• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sony lock up Tom Hanks and Ron Howard for more Dan Brown garbage

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://deadline.com/2014/08/sony-pictures-locks-tom-hanks-ron-howard-for-april-inferno-start-825270/

EXCLUSIVE: Sony Pictures and Imagine Entertainment have firmed an April start in Italy on Inferno, the third installment based on the Dan Brown novel series that began with The Da Vinci Code. The studio has closed its deals with Tom Hanks to reprise his role as Harvard symbologist Robert Langdon, and for Ron Howard to direct and Brian Grazer to produce with Howard. The script is by David Koepp.
 
ive seen angels and demons like 6 times in my life and i dont know why

it just always on and i end up watching it somehow

i dont even like it
 

FTF

Member
movies-tom-hanks-a-league-of-their-own-dugout-jimmy-dugan.gif
 

PJV3

Member
ive seen angels and demons like 6 times in my life and i dont know why

it just always on and i end up watching it somehow

i dont even like it

Is that the priest in a helicopter thing?, I only ever see that bit which is pretty ridiculous and has put me off ever wanting to see the rest.
 
I didn't hate the Da Vinci Code at all. In fact I rather enjoyed it. Particularly the Hans Zimmer soundtrack made it gold. I know he gets a lot of hate and I am sure there is something to that he is taking credit from all his slave composers work, but shit is good. It just is.

Chevaliers de Sangreal; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5FyRZbqfeM





Sometimes I like that I haven't read the book. Often it's the fans of the books who are the most angsty and vengeful. But on the other hand, watching the film first makes me passive to reading the superior book afterwards. And so many people have told me to read these Dan Brown books because they are fun and just a good entertaining read!

I guess there is no right or wrong in this. But it's something I think about. Like with Enders Game. I held off reading the book when the movie was announced, then I saw the bad reviews for the film, and was like fuck. And then when I was about to read the damn book I found out that the author is a complete maniac. Ugh. I'm just go masturbate, this shit is too complicated.
 
yep

its just as dumb as you think it is with or without any context

I remember when I read the book years ago. I pictured it being really dumb in my head.

The movie adaptation delivered the dumb.

Granted they didn't have much to work with since the source material was garbage.
 

FiveEyes

Banned
Well I kind of like the silly "here's what really happened" adventure/discovery romps like National Treasure. Da Vinci Code isn't on the same level but it's pretty entertaining.
 

watershed

Banned
Da Vinci Code was a good movie. Not great, but competent and interesting and I got the sense that everyone was trying to make something special and just fell short.

Angels and Demons on the other hand was not very good at all. It was a nonsensical thriller, almost like a Tom Hanks version of Liam Neeson's unstoppable brand of lame action movies.
 
If you guys are telling me that these movies are anything like the National Treasure movies I will watch them right now.

Also, they need to make more National Treasure movies.
 

way more

Member
ive seen angels and demons like 6 times in my life and i dont know why

it just always on and i end up watching it somehow

i dont even like it

It's pretty amazing how much of "the form" of a movie is simulates given how stupid everything is in it. I did realize how good of a director Ron Howard was till I realized how even though the plot is the dumbest thing in the world he stitched it together into something you could technically call a movie.
 

Wozzly

special needs, sexual needs
If you guys are telling me that these movies are anything like the National Treasure movies I will watch them right now.

Also, they need to make more National Treasure movies.

No, National Treasure is a masterpiece compared to these novels/movies.

Didn't the DaVinci Code do terrible at the box office? Ugh it probably did wonders internationally that's how it always goes.
 
No, National Treasure is a masterpiece compared to these novels/movies.

Didn't the DaVinci Code do terrible at the box office? Ugh it probably did wonders internationally that's how it always goes.
$758,239,851 worldwide isn't exactly terrible... How in the friggin' hell did this make that much money? (Yeah I propably know why but I'm just saying.)

Ha, I met someone in pre-production for this yesterday. I thought it was already well-known.
Most people thought it was still in development hell.
 

Quick

Banned
They're skipping Lost Symbol?

Regardless of the book series order (doesn't matter since the movies didn't really stick to it), Lost Symbol would've been huge in the US being set in Washington.
 
I'll watch it. Like this adventure type films, though National Treasure is more enjoyable for me. That being said, I found Angels and Demons more entertaining than Da Vinci Code, I found it better paced and exciting.

On that note, why didn't they make another National Treasure?!
 

massoluk

Banned
One day, people will realize Dan Brown wrote one good book called Angels and Demons and one meh book called Da Vinci Code, the rest are trash.
 

Showaddy

Member
I remember when I read the book years ago. I pictured it being really dumb in my head.

The movie adaptation delivered the dumb.

Granted they didn't have much to work with since the source material was garbage.

Wasn't the book's version even stupider? Like didn't Tom Hank's character fall out of the helicopter as well but without a parachute and somehow survive?
 

C4Lukins

Junior Member
Damnet Tom. You have been really choosing poorly over the past ten years. Same with Ron Howard, but he was only passable to begin with, with a few shining moments.
 

Dead Man

Member
I was hoping that my very literal reading of the title was correct, and Hanks and Howard were in a Sony jail for foisting that shit on people :(

Damnet Tom. You have been really choosing poorly over the past ten years. Same with Ron Howard, but he was only passable to begin with, with a few shining moments.

Rush was pretty decent. Totally holllywood garbage in some of the racing depictions, but even as a pretty serious F1 fan I enjoyed the film a lot.
 

LakeEarth

Member
There's a whole sequence in Angels & Demons which would be undone if someone in the last few hundred years slightly rotated a statue a bit. I just couldn't like the movie after that part.
 

Shiv47

Member
Well, I'll probably catch it when it gets played on cable at some point. I saw Angels and Demons that way, and that shit was hilarious. So earnestly delivered for such truly stupid material.
 

t26

Member
They're skipping Lost Symbol?

Regardless of the book series order (doesn't matter since the movies didn't really stick to it), Lost Symbol would've been huge in the US being set in Washington.

I think most Americans would find Florence and Venice much more exciting than DC.
 

gdt

Member
I've actually read all these books. In middle school The Da Vinci code blew my mind so I guess I've just been keeping up.

The Lost Symbol was horrible, but Inferno was a decent read. Too much Dante this Dante that blah blah, but the villain and the threat were solid. Great ending too I thought.

These books are soooo formulaic. But whatever, I don't die after I read one or anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom