TheKremlinBossMan
Banned
Wow the game is reviewing amazingly, already preloaded and ready to go. Hate to hear about the performance issues. Anyone know if that's with the day one patch on PS5 or it's just a mess technically?
Yes. We tested it with the patch and without it and noticed a slight improvement but issues still there.
Hogwarts only had some stuttering with rtx on, this thing run at 1440p40 frames on a 4090...'Ill be there day one even with the performance issues.
I sailed Hogwarts Legacy day one, and don't regret so.
See the footage posted above. The PS5 version has equally bad texture streaming.Probably the way that the developers are managing VRAM now that the development pipeline has primarily moved over to the next gen consoles.
Cerny IO has helped games like Hogwarts, Dead Space and other recent multiplatform AAA games run very smoothly on the PS5 where even PCs have struggled due to lack of vram. This is the first time ive seen a game have texture streaming this bad on PS5.Cerny IO is irrelevent when this had to be made feature-par with Series S...
That's what I was confused about, I didn't experience any issues. In the Survivor reviews I watched, they compared PC performance woes to Hogwart's. Which, when I played on launch, I didn't experience any issues personally, lol.Hogwarts only had some stuttering with rtx on, this thing run at 1440p40 frames on a 4090...
I enjoyed hogwarts at launch aswell but it was hardly a broken game.
Your posts in the OT paint a different picture.I was hyped for this but im buying DI2 over this.
See the footage posted above. The PS5 version has equally bad texture streaming.
How does di2 runs on ue4 much better than this one while releasing on 7 different platforms tho?UE4 sucks with open worlds and big levels.
this was to be expected sadly... only a handful of devs ever managed to have bigger open areas work well in UE4.
Really hope System Shock turns out good next month.
I mentioned it in my review but it's mostly cosmetics. I don't care for it either. There are new hairstyles, etc as well but mostly cosmetics outside of the Force-related ones in between.Is exploration rewarding this time or it's just cosmetics and fucking ponchos again?
Because i'm not gonna even bother exploring this time if the majority of what you find is useless crap.
Is the map as terrible as the first one or you can actually see shit this time?
Does combat still feels kinda clunky sometimes or they reached sekiro level of perfection?
What say you on these people?
Mmm it sounds like another decent 6,5\10 game with a star wars coat of paint that make it reach a full 7.I mentioned it in my review but it's mostly cosmetics. I don't care for it either. There are new hairstyles, etc as well but mostly cosmetics outside of the Force-related ones in between.
Map is still a mess (at least for me).
Combat is kind of better than Fallen Order, but the Force power themselves are underwhelming. I mean don't expect any cool ones? I even had like 6-8 skill points at one point banked since I didn't know what to use it for.
I'll be posting the complete Force abilities and Stances on MP1st once embargo for it is up.
Oh Jesus.
Looks like shit performance on PC is becoming more of a trend. Why is this so hard all of a sudden?True, but he also said he had an absolutely great time with the game, and that it was one of the best, if not the best Star Wars game in a long while. He compared PC performance to Hogwarts'. Which, I can't speak on behalf of everyone, but I didn't notice any crazy performance issues during my time with it. I'm sure and hope it'll be patched in time, maybe even before launch, but I'm not concerned.
The Fextralife review I posted goes over a pretty good amount while being spoiler free. Said the main campaign was about 20 hours on Normal. Max completion could be 25-30. Said that on Hard it would probably be 30 - 40 due to dying, etc. He said performance was pretty rough, but he was still able to enjoy and complete the game. Said it felt a lot like Hogwarts' did at launch on PC.
This baffles me to be honest. Like, how can reviewers acknowledge the tech issues but still give it a pass? I mean, is it because it will get patched out eventually? I don't agree with scoring it based on that since that is quite subjective given we are scoring based on potential. no?High scores for a $70 game with shitty performance issues.
Never change game reviews.
Don't do this to me.
This baffles me to be honest. Like, how can reviewers acknowledge the tech issues but still give it a pass? I mean, is it because it will get patched out eventually? I don't agree with scoring it based on that since that is quite subjective given we are scoring based on potential. no?
We gave it an 8 since it's still a fun game. It's better than the first, but it didn't exactly jump a lot in terms of combat, story etc.
Your posts in the OT paint a different picture.
Can’t wait to play this and not obsess over minor graphical nitpicks.
It's interesting how much Unreal Engine 4 games can still look as good as current Unreal Engine 5 games.
Are the pics from the pc version maxed out?
VERY underwhelming if true.
this thing run at 1440p40 frames on a 4090...
Crazy how Unreal Engine 3 can look better than most UE4 trash.
40 FPS at 1440p on a RTX 4090...
Yeah seems like same problems that plagued Gotham Knights at launched. Few months later it did get fixed and the game runs perfectly now. I really hope Jedi Survivor will get to that point faster..That's mainly due to CPU bottlenecks. Take a look at the GPU usage, the RTX4090 is only used at 50-60%.
Thats with 5900x, dear god.That's mainly due to CPU bottlenecks. Take a look at the GPU usage, the RTX4090 is only used at 50-60%.
Thats with 5900x, dear god.
I think there is a tweet or video in here or on reee.
Where did you find this information? Curious because I have a 4090 with 1440p display
What are the tech issues?This baffles me to be honest. Like, how can reviewers acknowledge the tech issues but still give it a pass? I mean, is it because it will get patched out eventually? I don't agree with scoring it based on that since that is quite subjective given we are scoring based on potential. no?
We gave it an 8 since it's still a fun game. It's better than the first, but it didn't exactly jump a lot in terms of combat, story etc.
Maybe the pics don't give justice to how the game really looks because i see nothing super impressive for a nextgen only game.Yeah, they are maxed out. Why underwhelming? It looks gorgeous.
Yeah seems like same problems that plagued Gotham Knights at launched. Few months later it did get fixed and the game runs perfectly now. I really hope Jedi Survivor will get to that point faster..
You got a review code? Are you some sort of youtube personality or something?LOL EA sent me the review code just now, but I am out of town until tomorrow. GG I got cucked. Will still have to get the job. Weeeeee
Check DM.You got a review code? Are you some sort of youtube personality or something?
Crazy how Unreal Engine 3 can look better than most UE4 trash.
What hate? I have a 4080, i'm gonna play the game better than 95% of people on this planet, but it still looks mid for a nextgen only title maxed out on pc, sorry not sorry dude.
checking nowCheck DM.
Crazy how Unreal Engine 3 can look better than most UE4 trash.