He is talking about Illuminati
Yeah, I got that.
He is talking about Illuminati
Tarzan did pretty well for itself if it weren't for that outlandish budget of $180M
Is Korea similar to china in its studio take, or more like europe?
Could not be happier that Inferno bombed. Fuck that transumanist trash. Brown lost his God damned mind with that ending.
In between? I don't really know what the specific studio cut is in South Korea. There was an article from the Wall Street Journal a couple of years ago that looked at expected earnings through one decade of release in various countries for every dollar earned at the box office in that territory.
In the US, $1 in box office was expected to translate to $1.75 over 10 years ($0.50 or so from the theatrical cut, $0.4 from home video, $0.6 from TV deals, $0.25 from digital).
In China, $1 boxoffice was expected to translate to $0.27 for the studio in 10 years ($0.25 box office cut, $0.02 everything else).
UK was expected to return $1.30 per $1 box office. Japan $0.83, Russia $0.65, South Korea $0.55
Things might have changed some in the past two years (we are in the middle of a transition in how people consume movies at home), but I think the article is broadly applicable.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/for-hollywood-not-all-box-office-dollars-are-equal-1409241925
Madea is a sure fire hit every single time.
Perry sure makes it look easy. You'd think someone else would at least try to get into that lane more than once a year...
I think we'll be getting an announcement of Ron Howard working on a TV show soon enough.
It'd be hilarious if Dr Strange turns out to be the biggest comic book property.
All it needed was a good movie and the property zooms past Supes, Bats, Spider, Iron.
It does strike me as the kind of film that's going to get a lot of basic cable play in the future.
That would be an impressive total for Strange, where north of $500-600M WW could happen. I didn't expect that at all. I figured $450-500M would be great for this one.
I had it better than Ant-Man overall (closer to 600M). Looks like it could go higher.
I think we'll be getting an announcement of Ron Howard working on a TV show soon enough.
I actually wasn't too sure on that as this film seemed very different than the rest. I'm probably looking forward to it more because of that.Ant-Man did 519M. I didn't think this would do worse.
My Dr Strange viewing was perhaps the oldest crowd for an MCU movie to date. Older people must really love them some Cumberbatch!
So how's Strange looking? Bigger than Ant-Man, lower than Guardians?
Most people probably don't even know it's a sequel. I didn't until a couple days ago.
Most people probably don't even know it's a sequel. I didn't until a couple days ago.They took FAR too long to make Inferno, and Angels & Demons for that matter.
There should have been two sequels (replace Inferno with The Lost Symbol) made before 2010. Da Vinci Code would still have been fresh and they would've made bank on that alone.
We need more british actors playing Marvel characters.From @ERCboxoffice on Twitter
DOCTOR STRANGE's $86M debut overseas is comparatively higher than many recent Marvel flicks. +49% ANT-MAN, +37% GotG, +23% CA: WS.
Is next week's thread Marvel vs DC wars or is Strange too low key to matter?
It'll make for a more active thread at least. We haven't had a substantial release for awhileIs next week's thread Marvel vs DC wars or is Strange too low key to matter?
I think Fantastic Beasts will top Strange in final worldwide. That Potterverse thirst.Also, Fantastic Beasts, another magic-based movie releases not too long after.
Looking forward to see how they match up critically and in the box-office.
I think fantastic beasts is gonna get mauled critically.Also, Fantastic Beasts, another magic-based movie releases not too long after.
Looking forward to see how they match up critically and in the box-office.
I think Fantastic Beasts will top Strange in final worldwide. That Potterverse thirst.
I watched Jack Reacher yesterday.
Jack Reacher was really good. It has like a 30% rotten score on Tomatoes... then again Ghostbusters is certified fresh... so. Not as good as the first though, but still solid.
Reacher has a average score of 5.1, Ghostbusters 6.5.
Meanwhile Doctor Strange is 92 % on a 7.3 average score.
Rotten is funny that way.
Reacher has a average score of 5.1, Ghostbusters 6.5.
Meanwhile Doctor Strange is 92 % on a 7.3 average score.
Rotten is funny that way.
Haven't seen Reacher 2, but if it's "not as good as the first," then it's pretty easy to see why a majority of critics didn't enjoy it. The first was a silly story driven by an uninteresting character with passable action scenes.
Yeah, it's very... standard.The first film was bland. Felt like a generic action flick. It was worth a one time watch for Cruise as he always elevates a film.
Inferno bombed? I'm in no way surprised, at all. There is just no demand for this as a franchise.
Yet another Sony blunder.
http://deadline.com/2016/10/doctor-...tional-box-office-weekend-results-1201844444/
Strange only 1% above Thor 2 overseas opening for similar territories.