Lovely Salsa
Banned
We should build a large antenna and point it at them so we can broadcast alien tv shows
I know how we would have to travel the stars if the speed of light is a hard limit. Aren't there, theoretically, computers/communication devices that are instantaneous.
Maybe we use those and then we have "transporters" set up when we finally reach a place. Except, they don't actually transport you, they just kill you and an exact duplicate is made at the place you want to go.
Not sure if posted yet but Bad Astronomer (Phil Plait) did a great article on it too. http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astr...ge_dips_in_brightness_are_a_bit_baffling.html
I think you're referring to quantum entanglement? Everyone seems convinced that you can't use it to send data but, mmystifyingly, it does seem that two particles can interact with each other faster than light can travel between them. Last time I looked into it, anyway.
IIRC, they've successfully transferred tiny pieces of data.
Not sure if posted yet but Bad Astronomer (Phil Plait) did a great article on it too. http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astr...ge_dips_in_brightness_are_a_bit_baffling.html
There's only like 100 million stars in the Milky Way, I mean the alien invasion force would surely zero in on our tiny ass planet which has no evidence of a spacefaring civilization and no natural resources to speak of instead of attacking one of the other 100 million possible star systems.
Humans have quite the collective ego to believe they are even important enough to get exterminated. We're so primitive that we still have nation states, projectile weapons, and can't even travel to the edge of our Solar System in one lifetime. If there are aliens out there they probably couldn't possibly give less of a fuck about us.
Not sure if posted yet but Bad Astronomer (Phil Plait) did a great article on it too. http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astr...ge_dips_in_brightness_are_a_bit_baffling.html
We don't know that. You have to consider that that civilization is very close to us in a galactic scale, so it wouldn't be surprising if we are the first sentient life they find even if the galaxy is indeed full of life elsewhere.
I know how we would have to travel the stars if the speed of light is a hard limit. Aren't there, theoretically, computers/communication devices that are instantaneous.
Maybe we use those and then we have "transporters" set up when we finally reach a place. Except, they don't actually transport you, they just kill you and an exact duplicate is made at the place you want to go.
Just what in the world, could reduce that massive suns light by 22%? That is mind blowing.sorry universe
Acordantly with the article, an object with a diameter half of the star disc! Mindblowing 😲.
What. How can this not be a planet? I assume they've seen no gravitational effect from a would be planet on the star? I don't see how there can be that many comets...
What. How can this not be a planet? I assume they've seen no gravitational effect from a would be planet on the star? I don't see how there can be that many comets...
Jupiter size planets only dim the light by ~1%. This object is dimming the light by 22%. This is not a planet.
I think you're referring to quantum entanglement? Everyone seems convinced that you can't use it to send data but, mmystifyingly, it does seem that two particles can interact with each other faster than light can travel between them. Last time I looked into it, anyway.
So, hypothetically, let say it's investigated more and turns out to be looking more and more like an alien civilization. Would it be possible to spend X billion dollars on a space telescope capable of actually viewing something orbiting a star ~1500LY away?
Would be really coolif they can ever confirm its an alien structure.and scary
Would be the beginning of a type 2 civilisation, trying to make a dyson sphere or something. They could already have it finished since we see the light 1400 years ago.
You wouldnt want to mess with them
Acordantly with the article, an object with a diameter half of the star disc! Mindblowing 😲.
Comet cloud seems ridiculous as well. Wouldn't gravity cause the comets to come together and become a star if they're all so massive?
I'm getting more excited about this. The scientists won't outright say it because of conservatism, but this seems artificial.
Comet cloud seems ridiculous as well. Wouldn't gravity cause the comets to come together and become a star if they're all so massive?
.
Reading this thread many gaffers want to mess with them for procreation purposes lol.
So, hypothetically, let say it's investigated more and turns out to be looking more and more like an alien civilization. Would it be possible to spend X billion dollars on a space telescope capable of actually viewing something orbiting a star ~1500LY away?
Not sure if posted yet but Bad Astronomer (Phil Plait) did a great article on it too. http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astr...ge_dips_in_brightness_are_a_bit_baffling.html
We already do this with fiber optics. The problem is sending the data through a space.
Scientists have been able to quantum entangle a photon through space about 25 miles apart which is the current record. This is only one photon. We are a long way from developing quantum internet. But it's looking promising.
The James Webb telescope, it's 3 year away from launching.
And used it to send information? Last I checked that was still theoretically impossible; sure you can entangle two particles but you can't manipulate that to transmit any data.
You think wrongI believe it has been proved that information can be transmitted.
Feels like the JWST has been 3 years away for 10 years.
Not that massive. Any comet cloud would be less massive than any alien construction anyway.
They are talking about an Oort cloud like that was disturbed by a passing star and felt towards the star. Of course such thing should not be stable, comets would start to melt / fall towards the star. They are saying that we are seeing this exactly moment in time, which would be extremely luckly.
Quantum entanglement could allow users to send data through a network and know immediately whether that data had made it to its destination without being intercepted or altered
Ah, I get why it's confusing, but this isn't actually about transmitting information at faster than light speeds. You still need to send the data encoded by the photons at sublight speeds through a fiber optic cable, its just using some quirks of entanglement for encryption. I think this line in particular is badly worded
What I love about this -- and I know I'm not being original in stating this -- is that this story, regardless of the actual cause of dimming, puts a lot of things into perspecective. Finding evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence would have a much smaller impact on humanity than I had ever assumed. In this case, we'd have to wait 3,000 years for a roundtrip communication (or contact, assuming the aliens decide to visit after getting our message). Maybe humans could visit in 1700 years if we could develop near-SOL travel in ~200 years. It would do nothing to change the Enlightened world's understanding of the universe other than to provide further evidence for various scientific theories already widely accepted relating to the origins of life. It would certainly be a nice boon for space funding in major countries, but beyond that ... I just don't see much.
The light patterns we're picking up now are also the same age so a giant telescope that could see that far would theoretically show us what is causing them.you'd be looking at 1500-4500y. old light. Whatever happened in there happened a long time ago.
What I love about this -- and I know I'm not being original in stating this -- is that this story, regardless of the actual cause of dimming, puts a lot of things into perspecective. Finding evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence would have a much smaller impact on humanity than I had ever assumed. In this case, we'd have to wait 3,000 years for a roundtrip communication (or contact, assuming the aliens decide to visit after getting our message). Maybe humans could visit in 1700 years if we could develop near-SOL travel in ~200 years. It would do nothing to change the Enlightened world's understanding of the universe other than to provide further evidence for various scientific theories already widely accepted relating to the origins of life. It would certainly be a nice boon for space funding in major countries, but beyond that ... I just don't see much.
Ooo this is an interesting question; how big would it have to be?So, hypothetically, let say it's investigated more and turns out to be looking more and more like an alien civilization. Would it be possible to spend X billion dollars on a space telescope capable of actually viewing something orbiting a star ~1500LY away?
How does that work? I can never quite wrap my head around this part.
If for example we've got two communication devices, both are at a distance of 10 light years away from each other. Com device A would see com device B as it was 10 years ago. But if com A sends a message at FTL speeds to com B it should arrive before com A can observe it. Com B can send a message back before com A can observe that the message has arrived, however com A did send the message. Just because com A can't oberserve the message arriving for another 10 years how does this mean that it's automatically time travel?
I think you're missing the point. The effect it has on 21st century human society is going to look like this:
1. Religious organizations will have to look at dogma and recontextualize it. This will not be trivial. Some will deal and adapt better than others.
2. Like exoplanet tech, our xenoscope tech will explode exponentially. We'll find MORE.
3. We'll have to consider the genuinely terrifying security implications.
4. We'll be forced to unthink our anthropomorphic views: "Why would an intelligent species attack us?" Is a completely stupid question. You don't have to go to space to ask "Does a Spider feel love?"
What I love about this -- and I know I'm not being original in stating this -- is that this story, regardless of the actual cause of dimming, puts a lot of things into perspecective. Finding evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence would have a much smaller impact on humanity than I had ever assumed. In this case, we'd have to wait 3,000 years for a roundtrip communication (or contact, assuming the aliens decide to visit after getting our message). Maybe humans could visit in 1700 years if we could develop near-SOL travel in ~200 years. It would do nothing to change the Enlightened world's understanding of the universe other than to provide further evidence for various scientific theories already widely accepted relating to the origins of life. It would certainly be a nice boon for space funding in major countries, but beyond that ... I just don't see much.
How long would that mass of comets last? Is it transient enough that we should be able to observe it shrinking over the next few years?
The answer to your question is that although from A and B's point of view there has been no causality violation (or time travel) there exists an inertial frame of reference C in which there has been. Special Relativity explains exactly how to find such a frame of reference C, and from C's point of view B will have replied before receiving A's message. Even worse, one could find an inertial frame of reference in which A received the reply before sending the message.
Without going into the details of how to find this frame of reference, it's important to note that since all inertial frames of reference are considered equivalent according to relativity, C's observation of a causality violation would be no less legitimate than A's or B's observation of no causality violation.
If you're interested in understanding this issue better, you can read more about relativity of simultaneity here.