Post like these are how you know if the poster is a virgin.I think ps fans are anticipating this game more than the Xbox and pc people I mean how will they live if this scores higher than all their 2 people walking climbing and talking simulators
Of course it is the best gameplay wise, the first 2 were basically another type of game and f3 is abysmal gameplay (and plot) wise, really an extremely low bar that doesn't guarantee more than a 7 in my book just because f4 was better than that.Yeah, on Steam. It's a solid 83% there.
I hated it at release. It looked and played like ass on PS4 and I went in expecting a deep RPG. Played it for few hours and stopped. Then I returned on PC years later and yeah, it looked much better and run almost flawlessly. I approached it as survival / exploration game and had a blast. Easily the best Fallout game from a gameplay perspective.
looks like Gene Park‘s review should be ready to go when the embargo is up
Probably mocking the people calling him a shill if he gives Starfield a high score.What would there be to regret?
Giving the game a 10 wouldn't be something to regret. Or he could just be trolling for attention......
What would there be to regret?
Giving the game a 10 wouldn't be something to regret. Or he could just be trolling for attention......
looks like Gene Park‘s review should be ready to go when the embargo is up
It's going to be interesting to see what reviewers say about the game.
As long as its a good game overall, i dont actually care, but i'll go with 85-90. I just feel that the game seems to set such a high bar in terms of scale and scope that it will probably miss on a few things.
Now if that second deep dive is actually a true representation of the game overall, and not just made to show the game in its best light, then easily 90+.
Because you only need a handful of dodgy reviews and 90+ is impossible to get, even if the rest of the reviews are all 9's and 10's. And this will probably get a few dodgy reviews over the whole 'code gate' crap.90+ easy, this is an epic game, talking hundreds of hours of content, 1000 planets, so many game systems at play, this isn't a normal game. Seriously I am bewildered at some of the low scores predicted here. Its like its not coming out for everyone's favourite games machine or something
No Mans Sky already did this though. People keep pretending like this game is doing something new rather than simply building upon similar games that came before. Which again is fine, I'm gonna be there tomorrow @ 5 playing this like millions of others. But people always unrealistically hype games up to be much more than they are. Just enjoy it, it doesn't need to be the best at everything, but hopefully it'll be the best at a lot of things to set it up for the next company that does a sci-fi RPG.90+ easy, this is an epic game, talking hundreds of hours of content, 1000 planets, so many game systems at play, this isn't a normal game. Seriously I am bewildered at some of the low scores predicted here. Its like its not coming out for everyone's favourite games machine or something
The Eurogamer thing you mean? I don't think a few reviews will significantly impact the overall consensus. Obviously this will have a lot of reviews more than the average game anyway.Because you only need a handful of dodgy reviews and 90+ is impossible to get, even if the rest of the reviews are all 9's and 10's. And this will probably get a few dodgy reviews over the whole 'code gate' crap.
looks like Gene Park‘s review should be ready to go when the embargo is up
I think after spending enough time with Starfield you will find No Mans Sky isn't a fraction of what Starfield is. It couldn't possibly anyway, Bethesda have been working on this before No Mans even came out and they have far more resources and are masters of building worlds and characters.No Mans Sky already did this though. People keep pretending like this game is doing something new rather than simply building upon similar games that came before. Which again is fine, I'm gonna be there tomorrow @ 5 playing this like millions of others. But people always unrealistically hype games up to be much more than they are. Just enjoy it, it doesn't need to be the best at everything, but hopefully it'll be the best at a lot of things to set it up for the next company that does a sci-fi RPG.
Your first sentence again is such PR speak, do you work for them or something? Have you played both games extensively and can provide context for the things you're saying? NMS was announced and released well before SF and has an insane amount of content and procedural planets to explore, you can even land absolutely anywhere. I've put a lot of hours in NMS and I have no doubt I'm gonna enjoy the hell out of SF, but this constant hyperbolic statements by people like you do nothing but injustice to both games.I think after spending enough time with Starfield you will find No Mans Sky isn't a fraction of what Starfield is. It couldn't possibly anyway, Bethesda have been working on this before No Mans even came out and they have far more resources and are masters of building worlds and characters.
It's like comparing Saints Row to GTA, same concept but a world apart in terms of ambition.
No it did not lmao.No Mans Sky already did this though.
No it did not lmao.
I swear people here choose to be ignorant rather than have a sensible discussion.No it did not lmao.
In a year that we got TOTK and BG3, i'd say Spiderman 2 stands zero chance at winning the GOTY award, regardless of how Starfield lands. I like Spiderman, but it hardly looks to be breaking new ground. I'm expecting a solid title but nothing more.Not sure what you're laughing at. If 2 is as good as 1, it will be in contention for goty, which is what the guy you quoted said.
The irony lol, anyone comparing NMS to Starfield is ignorant. Starfield is just on a completely different level to what NMS is.I swear people here choose to be ignorant rather than have a sensible discussion.
Its Gene Park, he will give it a 10.What would there be to regret?
Giving the game a 10 wouldn't be something to regret. Or he could just be trolling for attention......
Exactly, the poster got a little offended and accused me of working for Bethesda guy needs to take a breakApart from the fact both games are set in space, and you can mine resources through a gun, i dont really get the Starfield and No Mans Sky comparisons.
Starfield is a story driven RPG with handcrafted cities, settlements, bases, ships you can board, npc's with dialogue etc main and side missions, skill trees and leveling your player, etc, No Mans Sky is basically a survival game with almost no story.
The 1000 explorable planets in Starfield are just part of its side content, and that portion of Starfields side content is basically No Mans Sky's main game.
I swear people here choose to be ignorant rather than have a sensible discussion.
Users accusing each other of being shills and astroturfers on this forum is starting to get out of control. You feel like not talking positive about a game anymore.Exactly, the poster got a little offended and accused me of working for Bethesda guy needs to take a break
Its not about winning though. The guy I quoted was laughing at dude for saying it would be in contention. Doesn't seem laughable at all to assume a lot of people will have Spiderman 2 as a top 5, which is contention.In a year that we got TOTK and BG3, i'd say Spiderman 2 stands zero chance at winning the GOTY award, regardless of how Starfield lands. I like Spiderman, but it hardly looks to be breaking new ground. I'm expecting a solid title but nothing more.
Duke Nukem Forever took that personally.Everything below 90% would be a disgrace for a game that took so long to be made.