snaildog said:I don't care if it's prejudiced, it just seems ridiculous that I have to keep my bag down to a tiny weight when there's someone opposite me that's four times heavier. They don't even weigh the damn passengers at all. Stupid fat people.
I don't understand what your issue is.snaildog said:I don't care if it's prejudiced, it just seems ridiculous that I have to keep my bag down to a tiny weight when there's someone opposite me that's four times heavier. They don't even weigh the damn passengers at all. Stupid fat people.
Heavy suitcases arent the only things weighing down airplanes and requiring them to burn more fuel, pushing up the cost of flights. A new government study reveals that airlines increasingly have to worry more about the weight of their passengers.
advertisement
Americas growing waistlines are hurting the bottom lines of airline companies as the extra pounds on passengers are causing a drag on planes. Heavier fliers have created heftier fuel costs, according to the government study.
Through the 1990s, the average weight of Americans increased by 10 pounds, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The extra weight caused airlines to spend $275 million to burn 350 million more gallons of fuel in 2000 just to carry the additional weight of Americans, the federal agency estimated in a recent issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
Odnetnin said:that's right. You should tell them to their face and write a letter to the FDA/AAA. Fat people should be locked at home and not allowed out of the kennel. They also cause turbulence as their fat react to the atmospheric pressure
disclaimer: I am not fat
Jesus, his rant was so virulent I assumed it was satirical.Loki said:Yeah, I think we sorta had that one figured out-- unless you had a case of severe self-loathing.
Jak140 said:I assumed it was satirical.
Jak140 said:Jesus, his rant was so virulent I assumed it was satirical.
I just plain don't much like fat people. Send them off to an island somewhere (no technology) and breed them out of our countries.-jinx- said:I don't understand what your issue is.
Are you complaining about carry-on luggage size or weight? That has nothing to do with the weight of the other passengers.
Are you complaining about how needing to carry "fat people" causes the aggregate luggage weight limit per passenger to be lower than it might be otherwise? I'd find it hard to believe that you typically take more than 70-75 pounds of luggage on trips.
Are you complaining about having room on the flight? Quite frankly, fat people are only part of your worries. Tall people, or people with very broad shoulders, take up just as much (if not more) room on planes. And, why blame the passengers when most airlines just LOVE to design cramped seating areas on planes?
So what's really going on here?
snaildog said:I just plain don't much like fat people. Send them off to an island somewhere (no technology) and breed them out of our countries.
I really hope you're kidding.snaildog said:I just plain don't much like fat people. Send them off to an island somewhere (no technology) and breed them out of our countries.
More weight means more fuel; there's no way around it. Two hundred passengers on a given flight, at an extra 10 pounds each, means 2,000 added pounds. Specifically, the CDC states that in the year 2000, U.S. airlines had to burn 350 million extra gallons of fuel, at a cost of more than a quarter of a billion dollars, to haul the added weight of ever-widening Americans. That extra fuel released an estimated 3.8 million tons of climate-changing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Those are, if I may, pretty fat numbers, but they deserve some perspective. In the case of a fully loaded 747, which has a maximum takeoff weight close to 900,000 pounds, the sum heft of an overbooked cabin (about 400 well-fed souls) represents less than 10 percent of the total, which mostly consists of fuel (about 400,000 pounds), freight and the vessel itself.
That ratio isn't so impressive with every model, as the 747 has outrageous economies of scale. Generally, the smaller the aircraft, the more your girth matters. With the 747, our extra 10 pounds equate to .46 percent of the maximum. In the case of a 19-seater, it's about 1.2 percent.
That's not to downplay the significance of those 350 million extra gallons; only to point out that the weight of the passengers may not be as crucial to overall efficiency as you think. A less than optimal cruising altitude, for instance, can burn a lot more fuel than the expanded waistlines of those on board.
But for good measure, at least in this country, the airlines have turned proactive by refusing to feed you.
As for "driving up fares," while the impetus is there in concept, fares remain cheaper than ever. Mean ticket prices in today's dollars are the cheapest they've been since 1987. Adjusted for inflation, they are the lowest ever.
U.S. airlines had to burn 350 million extra gallons of fuel
"You're not a shoplifter, you're just a fat kid. Sorry about that fatty, fat, fatty. Hey Tom, he's just a fat kid. Aren't ya fatty? He's a big ol' fat kid. Here's some chocolate fatso."Fixed2BeBroken said:Fatty fat FATS!
Do you go around in real life ranting about the furry artist's agenda?Kaijima said:I wonder if some of you guys would ever go around in real life ranting about the shit you do. You know, take a stand against the blight of people you don't like! Stand up in that airplane and tell all the hideous, ugly fat people, those sub-human creatures which should be wiped from the face of the earth, to PAY YO' DAMN TICkET, OR GO KILL THEMSELVES!
:lol :lol :lol :lol Oh man.......Should fatter people pay more on planes?
RonaldoSan said:The world is going down the shitter...
Odnetnin said:that's right. You should tell them to their face and write a letter to the FDA/AAA. Fat people should be locked at home and not allowed out of the kennel. They also cause turbulence as their fat react to the atmospheric pressure
disclaimer: I am not fat.
Folder said:Having stepped off a trans-Atlantic flight some four hours ago I can confidently say yes, they should. If you don't fir in the seat, pay for two seats, an upgrade or don't fly until you've saved up.
I'll post an image here tomorrow disproving that.Nerevar said:If you're too big to fight in a seat the airline will force you to purchase another seat. I know it, becuase I've seen it happen.
:lolkpop100 said:The irony would be if those fat people that were forced to buy a 2nd seat were entitled to a second meal
:lol :lol :lolkpop100 said:The irony would be if those fat people that were forced to buy a 2nd seat were entitled to a second meal
Folder said:I'll post an image here tomorrow disproving that.