Star Wars: The Force Awakens - Official Teaser Trailer #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
So fucking hyped for this, I have a really hard time imagining it won't be, can't be leaps and bound better than Lucas' prequel turds.

Also, my heart warmed and I giggled like a schoolgirl when Han Solo showed up.

HYPE
 
tfacel12_large.jpg
I need it.
 
I'm not usually one to prejudge a film based on a teaser, but what's presented here doesn't feel like Star Wars at all.

It has all the iconography, the music, the locations... but without the 1930s and 40s style of serial film making (that was so integral to the identity of the original trilogy) this just feels like another blockbuster to me. Watch some of those classic Hollywood films and you'll see what Lucas was going for with the type of melodrama and action in the story. All of that's missing here, replaced instead with a completely different style of shooting and dialogue/line delivery that is decidedly untheatrical in tone.

It could very well be a good film, but I'm now skeptical that it's going to be a good 'Star Wars film'. Similar to JJ Abrams's attempts with Star Trek, funnily enough.

It's impressive that you've gathered that when the only dialogue in the trailer is a line almost straight out of the original trilogy..lol
 
Ok but in the prequals the Republic required vast resources to aquire an army, so to be able to supply 1000s of troopers, machinery etc I'd assume it's not something you can easily rebuild. But here it looks like they've grown in numbers and advanced technologically. Storm troopers are clones so would be interested to see how they're controlled without Darth Sidius, actually how they've progressed as if little has happened.

Another poster mentioned the Empire being galactic with many others evil parties invested in its prosperity, still not convinced though.

The Empire does indeed stretch throughout the Galaxy and the OT only focuses on stopping Death Stars and Luke defeating the Emperor. So there should be many Admirals that still exist and large amounts of forces that weren't destroyed. Remember too that the Rebels were relatively small in comparison to Empire forces, always on the cusp of being wiped out entirely.

The EU had many books that covered the various Empire groups that were left still operating throughout the Galaxy... so while all of those stories are gone now, they could still potentially mine the basic idea of fragments Empire forces still existing.

A blaster would be a better option for most Jedi too, given that they would have perfect future prediction auto-aim cheat codes and could snipe fools with their eyes closed at five clicks.

Blasters would be.. different but not necessarily better. Blasters suffer the same problem that all guns suffer from. They can malfunction in battle. Lightsabers were much more dependable.

The only things Force users can do with lightsabers are:
1)Deflecting blaster bolts. It requires prescience.
2)Throwing the saber and guiding it flight, as that requires telekinesis.
And of course, trained Force users have superhuman endurance and speed due to the Force enhancing them.

Anyone could learn to use a lightsaber otherwise, we just don't see that happening.

I don't remember where I saw it explained, could very well be EU which would make it... undependable at best... but the use of a lightsaber is said to be very dangerous for non-force users. The likelihood of seriously injuring yourself in battle was said to be very high if you didn't have use of the force to help guide the blade. This is because a saber doesn't have a "balance" the way a normal physical blade does and of course they can cut through nearly anything.

But as I said.. that explanation could be from the EU so.. grain of salt in regards to it's application to the new movies.
 
I seriously don't know how Peter Mayhew managed to play Chewbacca again though. He couldn't even stand during the panel and was shaking while walking to the stage. There must be a double.
 
We literally only know 3 words of dialogue from this film.

"Chewie...we're home."

I wasn't a big fan of that line, to be honest. Too self conscious, and the delivery was a little too cloying for my liking.

Also, what about all the voice-overs? I'm sure at least some of those lines will be in the film.
 
The Empire does indeed stretch throughout the Galaxy and the OT only focuses on stopping Death Stars and Luke defeating the Emperor. So there should be many Admirals that still exist and large amounts of forces that weren't destroyed. Remember too that the Rebels were relatively small in comparison to Empire forces, always on the cusp of being wiped out entirely.

The EU had many books that covered the various Empire groups that were left still operating throughout the Galaxy... so while all of those stories are gone now, they could still potentially mine the basic idea of fragments Empire forces still existing.



Blasters would be.. different but not necessarily better. Blasters suffer the same problem that all guns suffer from. They can malfunction in battle. Lightsabers were much more dependable.



I don't remember where I saw it explained, could very well be EU which would make it... undependable at best... but the use of a lightsaber is said to be very dangerous for non-force users. The likelihood of seriously injuring yourself in battle was said to be very high if you didn't have use of the force to help guide the blade. This is because a saber doesn't have a "balance" the way a normal physical blade does and of course they can cut through nearly anything.

But as I said.. that explanation could be from the EU so.. grain of salt in regards to it's application to the new movies.

I think the whole only force users have lightsabers thing went out of the window when they introduced general grievous. Ya know, this guy?

3255870-4643255100-86957.jpg


Not a force user.
 
I wasn't a big fan of that line, to be honest. Too self conscious, and the delivery was a little too cloying for my liking.

Also, what about all the voice-overs? I'm sure at least some of those lines will be in the film.

It'll probably be better in the context of whatever scene it's actually in. They just kind of plopped in at the end for that sentimental reaction.
 
I'm not usually one to prejudge a film based on a teaser, but what's presented here doesn't feel like Star Wars at all.

It has all the iconography, the music, the locations... but without the 1930s and 40s style of serial film making (that was so integral to the identity of the original trilogy) this just feels like another blockbuster to me. Watch some of those classic Hollywood films and you'll see what Lucas was going for with the type of melodrama and action in the story. All of that's missing here, replaced instead with a completely different style of shooting and dialogue/line delivery that is decidedly untheatrical in tone.

It could very well be a good film, but I'm now skeptical that it's going to be a good 'Star Wars film'. Similar to JJ Abrams's attempts with Star Trek, funnily enough.
I'm very sensitive to the classic 30s serial style of Star Wars, and I think you can't possibly be judging this aspect right now. You'll have to see the final film to judge whether it's still in that style.

Sure, there are a bunch of dynamic shots, but I think it's fully fair to expect some of that from a modern update. They're basically the equivalent of the daring shots in the Death Star trench run in the original film, which in its day wasn't "classic serial" either.

The part that makes me agree with you is that one shot that zooms in on the Falcon mid-shot. That breaks the 30s serial style, I think, but they did it in Episode II already.

I think the final film will have paced dialogue scenes, cutting between locations with Kurosawa-style screenwipes and, playful John Williams melodies - just as in the original films. If the final film has modern action movie filmmaking techniques - shaky cam, overly dynamic camera movements, flashbacks and other plot devices not used in the original - then I'll be bitching alongside you.
 
I wasn't a big fan of that line, to be honest. Too self conscious, and the delivery was a little too cloying for my liking.

Also, what about all the voice-overs? I'm sure at least some of those lines will be in the film.

You mean the voice overs that are pulled right from the same movies you say it doesn't feel like?
 
I think the whole only force users have lightsabers thing went out of the window when they introduced general grievous. Ya know, this guy?

Not a force user.

He's got a huge asterisk though in that he's a Cyborg that was personally trained in Lightsaber usage by a Sith Lord (Count Dooku). I mean, that's a major outlier.
 
Yeah Star Wars is going to end up being bigger than The Avengers.

Maybe not with this film, but after seeing that trailer it's almost guaranteed.
 
That teaser did it's damn job. Got hyped a fair bit more than I was before it.

Female lead. Black male lead that will hopefully survive the entire trilogy. Get off my lawn Han and CGI Chewie worked for me.

I want this to not let me down, so, I remain skeptical of a better finished product than Abrams Star Trek. Which while not terrible, was not all that great either.
 
I wasn't a big fan of that line, to be honest. Too self conscious, and the delivery was a little too cloying for my liking.

Also, what about all the voice-overs? I'm sure at least some of those lines will be in the film.

The "Chewie...we're home" line may not even be in the release version of the film.

The only other lines in this trailer were from Luke, which were just his lines taken straight from ROTJ, albeit slightly retouched and reordered.
 
Great trailer. I've already rewatched it a few times. I love the visual style in general and all of the character designs, so I really hope the film delivers.
 
A friend of mine was bitching about how bad this trailer was all day. It's like he had come in from some bizarro super-hater dimension... I couldn't fathom it.

Turns out he had watched the old and fake fan trailer that said Disney/Bad Robot on it. Lol he's not gonna live that one down.
 
I think I figured out what my biggest concern is with this movie.

I'm really worried that it's going to be super heavy on nostalgia and callbacks and full of "Hey remember this thing from those movies you like?"

You might suggest that the trailers so far have both had a good mix of new and old, but I really want to see these films tell their own story and not dwell too much on what happened in the past except for what they have to in order to establish the new stuff.

I swear, if there's some joke about Han shooting first, I'm done. DONE.
 
A friend of mine was bitching about how bad this trailer was all day. It's like he had come in from some bizarro super-hater dimension... I couldn't fathom it.

Turns out he had watched the old and fake fan trailer that said Disney/Bad Robot on it. Lol he's not gonna live that one down.

bahaha what was his reaction to the actual trailer?
 
I think I figured out what my biggest concern is with this movie.

I'm really worried that it's going to be super heavy on nostalgia and callbacks and full of "Hey remember this thing from those movies you like?"

You might suggest that the trailers so far have both had a good mix of new and old, but I really want to see these films tell their own story and not dwell too much on what happened in the past except for what they have to in order to establish the new stuff.

I swear, if there's some joke about Han shooting first, I'm done. DONE.

It's JJ Abrams. of course it's going to shamelessly rely on unearned nostalgia, it's the reason he was hired.
 
I think I figured out what my biggest concern is with this movie.

I'm really worried that it's going to be super heavy on nostalgia and callbacks and full of "Hey remember this thing from those movies you like?"

You might suggest that the trailers so far have both had a good mix of new and old, but I really want to see these films tell their own story and not dwell too much on what happened in the past except for what they have to in order to establish the new stuff.

I swear, if there's some joke about Han shooting first, I'm done. DONE.
Definitely there is a fine line, there.

I would say they need some callbacks to the original.. It's perfectly natural, being a sequel, and also there is some element of "coming home" that we actually want.

But if it's even at Star Trek 2009 levels of wink wink nostalgia, I will consider it too much.
 
There's also that one bounty hunter.

This guy

Clonewarsdeathwatch.jpg


In the center

I was completely unaware that they ever wrote Boba Fett as capable of wielding a Saber. I knew he collected them as trophies but not that he used them.

Looking it up most of his saber usage was based in the comics but I see at least one book reference to him using it. Interesting to say the least. That's still only two (counting Grievous) non-force users to ever wield a lightsaber in battle. That's a far cry from "tossing the force users only" out the window.

Wookieepedia says:
Due to the weightlessness of plasma and the strong gyroscopic effect generated by it, lightsabers required a great deal of strength and dexterity to wield, and it was extremely difficult—and dangerous—for the untrained to attempt using. However, in the hands of an expert of the Force, the lightsaber was a weapon to be greatly respected and feared. To wield a lightsaber was to demonstrate incredible skill and confidence, as well as masterful dexterity and attunement to the Force.

So.. still incredibly rare for a non-Force user to wield one.
 
I think I figured out what my biggest concern is with this movie.

I'm really worried that it's going to be super heavy on nostalgia and callbacks and full of "Hey remember this thing from those movies you like?"

You might suggest that the trailers so far have both had a good mix of new and old, but I really want to see these films tell their own story and not dwell too much on what happened in the past except for what they have to in order to establish the new stuff.

I swear, if there's some joke about Han shooting first, I'm done. DONE.

How are they going to avoid that shit when it's a semi-continuation of the original trilogy with some of the same damn characters? I say bring on the fucking nostalgia, muh-fuckers.
 
I was completely unaware that they ever wrote Boba Fett as capable of wielding a Saber. I knew he collected them as trophies but not that he used them.

Looking it up most of his saber usage was based in the comics but I see at least one book reference to him using it. Interesting to say the least. That's still only two (counting Grievous) non-force users to ever wield a lightsaber in battle. That's a far cry from "tossing the force users only" out the window.

Wookieepedia says:


So.. still incredibly rare for a non-Force user to wield one.

That's not boba fett, but yeah it's not impossible for non-force users. It's just really awkward without the proper training.
 
Haven't gone all the way through the thread but I'm assuming its been covered that Luke's robot hand was shot in ROTJ, and he just covered it with a glove. Maybe he decided to take the fake skin off or replace it altogether.
 
How are they going to avoid that shit when it's a semi-continuation of the original trilogy with some of the same damn characters? I say bring on the fucking nostalgia, muh-fuckers.

Again, I understand there are going to be many of the same characters and there's probably going to be at least some continuation in story. But there's no need to pack this new movie full of old stuff. If I want to see that old stuff, I can just go watch the old movies. I want things to move forward.
 
I'm not usually one to prejudge a film based on a teaser, but what's presented here doesn't feel like Star Wars at all.

It has all the iconography, the music, the locations... but without the 1930s and 40s style of serial film making (that was so integral to the identity of the original trilogy) this just feels like another blockbuster to me. Watch some of those classic Hollywood films and you'll see what Lucas was going for with the type of melodrama and action in the story. All of that's missing here, replaced instead with a completely different style of shooting and dialogue/line delivery that is decidedly untheatrical in tone.

It could very well be a good film, but I'm now skeptical that it's going to be a good 'Star Wars film'. Similar to JJ Abrams's attempts with Star Trek, funnily enough.

8iYIzTi.gif


There's a fine line between homage and parroting, but I BELIEVE in Mark 1 Abrams.

BELIEVE
 
Haven't gone all the way through the thread but I'm assuming its been covered that Luke's robot hand was shot in ROTJ, and he just covered it with a glove. Maybe he decided to take the fake skin off or replace it altogether.

Plus 30 years of wear and tear and doing Jedi shit across the galaxy.
 
SPOILERS

SPOILERS

SPOILERS

...


SPOILERS!


The film will start with Finn participating in an Empire mission with Kylo Ren in command, massacring and burning down a village (Stormtroopers being deployed to a village in trailer 1, Kylo Ren at the burning scene in trailer 2).
The mission makes Finn start questioning his moral stance and he decides to defect from the Empire. Traumatized and with blood on his hands, he returns to the star destroyer and shoots up his former allies with a TIE Fighter (seen in trailer 2) and attempts his escape.

He gets shot down over Jakku (opening shot to trailer 1, most likely the same planet where the village massacre took place), and he is left to search for refuge on his own.
He comes across Rey, who found Luke's lightsaber in her scavenging (clearly in the third pic below). Finn recognizes the weapon as that of the infamous Luke Skywalker, the legend responsible for crippling the Empire (know your enemy and all).

This leads Rey and Finn to seek out Luke after discovering that Rey has a connection with the force (and possibly the Skywalker family). They head to the trader outpost seen in both trailers. The Chrometrooper is hellbent on taking out Finn, and leads a ruthless hunt for him (almost satisfying the role of bounty hunter, only under the Empire's command). And so, we have the scene in which TIE fighters bombard the trader outpost with the intention of taking out Finn (trailer 2).


They steal the Millennium Falcon and attempt their escape from Jakku, with the intention of rallying with the Rebel Alliance in another system. Mind you, the pilot chasing down the Falcon utilizes chrome armor.


Upon escaping, they meet with the leader of the Rebel Alliance, Leia, knowing she's Luke's sibling and that she may be able to assist in seeking him out. They get Luke's saber in her hands and she recognizes it as her brother's, legitimizing Rey and Finn's intentions. Before sending them out to seek him (and unsure of Luke's mental state), she provides them with companions who have history with Luke: Han and Chewie. "Chewie, we're home" implies that Han nor Chewie have commandeered the Falcon in a long time, effectively busting the theory that Han and Chewie help Rey and Finn get out of Jakku (that would be a bit too convenient). This approach also enables the film to reunite Han and Leia in a way that makes sense. Also, I'll have to guess that R2 and C3P0 are under the Rebel Alliance's supervision up to this point, and they're also sent along with Han and company aboard the Falcon (just like old times).

Regarding Kylo Ren, I suspect he senses a threat to the Sith and the Empire, one linked to the Skywalkers (and we all know what happens when you pit a Skywalker against the Empire). He seeks out the remains of Vader, somehow trying to narrow down who this person (Rey) is. This might be an opportunity to integrate the much-rumored flashbacks (featuring Vader and the younger versions of Luke and Leia). Kylo then sets out to destroy this potential threat to an already-wounded Empire. He will serve as the endgame villain.

And regarding Poe Dameron, I think he'll be utilized as a rival to Finn (former Stormtrooper against a patriotic X-Wing pilot). It will make for interesting drama and nice contrast between the Empire and Rebel causes.

A stray and completely unsupported guess is that Finn will kill the Chrometrooper (Captain Phasma played by Gwendoline Christie) to complete his respective arc, solidifying him as a good guy when tempted by her to turn against his new friends.
 
One thing I absolutely want to see - Luke as an all powerful being. As in, sending Storm Troopers flying with the lift of a finger. impeccable light saber skills, etc.

He was powerful in ROTJ, and now he has had 30+ years to meditate, learn, and commune with The Force. I want to see him as an all powerful, almost insurmountable Master Jedi.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom