Majukun said:for the first time in my life,i'm not hyped about a zelda game.
but the idea of 35 hours of nintendo certified gameplay is enough for make me happy
i'm not saying i'm surprised,at all.MrOogieBoogie said:Twilight Princess provided just as much gameplay. Don't see why this is such a surprise to everyone.
Shick Brithouse said:I really don't understand your logic here. So are you really saying later into the hardwares lifecycle you're surprised that such a good game could be achieved? I would think it would be just the opposite, and more highly rated games would come later in any consoles life as the developers get more used to the hardware.
Sure, the Wii was pretty much outdated spec-wise from the start, but that doesn't mean it can't have games that a reviewer thinks are head and shoulders above the rest. And as Dar as graphics, it should only be judged on what the console can do, not what's possible on other systems.
I don't think EDGE (for the pedantic, 'the people at EDGE, by and large') cares much about that 'extra' stuff.sphinx said:you know, I think I am being misunderstood here. My comment about the Wii being outdated should not be interpreted like I am implying that outstanding games can't happen in older or outdated hardware.
I am mentioning it because in the situation at hand, Zelda:SS reviews, we have the situation that mostly all relevant reviewers and magazines are used to extremely imrpessive in HD looking, gorgeous games that also feature compelling online multiplayer enhancements and promises of attractive DLC maps and varied content throughout a game's lifespan. The standards for (non moneyhatted) high scores and glowing reviews are at an all time high.
Zelda:SS has none of that. (yeah, neither the Galaxies, all right)
Do you guys understand what the people at EGDE must have seen and played in this game in order to grant it a 10??
we are talking about a game that makes the reviewers at EDGE feel this is the resident evil 4 of the generation WITHOUT anything else but gameplay and actual in-game content, no promises of DLC, no multiplayer whatsoever no online whatsoever, nothing else but you, a gamer, a game and a god damn controller.
I knew Zelda was going to be good but never thought this would happen again after the galaxies.
I will be truly surprised if this game has an average of 97% on gamerankings. But there's just no way that's going to happen due to the reasons you mentioned.sphinx said:you know, I think I am being misunderstood here. My comment about the Wii being outdated should not be interpreted like I am implying that outstanding games can't happen in older or outdated hardware.
I am mentioning it because in the situation at hand, Zelda:SS reviews, we have the situation that mostly all relevant reviewers and magazines are used to extremely imrpessive in HD looking, gorgeous games that also feature compelling online multiplayer enhancements and promises of attractive DLC maps and varied content throughout a game's lifespan. The standards for (non moneyhatted) high scores and glowing reviews are at an all time high.
Zelda:SS has none of that. (yeah, neither the Galaxies, all right)
Do you guys understand what the people at EGDE must have seen and played in this game in order to grant it a 10??
we are talking about a game that makes the reviewers at EDGE feel this is the resident evil 4 of the generation WITHOUT anything else but gameplay and actual in-game content, no promises of DLC, no multiplayer whatsoever no online whatsoever, nothing else but you, a gamer, a game and a god damn controller.
I knew Zelda was going to be good but never thought this would happen again after the galaxies.
I think it looks better with it. Though it would look better if the gold overlay wasn't on top of the Z as well.SalsaShark said:man that Edge cover would be 10 times better without that huge Z in the middle
Man that was awesome.BY2K said:Dude.
The Great Bay Temple.
Dude.
Nuclear Muffin said:I wonder how much Nintendo paid for that review. It's the only way that they could possibly get a properly deserving review score from a western media outlet (See every Wii game not called Super Mario Galaxy, Super Mario Galaxy 2 or Donkey Kong Country Returns)
The UK press is nowhere near as bad as the US press when it comes to Wii reviews.Nuclear Muffin said:I wonder how much Nintendo paid for that review. It's the only way that they could possibly get a properly deserving review score from a western media outlet (See every Wii or DS game not called Super Mario Galaxy, Super Mario Galaxy 2 or Donkey Kong Country Returns)
True, but you don't have to move your arm to play Spirit Tracks.EmCeeGramr said:I don't know why people are honestly expecting, that if Jeff Gerstmann reviews it, he'd give it like 3 stars. He gave Spirit Tracks 4 stars. I actually really like Spirit Tracks, but I would not have expected that.
apana said:10 billion rupees.
nincompoop said:True, but you don't have to move your arm to play Spirit Tracks.
![]()
EmCeeGramr said:I don't know why people are honestly expecting, that if Jeff Gerstmann reviews it, he'd give it like 3 stars. He gave Spirit Tracks 4 stars. I actually really like Spirit Tracks, but I would not have expected that.
Jeff gave Wii Sports Resort 5 stars.nincompoop said:True, but you don't have to move your arm to play Spirit Tracks.
![]()
Gerstmann's review: "I tried playing Skyward Sword but Link just stood there moving his sword up and down the entire time! 0 stars lol!"
Nuclear Muffin said:He gave Majora's Mask 8.3. That says all you need to know about his anti Nintendo agenda...
Are you trying to say Skyward Sword doesn't deserve the score?Nuclear Muffin said:I wonder how much Nintendo paid for that review. It's the only way that they could possibly get a properly deserving review score from a western media outlet (See every Wii or DS game not called Super Mario Galaxy, Super Mario Galaxy 2 or Donkey Kong Country Returns)
EmCeeGramr said:Jeff gave Wii Sports Resort 5 stars.
Oh FFS. I'm annoyed by his weird distaste of MM that he expresses at GB sometimes, but that's not an "agenda."
Chet Rippo said:Are you trying to say Skyward Sword doesn't deserve the score?
apana said:10 billion rupees.
EmCeeGramr said:Jeff gave Wii Sports Resort 5 stars.
Oh FFS. I'm annoyed by his weird distaste of MM that he expresses at GB sometimes, but that's not an "agenda."
You're crazy, like BurntPork levels of crazyNuclear Muffin said:Gotta try and hide it you know. Rating every Nintendo game as shit would make it obvious.
No one is as crazy as BPChet Rippo said:You're crazy, like BurntPork levels of crazy
Chet Rippo said:You're crazy, like BurntPork levels of crazy
Nuclear Muffin said:He gave Majora's Mask 8.3.
http://twitter.com/#!/jasonkill/status/126759929091604480Jasonkill (Edge) said:I'm playing Adventures of Tintin just to make sure every other game I play this year feels like a Metacritic 100.
Edge said:Skyward Swords 10/10
Nuclear Muffin said:Nope, just terribly jaded. I've seen far too many Nintendo games get overlooked and underrated by the media and too many articles that slam Nintendo at every given opportunity, even when the story isn't really related to them. Nintendo are the media's whipping boy.
Never mind the general corruption of the media amongst the major publishers anyway, who are paid to overrate most PS360 & PC games... (nobody bothers to pay the media for a Wii or DS game since they mostly appeal to a different audience)
Finest sarcasm poster on GAF. Well played sir.Nuclear Muffin said:Nope, just terribly jaded. I've seen far too many Nintendo games get overlooked and underrated by the media and too many articles that slam Nintendo at every given opportunity, even when the story isn't really related to them. Nintendo are the media's whipping boy.
Nuclear Muffin said:Nope, just terribly jaded. I've seen far too many Nintendo games get overlooked and underrated by the media and too many articles that slam Nintendo at every given opportunity, even when the story isn't really related to them. Nintendo are the media's whipping boy.
Never mind the general corruption of the media amongst the major publishers anyway, who are paid to overrate most PS360 & PC games... (nobody bothers to pay the media for a Wii or DS game since they mostly appeal to a different audience)
I don't trust any media reviews at all, from any media outlet, for any game, from any publisher. Nintendo are the opposite of most other publishers where their games are massively underrated, instead of overrated.
Definitely an 11codhand said:So if an Edge 3 is a 6, then what's an Edge 10?
Nothing can top the king of crazy.EloquentM said:No one is as crazy as BP
pretty much.EmCeeGramr said:
Nuclear Muffin said:No. I'm accusing Nintendo of paying for good reviews here because their relations with the media are so bad that it's the only way that their games can get the reviews that they deserve.
miksar said:Eagerly anticipating "lol no hd dlc online coop pass jason philosophy moral choice link looks gay too japanese waggle for kids 6/10".