• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Soccer has become the sport of choice for NYC hipsters

Status
Not open for further replies.

Elchele

Member
Wonder if NYC FC will have a good impact in the people of NYC. I mean, they are basically a satellite team of Manchester City.

The constant soccer or football discussion is one of the most boring topics in the world, and somehow all threads in OT about the sport turns into it.

still better than Clegg talking about Man Utd transfers
 

njean777

Member
How is soccer in any way an "alternative" sport? It is the most popular sport in the world compared to any others. It isn't hip to like soccer.
 
Yes, a nickname.

Once again - the sport's official name is basically the same most everywhere else in the world.
The official name of the sport is basically the same most everywhere in the world, it's Association Football. "Football" alone is just a nickname that people use to refer to the code of football they're discussing when the context makes it obvious which code they're talking about.

It's like if we're talking about current events, and I mention that something happened on the 18th. Context makes it obvious that I don't have to specify 2014 or even April. If I'm talking about my family, I don't have to specify their surnames because context makes it obvious. If I'm talking about celebrities in general, I need to specify whether I'm talking about Michael Jackson or Michael Jordan, but if I'm talking about pop music (or alternatively, basketball,) I generally don't.

You're on a global forum with a strong contingent of Americans, in a thread about the sporting preferences of people in New York City, not in merry old England. Context calls for the sport to be referred to unambiguously.
 
The constant soccer or football discussion is one of the most boring topics in the world, and somehow all threads in OT about the sport turns into it.

mazzarri.gif
 

terrisus

Member
You're on a global forum with a strong contingent of Americans, in a thread about the sporting preferences of people in New York City, not in merry old England. Context calls for the sport to be referred to unambiguously.

and once again...you're posting on an american board.

And if one is talking about American Soccer, that would be fair enough.

But, if I'm talking about Liverpool Football Club, or the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, I'm definitely not going to be saying "Soccer."
 
And if one is talking about American Soccer, that would be fair enough.

But, if I'm talking about Liverpool Football Club, or the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, I'm definitely not going to be saying "Soccer."
You're in a thread about the sporting preferences of people in New York City.
 

terrisus

Member
You're in a thread about the sporting preferences of people in New York City.

Which is talking about English Premier League Football.

That may explain why, at 8:30 a.m. last Sunday, a lively crowd of supporters with tattoos and artfully rolled jeans showed up to Banter, a bar in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, with plank floors that caters to Premier League fans. With several in Steven Gerrard jerseys and team scarves emblazoned with the Liverpool team motto, “You’ll Never Walk Alone,” they settled in for a crucial live match between Liverpool and Manchester City.
 
Which is talking about English Premier League Football.
You realize that was written in the New York Times, written about Americans, by Americans, for a predominantly American audience? The grey old lady is following proper phrasing by using the actual name for organizations, but using a contextually unambiguous name when referring to the generic.
 

entremet

Member
This thread is now derailed due to semantics lol.

An American publication is going to use soccer. It's not that complex.
 

terrisus

Member
You realize that was written in the New York Times, written about Americans, by Americans, for a predominantly American audience? The grey old lady is following proper phrasing by using the actual name for organizations, but using a contextually unambiguous name when referring to the generic.

They called it Association Football?
 

Konka

Banned
soccer-vs.-football.png


It is called soccer in countries where there is another variation of Football that is not Association Football to separate the two. It is in no way just a USA thing.

Ireland - Gaelic Football
USA - American Football
Canada - American Football
Australia - Australian Football.

It is easier to call it Soccer.
 

terrisus

Member
Alright... So... Half a dozen or so English-speaking countries call it "Soccer," everywhere else calls it some version/translation/variation on "Football."

Sounds like there's one way which is much more clearly and universally understood than the other.
 

Cagey

Banned
Alright... So... Half a dozen or so English-speaking countries call it "Soccer," everywhere else calls it some version/translation/variation on "Football."

Sounds like there's one way which is much more clearly and universally understood than the other.

Yep, that would be the way used in the county where the paper is published.

You live in Connecticut. You certainly understand this. You're being purposely obtuse to fuel an argument out of, what? Boredom?
 

Azuran

Banned
I call it soccer all the time no matter what, even when I visited Europe and Latin America, because I know it annoys the hell out of people.
 

Konka

Banned
Alright... So... Half a dozen or so English-speaking countries call it "Soccer," everywhere else calls it some version/translation/variation on "Football."

Sounds like there's one way which is much more clearly and universally understood than the other.

And again it's because those countries don't have any other version of Football so they just call it that, there is no need to differentiate.
 
Alright... So... Half a dozen or so English-speaking countries call it "Soccer," everywhere else calls it some version/translation/variation on "Football."

Sounds like there's one way which is much more clearly and universally understood than the other.

If you call if football in Australia everyone will assume you are talking about a different sport. If you call it soccer everyone immediately knows what you're talking about. Even my friends who mostly watch the game prefer to call it soccer because it's just easier here.
 

terrisus

Member
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree for now - until the next topic where this invariably comes up anyway.

Good to see the people in the OP enjoying Liverpool FC matches.
 
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree for now - until the next topic where this invariably comes up anyway.
Disagree about what exactly? You disagree that the actual, official name of the sport is "association football?" That it is shortened to either "football" or "soccer" depending on local ambiguity?
 

Mr. Patch

Member
It's always quite interesting to see people upset at Americans for using a name they didn't invent in these kinds of topics.
 

Empty

Member
“You buy into the history and the tradition, the values of the club,” said Bryan Lee, a digital brand strategist who grew up in Southern California and lives in Greenpoint. He showed up in a vintage gray Liverpool away jersey. “Historically, Liverpool has been a blue-collar port city,” added Mr. Lee, 24, as thoughtful as if he were delivering his orals at graduate school. “The politics of Liverpool was really sort of anti-Thatcher. It’s become the people’s club. Those hardworking blue-collar values never really left, even though it’s been ushered into the modern era of the club being a global franchise.”

this is the worst thing i've read this year. "digital brand strategist" really makes it.
 

daviyoung

Banned
What's wrong with supporting Liverpool based on its working class ethos?

Liverpool FC has a working class ethos? How?

It's not anti-Thatcher because she was some upper class fatcat, it's anti-Thatcher because of the police cover-up of the Hillsborough disaster.

Liverpool is absolutely a port city, but it has an even older football team called Everton FC. Seems like the guy in the article has a very limited understanding of what club he's supporting and why. You could throw a dart at a map of the UK, attempt to justify the place it lands on, and you'd come up with an answer similar to that guy's.
 
nobody cares about soccer

This right here, is the single most ignorant comment I've ever read today.

Did you know the USA '94 World Cup holds the record for highest attendance in history? I'm Mexican and I know this. http://www.ussoccer.com/about/history/us-soccer-as-host

And that was 1994, two full years before you even had a professional soccer league! NBC Universal just paid $290 million dollar contract to exclusively show in your country the English Permier League games.

"Nobody cares about soccer"? I'm sure you live in your own little fantasy world, don't you?
 

JCX

Member
NY Times writing a trend piece on a trend that's been happening for years. A few years ago everyone started wearing the scarves, and this is in Michigan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom