• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Someone threw a grenade at George W. Bush and it didn't go off!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Guileless

Temp Banned for Remedial Purposes
Che, how's the US boycott going? Enjoying your Microsoft Xbox (TM) and posting on an American forum with American ads?
 

sans_pants

avec_pénis
Che said:
After this:



this:



...was expected.



Define "evil". I can see many many similarities if that's what you mean.


congratulations dude

you are not che guevara, you do not have the same ideals he did, you are just some dumbfuck on the internet complaining about the president
 

demon

I don't mean to alarm you but you have dogs on your face
If Bush were dead, Cheney would be president. *shudders*
 

Che

Banned
Guileless said:
Che, how's the US boycott going? Enjoying your Microsoft Xbox (TM) and posting on an American forum with American ads?

As I've said just because I'm boycotting US corporations and I'm against the US goverment doesn't mean I have anything against the american people and especially people in GAF who tend to be -how can I put it- not like you. But you obviously can't understand the difference since I've explained it a thousand times. Don't worry though I don't blame you, I understand your situation.
 

xabre

Banned
sans_pants said:
you are not che guevara, you do not have the same ideals he did, you are just some dumbfuck on the internet complaining about the president

Yes how dare we criticize the president...what audacity we have to complain about the president...we have no right to complain about, condemn or otherwise disapprove that which was ordained by God, the president.
 

sans_pants

avec_pénis
xabre said:
Yes how dare we criticize the president...what audacity we have to complain about the president...we have no right to complain about, condemn or otherwise disapprove that which was ordained by God, the president.


criticize him all you want, i wasnt talking to the general people on here

i dont care if you criticize him, just dont whine and bitch, say hes worse than hitler, and he needs to be assassinated
 

goodcow

Member
sans_pants said:
criticize him all you want, i wasnt talking to the general people on here

i dont care if you criticize him, just dont whine and bitch, say hes worse than hitler, and he needs to be assassinated

Those things fall under our ability to criticize him.
 

borghe

Loves the Greater Toronto Area
hating his policies and questioning his abilities is one thing. and that's why we hold elections for the job every four years.

laughing about the possibility of him dying or even saying we would be better off if he were killed (note the difference between being killed and just him not in office) is an entirely different story.

it's not righteousness, it's just being a civilized human being.
 

sans_pants

avec_pénis
honestly nothing you say is going to matter anyways

you guys probably dont even protest, and even if you did, protesting is futile, so continue to bitch and moan and act like little pussies and the rest of us will continue to not care
 

Guileless

Temp Banned for Remedial Purposes
What have you explained a thousand times?
What is my situation?
Why do you play a Microsoft Xbox (TM) while claiming to boycott American companies?
What are the chances you respond in understandable, coherent English?
 

Che

Banned
sans_pants said:
criticize him all you want, i wasnt talking to the general people on here

i dont care if you criticize him, just dont whine and bitch, say hes worse than hitler, and he needs to be assassinated

goodcow said:
Those things fall under our ability to criticize him.

sans_pants said:
ok then, get better criticisms

its really stupid and childish

:lol:lol:lol
 

Che

Banned
Guileless said:
What have you explained a thousand times?
What is my situation?
Why do you play a Microsoft Xbox (TM) while claiming to boycott American companies?
What are the chances you respond in understandable, coherent English?

1) ...

2) I'm implying something in that post but due to your situation I'm not surprised you didn't find it.

3) I bought Xbox used since except boycotting US corporations I'm boycotting companies with monopolistic tactics.

4) None... for you...
 

Boogie

Member
Che said:
1) ...

2) I'm implying something in that post but due to your situation I'm not surprised you didn't find it.

3) I bought Xbox used since except boycotting US corporations I'm boycotting companies with monopolistic tactics.

4) None... for you...

Ah, doesn't actually answer 1 and 2. Predictable :p
 

Flynn

Member
Tommie Hu$tle said:
agreed

not agreeing with someone ass backwards politics is not a reason to wish that person dead.

Making decisions that result in the deaths of tens of thousands of people is more than ass backwards.
 

Dilbert

Member
Che said:
1) ...

2) I'm implying something in that post but due to your situation I'm not surprised you didn't find it.

3) I bought Xbox used since except boycotting US corporations I'm boycotting companies with monopolistic tactics.

4) None... for you...
I don't know what the history is here, but this is the weakest set of non-responses that I've seen in quite some time.
 
Flynn said:
Making decisions that result in the deaths of tens of thousands of people is more than ass backwards.


So he is more cupable than the both legislative houses of the US. One man can't send us to war. Each and every member of both houses of congress share in the blame. If you are going to blame someone then blame them all.
 

DarienA

The black man everyone at Activision can agree on
Tommie Hu$tle said:
So he is more cupable than the both legislative houses of the US. One man can't send us to war. Each and every member of both houses of congress share in the blame. If you are going to blame someone then blame them all.

True but let's get even a bit more technical.

One man can send us in to an armed conflict. Only the full group of folks(Congress) can send us in to a war.... even without approval doesn't he have like 60 days before he'd have to terminate the troop disposal without congressional approval?

We had to go to Iraq to prevent those terrorists from potentially gaining access to Iraq's WMD's!
 
DarienA said:
True but let's get even a bit more technical.

One man can send us in to an armed conflict. Only the full group of folks(Congress) can send us in to a war.... even without approval doesn't he have like 60 days before he'd have to terminate the troop disposal without congressional approval?

We had to go to Iraq to prevent those terrorists from potentially gaining access to Iraq's WMD's!


I believe this is true but, he can do some executive tomfoolery to extend that I think that's how Vietnam happened we would have to ask Boogie.
 

Guileless

Temp Banned for Remedial Purposes
-jinx- said:
I don't know what the history is here, but this is the weakest set of non-responses that I've seen in quite some time.

Aren't they though? Che generally types shit he must have read off of a circa-1970 leftist pamphlet in broken English, people question what he wrote (if they can even understand it enough to do so, which is about half the time), then he typically makes a grade-school level insult and abandons the thread without even attempting to defend what he wrote.

He'll probably abandon the thread now. Even he has some shame (I think.) If not, what is my situation Che? I really want to hear this.
 
Tommie Hu$tle said:
I believe this is true but, he can do some executive tomfoolery to extend that I think that's how Vietnam happened we would have to ask Boogie.

Nah, the escalation of Vietnam happened by the approval of Congress with the Gulf of Tonkin (sp?) Resolution. After the war, Congress then passed the law Darien is talking about, though it has never actually been contested because when the conflict does go over 60 days, congress has always given the green light.
 

Boogie

Member
Guileless said:
Aren't they though? Che generally types shit he must have read off of a circa-1970 leftist pamphlet in broken English, people question what he wrote (if they can even understand it enough to do so, which is about half the time), then he typically makes a grade-school level insult and abandons the thread without even attempting to defend what he wrote.

He'll probably abandon the thread now. Even he has some shame (I think.) If not, what is my situation Che? I really want to hear this.

I think he benefits from the fact that the majority sees his insane ravings for what they are and ignore him, but that has the side effect of never having his ravings challenged, so I think he's developed a high opinion of himself because of it.

On the whole, I think it's a good thing that his ravings are dismissed as mostly harmless. After all, compare him to the times of nrXic and Refugee, where their rantings would result in 10+ page political flamefests.
 

Flynn

Member
Tommie Hu$tle said:
So he is more cupable than the both legislative houses of the US. One man can't send us to war. Each and every member of both houses of congress share in the blame. If you are going to blame someone then blame them all.

They all suck, but right now the Executive branch has tons of leverage over the government. The Executive makes the decisions and the legislative rubber stamps them.
 

Zaptruder

Banned
The perfect coup de grace would be stuffing Ann Coulter full of explosives and having her do a strip dance for the GOP, with Bush biting on its nipples which would act as the trigger for the explosives.
 

Che

Banned
Cyan said:
Sheer idiocy. Think for a moment about what would actually happen if Bush were successfully assassinated.

Hint: the Patriot Act and Guantanamo Bay would look downright friendly.

I know you're right, but I'm not taking the assasination attempt that seriously since it wasn't successful thus I don't care to analyse what would have happened. I'm just saying that people like Bush or Hitler don't deserve to live and they make this world worse than it already is.
 
goodcow said:
Do I feel we'd be better off if Bush wasn't President, even if that includes him not being alive? Yes.

I have been involved in some extremely heated political campaigns, full of lies and mudslinging from both sides, and while the venom flew freely, I always knew that it wouldn't come to the level that one would want to see the other dead. If you seriously believe that goodcow, you're part of the problem of the bitter atmosphere in politics. And FWIW, I said the exact same thing to moron dittoheads who said what goodcow did towards Clinton.
 

Guileless

Temp Banned for Remedial Purposes
I know I shouldn't challenge him, but sometimes I can't help it. Like when he claims to boycott American companies and then posts about his farvorite Xbox games. Come on man.

Sometimes challenging his ilk can be funny. Just the other day, Fight for Freeform claimed that he would rather live in Iran than the United States. Seriously. You can't make up high comedy like that.

What's my situation Che? How do you expect me to change if you don't help me?
 

fse

Member
bush.jpg


Grenades don't kill people. I do.
 

xabre

Banned
borghe said:
laughing about the possibility of him dying or even saying we would be better off if he were killed (note the difference between being killed and just him not in office) is an entirely different story.

Would you say the same thing about Stalin? Not comparing Bush to Stalin, just making a point.
 

Phoenix

Member
borghe said:
wow. you guys are disappointed because someone wasn't killed.

you are all fucking worthless.

that's where we are in the states I guess. Your candidate doesn't get elected so you hope the other one gets assassinated.

+1
 

MC Safety

Member
goodcow said:
Tones don't register over the internet, as it's just text, but it's not as if I'm sitting here with an evil look on my face saying "He should be dead" in some demonic manner.

Do I wholly disagree with this administration? Yes.
Do I feel we'd be better off if Bush wasn't President, even if that includes him not being alive? Yes.
Would I ever actually cause, plot, or advocate harm to him? No.

You can't even waffle well. Pathetic.
 

Che

Banned
Boogie said:
I think he benefits from the fact that the majority sees his insane ravings for what they are and ignore him, but that has the side effect of never having his ravings challenged, so I think he's developed a high opinion of himself because of it.

On the whole, I think it's a good thing that his ravings are dismissed as mostly harmless. After all, compare him to the times of nrXic and Refugee, where their rantings would result in 10+ page political flamefests.

Insane ravings because I'm against a goverment that has killed thousands just to make the rich richer, leaving their troops who would fight only to protect their country and NOT to make the oil corporations and weapons' dealers richer in a shithole like Iraq where everybody hates them? Maybe because I'm against these soulless corporations (and I'm not talking only about the US ones) who exploit the poor and helpless to make money? Who force children to work 16 hours a day in third world countries so that they can have a nice big profit? Thousands are dying around the world from starvation billions are the poor and these disgusting politicians are spending billions to make bombs while corporations have huge amounts of money that just stay in the banks. I'm against the whole corrupted capitalistic system and I'm seeing the whole globalization process from a totally different perspective. You see I don't want to exploit third world countries and generally the poor I want to help them since I think of it as our duty as human beings. Are these the insane ravings you're talking about? Whatever man you can't understand me and we're totally offtopic.
 

Pimpwerx

Member
I don't think it has anything to do with "your candidate didn't win, blah blah blah". You know, I wish death on Ariel Sharon, Jerry Falwell, John Travolta and Rosie O'Donnell. For one, I'm not stupid to think that I have any control over the cosmos to make this stuff happen by sheer will, so my feelings are meaningless. Second, these people (Travolta and fathead aside) are responsible for the death (or at least strong persecution) of millions of people. That one or two douchebags should affect so many negatively is reason enough for me to want their heads to roll. Don't like it? Tough shit. You're welcome to feel the same way about me. But again, it's not like someone wishing ill on me will make it come to pass. People are entitled to feel anyway they want, no matter how irrational. The great thing is that for all the negative comments in here, how many of us have made policy decision that have lead to the deaths of thousands? HA! Bush is a fucking douchebag, and were the worst to happen to him, I would probably crack a toast. PEACE.
 

xabre

Banned
Boogie said:
the hell? What point is that, if you're not comparing him?

That despite your policies and however heinous they may be (killing 10 million or 10 thousand) you apparently don't deserve to die for them and shouldn't expect people to be glad if you do.
 

Boogie

Member
Che said:
Insane ravings because I'm against a goverment that has killed thousands just to make the rich richer, leaving their troops who would fight only to protect their country and NOT to make the oil corporations and weapons' dealers richer in a shithole like Iraq where everybody hates them? Maybe because I'm against these soulless corporations (and I'm not talking only about the US ones) who exploit the poor and helpless to make money? Who force children to work 16 hours a day in third world countries so that they can have a nice big profit? Thousands are dying around the world from starvation billions are the poor and these disgusting politicians are spending billions to make bombs while corporations have huge amounts of money that just stay in the banks. I'm against the whole corrupted capitalistic system and I'm seeing the whole globalization process from a totally different perspective. You see I don't want to exploit third world countries and generally the poor I want to help them since I think of it as our duty as human beings. Are these the insane ravings you're talking about? Whatever man you can't understand me and we're totally offtopic.

:lol

Noble positions, but it's when you jump from them to wishing death upon Bush, making Hitler comparisons, boycotting (or only claiming to) American products, and hating Americans themselves (which you'll deny of course), where you turn into Mr. Left-Wing Nutjob.

You construct strawmen just as enthusiastically as the neo-cons on the board do, when we had them.
 

Boogie

Member
xabre said:
That despite your policies and however heinous they may be (killing 10 million or 10 thousand) you apparently don't deserve to die for them and shouldn't expect people to be glad if you do.

And if that's the extent of your analysis, sure, you might have a point. But that's an awfully superficial and lazy analysis :p
 

Guileless

Temp Banned for Remedial Purposes
I nominate this thread for the OT Hall of Fame.

Looks like Che is shameless. Still posting in the thread but won't deign to enlighten me about my unfortunate "situation" that prevents me from grasping his particular brand of genius. Acting just like a capitalist fat cat too busy checking his stock tables to help a sweet old lady across the street. :(
 
Che said:
Mass murderers and war criminals like Bush don't deserve to live. If the assassination attempt against Hitler has succeeded many people might have lived. That's all I have to say about the issue.

I never thought I would say this about an internet poster:

But, if I ever met you in real life, I would punch you in the face. You epitomize European arrogance combined with redneck stupidity all in the body of one man. People such as yourself are loathsome pretentious fucks who would probably be friendlier if someone stuck a banana up their ass.


Edit: If this post gets me banned, so be it, but this is something that I've been wanting to say the likes of Che for a while.
 

Che

Banned
Boogie said:
:lol

Noble positions, but it's when you jump from them to wishing death upon Bush, making Hitler comparisons, boycotting (or only claiming to) American products, and hating Americans themselves (which you'll deny of course), where you turn into Mr. Left-Wing Nutjob.

You construct strawmen just as enthusiastically as the neo-cons on the board do, when we had them.

Oh for god's sake why the hell am I then in a forum where 70-80% of the people are americans? Are you serious man? When will the republicans finally understand that when someone is against the US goverment in not against every american? I did not wish Bush to die I said he deserves to die (there's a difference), I did make Hitler comparisons and as for the boycotting it's good for a protector of the corporate profit like Bush and the rest of his gang to know that he's losing something when he keeps killing people.
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
"I despise what the Republican party is doing. I KNOW, I'll kill the President! That'll solve everything!"

Idiots.
 

luxsol

Member
Che said:
Insane ravings because I'm against a goverment that has killed thousands just to make the rich richer, leaving their troops who would fight only to protect their country and NOT to make the oil corporations and weapons' dealers richer in a shithole like Iraq where everybody hates them? Maybe because I'm against these soulless corporations (and I'm not talking only about the US ones) who exploit the poor and helpless to make money? Who force children to work 16 hours a day in third world countries so that they can have a nice big profit? Thousands are dying around the world from starvation billions are the poor and these disgusting politicians are spending billions to make bombs while corporations have huge amounts of money that just stay in the banks. I'm against the whole corrupted capitalistic system and I'm seeing the whole globalization process from a totally different perspective. You see I don't want to exploit third world countries and generally the poor I want to help them since I think of it as our duty as human beings. Are these the insane ravings you're talking about? Whatever man you can't understand me and we're totally offtopic.
So what do you actually buy? Because the US companies have deals with countries around the world, like China, India, Mexico, etc to make products, and they're just as guilty as the US when it comes to killing thousands (in their own way) and slave labor just to make a few people richer.
You should be boycotting a lot more than just US corporations cause their evil doesn't stop there, you should be boycotting products that come from evil countries who let their people be exploited too. =P
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom