• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Should we be having kids in the age of climate change?

Status
Not open for further replies.

poodaddy

Member
Yeah I did the one and done. I love my daughter more than any thought could adequately convey, but I don't want to contribute to an over population problem.
 

Nocebo

Member
Smart and conscientious people don't necessarily bring smart and conscientious kids to the world.
Is the ratio of smart and conscientious kids raised by smart and conscientious parents insignificant or what? Do you have any stats or did you just want to seem clever and smug?
 

A Fish Aficionado

I am going to make it through this year if it kills me
We can never ever make humans extint via volunteers who don't have kids. There will always be those want kids.

Let's have 50% less, the earth would thank us.
That's not how populations work. We'd be in a similar position as Japan. An inverse population pyramid is a sign something is wrong.
 
I'd say that a child born in first world country has more power to stop the climate change despite the tons of carbon dioxide produced by the child's existence.

That child is going to be more educated*, have more financial power and has more political influence to pressure first world countries to work on the problem. Like it or not, this problem will be solved by mostly first world countries** (either through policies pressured unto other countries or scientific progress).

*(and thus will have better understanding about the seriousness of the issue and more likely to actually become a scientist working on the problem)

**(With russia and china being exceptions)
 
I'll have children, yeah. Probably 1-3, depending on what my SO wants. Just because the world is in dire straights doesn't mean humans should stop pro-creating... that's stupid.

Also, how many of you claiming that you won't want kids are actually in a position to have any? In other words, how many of you actually have an SO where having kids is on the table?

They likely aren't and probably never will. That's why it's so easy for them to say never.

It's amazing how many people on gaf are depressive... This attitude isn't helping at all.

I don't take much stock in the opinions of many Gaffers here due to their depressing, nihilistic post history. It's easier to say "it's all over" than actually do shit.

Were the smartest organisms on the planet so far.

Lmao
 

Ishan

Junior Member
Yes humans are resilient . Once the world realises were fucked well collectively come together and fix it somehow . We put a man on the moon in the 60s I'm sure if you pour in the worlds intellect into combating climate change with political will well find a way ...

Essential trajectory of science major advances happen all the time but given urgencies with funding and directed approaches humans figure a way out normally . Were the smartest organisms on the planet so far .


Edit on a purely logical sense think about it we have the smartest ppl working on disparate fields if it came to an existential threat a vast majority of those minds will work and fix it ... Yes the scientists will bail us out not the politics which made a mess but that's the job of scientists anyway overall bailing out and helping humanity if need be. Let's hope it doesn't come to that if it does I'm pretty sure well fix it.
 

Ishan

Junior Member
I'll have children, yeah. Probably 1-3, depending on what my SO wants. Just because the world is in dire straights doesn't mean humans should stop pro-creating... that's stupid.



They likely aren't and probably never will. That's why it's so easy for them to say never.



I don't take much stock in the opinions of many Gaffers here due to their depressing, nihilistic post history. It's easier to say "it's all over" than actually do shit.



Lmao
Really which other smarter life form are you aware of ? From a purely logical point of view human intelligence is the best defense you have against any form of extinction event

Edit oh I see grammar while typing on my iPad yeah hope you had a good laugh ...
 

zoukka

Member
I'd say that a child born in first world country has more power to stop the climate change despite the tons of carbon dioxide produced by the child's existence.

That child is going to be more educated*, have more financial power and has more political influence to pressure first world countries to work on the problem. Like it or not, this problem will be solved by mostly first world countries** (either through policies pressured unto other countries or scientific progress).

*(and thus will have better understanding about the seriousness of the issue and more likely to actually become a scientist working on the problem)

**(With russia and china being exceptions)

And now USA.
 

Ishan

Junior Member
I'd say that a child born in first world country has more power to stop the climate change despite the tons of carbon dioxide produced by the child's existence.

That child is going to be more educated*, have more financial power and has more political influence to pressure first world countries to work on the problem. Like it or not, this problem will be solved by mostly first world countries** (either through policies pressured unto other countries or scientific progress).

*(and thus will have better understanding about the seriousness of the issue and more likely to actually become a scientist working on the problem)

**(With russia and china being exceptions)
Political will will flow from first world countries . Intellectual manpower not so sure at this point were moving very swiftly towards a globalised perspective on "solving" things intellectually as you out it . A vast amount of the legal and appreciated migration to first world countries is from other countries brainpower. The initiative will probably come from first world countries but I wouldn't go so far as to say they will by themselves solve it .
 

KHlover

Banned
We can never ever make humans extint via volunteers who don't have kids. There will always be those want kids.

Let's have 50% less, the earth would thank us.
I don't think the world cares if a few people in the Western world have less kids while people in 3rd world countries continue to fuck like rabbits. It's not us to drive the overpopulation of the planet and it's not us who can stop it by absenting.

I mean you could go and do like Haviland Tuff does in GRRMs "Tuff Voyaging" and forcibly make certain parts of the population impotent, but unless you want to go there all that can be done is trying to convince those people in places where having like 8+ children is normal to have less children.
 

ohlawd

Member
having kids right now is selfish as fuck. my generation and the ones before ruined the world for them. they're gonna suffer and so will their kids and their grandkids. fuck that shit

and so many kids out there right now need homes and families. they need us more than our "future" kids do
 

TBiddy

Member
having kids right now is selfish as fuck. my generation and the ones before ruined the world for them. they're gonna suffer and so will their kids and their grandkids. fuck that shit

and so many kids out there right now need homes and families. they need us more than our "future" kids do

That attitude makes me angry. I'm gonna restrain myself, in order to not get banned, but my girlfriend is currently pregnant, and it annoys the hell out of me that you think we're selfish, because you have some skewed view on how the world actually works.
 

StayDead

Member
Honestly, the only way we'll stop global warming is for all humans to just cease to exist. We're a literal plague on this planet and because of our selfish nature we've not only lead countless species to extinction, but we're doing the same to the planet we live on.

I don't think we should cease to exist, because I personally like living, but unless we change our ways then this is going to be a constant driving factor whatever happens. If we colonise another planet then we'll destroy that as well. The uneducated (and sometimes educated) mass of people just simply don't care. If it doesn't directly impact their own freedoms then they don't give a shit and by that time it's too late to do anything.
 

sazzy

Member
If you're an intelligent, progressive, secular person, then yes you should have children and raise them with the aforementioned values, because the feeble-minded, bigoted, extreme religious persons are sure as hell not going to stop having children.
 
If I decide I want to have a kid and meet a nice girl who I think would be a good mother and also wants to have a kid then yes I will have a kid. Thats cool if you choose not to, I probably wont have a kid. I don't really give a fuck about if people think thats selfish or not. If thats selfish of me then consider me selfish.
 

Hermii

Member
This mentality would basically lead to the extinction of the human race and become a self-fulfilling prophecy, wouldn't it?

If billions of People had this mentality, yes. If millions of People had it, it would lead to less human beings, less overpopulation. less emissions and less global warming.
 
From a mathematical/cold pov we probably should be less humans on this planet in general... we also should live under different systems that sustain our needs and guarantee our survival (short-term survival that is). We don't really undertsand all the implications we have on our environment and once we do then we are incapable to adapt in time to prevent serious outcomes.

It is what it is I guess, maybe one of these "great filter" scenarios, or maybe we just walk willingly into catastrophic events like this will eventually become one and for the people that will look back at it it will be clear that it was bound to happen like that with the way it was and they wont make the same mistake twice... until they eventually do.
 

Airola

Member
It's odd when people are saying it's selfish to have children when they often are basing their choice in not feeling good or right about it if they would bring a child in this world.

I mean, isn't that a selfish choice too? You don't do it because it feels bad to you. You don't do it because you feel better if you don't do it.



This post is golden and it explains pretty well how the "selfishness" thing really goes:

It's a personal decision between you and your partner. As always I would urge time and care to be taken with the commitment needed (time and financial). As for the factors involving our home, the earth, I'd say part of being human and wanting to try and enjoy what we can before we kick the bucket may well involve having a family for many. That should never be taken away, we should care for the earth alongside caring for humanities happiness. Some decisions inevitably tip somewhat to the selfish side on the "grand scale", but that is to be human. Day 0 to day death is never going to be totally selfless for anyone. It's impossible. Looking after yourself and your needs is inherently a somewhat selfish act.

We do need to do a better job of looking after the earth though... Parental restrictions just aren't the right approach. Not as a mandate. If it's your reason for not having kids, fair enough, but make sure you are being honest with yourself.
 

WaterAstro

Member
Again, not having kids is not going to solve climate change. We have the resources to support a bigger population, but we're extremely wasteful with it.

More than ever, people who are doing their best to mitigate climate change should be having kids in order to pass down social and cultural habits that are needed to reduce emissions.

If the next generation of humans are going to only consist of people over-consuming, not caring about the environment, then humanity ends there.
 

Nocebo

Member
having kids right now is selfish as fuck. my generation and the ones before ruined the world for them. they're gonna suffer and so will their kids and their grandkids. fuck that shit

and so many kids out there right now need homes and families. they need us more than our "future" kids do
Uhoh, be careful to not cut yourselves on this post guys and girls.

I don't see how it is selfish to devote your life to the preservation of the human race. Last time I checked humans bodies still break down and die, especially around 80 years of age and on. Societies will collapse if there is no new blood. If a great number of people stopped having children now, things would likely get much worse and faster than through climate change.
 

Big Nikus

Member
That attitude makes me angry. I'm gonna restrain myself, in order to not get banned, but my girlfriend is currently pregnant, and it annoys the hell out of me that you think we're selfish, because you have some skewed view on how the world actually works.

Yeah, don't pay too much attention to those posts.
If we'd listen to GAF, we'd have to let the climate change deniers fuck all they want while we restrain ourselves from having well educated kids.
Also, congrats :)
 

Skinpop

Member
That's not how populations work. We'd be in a similar position as Japan. An inverse population pyramid is a sign something is wrong.
wrong isn't the right word. it simply means that things are correcting themselves. technology and culture change the circumstances we live in so it's only natural to see this reflected in population growth. the conditions of today are simply vastly different than when japan had their population growth. at some point this population decline will reach its apex and the pendulum will change direction again.
The problem if anything is that we view a lack of growth as a problem. I think it's a good thing that there's at least one country that tries to face the decline rather than ensure perpetual growth.
 
This is the biggest issue IMO.

Me and my GF have been going strong and I love her to bits, but I'm not sure I can have kids and look them in the eye while the world burns.
We have had numerous fights over this.

The ramifications that global warming will bring are just insane.
Extreme weather causing mass migration.
Totalitarian regimes coming to power cause of civil unrest, and xenophobia.
Not to mention the wars that will be fought over the few resources we have left.

If you can bring a child into that world with out your stomach turning then good on you?
 
wrong isn't the right word. it simply means that things are correcting themselves. technology and culture change the circumstances we live in so it's only natural to see this reflected in population growth. the conditions of today are simply vastly different than when japan had their population growth. at some point this population decline will reach its apex and the pendulum will change direction again.
The problem if anything is that we view a lack of growth as a problem. I think it's a good thing that there's at least one country that tries to face the decline rather than ensure perpetual growth.

slow economic collapse = "things correcting themselves"?
 

Skinpop

Member
If you can bring a child into that world with out your stomach turning then good on you?
would you wish yourself unborn if the world was struck with disaster tomorrow, or gradually over the next 20 years? If so then what is the threshold where you decide it's better to not just die but to actually forfeit your life until now and become unborn? 10% or 20%, 50%, 90%?
slow economic collapse = "things correcting themselves"?

exactly. population growth depends on a series of inputs, it's not magic that determines it but the changing situation of the world. Don't you find it odd that population decline is viewed as disaster in a world where people scream population overgrowth? obviously our economic and political systems are not equipped to deal with reality long-term and so facing these issues head on are the only thing that will lead to a new paradigm.

Because things aren't as bad as the headlines say they are.

even if they were, the suffer/flourish equation would have been far bleaker for our stone age ancestors, so how could they still be so selfish and procreate knowing their children would likely suffer?
 

A Fish Aficionado

I am going to make it through this year if it kills me
This is the biggest issue IMO.

Me and my GF have been going strong and I love her to bits, but I'm not sure I can have kids and look them in the eye while the world burns.
We have had numerous fights over this.

The ramifications that global warming will bring are just insane.
Extreme weather causing mass migration.
Totalitarian regimes coming to power cause of civil unrest, and xenophobia.
Not to mention the wars that will be fought over the few resources we have left.

If you can bring a child into that world with out your stomach turning then good on you?
Because things aren't as bad as the headlines say they are.

Extremely weather has always driven human migration and development.
 

Skinpop

Member
well ok, nevermind all the people that will become poor while you search for a new "paradigm"...
we can only do our best, that's just how things are. we should do what we can to ease suffering but it's inherent with change so there's only so much that can be done to help.
 
when did this escapism in GAF started? if you really want to do something good be more aware of your surroundings and if you really care so much about children finance at least NGOs to educate the poorest and weakest in third world countries. you can go further and adopt children or be a godparent.
I'm not blaming the invidual person to not wanting kids for whatever reason, but the arguments in the OP are just the ones of someone lazy.
 

KonradLaw

Member
It's not the western world or even asia that will be the problem. Almost all of XXIth century population growth will be coming from Africa, with the continent's population projected to up to 5,5 billion.
 
Relevant Utopia scene

"Nothing uses carbon like a first-world human. Yet you created one.

Why? Why would you do that? He will produce 515 tonnes of carbon in his lifetime. That’s 40 trucks’ worth. Having him was the equivalent of nearly 6,500 flights to Paris. You could have flown 90 times a year, there and back, nearly every week of your life, and still not had the same impact on the planet as his birth had.

Not to mention the pesticides, detergents, the huge quantity of plastics, the nuclear fuels used to keep him warm. His birth was a selfish act. It was brutal. You have condemned all this to suffering. In fact, if you really cared what you’d do is cut his throat open right now."

oh man totally forgot about this show and this clip hit me like a ton of bricks
 
when did this escapism in GAF started? if you really want to do something good be more aware of your surroundings and if you really care so much about children finance at least NGOs to educate the poorest and weakest in third world countries. you can go further and adopt children or be a godparent.
I'm not blaming the invidual person to not wanting kids for whatever reason, but the arguments in the OP are just the ones of someone lazy.
'gaf' has been like this for years but the trump election has accelerated the fatalism to a fever pitch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom