iamvin22
Industry Verified
The judge should watch the video and look at this screenshot then look at tencent and say "pay the man and cancel the game".I mean look at this...
![]()
The judge should watch the video and look at this screenshot then look at tencent and say "pay the man and cancel the game".I mean look at this...
![]()
i don't think any AI slop case would factor into this. Infringement comes down to whether or not Tencent's work is derivative enough that it can be confused for an actual Horizon game and devalue the franchise that Sony bafflingly has invested hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars into. Take away the logo and this looks like a Horizon game period.I suspect there will be a lot of overlap between how the California judges preside over this case vis-a-vis the Disney vs OpenAI lawsuit.
If Sony can argue this is essentially an unauthorised derivative work of Horizon (which given it a) looks like a complete rip off; and b) they already asked to "derive" use of the license for their own works) then that might be a winning strategy to get this over the line.
However, if even the US courts look favourably on OpenAI and deem it acceptable for their AIs to generate derivative works of popular Disney/Marvel/Star Wars characters for their customers, then there may be an angle for Tencent to use that as precedent to wriggle out of this fiasco.
I hope Tencent get butchered though quite frankly.
It'll be almost impossible for Sony to enforce any ruling in China, but they should be able to carry any court ruling to enforce across most other regions to block distribution from Tencent there and receive damages.
However in China this will still be Tencent's "Little Timmy, we've got Horizon at home… it's the Temu version".
It's a losing prospect so I wouldn't be surprised if he's pushing it at Sony out of the same vanity that got us a Zero Dawn remaster.I have a feeling this is financed by Hermen Hulst from his side pocket![]()
From an infringement point of view, you're better off making a total clone game that plays exactly like the game you want to copy but looks totally different than the reverse.So the artwork looks similar, but the game play loop is totally different. I hope sony fail, what is next? COD sueing BF because pew pew pew?
Funny to see the fanboys scrambling to defend Sony for the lawsuit after damning Nintendo for the intent to fight Palworld and then the lawsuit so long now.
Game looks like a cool Monster Hunter-like, with Wilds faltering it has a chance. Hope it's really good, not a wannabe like God Eater/Toukiden/Wild Hearts etc.
Also, weird this is the first time they've done this
![]()
They have American subsidiaries that can be compelled to pay.LOL @ suing China for stealing IP. China don't care.
Lol Horizon is like one of Sony's top 5 brands, if not top 3.Tencent's work is derivative enough that it can be confused for an actual Horizon game and devalue the franchise that Sony bafflingly has invested hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars into.
Yeah, but it's Sony, so it's good.Basically a Palworld situation?
I mean...
Thread turned into low IQ takes festa in record time.Lol Horizon is like one of Sony's top 5 brands, if not top 3.
There's nothing baffling about investing into (and protecting) a series that sold over 35 million copies.
But then again.. Genshin Impact... And its still around.
Gameplay patents are what makes the difference here imo.So anyone who was in favor of Palworld should be in favor of this, correct?
They probably sued out of fear of how bad the dei woke filled Horizon franchise will look next to its chinese copy. Embarassing display of insecurity from Soyny. Also a full on display of hypocrisy as well from the same publisher fully endorsing Palworld.
I'm not so sure, you'll never see this thing in a Tencent game:The art direction is a blatant ripoff
Not getting into the absurdity of software patents, which shouldn't even exist in the first place, the point is I guarantee there will be people saying Sony is in the right here where Nintendo was being ridiculous, and engaging in whatever mental gymnastics it requires to try and hold such a stance.Gameplay patents are what makes the difference here imo.
This is simple IP theft, which Nintendo could have sued for, but chose not to because they knew they wouldn't be guaranteed to win.
Sony will regret trying to appeal to the Chinese market,
Yeaaaah, if you can swap the logos and it looks like it works, it's probably an issue, lmao.I mean look at this...
![]()
It's not like this will stop Tencent devs (the ones doing it) targeting the PS5 or that there will be a general company resentment against SIE. Business does not work like that.It's the only thing working great for them this gen. Another reason why this move is dumb. You dont want to jeopardize relations with Tencent.
do we know this? If this is true, I predict that this is gonna be a colossal failure.The reason for the lawsuit is that Sony is working on a MMO
I remember seeing this and immediately noticing how similar this looks to horizon and laughing. But I don't really think that's grounds to sue someone. If that's the case than a lot of dev's can sue eachother.