TheWorthyEdge
Member
Unvote: Zubz
And there we have it. Not voting for anyone ATM.
And there we have it. Not voting for anyone ATM.
Actually you do say your holding off until everyone posts, so thats fair enough just now i guess.
What if Blargonauts role is that if he gets detained first he wins...but if he dies overnight he loses...?
What if Blargonauts role is that if he gets detained first he wins...but if he dies overnight he loses...?
Or he's a normal rebel and this is how he gets people to leave him alone.Ugh Blarg... You realize the way you're posting is textbook jester right? No one likes jesters...
Ugh Blarg... You realize the way you're posting is textbook jester right? No one likes jesters...
I agree there wouldn't be a Jester. Not sure what Blarg is doing overall.
Were you thinking this would be more of an RP thing?
Oh ok...
Having taken a shower and reflected a little, i think i may have a problem with Terrabyte's little 'trap' after all. At first it seems to have the Rebel interest at heart, but i find it curious that he was able to shift the suspicion so easily on to Palmer.
Did you know that my mother is on the Galactic Senate?
The Senate was dissolved when Palpatine took over and turned it into the puppet Imperial Senate. Clearly you've been away for a while, you must be a Jedi who's been in hiding all this time!
Blah, go home, you're drunk on blue milk.
I agree there wouldn't be a Jester. Not sure what Blarg is doing overall.
Were you thinking this would be more of an RP thing?
Are we supposed to be roleplaying?
EMPIRE AND REBELLION
CRASHED TOGETHER BELOW TATOOINE'S TWIN SUNS
SIDE BY SIDE NEAR A MOISTURE FARM SO OLD, THE MOLD
IS VAPING MEEEE
I'll make more of an actual post when I get to work in a couple hours and really do more than keep up with the action, but I'll say now that after the Amar0x situation (even if I didn't actually vote in it), I'm pretty reluctant to you vote off a person just because they're being a joker.
Amir0x is exactly who it was reminding me of.
Why shouldn't we vote for you? Why shouldnt you die today?
Presented with death your response is "Oh ok"?
Could you say you were...swamped?What else could I say? At the time I wrote that post I was chosen randomly as a sacrifice.
But I've been catching up on the thread since then, and it seems the reason people are voting for me is that I'm posting but I'm not posting enough. And people don't want to detain someone who was completely inactive. But even before the game started I said that I wouldn't be able to post like crazy because I was busy this weekend! How much is a gal supposed to post to keep everyone happy?!
Ok, now to go back and read everyone's posts properly...this thread sure is moving fast. For such a boring planet things are definitely exciting.
Could you say you were...swamped?
Could you say you were...swamped?
Caught up with the thread. Feeling a bit less suspicious of Tera, now.
TheWorthyEdge, can I ask why you're always first to ask other people about their reasoning? Shouldn't the accused be the one asking those questions?
You're coming across as the most suspicious for me but I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt and we still have time before the votes are tallied.
Not gonna vote against who voted me, that'd be petty and counter-intuitive.
So, I've been having trouble thinking of what to add to the discussion, although perhaps that's to be expected at this point. I will say that Blarg's posts have been simultaneously funny and incredibly confusing. No idea what's going on there.
As far as detaining, while I do think we should try to exercise this power, I'm also in the camp that's against blindly going after inactives. I think that the risk of detaining somebody with a useful rebel power role who might be laying low to avoid unwanted attention is difficult to ignore. I'd also imagine that the Hutt have more to gain by actually posting right now to try to seem rebel-aligned.
Agreed, but I still think if they did have a role worth staying alive for they would keep talking, no? It doesn't exactly seem they would be on our team if they don't talk and contribute much at all. It almost makes them look like a neutral.
I would assume there would need to be a balance. Too much attention could paint a big target on their back, and they need to make sure they survive at least long enough to actually use their ability (I'm not sure if an ability gets used if one is killed during the first night). At the same time, I do agree they they do need to talk enough to convince us that they are on the rebel side, so that we don't do the Hutt's jobs for them.
Personally, nobody has really stood out to me for detainment just yet, but I really need to give the thread another once over. I understand that there are some suspect people, so I need to make sure I know what's going on.
As do I. Is there a way, on Mobile GAF, that I can look at posts from a single person?
I'm in a similar boat.So, I've been having trouble thinking of what to add to the discussion, although perhaps that's to be expected at this point. I will say that Blarg's posts have been simultaneously funny and incredibly confusing. No idea what's going on there.
As far as detaining, while I do think we should try to exercise this power, I'm also in the camp that's against blindly going after inactives. I think that the risk of detaining somebody with a useful rebel power role who might be laying low to avoid unwanted attention is difficult to ignore. I'd also imagine that the Hutt have more to gain by actually posting right now to try to seem rebel-aligned.
I'm in a similar boat.
Initially, I wanted to see if we could pass the first day without detaining but then again, exercising that power gives us agency.
This is why Worthy stood out, for me personally. It looked less like defending other posters and more like getting people to second guess themselves and stall any momentum being built up.
I play a lot of Werewolf outside of the online-realm and I'm always the person that asks the most questions regarding any suspicious activity. Playing it online is a huge difference but I'm not going to change my playstyle even if it could hurt me later on. Mafia too me, day one, is asking questions and gathering up as much information as you can so thats what I do. I'm going to prod and prod for any information that the rebel's could use to their advantage.
Is there a reason? Just asking. Want to know why we are doing this and not Terrabyte.
Worthy, you understand that the reason I initially voted for you was not because you were suspicious and asking questions about TB.
I'm in a similar boat.
Initially, I wanted to see if we could pass the first day without detaining but then again, exercising that power gives us agency.
This is why Worthy stood out, for me personally. It looked less like defending other posters and more like getting people to second guess themselves and stall any momentum being built up.
Caught up with the thread. Feeling a bit less suspicious of Tera, now.
TheWorthyEdge, can I ask why you're always first to ask other people about their reasoning? Shouldn't the accused be the one asking those questions?
You're coming across as the most suspicious for me but I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt and we still have time before the votes are tallied.
Not gonna vote against who voted me, that'd be petty and counter-intuitive.
1. Detain Blargonaut because he's actively hindering my enjoyment of this game. I doubt he's a Hutt, but as I've said before, I don't mind making a suboptimal choice in favor of having fun. This is a game, in the end.