Study: White Americans Become Conservative When Told They're Becoming a Minority

Status
Not open for further replies.
Believe as you wish, but both sides today have a mix of fear and hatred that often boil up to the surface.

but it's the republican side that's uses race to whip up fear and social paranoia. The democratic party would never stoop as low as the Willie Horton ad or any other repulsive example of premeditated race baiting tactics the Republican Party has employed in the last few decades
 
I find it best to abstain from conversations when the other side has already decided how it'll end. Thanks.

I'd love for you to explain the Democrat's call for a

-Higher minimum wage
-Gay marriage (Which doesn't exist in Italy, Ireland, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Finland, Australia)
- Abortion (Our constitutional protections extend the right much farther than many European nations)
- Support for Unions*
- Universal Health Care (It isn't Single payer but neither is the Swiss model)
- Many state parties which have outlawed the Death Penalty and continue to do so (Maryland being the most recent)
- Large support for legal weed with it being legalized by two state, its not legal anywhere in Europe except Netherlands (to be fair both govs opposed the measure and supported decriminalization)
- Support for renewable energies with the their largest ever investment with the 2009 stimulus.
- Support for economic stimulus and a opposition to spending cuts, which was roundly rejected by left leaning Europe. (Republicans have unfortunately reversed this)
-calls for increased taxes on the wealthy

Makes them center-right when their left of many left parties on those issues. Are there issues that other parties are more left of? Yea. Are there some conservative parties that have ideas further left than some democratic ideas? Of course. But this isn't a neat fit. But the constant invocation that the US Democratic Party is a center right party is a tired trope that only works when a lot of contrary evidence is ignored or dismissed.

*
Democratic Platform said:
We will continue to fight for the right of all workers to organize and join a union. Unions helped build the greatest middle class the world has ever known. Their work resulted in the 40-hour workweek and weekends, paid leave and pensions, the minimum wage and health insurance, and Social Security and Medicare—the cornerstones of middle class security. We will fight for labor laws that provide a fair process for workers to choose union representation, that facilitate the collective bargaining process, and that strengthen remedies for violations of the law. We will fight for collective bargaining rights for police officers, nurses, firefighters, emergency medical technicians, teachers, and other public sector workers—jobs that are a proven path to the middle class for millions of Americans. We will continue to vigorously oppose "Right to Work" and "paycheck protection" efforts, and so-called "Save our Secret Ballot" measures whenever they are proposed.
 
There's other research that suggests people double down on factually wrong opinions, but are more likely to believe it if you boost their self-esteem before presenting the fact. Making someone feel stupid, weak or threatened seems like a good way to boost reactionary thoughts.

Apart from that there's also a belief that more anxiety can also lead to more conservative views and vice-versa.

Psychologists have found that conservatives are fundamentally more anxious than liberals, which may be why they typically desire stability, structure and clear answers even to complicated questions. “Conservatism, apparently, helps to protect people against some of the natural difficulties of living,” says social psychologist Paul Nail of the University of Central Arkansas. “The fact is we don't live in a completely safe world. Things can and do go wrong. But if I can impose this order on it by my worldview, I can keep my anxiety to a manageable level.”

Anxiety is an emotion that waxes and wanes in all of us, and as it swings up or down our political views can shift in its wake. When people feel safe and secure, they become more liberal; when they feel threatened, they become more conservative. Research conducted by Nail and his colleague in the weeks after September 11, 2001, showed that people of all political persuasions became more conservative in the wake of the terrorist attacks. Meanwhile, in an upcoming study, a team led by Yale University psychologist Jaime Napier found that asking Republicans to imagine that they possessed superpowers and were impermeable to injury made them more liberal. “There is some range within which people can be moved,” Jost says.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/calling-truce-political-wars/
 
I'd love for you to explain the Democrat's call for a

-Higher minimum wage
-Gay marriage (Which doesn't exist in Italy, Ireland, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Finland, Australia)
- Abortion (Our constitutional protections extend the right much farther than many European nations)
- Support for Unions*
- Universal Health Care (It isn't Single payer but neither is the Swiss model)
- Many state parties which have outlawed the Death Penalty and continue to do so (Maryland being the most recent)
- Large support for legal weed with it being legalized by two state, its not legal anywhere in Europe except Netherlands (to be fair both govs opposed the measure and supported decriminalization)
- Support for renewable energies with the their largest ever investment with the 2009 stimulus.
- Support for economic stimulus and a opposition to spending cuts, which was roundly rejected by left leaning Europe. (Republicans have unfortunately reversed this)
-calls for increased taxes on the wealthy

Makes them center-right when their left of many left parties on those issues. Are there issues that other parties are more left of? Yea. Are there some conservative parties that have ideas further left than some democratic ideas? Of course. But this isn't a neat fit. But the constant invocation that the US Democratic Party is a center right party is a tired trope that only works when a lot of contrary evidence is ignored or dismissed.

*

I don't think that any of that makes them left of center. Left of center is where socialists live. You have made a list of things that moderate economic liberals support (right of center).
 
Humans are pretty selfish creatures overall. I guess evolution made us this way. Though it also seems to be a disadvantage in some ways in that genetic diversity is pretty important for survival purposes. Very tricky dilemma we have.
 
Humans are pretty selfish creatures overall. I guess evolution made us this way. Though it also seems to be a disadvantage in some ways in that genetic diversity is pretty important for survival purposes. Very tricky dilemma we have.

We have the potential for both selfishness as well as altruism. Here's a paper that reports spending some money on other people makes them more happy than when they spent in on themselves.

http://greatergood.berkeley.edu/images/application_uploads/norton-spendingmoney.pdf

Abstract:

While much research has examined the effect of income on happiness, we suggest that how people spend their money may be at least as important as how much money they earn. Specifically, we hypothesized that spending money on other people may have a more positive impact on happiness than spending money on oneself. Providing converging evidence for this hypothesis, we found that spending more of one’s income on others predicted greater happiness both cross-sectionally (in a nationally representative survey study) and longitudinally (in a field study of windfall spending). Finally, participants who were randomly assigned to spend money on others experienced greater happiness than those assigned to spend money on themselves.
 
i really enjoy my liberal life, so nobody tell me I'm becoming a minority. not even just to troll because your joke will make me seriously become conservative
 
Eye-tracking devices look so nightmarish.

iX5pGSxJQO0f9.jpg

beaming dat FoxNewps straight into her brain.
 
We have the potential for both selfishness as well as altruism. Here's a paper that reports spending some money on other people makes them more happy than when they spent in on themselves.

http://greatergood.berkeley.edu/images/application_uploads/norton-spendingmoney.pdf

Abstract:

Interesting stuff. Humans do tend to be selfish, but there can also be altruism there. Maybe it stems from the affection from a mother and father? I guess it is something like: selfishness breeds selfishness and generosity and love breeds generosity and love. Humans can be spun either way.
 
*sigh* This would be more informative if the article stated what conservative policies were in the study. Also, lacks any statement about how strongly it swayed opinion. The masses will not question these things from the article sadly.
 
*sigh* This would be more informative if the article stated what conservative policies were in the study. Also, lacks any statement about how strongly it swayed opinion. The masses will not question these things from the article sadly.
The study costs money to read. So unless we get access, we won't know for sure.

But it could be a bunch of things. Ability to become a citizen, amnesty, work related laws, border security, etc.
 
The study costs money to read. So unless we get access, we won't know for sure.

But it could be a bunch of things. Ability to become a citizen, amnesty, work related laws, border security, etc.

Glad at least one person has an interest too. I just hate how little information most articles about real studies actually give, while often times the article has an agenda that is different than the actual findings in the study.
 
Not saying it's right but it's not surprising.

Is there any country or people, where you tell the majority they are going to become a minority and then expect them not to act emotional or irrational I wonder?
 
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...ization_could_america_become_mississippi.html

It gets worse

The final experiment—where questions were further refined and targeted—saw similar results. As Craig and Richeson write, “Perceived group-status threat, triggered by exposure to majority-minority shift, increases Whites’ endorsement of conservative political ideology and policy positions.” What’s more, this held true even after they told respondents “whites are likely to remain at the top of the future racial hierarchy.”


You can see it right now, in the Deep South, where our history weighs heaviest. In Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama, elections are polarized by race: Whites vote one way, blacks the other. The result is constant acrimony, huge disinvestment in public goods like education and health, and a political culture where the central question isn’t “how can we help each other” but “how can I stop them from taking what I have.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom