OK so Sweden and Germany have more per capita than Canada and the US. Now what? What's your point? The US and Canada have far more than other countries like the UK? Point is, these people are not at the border of Canada, they're at the border with EU nations. I keep seeing this over and over. Why can't the US and Canada take them. Why should they? Why not South Korea and Japan?
I keep seeing this whataboutism thrown around. Canada is taking in Syrian refugees, and Canada and the US take in a lot of refugees yearly. Don't blame us because your countries have no idea what to do or how to maintain the borders. So many EU nations are fighting over themselves, saying we'll build walls, we'll leave the Schengen area, we won't stop them from leaving to another country. Plus, it's blatantly obvious that the primarily homogenous nations of Europe are being faced with massive demographic change and are now trying to skirt around the issue. 'Oh but we take in more per capita than others, oh we'll only take them in if they're not Muslim'.
I mean don't get me wrong. It's a humanitarian crisis. No country can sustain unchecked migration. It's truly lead to the decline or collapse of many a society in history. Refugees are more than likely uneducated, underskilled and will never be upwardly mobile within the country they flee to or are placed. How many Syrians do you think know the first thing about Slovakian culture, language, life, etc. As opposed to an immigrant who applies, who lists education, who has family or has school or a job lined up to fall back on.
I am sorry but you are deluded. You're comparing a US & Canada, both which have a massive amount of available land (20 million km2) and a total population of 357 million. Compared that to the EU, 4.3 million km2 available land and a population of 508 million. Not to mention that vast wealth of US & Canada, compared to a country like Slovakia.
The simple fact is, there are too many refugees coming, the numbers are simply too big. Germany, this year expects 800k asylum application or 1% of their total population for this year alone. And this is only Germany we are talking about here. That's 15,000 new people per week, that need new housing, schools and healthcare. Not to mention the language/religious and cultural barriers.
There are some estimates that in Libya alone there are around 5 million people waiting to cross into the EU. And that's not even accounting for people that might cross though Turkey and other southern countries.
Personally the UK & the US should take the greater numbers, their the ones that were war mongering and started this whole mess in the first place. Now a poorer countries with their own problems, like Slovakia, Greece, and Hungary, countries that had nothing to do with middle east and it's bombing is now being slated for not taking in a greater number. True their excuse is deplorable but you must see their point of view.
I mean where is the UK in all of this???. They were the ones that were most supportive of the stupid war in the whole of EU and not they turn their backs and say its the EU problem. And just for the record, I live in the UK.
I personally think that this could potentially be the beginning of the end of the EU. This is a problem that cannot be fixed (people coming from two large continents) and with the no border rules and economic troubles already in the EU, this humanitarian problem will expose all of the weaknesses of the EU. It's only a matter of time before countries will start to want their border controls back and once that ball starts rolling it won't stop until EU if finished.
Thanks to all the governments around the world who started this mess. Awesome job guys, well done. Who should we go bomb next now? Maybe we should have a poll on this.