Yikes, hair color and gender, of so many they could have chosen, yikes, what a rip off, lol. Guess they're safe if they just change the hair color and gender, how silly of Sony, paying lawyers, starting procedures for something they can easily switch up in like 5 minutes and all the effort will be wasted...
nial said:
You need to say it a third time for it to be true, don't quit! I guess you do think they should sue over it as instead of explaining how this is different, you just point out they were involved with Souls (and give them full credit, author lol) like that was anyone's point? Or just deflecting with nonsense?nial said:
Speculating over inner goals is the most pointless thing. It could be, could not, what exactly does that add to the conversation?
Literally not the same scenario like at all lol.
Sadly temp-banned today.Thanks a lotnial , now the Nintendo fanboys are all agitated and it will take forever to calm them down again!
@GigaBowser will drop by at any moment posting a wall of screenshots of Street Fighter 6 Switch 2 vs Ps5pro.
That's literally exactly what Sony is suing to do.
California Federal Court.
Literally not the same scenario like at all lol.
Tencent literally tried to license the IP and failed, then turned around and stole the entire look (and potentially premise) of Horizon (this alone makes the Sony case imo). When did Pocketpair approach Nintendo or the Pokemon Company in any way before Palworld?
And how does suing over someone aping the entire look and feel of your game relate to Nintendo trying to sue over gameplay element patents (which incidentally they're trying to change mid-trial to avoid losing)?
Sadly temp-banned today.
#FreeGigaBowser!
That's literally exactly what Sony is suing to do.
Any service game that loses the US market is basically DOA. Tencent now has to either win the case (unlikely) or they have to find a solution with Sony.
Cali court.
Again?!?
He's been moderated wildly if you ask me.
I did but to my defense I didn't even know they made corporate boot licking meds. You must share some of your prescription with me sometime.
Meds. Again.I did but to my defense I didn't even know they made corporate boot licking meds. You must share some of your prescription with me sometime.
Lighten up,you don't have to reply to every single negative comment someone makes regarding Sony.
You can't sit there with a straight face and tell me that what I said about Sony being hypocritical about this whole thing after Palworld isn't true.
As far as I'm concerned both Sony and Nintendo can fuck off with claims like these regardless of how similar they look as long as there's no direct code being copied especially when they have the audacity to sell the thousands of AI slop 1 minute games that permiate both the Ps Store and E shop.
Where do we draw the line? Should Rocksteady sue Insomniac for copying their Arkham Freeflow combat into Spiderman? Should Ubisoft sue every open world game with towers since Assassin's Creed? Or is it only art related? Only if two things look the same? From Software should sue Lies of P dev? Polyphony should sue every other racing sim out there for having the nerve to include cars in their game! Where do we draw the line?
Do these chinese games look similar to Horizon and Pokemon? YEAH they do,they clearly wear their inspiration on their sleeves to a ridiculous extent yet they play nothing alike which is more than I can say about some of those games I enumerated earlier that weren't targeted by suits.
So again I ask: Where do we draw the line?
LOLI mean look at this...
Bots and absolute psychopaths
meanies
That IS a good reminder indeed and here comes the part where you tell us all why Sony didn't sue From Software then if you think it's fine for them to do so now to a different company? It's the same principle.
adamsapple
Kacho
And c'mon, we all know each other. You must know I don't seriously type like that most of the time. 
This is your third meltdown in a row. The Duskbloods doesn't exactly look at all like Bloodborne beyond some shallow similarities, and Sony, like most companies, would never sue you over copied game mechanics. That's how the entire soulslike genre is even allowed to exist.
Done!
Also interesting to see that Tencent started development of the game before they asked for the IP license, then just continued along after being told no.
One is copyright, one is patent trolling. They are not the same.After this, I don't want to hear SHIT from Sony fans about the Palworld lawsuit.
FWIW patent suits are stronger and easier to prove which is why Nintendo didn't include copyright stuff
They did the patents after Palworld released.
They modified them after the release, which is extremely common
I'm mostly joking, I am fairly against Nintendo in the PalWorld lawsuit, so I have no issues with Sony siding with them lol (even if it had been the same entity)
Robot creatures existed long before horizon
The only meltdowns in this thread are you quickly trying to come to the defence of Sony on every negative post about them.
![L*][*N*K](/data/avatars/m/842/842515.jpg?1750247637){kind=avatar}
There are people on Twitter right now saying that Sony owns the legal rights for "Mechanical dinosaurs"
imagine being a steam chud posting shit and you end up in an official sony lawsuit... but it's a good way to shwo that people are confusing this for hzd which is why sony has a case. The screenshot comparison is also hilarious too.
Also interesting to see that Tencent started development of the game before they asked for the IP license, then just continued along after being told no.
at least read the lawsuit before you type stupid stuff like this
Yeah the Steam comments making it in there are hilarious rofl.
Yep, as I said, shallow similarities. Where exactly do you think both Bloodborne and The Duskbloods take their inspirations, aesthetic-wise, from?The only meltdowns in this thread are you quickly trying to come to the defence of Sony on every negative post about them.
Ah yes,barely any similarities about Duskbloods and Bloodborne, that's why half the internet was thinking it was an indirect sequel to BB in the same vein as DS to DeS:
Look at all these "shallow" similarities:
Now who's the one being disingenuous about it?
Keep doing what you're doing though! Everyone on GAF already knows exactly what it is...
