Karma Kramer
Banned
I really think its just a broken system... in 2037 who knows how long people will live... seems like this is only just going to get worse and worse
Gallbaro said:Or subsidize McDonalds, and everyone can keep dying, only faster!
Gaborn said:Do what FDR did. When FDR implemented social security life expectancy for the average man was 65. Raise the retirement age to life expectancy in the US.
empty vessel said:I'm adamantly opposed to this. The solution is not to punish ourselves. It's to eliminate the cap and tax the wealthy further to make up any difference (or slash the wasteful military budget, or both). If anything, the retirement age should be lowered and benefits increased. (Modernization and the accumulation of social wealth are supposed to make our lives easier over time, not worse. This isn't the 1930's, it's 2009. We should be working less and retiring earlier. And there is no impediment to doing this whatsoever.)
This.Gaborn said:Do what FDR did. When FDR implemented social security life expectancy for the average man was 65. Raise the retirement age to life expectancy in the US.
Well, I hope you are not suggesting that birth rates be greatly increased. That is trying to fix a Ponzi scheme by just getting more suckers at the base of the pyramid.laserbeam said:Declining Birth rates and another factor relating to births is thinning the Pool of people paying into SS. Meanwhile more and more people are reaching the age to start drawing from it.
Greying Population means SS is screwed.
the problem is that in order to fix SS is going to take some radical thinking. It's too easy to sit back and keep saying "raise the retirement age." or "raise taxes." And with this silly "government has no role" people protesting on public roads (lol) it's not gonna get any easier to come up with real solutions.speculawyer said:This.
And people are going to have to get used to the idea of downgrading jobs. If you are old and can't do a job you used to be able to do but are still old enough to work, you are gonna have to take a lesser job.
SapientWolf said:It will the whole thing?
MC Safety said:Uhn. The people who've paid for years and years and who won't receive benefits would care.
For starters.
11 More years and I'll run for President, if you can hold out that long I'll sort out this bullshit, can I count on your vote in 2020?Banana Kid said:I really just want things to get okay enough that everyone will just lie to me again. Every news story about the economy just scares/depresses me now. Make up some good news and let me feel better.
Jason's Ultimatum said:Not popular, but eliminate the cap.
Ehh. It's nowhere near 100% yet, as I said interest payments on our debt hasn't even eclipsed Social Security alone yet so there's no way that interest payments are 100% of our governments taxes and we're contributing 100% of our budget straight to credit year after year. It isn't THAT bad by any stretch but it will be eventually if it isn't curbed.DiatribeEQ said:I believe it was either his 1st or 2nd term, that after Reagan had been elected, he wanted (I believe) the IRS audited. I forget what the commission name was at the time, but essentially it had said that 100% of all taxable revenue that was collected out of each of our paychecks & through income tax, ect, was 100% spent in paying towards our national debt & the interest it was accruing. With this in mind, it makes wonder: If everything the government is collecting is going towards the national debt (if exclusively towards the interest alone or principal & interest), then that naturally means that nothing is being actually paid for our services we think our tax monies are going anywhere. You can say "Well, there's a reason why they take out 2 types of taxes from our paychecks, one is for our Social Security and the other is what you just mentioned. But if that's the case, then that means our nation has been running in debt (1 trillion+ a year) for the last 24-28 years.
You want to bet that the government didn't touch what was supposed to be set aside for our retirements? I bet that, that money was already spent long before it's pulled out of each and every one of my paychecks, all for something not even resembling social security related spending.
mAcOdIn said:Ehh. It's nowhere near 100% yet, as I said interest payments on our debt hasn't even eclipsed Social Security alone yet so there's no way that interest payments are 100% of our governments taxes and we're contributing 100% of our budget straight to credit year after year. It isn't THAT bad by any stretch but it will be eventually if it isn't curbed.
Immediately? How long would you propose this take? Are you willing to relinquish everything you've paid into it thus far without bitching?JayDubya said:Not popular, but eliminate the program.
We've already relinquished everything we've paid into it. You think you're ever getting that money back? Because I don't.adamsappel said:Immediately? How long would you propose this take? Are you willing to relinquish everything you've paid into it thus far without bitching?
perfectchaos007 said:Good. Maybe now people will put money into a retirement fund instead relying on socialism to pay for their life after work.
It's called a savings
Joe Shlabotnik said:You're not supposed to rely on SS exclusively. That was never the point. It's a baseline of support so that you're not homeless and starving if, oh say for example, your retirement fund drops 40% a few years before you retire. Of course that's a crazy-talk scenario that could never ever ever happen!
Branduil said:We've already relinquished everything we've paid into it. You think you're ever getting that money back? Because I don't.