+ Franklin
That girl? She never even won a nobel.
+ Franklin
9. Watson + Crick
+ Franklin
I agree. Listening to him has never really made my ears perk up as much as the likes of Carl Sagan, Einstein, or Tesla
He has a very boring and kind of depressing view of the universe where those three have such a fascinating sometimes almost mystical view on things.
Dammit.
That is why my first paragraph talked about penicillin and DDT. Both of those have saved 100s of millions of lives. Got to define how we measure greatness.
Crick was much more important than Watson. Replace Kepler with Joseph Lister and Tesla with William Osler.1. Mendel
2. Darwin
3. Newton
4. Einstein
5. Galileo
6. Rutherford
7. Kepler
8. Curie
9. Watson + Crick
10. Tesla
Why don't you guys pick on a genius who isn't in a wheelchair?
If it was the Pope saying that it is perfectly rational to be wary of aliens finding Earth, or that AI could end humanity, then how many of you would be calling him a mediocre representation of God and making Top 10 Pope Lists?
Hawking was one of the first scientists to quantify the nature of black holes in that they contain large amounts of entropy and therefore emit radiation. As far as I'm aware, many of his ideas about black holes still stand in some form and have important implications about our understanding of gravity at the level of quantum physics. And even if they are overturned, his contributions to physics are still very important.Hawking's main theory about black holes was disproved and he later came up with an even more unlikely theory about them. Just recently he wrote a new paper and it was full of holes.
Why not Faraday?
Crick was much more important than Watson. Replace Kepler with Joseph Lister and Tesla with William Osler.
Then you'd have a perfect list.
Osler was a master clinician and educator, not a scientist. Your allopathic biases are quite strong.Crick was much more important than Watson. Replace Kepler with Joseph Lister and Tesla with William Osler.
Then you'd have a perfect list.
Let's have this fight right now. Who are everyone's top 10 scientists? I'll go first.
- Einstein
- Edison
- Copernicus
- Whitney
- DaVinci
- Archimedes
- Nye
- DeGrasse Tyson
- Sagan
- Perkins
Faraday had no mathematical training to my knowledge, and then Maxwell came along.
Can we all agree that Michio Kaku is a hack though?
Faraday had no mathematical training to my knowledge, and then Maxwell came along.
Abelian von Neumann algebra
Affiliated operator
Amenable group
Arithmetic logic unit
Artificial viscosity (a numerical technique for simulating shock waves)
Axiom of regularity
Axiom of limitation of size
Backward induction
Blast wave (fluid dynamics)
Bounded set (topological vector space)
Carry-save adder
Cellular automata
Class (set theory)
Decoherence theory (Quantum mechanics)
Computer virus
Commutation theorem
Continuous geometry
Direct integral
Doubly stochastic matrix
Duality Theorem
Density matrix
Durbin–Watson statistic
Game theory
Hilbert's fifth problem
Hyperfinite type II factor
Ergodic theory
EDVAC
explosive lenses
Lattice theory
Lifting theory
Inner model
Inner model theory
Interior point method
Mutual assured destruction
Merge sort
Middle-square method
Minimax theorem
Monte Carlo method
Normal-form game
Pointless topology
Polarization identity
Pseudorandomness
PRNG
Quantum mutual information
Radiation implosion
Rank ring
Operator theory
Operation Greenhouse
Self-replication
Software whitening
Standard probability space
Stochastic computing
Subfactor
von Neumann algebra
von Neumann architecture
Von Neumann bicommutant theorem
Von Neumann cardinal assignment
Von Neumann cellular automaton
von Neumann constant (two of them)
Von Neumann interpretation
von Neumann measurement scheme
Von Neumann Ordinals
Von Neumann universal constructor
Von Neumann entropy
von Neumann Equation
Von Neumann neighborhood
Von Neumann paradox
Von Neumann regular ring
Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
Von Neumann spectral theory
Von Neumann universe
Von Neumann conjecture
Von Neumann's inequality
Stone–von Neumann theorem
Von Neumann's trace inequality
Von Neumann stability analysis
Quantum statistical mechanics
Von Neumann extractor
Von Neumann ergodic theorem
Ultrastrong topology
Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem
ZND detonation model
Shame no one knows about the genius of Von Neumann.
Just recently he wrote a new paper and it was full of holes.
Sounds successful then!
Who seriously puts Tesla in their top ten?Replace Tesla with Gauss and that is not too terrible.
My allopathic biases are quite strongHow would Lister make it on the list above Pasteur?
Always interesting to see people who have likely never accomplished anything substantial in their lives criticizing famous/historical figures.
"Stephen Hawking is mediocre!"
"Alexander the Great...was he really that great?"
Let's have this fight right now. Who are everyone's top 10 scientists? I'll go first.
- Einstein
- Edison
- Copernicus
- Whitney
- DaVinci
- Archimedes
- Nye
- DeGrasse Tyson
- Sagan
- Perkins
That is why my first paragraph talked about penicillin and DDT. Both of those have saved 100s of millions of lives. Got to define how we measure greatness.
My allopathic biases are quite strong
Faraday was still incredibly significant. He had no mathematical training but he did a lot of work that would eventually (in the hands of Maxwell) turn into the concept of a field, which is a central (perhaps the central) concept in modern physics.
Let's have this fight right now. Who are everyone's top 10 scientists? I'll go first.
- Einstein
- Edison
- Copernicus
- Whitney
- DaVinci
- Archimedes
- Nye
- DeGrasse Tyson
- Sagan
- Perkins
Einstein has said he would not have made progress in his theory of special relativity without the work of Maxwell, who in turn would have no base for his mathematical prowess if not for Faraday.
The line of scienctific progress is so fascinating.
Tesla was alright but no way does he make a top ten, people.No Tesla makes this list false. Fact.
Um, how can you forget Newton?
Are we using a committee to determine the Top 10 or are we using media polls and computer algorithms?
Newton needs to be in.
Benjamin Franklin proved that lightning was electricity and created the lightning rod, which saved countless lives, homes and cities. He was a great man but people don't compare his scientific accomplishments to Einstein, who showed us some of the basic natures of reality like how time is relative. Really, just think about how insane it is that time progresses at different speeds depending on where you are at or what you are doing.
Let's have this fight right now. Who are everyone's top 10 scientists? I'll go first.
- Einstein
- Edison
- Copernicus
- Whitney
- DaVinci
- Archimedes
- Nye
- DeGrasse Tyson
- Sagan
- Perkins
The foundations of Science were formulated by a bunch of people who were proven wrong. And being in someone's top ten does not make you a terrible Scientist.
Go look at those top ten Physicists. I have no doubt they are all over 100 and were proven wrong a thousand times.
Shame no one knows about the genius of Von Neumann.
Known for all this. Not to say he may be better than some scientists on the top ten lists (other theorems have much more widespread use in their disciplines and others vs quantity), but he needs more credit.
That just makes him more amazingFaraday had no mathematical training to my knowledge, and then Maxwell came along.
Let's have this fight right now. Who are everyone's top 10 scientists? I'll go first.
- Einstein
- Edison
- Copernicus
- Whitney
- DaVinci
- Archimedes
- Nye
- DeGrasse Tyson
- Sagan
- Perkins
Tesla was alright but no way does he make a top ten, people.
Unless it's "Top Ten grossly overrated scientists"
Newtonian physics were disproved. He was a scrub.
Einstein has said he would not have made progress in his theory of special relativity without the work of Maxwell, who in turn would have no base for his mathematical prowess if not for Faraday.
The line of scienctific progress is so fascinating.