Che said:After this:
this:
...was expected.
Define "evil". I can see many many similarities if that's what you mean.
Guileless said:Che, how's the US boycott going? Enjoying your Microsoft Xbox (TM) and posting on an American forum with American ads?
sans_pants said:you are not che guevara, you do not have the same ideals he did, you are just some dumbfuck on the internet complaining about the president
xabre said:Yes how dare we criticize the president...what audacity we have to complain about the president...we have no right to complain about, condemn or otherwise disapprove that which was ordained by God, the president.
sans_pants said:criticize him all you want, i wasnt talking to the general people on here
i dont care if you criticize him, just dont whine and bitch, say hes worse than hitler, and he needs to be assassinated
goodcow said:Those things fall under our ability to criticize him.
sans_pants said:criticize him all you want, i wasnt talking to the general people on here
i dont care if you criticize him, just dont whine and bitch, say hes worse than hitler, and he needs to be assassinated
goodcow said:Those things fall under our ability to criticize him.
sans_pants said:ok then, get better criticisms
its really stupid and childish
Guileless said:What have you explained a thousand times?
What is my situation?
Why do you play a Microsoft Xbox (TM) while claiming to boycott American companies?
What are the chances you respond in understandable, coherent English?
Che said:1) ...
2) I'm implying something in that post but due to your situation I'm not surprised you didn't find it.
3) I bought Xbox used since except boycotting US corporations I'm boycotting companies with monopolistic tactics.
4) None... for you...
Tommie Hu$tle said:agreed
not agreeing with someone ass backwards politics is not a reason to wish that person dead.
I don't know what the history is here, but this is the weakest set of non-responses that I've seen in quite some time.Che said:1) ...
2) I'm implying something in that post but due to your situation I'm not surprised you didn't find it.
3) I bought Xbox used since except boycotting US corporations I'm boycotting companies with monopolistic tactics.
4) None... for you...
Flynn said:Making decisions that result in the deaths of tens of thousands of people is more than ass backwards.
DarienA said:I don't know about other folks... but I loves me some shaved Bush....
Tommie Hu$tle said:So he is more cupable than the both legislative houses of the US. One man can't send us to war. Each and every member of both houses of congress share in the blame. If you are going to blame someone then blame them all.
DarienA said:True but let's get even a bit more technical.
One man can send us in to an armed conflict. Only the full group of folks(Congress) can send us in to a war.... even without approval doesn't he have like 60 days before he'd have to terminate the troop disposal without congressional approval?
We had to go to Iraq to prevent those terrorists from potentially gaining access to Iraq's WMD's!
-jinx- said:I don't know what the history is here, but this is the weakest set of non-responses that I've seen in quite some time.
Tommie Hu$tle said:I believe this is true but, he can do some executive tomfoolery to extend that I think that's how Vietnam happened we would have to ask Boogie.
Guileless said:Aren't they though? Che generally types shit he must have read off of a circa-1970 leftist pamphlet in broken English, people question what he wrote (if they can even understand it enough to do so, which is about half the time), then he typically makes a grade-school level insult and abandons the thread without even attempting to defend what he wrote.
He'll probably abandon the thread now. Even he has some shame (I think.) If not, what is my situation Che? I really want to hear this.
Tommie Hu$tle said:So he is more cupable than the both legislative houses of the US. One man can't send us to war. Each and every member of both houses of congress share in the blame. If you are going to blame someone then blame them all.
Cyan said:Sheer idiocy. Think for a moment about what would actually happen if Bush were successfully assassinated.
Hint: the Patriot Act and Guantanamo Bay would look downright friendly.
goodcow said:Do I feel we'd be better off if Bush wasn't President, even if that includes him not being alive? Yes.
trippingmartian said:Should have thrown a pretzel.
borghe said:laughing about the possibility of him dying or even saying we would be better off if he were killed (note the difference between being killed and just him not in office) is an entirely different story.
Would you say the same thing about Stalin? Not comparing Bush to Stalin
borghe said:wow. you guys are disappointed because someone wasn't killed.
you are all fucking worthless.
that's where we are in the states I guess. Your candidate doesn't get elected so you hope the other one gets assassinated.
goodcow said:Tones don't register over the internet, as it's just text, but it's not as if I'm sitting here with an evil look on my face saying "He should be dead" in some demonic manner.
Do I wholly disagree with this administration? Yes.
Do I feel we'd be better off if Bush wasn't President, even if that includes him not being alive? Yes.
Would I ever actually cause, plot, or advocate harm to him? No.
xabre said:Would you say the same thing about Stalin? Not comparing Bush to Stalin, just making a point.
Boogie said:I think he benefits from the fact that the majority sees his insane ravings for what they are and ignore him, but that has the side effect of never having his ravings challenged, so I think he's developed a high opinion of himself because of it.
On the whole, I think it's a good thing that his ravings are dismissed as mostly harmless. After all, compare him to the times of nrXic and Refugee, where their rantings would result in 10+ page political flamefests.
Boogie said:the hell? What point is that, if you're not comparing him?
Che said:Insane ravings because I'm against a goverment that has killed thousands just to make the rich richer, leaving their troops who would fight only to protect their country and NOT to make the oil corporations and weapons' dealers richer in a shithole like Iraq where everybody hates them? Maybe because I'm against these soulless corporations (and I'm not talking only about the US ones) who exploit the poor and helpless to make money? Who force children to work 16 hours a day in third world countries so that they can have a nice big profit? Thousands are dying around the world from starvation billions are the poor and these disgusting politicians are spending billions to make bombs while corporations have huge amounts of money that just stay in the banks. I'm against the whole corrupted capitalistic system and I'm seeing the whole globalization process from a totally different perspective. You see I don't want to exploit third world countries and generally the poor I want to help them since I think of it as our duty as human beings. Are these the insane ravings you're talking about? Whatever man you can't understand me and we're totally offtopic.
xabre said:That despite your policies and however heinous they may be (killing 10 million or 10 thousand) you apparently don't deserve to die for them and shouldn't expect people to be glad if you do.
Guileless said:I nominate this thread for the OT Hall of Fame.
Che said:Mass murderers and war criminals like Bush don't deserve to live. If the assassination attempt against Hitler has succeeded many people might have lived. That's all I have to say about the issue.
Boogie said::lol
Noble positions, but it's when you jump from them to wishing death upon Bush, making Hitler comparisons, boycotting (or only claiming to) American products, and hating Americans themselves (which you'll deny of course), where you turn into Mr. Left-Wing Nutjob.
You construct strawmen just as enthusiastically as the neo-cons on the board do, when we had them.
So what do you actually buy? Because the US companies have deals with countries around the world, like China, India, Mexico, etc to make products, and they're just as guilty as the US when it comes to killing thousands (in their own way) and slave labor just to make a few people richer.Che said:Insane ravings because I'm against a goverment that has killed thousands just to make the rich richer, leaving their troops who would fight only to protect their country and NOT to make the oil corporations and weapons' dealers richer in a shithole like Iraq where everybody hates them? Maybe because I'm against these soulless corporations (and I'm not talking only about the US ones) who exploit the poor and helpless to make money? Who force children to work 16 hours a day in third world countries so that they can have a nice big profit? Thousands are dying around the world from starvation billions are the poor and these disgusting politicians are spending billions to make bombs while corporations have huge amounts of money that just stay in the banks. I'm against the whole corrupted capitalistic system and I'm seeing the whole globalization process from a totally different perspective. You see I don't want to exploit third world countries and generally the poor I want to help them since I think of it as our duty as human beings. Are these the insane ravings you're talking about? Whatever man you can't understand me and we're totally offtopic.