So how much are you willing to pay?

Danny Dudekisser

I paid good money for this Dynex!
images
I'm not doing it for $5, you cheap slut.
 

nikos

Member
I was prepared to pay $500 for the bundle. I've already sold a bunch of Switch games and listed my OLED to pretty much cover the cost.

Not sure I'd pay much more. I was already kind of on the fence about paying $500 for Mario Kart.
 
Last edited:

Dacvak

No one shall be brought before our LORD David Bowie without the true and secret knowledge of the Photoshop. For in that time, so shall He appear.
$500 for the bundle is fine. I loved my Switch 1 and played it probably 50x more than my $3000 PC, so I probably would have paid beyond what most people would for the hardware.

I’m okay paying $70 for most first party games, and $80 for the “big” ones. But no more than that.

I don’t really have a huge problem with the prices if I’m being honest. I buy like one or two games a month at most. The difference between $60 and $80 is practically nothing.

Shit, I’ve recently had meals that were like $500+, so I just need to skip one of those a year to completely make up the extra costs.
 

Durin

Member
My breaking point is $60, because I've never payed more than that for a game beyond some collector's edition or retro thing. The $450 price point on the console isn't really the problem, that's a one-time thing, and I can sell/trade-in my old Switch.

The issue with these rising game prices to $70 or $80 is that it just tells me my day one purchase is not necessary...and that's even easier by how many AAA games come out broken in some way where waiting will give me the objectively better experience at a cheaper price.

So many games come out in the AA and indie space, Game Pass exists, and I've gotten more into emulation for older games I missed out on...I'm literally spoiled for choice.
 
Last edited:

ItsGreat

Member
You cheap arse, sale only, steam shovel ware and 3 month price drop vultures are sounding pretty ungrateful.

Constantly biting the hands of gamers who subsidise this ecosystem, the ones ensuring your gaming welfare system keeps supplying you with games - is not a good look.
 

Shifty1897

Member
I rarely pay $60 for games, I have paid $70 for a game twice in my life, and both of those were mistakes. $80 will not happen for me anytime soon, ask me again in the 2030's.
 
The Nintendo Shills that are defending Nintendo's greedy practices online show there is a big enough market willing to pay the crazy Prices. The Switch 2 will no doubt doubt Sell out for it's immediate future but again I wonder a year from now if the Mass Consumers are willing to shell out $80+ for a game. This issue goes much deeper than the Nintendo Switch 2. Graphics card prices have Skyrocketed in recent months but they continue to sell. Big Companies are openly Scalping card prices and it's typical to see new GPU's being charged at big box stars $400+ over the retail price. So what is your limit on how much you are willing to spend to support rising prices? My personal take is the overall Quality of games have dropped in the Shitter but they want to keep yelling about rising production cost. It's like Mcdonald's dropping your hamburger on the ground and charging you another $1 for your Mcdouble for the privilege.

Let me Re-phase this a different way:

If the big 3 (Sony,Microsoft,Nintendo) decided to start charging $150 a game within say 5 years. Or even if they keep saying rising cost and inflate the price to $250 a game. What is your breaking point?

Hardware? Lets say the PS6 launches at a cool $999.99? or Xbox makes a new Super powerful windows handheld retailing for $1499.99? Again, How much are you willing or able to spend to keep support "rising cost."

There is always a breaking point with the mass consumer when it comes to price. Prime example is the Apple Vision Pro. Apple fans are even more of a cultist group than even Nintendo fans. Normally you put apple on it and they buy, buy, buy! AT over $3000 the Apple Vision pro didn't sell.
I take back what I said, the consoles actually as expensive as pcs and I was just talking from a desperate perspective looking for quality content but it's actually much worse than that.
 

Men_in_Boxes

Snake Oil Salesman
We've all purchased multiple $60 or $70 dollar games that we haven't played more than 10 or 15 hours.

We've all purchased multiple $60 or $70 dollar games that we played for more than 40 hours.

If you don't want the Corvette, buy the Civic.
 

RoadHazard

Gold Member
Mario Kart is already 1000 SEK in Sweden (which actually does make sense if you add our 25% VAT to $80). Most expensive game I've seen since I saw NeoGeo game ads in magazines back in the day.

I'm getting it in the bundle, but would I actually pay 1000 SEK for a game? Maybe for another massive Zelda, not for a kart racer.
 

Danjin44

The nicest person on this forum
I really don’t care about prices to be honest, I buy 5-8 games a year I can afford it. i wish I had more time to buy more games and complain about the prices to be honest
Same, when I was younger money was the biggest issue but now time is biggest issue more than money.
 

StueyDuck

Member
$400 with console and MKW

Games should be $60.

I'd accept the $80 if ninty were willing to fluctuate and put out their mid-gen fluff (you know, like the average Kirby's, weird peach game and generic paper Mario games) at like $40.

But they won't, and not a chance I am gonna buy the Nintendo mid-gen slop for $80.
 
Last edited:

PeteBull

Member
Hardware? Lets say the PS6 launches at a cool $999.99? or Xbox makes a new Super powerful windows handheld retailing for $1499.99? Again, How much are you willing or able to spend to keep support "rising cost."
The moment we got official confirmation ps5pr0 is 700usd discless i was sure ps6 gonna be 999.
Games likely 99usd.
I agree with every1, ofc:
rick-ross.gif


But on the other hand:
it-is-what-it-is-whiskey-girl-j3zk3vv8yqur66eo.gif


 
There is always a breaking point with the mass consumer when it comes to price.
But there's a big portion of users here on GAF who are anything but part of this demographic. On GAF, hardcore enthusiasts are massively overrepresented. That's why we have so many *90 type GPU users here when they make only a tiny fraction of the overall GPU market. I can give you some tales from my ass, but in reality the best thing would be to find a proper market research study done by some reputable firm or institution. I'm sure there are scientific, standardized ways of calculating these "breaking points" as you call them.
 

Shockwave_Fox

Neo Member
Im at a point now where I dont even want to pay like £20 - £30 for games now.

Maybe its because Ive gamed for years and its all starting to bore me now or as a family man my priorities are different.

I do still game a fair amount but it feels mostly like just doing something to pass the time rather than something immersive or exciting.

I feel like this gen has really put me off gaming honestly, I said after I got my PS5 a year or 2 after my Series X that these will be my last consoles and Im done - was looking to go PC when this gen ends maybe but the prices are a shit show so dont think I will after all.
 

IAmRei

Member
My motto is : if You like it, You have the money, then buy it. Nobody force everyone. Like above said, vote with Your wallet.

I was once, Lego collector, I bought expensive rare minifig or rare sets, if I have the money. Nobody force me to buy it, and because I want it.

But again, for me, $100 still fine, as long as the experience is great and that's what I want. More than 100 is not fine for now

The console however, not more than $1000

The prices, also rise because the development cost are also rise

I am game dev, i know it's expensive to make games these days...
 

ssringo

Member
Hardware price is negotiable. Software not as much.

$70 is already too high for 99% of game releases and the 1% that it isn't, I'm looking for a deal to drop it to $60 or less.

There are so many games getting released that I can always find something new and interesting for $60 or less. And frankly I'd rather give money to smaller devs when possible.
 

Kabelly

Member
I had an idea, Americans can pay $1000 for a Switch 2 and they can drop the price for the rest of the world to counterbalance these tarriffs.
 

Laptop1991

Member
I'm still annoyed when they doubled the price of brand new PC games from 30 quid which i bought Skyrim for to 60 10 years ago, because the quality of the ports certainly didn't double lol,

I do what i've always done, find the cheapest price possible and only once or twice paid anywhere near 60.
 

MikeM

Member
I just bought a Switch OLED for the kids. Their chances of getting a Switch 2 at that price is…. 0. Especially without OLED. So game cost is moot for me.

As for future machines- tariffs going to change a lot between now and years out. People won’t be able to afford inflated gaming boxes when they’ll be losing jobs anyways.
 
Last edited:
With every nickel and dime practices used in modern games, I feel the entry point for a base game should stay at $60. That's what I generally pay on Steam games, if not cheaper even on release. So no way in hell is justifiable to ask $70-$90 on a base game. Leave those price ranges for deluxe editions or editions that contain the season pass or whatever. Console players are just used to fucked that they see they are the boiling frog that just accepted their fate.
 

Vlodril

Member
For a new game about 30-40 is where i am at. If i really want it i will go higher to 50 ( i think 55) or something is the most i have done. Otherwise i will wait until it's sub 20. The only reasons i buy new games day one when i am interested in them is a) it's on pc so i can get it about 40 on cdkeys or be it's on psn so i can get it for about 40 by gamesharing with a friend.
 

Tg89

Member
I don't think Apple Vision is a great example. VR is just an incredibly unattractive product at this point in time.

I don't have a breaking point necessarily, obviously I'd buy less games if they all were $250 than if they were $70. That said, I'd probably still pay for the ones I absolutely wanted to play - if Sekiro 2 came out and was $150 I'd be there, same with the next Zelda. If Blizzard magically came back from the dead and released a StarCraft sequel that lived up to Brood War, I'd pay whatever they wanted for it.

On the flip side, Ubisoft could launch the next Assassin's Creed for $5 and I wouldn't touch it.
 

reinking

Gold Member
That is hard for me to answer because price is not the only factor when I make a purchase. Especially when it comes to entertainment. I do agree that there is a breaking point when it comes to the mass consumer but you are asking this question on an enthusiast board.
 

archvile7

Member
No nintendo game is worth 80 dollars unless they wanna start creating actual deep and interesting stories for there games, have much more voice acting in there games, have wayyyyy more animations/mocap for there games etc etc. It's not like these 80 dollar games are getting massive budgets and massive amounts of investment into them. Nintendo are doing what they've always done but now they're charging fans more because they know there fanbase will gobble it up ala pokemon style.
You people seem to forget that certain SNES games like FFIII went for $80 in some areas back in the day.

I remember seeing it for $90 at my local Circuit City.
 

phant0m

Member
I think my hard cap for deluxe/premium editions is probably a hundo.

But tbh I also don’t need any more new games. Will I buy, play and enjoy them? Sure, but if they never made another new game ever after today I’d still have enough to play til the day I die.
 

Deerock71

Member
Let's just say I'll know my limit when I get there, but $70 and $80 for physical games isn't it. And if GTA VI launches this century, they're the ones that floated out the $100 trial balloon.
 

Sebastian1295

Gold Member
You people seem to forget that certain SNES games like FFIII went for $80 in some areas back in the day.

I remember seeing it for $90 at my local Circuit City.

The problem is that everything is much more expensive now and wages haven't increased enough to offset it all. And back then we used to get really nice cases with manuals and game carts, but nowadays we get cheap plastic cases with cheaply produced discs inside and no manuals.
 
Last edited:

Catphish

Member
$75 is my limit, and that would only be for something special, like a Rockstar game, or something along those lines.

$60 is my limit for most standard releases.

The thing is, most games ship in a half-baked state these days. So I almost never buy a game at release. I prefer to wait until the game is patched up properly. And by then, it's on sale.

But Nintendo is fucking high if they think I'm paying $80 for one of their games, on a technologically sub-standard console. Me n my kid were both pretty hyped to pick up a Switch2, until all the recent info started coming out. Now, neither of us give a shit. We got plenty of other stuff to play.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom