JackSparr0w
Banned
Nope screw consoles and the mega corporations that control them.Yeah, screw videogames.
/s
Nope screw consoles and the mega corporations that control them.Yeah, screw videogames.
/s
I mean, MLB The Show's driver is live service and there is still the quality single player component. GT7 as well.
If these are their style, and if they do online games with their cinematic pedigree, they will have their own type of niche others aren't really doing.
Nope screw consoles and the mega corporations that control them.
"If the consoles are not involved there is no Witcher 3 as it is," answers Marcin Iwinski, definitively. "We can lay it out that simply. We just cannot afford it, because consoles allow us to go higher in terms of the possible or achievable sales; have a higher budget for the game, and invest it all into developing this huge, gigantic world.
"Developing only for the PC: yes, probably we could get more [in terms of graphics] as there would be nothing else - they would be so focused, like if we would develop only on Xbox One or PlayStation 4. But then we cannot afford such a game."
If it's the odd game and doesn't have any impact on what they do best then I don't mind. But if they go off on the deep end and make it their primary focus like pretty much every other publisher these days then I riot and you're all rioting with me.
Yes record sales for a console = stagnating based on my cherry picked data without context. And your sentiment is ridiculous.I'm happy that Playstation is stagnating and Xbox is dying but the day Nintendo goes bankrupt I'll pop the champagne.
Yep, it's this, the allocation for m&a went from 2t jpy to 1.8t jpy.The nuance on this in the call transcript is a bit different:
https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/IR/library/presen/er/pdf/22q4_sonyspeech.pdf
They say that expenses associated with acquisitions since FY2022 including Bungie are expected to increase by 20%
So my understanding is that they're talking about management costs relative to new studios already acquired and not about reserving more money to buy new ones.
There are rumors that the PS5 slim will have no drive and there won't be a version with drive. You would have to buy the disc drive as an add on.How about a PS5 slim without a disc drive at $349, with drive at $399, launching fall 2023!!!
No. There will be several multi player games which will be on PC day 1 I guess.Are folks thinking we will see less PS on PC coming up?
I look forward to the day when you realize, that regardless of your preferences, there is at least one or two mega corporations controlling whatever you are into.Nope screw consoles and the mega corporations that control them.
Are you going to pretend there wasn't pent-up demand from the previous years of shortages?
6.3m PS5 sold
How do they post these kinds of numbers and their share price is down 6 percent?
I don't understand the stock exchange at ALL!
There more to Sony then just the gaming divisionHow do they post these kinds of numbers and their share price is down 6 percent?
I don't understand the stock exchange at ALL!
There more to Sony then just the gaming division
How do they post these kinds of numbers and their share price is down 6 percent?
I don't understand the stock exchange at ALL!
Because it's not about console sales, they issued a conservative profit forecast for the next fiscal year. Current CFO prefers to be conservative at the beginning of the fiscal year and then upgrade the forecast later.How do they post these kinds of numbers and their share price is down 6 percent?
I don't understand the stock exchange at ALL!
Xbox only shipped 1M consoles this quarter (estimated based on hw revenue).
You linked to a movie flopping, what the heck does that have to do with video games?Morbius Out-Flops Itself, Viral Twitter Memes Blamed
Sony execs have to be embarrassed.www.vulture.com
Probably because they didn't release any this Q?
They’ve got the most robust sub offering.
They’ve got the best cloud network.
They’ve got a lot of great studios and IP.
Their console is broadly comparable to the PS5 so shouldn’t have too much difficulty in manufacturing it.
They’ve got plenty of money to secure timed exclusives and content.
Over time they should have developed to be in a much stronger position than this.
We are now in a bizarre position where Sony recovered from the PS3, shored up their single player offerings and are now expanding out into areas that in most people’s minds are Microsoft’s wheelhouse (PC gaming, subs, GAAS).
It really is just poor management from top to bottom.
For someone who wishes for the death of home consoles and handhelds these kind of mental gymnastics are not surprising but ultimately still embarrassing.You can ignore me but you can't ignore Sony's report.
Sony sold at a loss (digital version) or break even ($499 version) a few million of PS5s, yay!
Not really their user-base is not growing, software is down and revenue is up a tiny amount barely outperforming the Xbox brand who had a 30% hardware decline and a year with no AAA first party releases.
But you use a shitty OS on your PC that's controlled by a mega corp!Nope screw consoles and the mega corporations that control them.
But you use a shitty OS on your PC that's controlled by a mega corp!
It's over. GG Phil. Covid kept Xbox close to PlayStation but it's a wrap.Just waw.
So 38.5 million PS5s against 19.5 million (if going by Ampere's figures) Series
Imagine the gap if going by sold-through
They listened to social media (who were memeing) and re-released it for it to flop extra hard, twice.You linked to a movie flopping, what the heck does that have to do with video games?
Why does this logic only apply to PS and not to Switch for instance? When Switch had supply issues according to some at the beginning.Are you going to pretend there wasn't pent-up demand from the previous years of shortages?
My question is, how do we gauge trajectories from the big companies on whether they are going to fuck with consumers due to market share power? I don't expect Sony to throw a thong at PlayStation machine anytime soon, but typically with dominance comes ignorance due to status quo of choice. Things like less investment in more typically risk adverse options, higher prices because they can and because they can gain more profits or pushing certain acquisition boundaries.
I'm not here dooming and grooming that Sony is going to suddenly fuck with the goose and we'll all pay for not supporting poor Xbox, that's just pure gamer fuel stupidity. I'm just trying to engage in forethought that while speculative in nature has some potential to it.
Invalid.Their console is broadly comparable to the PS5 so shouldn’t have too much difficulty in manufacturing it.
Just waw.
So 38.5 million PS5s against 19.5 million (if going by Ampere's figures) Series
Imagine the gap if going by sold-through
The 7 year old switch vs the new ps5 with two years of shortages from launch, really?Why does this logic only apply to PS and not to Switch for instance? When Switch had supply issues according to some at the beginning.
PS5 just came out?the new ps5
Series s was a bad idea?Invalid.
They have two COMPLETELY different SKUs so they literally need two different assembly lines. Now compare this to PS5 where the difference is close to one side panel and an optical drive difference
What? I'm talking about the Switch's first years, when some were saying it had major shortages. When sales blew up later no one mentioned "pent up" sales. But it's the case now for PS?The 7 year old switch vs the new ps5 with two years of shortages from launch, really?
I don't think it would necessarily be Microsoft trying to buy SE. More that other entities try to invest in SE that would harm Sony's ability to do business with them. Also, if other big third parties start going away, Sony might still go after SE just to make absolutely sure they go nowhere. That could be a full on acquisition or a huge investment and partnership.
Even then, MS would simply decide to target Capcom, Sega or From. Sony can not protect all of its partners, short of massively investing in all of them, or get the japanese government to intervene (they won't)...
When even with shortages they were the 2nd fastest selling PS to date, pent-up takes a very different meaning.Are you going to pretend there wasn't pent-up demand from the previous years of shortages?
And Sony just shipped 19m in a year.Just waw.
So 38.5 million PS5s against 19.5 million (if going by Ampere's figures) Series
Imagine the gap if going by sold-through
I am confused... even if this were the case? Why does it matter? Is it Sonys fault there isn't pent-up demand for some other product?Are you going to pretend there wasn't pent-up demand from the previous years of shortages?
anyway, digital growth is flat, guess all digital no-options fanboys are going to have suffer people having options
I think Xbox will ship between 6-8M XB this year. Potentially they will be outsold by 3 or 4:1 this year if PS5 hits the 25M milestone.Just waw.
So 38.5 million PS5s against 19.5 million (if going by Ampere's figures) Series
Imagine the gap if going by sold-through
Even if Xbox left the market tomorrow, Nintendo and PlayStation would still contend with each other. Meaning the console market would still not be in a monopoly, and both companies would have to concern themselves with making stupid moves.
From what I understand, the CMA noted that despite Nintendo not having access to big third-party franchises like Call of Duty, it's thriving. Switch is selling more than any other console besides PlayStation 2. A direct result of their very strong first party offerings and creative maneuvers on their hardware. This is one of the reasons they doubted Sony's concerns for the console space in the ABK deal. Concerns that were ultimately dismissed.
Even though some will try to point to Sony being the only high-end console manufacturer, should Xbox leave, they completely overlook that Nintendo is the only low-end console manufacturer and no one sees a problem with that. Because there isn't one. If developers and gamers start feeling that they're getting a very bad shake out of Sony, Nintendo will remain an option to play on and develop for. Sure, the games won't be the same. That doesn't mean they'll be worse.
PC gaming is also still an option if the console market gets ugly and pricey. Devices like SteamDeck have also shown it is possible for PC gaming to be on-the-go and more friendly to a casual audience. Mobile gaming is also an option, with an increasing amount of mobile games being robust experiences. Not yet akin to current console or PC titles, but getting there. Then you have stand-alone VR headsets like Quest and potentially Valve's upcoming device.
This also completely neglects the potential for another company to try their luck at filling in the spot left behind by Xbox, as well as ignoring the emergence of cloud gaming. Even without Xbox, the market is robust and with many gaming options. Xbox isn't necessary. It's another option that has largely just been a foil to PlayStation specifically in the console space for many years now.
What? I'm talking about the Switch's first years, when some were saying it had major shortages. When sales blew up later no one mentioned "pent up" sales. But it's the case now for PS?
Nah, we need xbox to keep Sony in check. Same for MS needing Sony. Someone needs to be in the high end console space or we are cucked.
The switch didn't launch in a global pandemic where demand and shortages were wild on a global scale. Its completely apples to oranges.