On-thread topic:
Why is it exactly that nobody ever talks about Master System Sonic anymore? I've only ever seen it mentioned by you guys and when it was on Awesome Games Done Quick one year. Is it because the Master System didn't sell well in the US?
Like Sciz said, they were put on the Game Gear and they weren't very good games to begin with. Sonic 2 8-bit, for example, is like the bane of my existence along with Sonic Blast GG (which did get ported to the SMS, and that version is remarkably
worse than the GG version).
We had a bit of a quibble in here when we discussed the merits of Sonic 1 GG/SMS once because some of us really liked the special stages in it, and some of us didn't care much for it. Overall, though, if you had a Genesis and a Game Gear, you probably weren't going to play the SMS version of something you either have another version of, or something you've already played.
I'd also like to add that there is a fan-made version of Sonic Triple Trouble for the SMS by Glitch. It has some bugs, but if you were ever curious, it exists.
Brief change-of-topic:
apparently Marble Zone's music was hiding in Sonic [1] for the Master System's soundtrack this entire time, and we've only just noticed it.
The guy who found it's checked; there aren't any other hidden songs, although there appears to be evidence that some other songs were hastily overwritten.
Wow. That's actually really good. It sounds better like that, really, and I'm surprised it's faster.
I don't think it necessarily indicates that Sonic 1 8-bit was supposed to be a downport, but maybe it was supposed to share more stages in common with the 16-bit version along with GHZ, LZ and SBZ. It's certainly
plausible the Marble Zone was to be included going by the general pace of Sonic 1 16-bit. Maybe Marble Zone was supposed to be another slower stage between two faster-paced stages. Edit: Or maybe it's because they might've been afraid of
this guy finding out that his cues might have been taken for a Sonic game.
Off-thread topic:
Similarly, I've lost count of how many "GAMING/OFF-TOPIC SIDE, AMIRITE FELLAS" post I've read in community threads over the years. It really does seem like two different worlds that happen to share servers sometimes and occasionally intermingle.
This is why I've clamped down on this sort of thing in this thread recently. It doesn't add anything, and it's irrelevant to discussion in this thread because things are generally crossposted.
But I also agree with ShockingAlberto, in that this culture should come from the posters (and mods are posters too). That's something I've indirectly been realizing with the whole PS4 Playroom fiasco; we need to hold ourselves to higher standards, and we need to encourage each other to have high standards for ourselves, because yelling and scolding only go so far.
This is why I'd subtly encouraged you guys to make more posts beyond list posts (of course, we've had the few times where I've outright said, "can you elaborate on that?" or "stop merely posting a list and explain why you chose those things"). A lot of you may not have noticed it, but throughout the two years that the community threads have existed, a lot of you have refined your posting styles a little bit little-by-little. Many people here have just gotten
better at posting and with their prose in general, and that impresses me a lot. I'm pretty happy that a lot of you took the initiative to change it up a little bit when the time called for it, whether we're talking about music, level design, games, etc. Those times when we were talking about Sonic sprites or level design/aesthetic for various games were good because you wanted to discuss it instead of drive-by post with a small point to add.
That's why I said a few pages back to Shadow Hog that he should think of posting his post in the Essential RPG thread this year because it was actually
good. When you guys were writing your GotY/SotY posts last year and were pretty proud of what you accomplished, I was pretty happy to see that. It's probably the teacher in me, but I like seeing people take the initiative like that and learn from others to contribute to their posting style to modify it.
But at the same time, you have to feel encouraged to change your posting style and put more effort into cultivating a discussion. Some people just...
don't, and they continuously go with output that isn't necessarily in-depth, or consists of drive-by posts because they either don't really care, they don't have time, or they don't have the patience for it. And that, in turn, doesn't make the forum feel as unified as it did four to six years ago. You have a lot of people coming in from different corners with different posting styles and different reasons for posting on the site. Some people like coming to GAF for the laughs and the gifs. Some people like coming to GAF for the discussion (game-specific). Some people like coming to GAF for sales talk. And some people like coming to GAF as it's a news aggregate for them.
And that seems to be the guise that the Gaming Forum truly seems to have taken: a news aggregate. As I said before, I felt like putting OTs in the Community Forum after a month contributed to this somewhat. But a lot the focus obviously shifted with the advent of new consoles and company politics, and thus a snarky atmosphere where a lot of the focus seems to be on memetic culture as opposed to promoting any sense of in-depth discussion. It seems like a fairly large chunk of active members on the Gaming Side would prefer to throw in their two cents and leave as opposed to sticking around and learning from other members via discussion. If no one is willing to discuss with someone who would like to discuss something, then the desire for good discourse begins to disintegrate more and more.
I do have to wonder if the people who would like to cultivate discussion with depth might be in the minority as opposed to the majority. As Alberto said, the change does have to come from within--the users. There's only so much you can do to encourage people to post with more rationality and insight, but it's ultimately up to them to decide to do that. It only just happened in here because it's a smaller concentrated area with users who are more familiar with each other, and users who aren't very quick to judge.
It wouldn't hurt to
try, but ultimately it falls upon the users--and there's a
lot of users to convince now than there was several years ago--to engage in discussion as opposed to being dismissive of any sort of positive or negative discourse in various threads. Especially at this juncture.