United Nations and Human Rights Watch.

Aan’s proclamation has been removed from the page, but the Facebook group has doubled to 2,000 since the controversy made local news reports.

Most of the postings, however, are diatribes against Aan and his supporters.

“These atheists should be beheaded, that’s what they deserve,” wrote a man who identified himself as Putra Tama, a Muslim from neighboring Jambi province.

Other posts challenged atheists from the group to dare show themselves, instead of hiding behind the anonymity of social media.

“If you think your arguments are true, why don’t you just have a face-to-face meeting with us, people who still believe in God? You’re just a group of cowards,” taunted a post by another Muslim.

Although Indonesia’s constitution guarantees freedom of religion, it only recognizes six faiths: Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Catholicism, Protestantism and Confucianism.

Perceived blasphemy against any one of these religions carries a maximum five-year jail term.
 
Let's say that there is someone in the USA ( or any country) who preaches to people about how being American is terrible and that he is constantly promoting for people to revoke their rights as citizens and secede. Isn't that a danger to the country as a whole? Wouldn't you want to stop him from spreading his ideas?
what is this I don't even

Absolutely not. That person should have the right to say those things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom