Mikey Jr.
Member
Using a giant unnatural shape to block off light seems like a pretty good way to communicate
Clearly, as we still have no idea if it is natural or deliberate.
Using a giant unnatural shape to block off light seems like a pretty good way to communicate
Clearly, as we still have no idea if it is natural or deliberate.
Something more like this would explain the irregular dips in light:
1. It depends on where in the sequence the message is (if it is deliberate)
2. It depends on what the tempo of the sequence is.
Let's assume the message is caused by large occulting structures. If they're too close to the sun and (as we have observed) effective at blocking a large fraction of radiation, would you risk cutting off sunlight at home for a few days?
If the structures are large and further out in the orbit in an array to ensure observers in all directions might see it, then it could naturally be a long time between occultation events because of orbital distances involved.
Signalling '1234' would require a more directed approach as to where the blocked light is going to be directed. Which would limit the potential number of observers.
Or this.
Observations are already in progress at the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network, and the Kickstarter funds will take us deep into 2017. For more on the Las Cumbres work, see Corey Powells recent interview with Boyajian for Discover Magazine, from which this:
From our new observations, well be able to tell a lot about the material thats passing in front of the star: if its some kind of dusty thing, some kind of solid thing. [Boyajians working hypothesis is that the dimming is caused by a huge swarm of comets, set loose perhaps by some cataclysmic event around the star.] Whats also important is that we will also get a baseline of spectral observations so we can look at if theres any radial velocity shift or if theres any variable emission of the lines, things wed expect comets to have.
It's really not a good system for communication though due to the constraints of light speed. What would be the point in a message using a star when the earliest anyone will see it is thousands of years (and assuming they're looking in the right spot).
Now a beacon of sorts, or a type of signal/warning device, like a galactic light house I could possibly see.
If they have memes, it could be Dank Matter.
Viral marketing for Halo 6 starting early huh?:O
Thats what it looks like isnt it.
:O
Thats what it looks like isnt it.
where does one get sufficient amount of material to make a dyson sphere or swarm?
I mean, if an intelligent race started on a planet orbiting a star, that would be smaller than the star, what are they using for material to make the panels?
We could do the same with Pluto. I mean, that thing isn't even a planet.If they have an asteroid belt I'm assuming that. Maybe strip mining entire planets from their solar system that they never particularly liked.
Would anything bad happen if we removed maybe every other rocky planet in the solar system except mars. Like just mined them till they're nothing. They're not particularly useful to us currentlyWe could do the same with Pluto. I mean, that thing isn't even a planet.
Viral marketing for Halo 6 starting early huh?
where does one get sufficient amount of material to make a dyson sphere or swarm?
I mean, if an intelligent race started on a planet orbiting a star, that would be smaller than the star, what are they using for material to make the panels?
where does one get sufficient amount of material to make a dyson sphere or swarm?
I mean, if an intelligent race started on a planet orbiting a star, that would be smaller than the star, what are they using for material to make the panels?
Would anything bad happen if we removed maybe every other rocky planet in the solar system except mars. Like just mined them till they're nothing. They're not particularly useful to us currently
343's attention to detail this time around is astounding. But I guess that wraps up the mystery of this planet. We found the forerunners guys.Literally six halos in that image too
That's why Dyson SpheresSwarms are such an achievement--they would need access to materials across multiple star systems and that means access to FTL travel almost certainly. Or I suppose a willingness to strip mine every planet except the one your civilization lives on.
WeVenus might be the actual better planet to try and colonize. Apparently it'd be a good place for cloud cities.
It's only recently been observed and you really want to rule out everything if you are going to claim it's aliens. That's because our rationale needs to be one of skepticism otherwise we'd be sending messages back to pulsars to contact the LGM.
That's what I'm saying though.
If it is being used as some sort of beacon, it's a terrible one. Rather than doing something predictable and leaves no room for interpretation, it's random.
Hence why I said it's not being used for communication at least. I ruled that out.
That's what I'm saying though.
If it is being used as some sort of beacon, it's a terrible one. Rather than doing something predictable and leaves no room for interpretation, it's random.
Hence why I said it's not being used for communication at least. I ruled that out.
The objective of this kind of communication could be to achieve just one thing:
-Let other intelligent beings know that they are not alone.
That's it. Heck you probably, arguably, don't even want to communicate anything else because you don't know who you might be communicating with.
Dimming a star, in a manner that suggests deliberation, is great way to do this. You are technically communicating at the speed of light, it's the fastest anything can go. You would also potentially be communicating with multiple potential recipients at the same time.
The objective of this kind of communication could be to achieve just one thing:
-Let other intelligent beings know that they are not alone.
If (huuuuge IF) it's aliens, this is my thinking.
There is no message simpler or more important than "We were here".
It's kind of crazy that a higher civilization can be detected first by a lower civilization because of the sheer scale of what they've accomplished and built. While they probably have no idea we're even here in this planet, potentially watching them.
It's kind of crazy that a higher civilization can be detected first by a lower civilization because of the sheer scale of what they've accomplished and built. While they probably have no idea we're even here in this planet, potentially watching them.
That's what I'm saying though.
If it is being used as some sort of beacon, it's a terrible one. Rather than doing something predictable and leaves no room for interpretation, it's random.
Hence why I said it's not being used for communication at least. I ruled that out.
They would have no idea that we are watching them because if they somehow had a powerful enough telescope to observe what was happening on Earth right now then what would they would be looking at would be life during the 6th century, not 2016.
That's why Dyson Spheres\Swarms are such an achievement--they would need access to materials across multiple star systems and that means access to FTL travel almost certainly. Or I suppose a willingness to strip mine every planet except the one your civilization lives on.
∀ Narayan;212716428 said:Say that this scenario is closer to reality than we think: That a species that has been in existence just about as long as us is creating a Dyson sphere. What does that say about us? Makes you wonder, doesn't it?
Gosh I hope I get to meet an alien in my lifetime.
That'd be dope.
Couldnt it be a planet forming around the star? Or something like 2 planets coliding, sorta like our moon was created
Maybe our perspective would broaden and we'd gain a different appreciation for life.Even if aliens were to show up, it's really depressing to think that Humanity isn't nearly ready for something like that. We're still shortsighted morons who constantly kill ourselves on a daily basis because of the colour of our skin, all while destroying the planet we're on and every other species that occupies it. We value material objects more than life.
Can you imagine what we'd do to a visitor.
No, that was one of the first things ruled out. Even a planet the size of Jupiter wouldn't be enough no dim the star that much and due to how gravity works it's impossible that a planet, say, 100 times the size of Jupiter, would exist.
Even if aliens were to show up, it's really depressing to think that Humanity isn't nearly ready for something like that. We're still shortsighted morons who constantly kill ourselves on a daily basis because of the colour of our skin, all while destroying the planet we're on and every other species that occupies it. We value material objects more than life.
Can you imagine what we'd do to a visitor.
and what if our science is very primitive compared to what they can do, and they see 2016, from that distance, and wants nothing to do with this shitty planet.
Probably a stupid question but wouldn't a Dyson Sphere just melt that close to a star?
Those images are a bit deceiving. Any Dyson structure would be built in the Habitable Zone of its star. So about at the radius at which the Earth orbits for a similar star.
What is a faster method, pray tell?
If light speed is indeed a hard limit for the universe, then a passive occulting configuration of things (TM) is perhaps the most efficient and effective way of 'communicating'. Or perhaps the occultation is simply a consequence of a civilisation building things they can't prevent that from casting shadows.
(Assuming there isn't a natural explanation for the observations)
Makes sense, for some reason seeing all of those pics I had the idea that you would need to make the sphere close to the star to gather all the energy, but considering how much energy a star can emit you probably don't neet it to be really close (we can already do it from here).