Tobey Maguire is best spidey. Also had the best suit.
Tobey lacks charisma and sounds like a giant pussy honestly. His high pitch voice is annoying to me.
Tobey Maguire is best spidey. Also had the best suit.
Can i have a Tobey Maguire crying avatar too.
Lol, no contest.
Raimi's.
SM2 is not the best because the loss of powers related to high stress is not believable in the non-mutant super hero Marvel universe
if only we could have animated avatars
![]()
IMHO, if you put Garfield and Stone into the Raimi films with the Raimi scripts, I'm pretty certain they could do much better than both Toby and Dunst did in the Raimi movies. They are both great at acting, it's the horrible scripts in TASM1 & 2 that bring the movies down and make it seem like Toby and Dunst do a better job.
The warped comparison in my head is Raimi = Batman '66, Webb = Burton. I like Adam West Batman more than Burton's, but appreciated Burton's as a reader. And like Batman The Animated Series, Spectacular Spider-Man is far better than both.
Upon further research, I found it happened in the comic!
Stupid or not, it came from the source material! Which is usually a complaint of the Raimi films. They took that and combined it with the Spider-Man no more story, which convinced me that Raimi has a great grasp of the character and really was a fan. In my opinion, he did it better than the comic book lol.
He may not have focused on a quip heavy Spider-Man, but I think all the Jameson stuff makes up for that. TASM pulls from a different line of Spidey, and it gets some of it right like Spider-Man's charisma and all. But they absolutely drop the ball when it comes to putting the actual story to film. Especially in TASM2, that movie has no idea what it's trying to be.
Exactly right. I prefer the campiness of the Raimi versions; they're just fun.Yea they are cheesy, which to me is why they are so good. They are emulating so well the old comic books before super hero movies became so serious grim dark explosion fests
That it did.it gave us lots of memorable animated gifs that will cherish for a long long time
Spiderman 2? Mediocre?Damn everyone seems to like Spider-Man 2 and I really thought it was mediocre when I first saw it.
Good. As we can see without fanboyism or nostalgia for either series, a clear winner is established.Watched the first movie from both directors last weekend. There is no contest comparing the two, Raimi is FAR superior.
Both have flaws, but Raimi seems to identify a distinct difference between Parker with and without the mask on and the journey the character takes to become the hero(even if it gets a bit silly and lamebrain in the final act). I constantly had issues and questions surrounding how Webb developed the character and providing reason for me to give a shit.
Even ignoring the super-villain plots entirely in both films, the origin story was better handled and more entertaining from Raimi. Both suffer from 'pixie girl' treatments in terms of Gwen and MJ both swooning for unearned reasons over Parker, but Parker at least had a distinct personality from Spiderman coming from Raimi. A problem I found Garfield and Webb failed to deliver on in ASM1.
Tobey lacks charisma and sounds like a giant pussy honestly. His high pitch voice is annoying to me.
I don't know if it's been said, but if you could take Webb's Spiderman & Gwen and swap them into Raimi's Movies, we would all be much happier... with the 1st 2 Spiderman movies at least.
can't speak for ASM3, but I would hope that it's better than SM3
I don't know if it's been said, but if you could take Webb's Spiderman & Gwen and swap them into Raimi's Movies, we would all be much happier... with the 1st 2 Spiderman movies at least.
Alot of the fans of the Webb movies on why they're "superior" (get it?) sound as if they would be satisfied with 2hrs of Spider-Man swinging, hanging with Gwen and fighting only. No one ever defends the "plots" of these films or the lack of character development. Its clearly a youtube generation that favors these movies. Those with the shorter attention spans and only know instant gratification. This does not make a good movie, for any character/genre of film.
I'm team Raimi. I enjoyed the stories for Goblin and Doc Ock and wish Venom had that chance as well. Regardless, no one can ever claim Tobey is a crybaby after this film. A guy with Daddy issues is pretty and isn't my Spider-Man.
Alot of the fans of the Webb movies on why they're "superior" (get it?) sound as if they would be satisfied with 2hrs of Spider-Man swinging, hanging with Gwen and fighting only. No one ever defends the "plots" of these films or the lack of character development. Its clearly a youtube generation that favors these movies. Those with the shorter attention spans and only know instant gratification. This does not make a good movie, for any character/genre of film.
I'm team Raimi. I enjoyed the stories for Goblin and Doc Ock and wish Venom had that chance as well. Regardless, no one can ever claim Tobey is a crybaby after this film. A guy with Daddy issues is pretty and isn't my Spider-Man.
Alot of the fans of the Webb movies on why they're "superior" (get it?) sound as if they would be satisfied with 2hrs of Spider-Man swinging, hanging with Gwen and fighting only. No one ever defends the "plots" of these films or the lack of character development. Its clearly a youtube generation that favors these movies. Those with the shorter attention spans and only know instant gratification. This does not make a good movie, for any character/genre of film.
I'm team Raimi. I enjoyed the stories for Goblin and Doc Ock and wish Venom had that chance as well. Regardless, no one can ever claim Tobey is a crybaby after this film. A guy with Daddy issues is pretty and isn't my Spider-Man.
Heh. Good one.Don't think you should insult the audience, the films do that enough.
Alot of the fans of the Webb movies on why they're "superior" (get it?) sound as if they would be satisfied with 2hrs of Spider-Man swinging, hanging with Gwen and fighting only. No one ever defends the "plots" of these films or the lack of character development. Its clearly a youtube generation that favors these movies. Those with the shorter attention spans and only know instant gratification. This does not make a good movie, for any character/genre of film.
I'm team Raimi. I enjoyed the stories for Goblin and Doc Ock and wish Venom had that chance as well. Regardless, no one can ever claim Tobey is a crybaby after this film. A guy with Daddy issues is pretty and isn't my Spider-Man.
Lol, Doc Ock 's character was all over the place. All of Raimi 's villains are sympathetic characters who turned bad due to forces out of their control. Both Doc Ock and Goblin were very similar - both liked Peter / Spider-Man too. Btw, how did Doc Ock become good again at the end of 2? I'm asking because I don't remember. And why did he lose his powers, btw? Tobey might not be a crybaby but he is annoying as f***. That train scene as well - so cringeworthy.
Raimi's Spider-Man was just not funny as well and it certainly doesn't have a scene as powerful as the one in TAS2.
Alot of the fans of the Webb movies on why they're "superior" (get it?) sound as if they would be satisfied with 2hrs of Spider-Man swinging, hanging with Gwen and fighting only. No one ever defends the "plots" of these films or the lack of character development. Its clearly a youtube generation that favors these movies. Those with the shorter attention spans and only know instant gratification. This does not make a good movie, for any character/genre of film.
I'm team Raimi. I enjoyed the stories for Goblin and Doc Ock and wish Venom had that chance as well. Regardless, no one can ever claim Tobey is a crybaby after this film. A guy with Daddy issues is pretty and isn't my Spider-Man.
Lol, Doc Ock 's character was all over the place. All of Raimi 's villains are sympathetic characters who turned bad due to forces out of their control. Both Doc Ock and Goblin were very similar - both liked Peter / Spider-Man too. Btw, how did Doc Ock become good again at the end of 2? I'm asking because I don't remember. And why did he lose his powers, btw? Tobey might not be a crybaby but he is annoying as f***. That train scene as well - so cringeworthy.
Raimi's Spider-Man was just not funny as well and it certainly doesn't have a scene as powerful as the one in TAS2.
There was a powerful scene in TAS2?
More powerful than any of the other Marvel movies, at least.
Sandman's origin transformation sequence was amazing, SM3 has lots of poo but the casting of Sandman was great.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpaecszRRG0
Lol, Doc Ock 's character was all over the place. All of Raimi 's villains are sympathetic characters who turned bad due to forces out of their control. Both Doc Ock and Goblin were very similar - both liked Peter / Spider-Man too. Btw, how did Doc Ock become good again at the end of 2? I'm asking because I don't remember. And why did he lose his powers, btw? Tobey might not be a crybaby but he is annoying as f***. That train scene as well - so cringeworthy.
Raimi's Spider-Man was just not funny as well and it certainly doesn't have a scene as powerful as the one in TAS2.
I prefer the Raimi films, but I enjoyed the Lizard quite a bit.
Don't think you should insult the audience, the films do that enough.
Alot of the fans of the Webb movies on why they're "superior" (get it?) sound as if they would be satisfied with 2hrs of Spider-Man swinging, hanging with Gwen and fighting only. No one ever defends the "plots" of these films or the lack of character development. Its clearly a youtube generation that favors these movies. Those with the shorter attention spans and only know instant gratification. This does not make a good movie, for any character/genre of film.