If he doesn't have access to a gaming PC that's a pretty easy claim to make, as horror games this gen have all been either terrible (Alone in the Dark 360/PC) or faux-horror disguised action games (Dead Space) on consoles.
Has anyone tried getting the "Don't kill any enemies" achievement on Hard combat difficulty? Is it a doable?
Then the claim should be more specific, e.g. "best horror game on platform X/Y/Z bar none this gen".
Or, you know, Siren: Blood Curse and Condemned 2 to say a couple that I own.
I'm sorry, but while I haven't actually played the game, this post just seems too hyperbolic. I know the feeling of finishing a game and being ecstatic about it, but I also know that this immediate sensation tends to bias or overlook the flaws of the game in question. In my experience it's usually better to let the impressions brew and mature a little, while giving the aspects of the game more thoughts before proceeding to communicate broad, overtly optimistic claims, such as "best horror game bar none this gen". Just a minor comment .
Then the claim should be more specific, e.g. "best horror game on platform X/Y/Z bar none this gen". As it stands now, it encompasses all survival horror games this generation.
Or, you know, Siren: Blood Curse and Condemned 2 to say a couple that I own.
I'm sorry, but while I haven't actually played the game, this post just seems too hyperbolic. I know the feeling of finishing a game and being ecstatic about it, but I also know that this immediate sensation tends to bias or overlook the flaws of the game in question. In my experience it's usually better to let the impressions brew and mature a little, while giving the aspects of the game more thoughts before proceeding to communicate broad, overtly optimistic claims, such as "best horror game bar none this gen". Just a minor comment .
I'm confused by your post brandon. Why would I need to sleep on it? All I know is I was after a good survival horror fix and downpour provided that for me. I found it unsettling all the way through and it's been a while since any game has done that to me.
I loved entering buildings not knowing what was in store for me, I liked murphy and his story and overall just really dug the ambience and vibe of the game. Admittedly there were occasions that my enthusiam dropped when patrolling the streets but then the game would pull me back in with some great side quest or some head fuck in the main story.
eh I made a joke and then decided to edit it out because it's not very constructive. I'm totally 100% with you about the game.
I thought so. I was just making sure. I'm glad someone feels the same way as me about it.
What can I say, I'm a sucker for old school horror games. I get that others have different, maybe even higher expectations than me especially in this current market (like with how many people rag on the technical setbacks) but it's all about the mindset I have when I approach games like SH.
My biggest gripe is that I felt like the art direction was so good and got incredibly creative and unique as it went, but the graphics weren't really able to compliment the vision. I saw some awesome vistas and such that, with better visuals, could have looked incredible.
Yeah I agree about the mindset. It's strange but it can make all the difference. When I first launched the game I was ready and willing to be taken on a chilling journey (as cheesy as that sounds) and I just embraced what the game threw at me. I find it laughable when people complain about technical issues when they don't effect the game in anyway. They have no business playing games IMO. Lol.
well even my hyperbolic self had issues with the technical limitations, mainly because had it ran smoother and had it looked better, I think it really could have gone a very long way in the general consensus of the title.
it didn't ruin the game for me (clearly) but I was annoyed by all the stuttering and texture loading... I mean I would come out of a menu and watch Murphy's clothing textures reload.
one thing I do want to mention is the combat system. uhm, really? before I played the game I thought it was going to be some disaster, but I thought the game had the best gameplay in the series. the creature designs weren't very inspired, but actually fighting them was never a problem. it was very basic and incredibly easy to do, and as far as I know people don't really want complicated or combo based combat in Silent Hill.
edit: about to change my avatar because I feel like it makes my posts look mean or something for some reason.
I have a question for veterans of the series. After reading up on sh homecoming (ive never played it) and seeing that it gets mixed reactions I wondered what was so terrible about it. I can get the game really cheap now and my curiosity is getting the better of me so know ill take a look at it at some point.
For all the negativity is it got anything going for it at all?
The game's native res is 720p, it didn't look any worse because upscaling does practically nothing to IQ and in fact sometimes makes it worse when the game utilizes high amounts of anti aliaising (ie Alan Wake) by blurring the textures something terrible. This game uses a seemingly high amount of FXAA or something, and when upscaled results in some really weird blurring and for whatever reason a ton of screen tearing.
First of all saying it looks "HIDEOUS" in its native res is moronic, and shows you really don't know what you are talking about. Not to mention you're not "lowering your standards" as that's the resolution the game is rendering at regardless, so arbitrarily setting it to 1080p to have it be blurred to hell and back and have more screen tearing just to say you had it set at 1080p isn't exactly the smartest COA tbqh...
I'm primarily a PC gamer. Anything less than 1080p @ 60fps with 0 screen tearing in this day and age is hideous to me.
I should not be forced to lower the res to 480p where on my TV it becomes a massive mess of jaggies and late loading textures.
Before I ever loaded up the game, I set it to 480p to "eliminate" the issues people talked about. It didn't eliminate SHIT. It just made the game look worse, and ran at a low FPS.
I have a question for veterans of the series. After reading up on sh homecoming (ive never played it) and seeing that it gets mixed reactions I wondered what was so terrible about it. I can get the game really cheap now and my curiosity is getting the better of me so know ill take a look at it at some point.
For all the negativity is it got anything going for it at all?
It's not a terribly bad game if you can pick it up for cheap and just want a decent horror game. It's just a bad Silent Hill game. The combat feels completely out of place (I don't want to be side stepping and dodge rolling in a Silent Hill game) and the enemies aren't designed well to match the combat. None of the locations are particularly memorable or all that interesting to be in, and the story is dull by Silent Hill standards. That's my opinion on it anyways, it wasn't a terrible game and I wasn't gouging my eyes out trying to play it, but it just reeks of "meh" all around.
It's really sad to see some people who post about PS1 games being unplayable because of their graphics. There are so many classic PS1 games that are still a blast to play despite being blurry polygonal blocks. Silent Hill 1 is a great example. It's funny that a game that looks like a blurry mess can be scarier than these games with huge production values.
Yes. It's a lot better then Downpour. Well, at least mechanically and er, graphically.I have a question for veterans of the series. After reading up on sh homecoming (ive never played it) and seeing that it gets mixed reactions I wondered what was so terrible about it. I can get the game really cheap now and my curiosity is getting the better of me so know ill take a look at it at some point.
For all the negativity is it got anything going for it at all?
Yes. It's a lot better then Downpour. Well, at least mechanically and er, graphically.
It gets too bad of a rap.
Agree with Brandon here. Also I sent you a friend request on xbox man.
Condemned was okay. Both of them. I liked the first one enough, second didn't do a lot for me. And as I said, perhaps I'm in the minority but I didn't like Siren.
Watwatwaaat?as I said, perhaps I'm in the minority but I didn't like Siren.
I have a question for veterans of the series. After reading up on sh homecoming (ive never played it) and seeing that it gets mixed reactions I wondered what was so terrible about it. I can get the game really cheap now and my curiosity is getting the better of me so know ill take a look at it at some point.
For all the negativity is it got anything going for it at all?
Are you kidding? Blood curse scared the shit out of me. I agree with the episodic structure, though, what the fuck were they doing?!If he doesn't have a PC then that wouldn't have even entered his frame of thought when making that comment, so no he really shouldn't be expected to.
Blood Curse is an almost comedic bastardization of the original Siren game with a completely pointless and immersion breaking episodic structure, and I wouldn't call the super sayain drunken hobo simulator a horror game tbqh.
EDIT: Don't take that as me not liking those games--because I do (except whoever thought the last episode of Blood Curse was a good idea can eat a shit sandwich)--but I just wouldn't classify them as good horror titles (or horror titles at all in C2s case).
The gameplay in Blood Curse just annoyed me. I didn't like the whole jacking system thing, it just seemed like a useless gameplay mechanic that added nothing to the experience. I think they were on the right track for an idea that could have made the game creepier but for me it just didn't work.
Enemies in horror games just don't do it for me. I like Silent Hill because there's so much more to the atmosphere and overall creepiness than just the enemies. The games don't rely on the creatures to make it scary whereas the Shibito were the driving force behind the scariness of Siren. Sure there were some other elements here and there, but I think the Silent Hill games, including Downpour, completely flatline the competition when it comes to the breadth of cool, creative horror elements.
I thought some of the sidequests in Downpour were more effective than the entirety of any horror title I've played this gen -- excuse the hyperbole.
Just picked it up tonight. Nobody in town had the PS3 version so I bit and got it for 360. Installing now.
Coincidentally enough, it is absolutely pouring outside right now. First good rain of the spring.
I'll be back here in a few days.
I sort of love/hate Siren too. I think it nails the atmosphere, is incredible complex and deep in its game design, and the story is interesting. However, the games are really really tedious to play. I played Siren 1 & 2, but didn't finish either because I just got bored eventually. Great experiences, and I respect them as games and would like more Siren games, but I don't find them that fun to play, which is probably why I still haven't started Blood Curse.
Blood Curse has been dramatically streamlined from 1-2. You should try it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dBqHSrcfUxo#
Pretty awesome Love Psalm remix for Book of Memories (didn't know where else I should post this, just wanted to share).