yeh lets make humans extinct before the earth destroys itself.
Is the ratio of smart and conscientious kids raised by smart and conscientious parents insignificant or what? Do you have any stats or did you just want to seem clever and smug?Smart and conscientious people don't necessarily bring smart and conscientious kids to the world.
That's not how populations work. We'd be in a similar position as Japan. An inverse population pyramid is a sign something is wrong.We can never ever make humans extint via volunteers who don't have kids. There will always be those want kids.
Let's have 50% less, the earth would thank us.
That's not how populations work. We'd be in a similar position as Japan. An inverse population pyramid is a sign something is wrong.
Also, how many of you claiming that you won't want kids are actually in a position to have any? In other words, how many of you actually have an SO where having kids is on the table?
It's amazing how many people on gaf are depressive... This attitude isn't helping at all.
Were the smartest organisms on the planet so far.
Really which other smarter life form are you aware of ? From a purely logical point of view human intelligence is the best defense you have against any form of extinction eventI'll have children, yeah. Probably 1-3, depending on what my SO wants. Just because the world is in dire straights doesn't mean humans should stop pro-creating... that's stupid.
They likely aren't and probably never will. That's why it's so easy for them to say never.
I don't take much stock in the opinions of many Gaffers here due to their depressing, nihilistic post history. It's easier to say "it's all over" than actually do shit.
Lmao
I'd say that a child born in first world country has more power to stop the climate change despite the tons of carbon dioxide produced by the child's existence.
That child is going to be more educated*, have more financial power and has more political influence to pressure first world countries to work on the problem. Like it or not, this problem will be solved by mostly first world countries** (either through policies pressured unto other countries or scientific progress).
*(and thus will have better understanding about the seriousness of the issue and more likely to actually become a scientist working on the problem)
**(With russia and china being exceptions)
Political will will flow from first world countries . Intellectual manpower not so sure at this point were moving very swiftly towards a globalised perspective on "solving" things intellectually as you out it . A vast amount of the legal and appreciated migration to first world countries is from other countries brainpower. The initiative will probably come from first world countries but I wouldn't go so far as to say they will by themselves solve it .I'd say that a child born in first world country has more power to stop the climate change despite the tons of carbon dioxide produced by the child's existence.
That child is going to be more educated*, have more financial power and has more political influence to pressure first world countries to work on the problem. Like it or not, this problem will be solved by mostly first world countries** (either through policies pressured unto other countries or scientific progress).
*(and thus will have better understanding about the seriousness of the issue and more likely to actually become a scientist working on the problem)
**(With russia and china being exceptions)
That's not how populations work. We'd be in a similar position as Japan. An inverse population pyramid is a sign something is wrong.
I don't think the world cares if a few people in the Western world have less kids while people in 3rd world countries continue to fuck like rabbits. It's not us to drive the overpopulation of the planet and it's not us who can stop it by absenting.We can never ever make humans extint via volunteers who don't have kids. There will always be those want kids.
Let's have 50% less, the earth would thank us.
having kids right now is selfish as fuck. my generation and the ones before ruined the world for them. they're gonna suffer and so will their kids and their grandkids. fuck that shit
and so many kids out there right now need homes and families. they need us more than our "future" kids do
Because it costs a fortune to adopt.
To answer you question: Sure have as many kids as you want. I personally think this whole climate change and global warming is much to do about nothing.
This mentality would basically lead to the extinction of the human race and become a self-fulfilling prophecy, wouldn't it?
I find it a little disturbing that people here seem to be the arbiters of who "should" and who "shouldn't" have kids, even if it's in the abstract.
It's a personal decision between you and your partner. As always I would urge time and care to be taken with the commitment needed (time and financial). As for the factors involving our home, the earth, I'd say part of being human and wanting to try and enjoy what we can before we kick the bucket may well involve having a family for many. That should never be taken away, we should care for the earth alongside caring for humanities happiness. Some decisions inevitably tip somewhat to the selfish side on the "grand scale", but that is to be human. Day 0 to day death is never going to be totally selfless for anyone. It's impossible. Looking after yourself and your needs is inherently a somewhat selfish act.
We do need to do a better job of looking after the earth though... Parental restrictions just aren't the right approach. Not as a mandate. If it's your reason for not having kids, fair enough, but make sure you are being honest with yourself.
We can never ever make humans extint via volunteers who don't have kids. There will always be those want kids.
Let's have 50% less, the earth would thank us.
Uhoh, be careful to not cut yourselves on this post guys and girls.having kids right now is selfish as fuck. my generation and the ones before ruined the world for them. they're gonna suffer and so will their kids and their grandkids. fuck that shit
and so many kids out there right now need homes and families. they need us more than our "future" kids do
You realize the earth does not give a fuck whether it even exists
Yup I am doing my part here. Just had my second child, Ayane, yesterday!
Come at me antinatalist GAF
That attitude makes me angry. I'm gonna restrain myself, in order to not get banned, but my girlfriend is currently pregnant, and it annoys the hell out of me that you think we're selfish, because you have some skewed view on how the world actually works.
wrong isn't the right word. it simply means that things are correcting themselves. technology and culture change the circumstances we live in so it's only natural to see this reflected in population growth. the conditions of today are simply vastly different than when japan had their population growth. at some point this population decline will reach its apex and the pendulum will change direction again.That's not how populations work. We'd be in a similar position as Japan. An inverse population pyramid is a sign something is wrong.
wrong isn't the right word. it simply means that things are correcting themselves. technology and culture change the circumstances we live in so it's only natural to see this reflected in population growth. the conditions of today are simply vastly different than when japan had their population growth. at some point this population decline will reach its apex and the pendulum will change direction again.
The problem if anything is that we view a lack of growth as a problem. I think it's a good thing that there's at least one country that tries to face the decline rather than ensure perpetual growth.
would you wish yourself unborn if the world was struck with disaster tomorrow, or gradually over the next 20 years? If so then what is the threshold where you decide it's better to not just die but to actually forfeit your life until now and become unborn? 10% or 20%, 50%, 90%?If you can bring a child into that world with out your stomach turning then good on you?
slow economic collapse = "things correcting themselves"?
Because things aren't as bad as the headlines say they are.
Because things aren't as bad as the headlines say they are.This is the biggest issue IMO.
Me and my GF have been going strong and I love her to bits, but I'm not sure I can have kids and look them in the eye while the world burns.
We have had numerous fights over this.
The ramifications that global warming will bring are just insane.
Extreme weather causing mass migration.
Totalitarian regimes coming to power cause of civil unrest, and xenophobia.
Not to mention the wars that will be fought over the few resources we have left.
If you can bring a child into that world with out your stomach turning then good on you?
we can only do our best, that's just how things are. we should do what we can to ease suffering but it's inherent with change so there's only so much that can be done to help.well ok, nevermind all the people that will become poor while you search for a new "paradigm"...
Relevant Utopia scene
"Nothing uses carbon like a first-world human. Yet you created one.
Why? Why would you do that? He will produce 515 tonnes of carbon in his lifetime. Thats 40 trucks worth. Having him was the equivalent of nearly 6,500 flights to Paris. You could have flown 90 times a year, there and back, nearly every week of your life, and still not had the same impact on the planet as his birth had.
Not to mention the pesticides, detergents, the huge quantity of plastics, the nuclear fuels used to keep him warm. His birth was a selfish act. It was brutal. You have condemned all this to suffering. In fact, if you really cared what youd do is cut his throat open right now."
'gaf' has been like this for years but the trump election has accelerated the fatalism to a fever pitch.when did this escapism in GAF started? if you really want to do something good be more aware of your surroundings and if you really care so much about children finance at least NGOs to educate the poorest and weakest in third world countries. you can go further and adopt children or be a godparent.
I'm not blaming the invidual person to not wanting kids for whatever reason, but the arguments in the OP are just the ones of someone lazy.